JoB
LOL…you know it’s amazing…
you guys says things like “the will of the people” like the only people who count are Senator Obama supporters…
have you not noticed that he does not even get all of the popular vote? There is no 70/30 split here.. not even a 60/40… The differences are statistically small…
there was a time when the only one who thought that George Bush had an overwhelming mandate with such numbers was Mr Bush…
now i hear similar margins repeated as though they really meant something…
yet… if those same numbers are the margin of a CLinton win.. they aren’t important…
and i think you should check the results of the Texas primary… i seem to recall that Senator Obama did not end up with the majority of delegates there…
And what about Florida and Michigan? it’s true that Obama wasn’t on the ballot on for one of those states.. but i believe he was for the other…
of course, i forgot… the democrats in those states don’t count any more than the democrats who support Clinton…
Pennsylvania doesn’t count because it is a “Hillary home state” full of old and poor voters…
So the old and poor don’t count as citizens either?
Gosh… voters who count haven’t been so restricted since they lifted the property requirements for voting…
And what is with the assertion that Clinton’s supporters really want the republicans to win if they don’t get their candidate?
hmmm.. i just somehow got lumped with traitors for nothing more than not choosing Senator Obama…
Imagine that.. anyone who doesn’t actively support Senator Obama is now helping the Republican cause…
and who is being divisive??????
Somebody needs to get over themselves….
I hear you think he has addressed his “acquaintances” …. calling them acquaintances settles the issues for Senator Obama’s supporters…
what is the matter with the rest of us who think maybe he should stop evading the questions?
The truth is that he hasn’t answered any of those questions… he has called political supporters and friends acquaintances and told America they don’t need to be hoodwinked by things that are irrelevant.
In other words… he wants us to listen to his words and not look too closely at anything else.
I admit, his words are compelling. i just read the editor from Utne Reader comparing the impact of his words to Paul Wellstone’s … and we all know his movement is compared favorably to Kennedy’s …
but to quote Hillary.. it’s words… he is a compelling speaker…
but what has he done?
who has he done it with?
and what makes anyone think dismissing half of his possible constituency is inclusive?