-
Search Results
-
Topic: RAVE—–Mt. Rainier!!
You were SO standing out today, in all of your beautiful glory!
You looked absolutely beautiful, as my bus went over the West Seattle Bridge this morning, and then on the next bus on Southbound I-5, and even more so, from a much closer perspective, in my destination of Tacoma!
Absolutely stunning on the bus ride back, along North I-5, as we passed you leaving Tacoma.
And then, coming back over the Bridge on the way home, still standing so proud, albeit back to being farther away…..
Mike
Full Content at http://www.srd.n-theory.com
Over the summer, we began working with a small, diverse group of both for-profit and non-profit housing developers and citizens, all with an interest in promoting socially responsible development toward Seattle’s future built form. The Harrell, McGinn, Murray, and Steinbrueck campaigns all responded with detailed responses to our questionnaire.
After the primary election, we submitted the same questions to the candidates for City Council. We are happy to say that we have received responses from all but one campaign. The Conlin, Sawant, Bagshaw, Bellomio, Licata, O’Brien, and Shen campaigns all responded to our questions.
As the responses cannot be succinctly summarized—and with 7 different responses to 5 essay questions—below is not so much a summary as an excerpt from each full response:
Richard Conlin views the most “salient” issue regarding socially responsible development (SRD) to be the work of integrating affordable housing and transportation choices in a way that is accessible to all. His challenger, Kshama Sawant, acknowledges that Seattle has reason to tout its green credentials, but writes that these improvements are often at the expense of already marginalized communities. Sally Bagshaw hopes to advance SRD by requiring affordable units in market rate apartments, while Sam Bellomio advocates strengthening citizen engagement. Mike O’Brien, in his response, highlights his success in securing funds for a cultural center in Little Saigon as part of the Yesler Terrace Re-Development, as a way to prevent displacement and retain the neighborhood character.
Potential negative outcomes of growth, for Albert Shen, include inadequate public transit relative to the city’s growth, in particular to underserved communities—for example, the lack of a Graham Street LINK station. Kshama Sawant sees gentrification as a negative outcome of growth and development, and proposes freezing rents and enacting rent control as remedies. While Richard Conlin, after explaining the nature of Seattle’s boom-bust cycles, asserts that people in Seattle do not fear change, but rather loss. According to Sally Bagshaw, this is caused by rapid growth—and to Nick Licata this rapid growth tends to exacerbate already existing discrepancies in wealth.
Nick Licata asserts that the “Seattle process” can make the city reactive, when it should be responsive—essentially always “one (economic) boom behind.” However, the he goes on to say that as a model of community engagement, Seattle has set an international example. Mike O’Brien sees the “Seattle process” as an opportunity to fully examine a development’s merits, but that the lengthy review can increase costs that ultimately get passed on higher housing costs. Both Albert Shen and Kshama Sawant indicated that the process can cause delays to the supply of affordable housing, and both draw the connection between the delay in affordable housing and an inadequate public transportation system. Kshama Sawant proposes that while the “Seattle process” has somewhat democratized the process, monied influence still holds undue sway. Richard Conlin values the democratic principles behind the process, but sees it fall apart at times when it is an endless loop, and in the worst case the views ultimately taken into account are simply the last ones standing. He laments that the current land use code is often too focused on things we do not want to see happen, rather than promote opportunities for the things we would like to see happen.
In regards to building typologies and parking, Sally Bagshaw recognizes people’s desire to preserve single family neighborhoods, but states that 100,000 new neighbors are expected within city limits within the next 10 years. She has been impressed by some of the density solutions advocated by Seattle-based Sightline Institute’s Founder and Executive Director, Alan Durning, in his book Finding Home. These include, for example, easing parking and owner occupancy restrictions for (modest) detached and attached accessory dwelling units. Sam Bellomio states that the future typologies will be decided by the impacted neighborhoods. Nearly all candidates expressed the very critical need for improved public transportation to accompany any new growth in the city or any change to the building typologies as issues of both efficiency, sustainability, and equity.
All the candidates who responded express a desire for a range of affordability across all neighborhoods. Mike O’Brien sees the need for a multi-faceted approach that includes strengthening the incentive program in the SLU rezone to a variety of housing types, including micro-housing. Albert Shen states that his 8 years with the Seattle Chinatown International District Preservation and Development Authority (SCIDpda), a non-profit housing provider and community development agency, gives him direct experience in working with the affordable housing community. Kshama Sawant sees raising wages, controlling rents, and taking advantage of currently vacant and underutilized buildings as steps to take before increasing supply. Richard Conlin sees the greatest need for people who earn 30-50% of area median income (AMI), especially as the Federal government reduces its commitment, and sees the Housing Levy as a key tool for this. Nick Licata states that preservation of existing housing is a key to affordability as well, and that the creation of the City’s rental housing inspection program, which he spearheaded, will promote stronger maintenance practices and will help prevent some properties from reaching such a state of disrepair that they are vulnerable to redevelopment.
Topic: Spanish Nanny or Nanny Share
Hello – We are looking for a Spanish speaking nanny to watch our 4 year old son in the mornings starting as soon as we find the right nanny :)
We would be interested in a nanny share too, with a toddler aged child 2-5 yrs.
The hours we need someone is 7.15-12.45pm Monday to Thursday and 7.15-1pm on Fridays. He will need to be walked to preschool each day, a 10 minute walk from our house in Admiral neighborhood.
We are looking for someone that is active and likes to be outdoors. Enjoys playing with children, doing crafts, and going on walks.
Thanks!
April – aprilbottman@yahoo.com
Fresh; opened 2 weeks ago. My big guy’s problem is serious enough I’m going with wet food. Leave your contact info and I’ll bring it to you anywhere in West Seattle/Burien. (If you don’t know what it is, you don’t want it.)
Topic: Spanish Nanny Needed
We are looking for a Spanish speaking nanny to watch our 4 year old son in the mornings starting October 30th for about four to six weeks. The hours we need someone is 7.15-12.45pm Monday to Thursday and 7.15-1pm on Fridays.
We are looking for someone that is active and likes to be outdoors. Enjoys playing with children, doing crafts, and going on walks.
Please email aprilbottman@yahoo.com
We are looking for someone who would be able to help us move my mother-in-law from one house to another in Gig Harbor tomorrow. Have to be able to lift 75lbs – be in shape and ready to work a full day. Email me if interested or call after 6. John 978 973 5434 searslandscapingwa@yahoo.com
1997 Nissan Hardbody Truck
4 cyl. Manual, 4×4
118,000 miles
newer transmission and transfer case, exhaust manifold
fiberglass canopy with yakima racks, locking toolbox
great truck – $5500
call 715-8834
West Seattle, Washington
02 Tuesday
