- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 26, 2012 at 5:46 pm #752197
dhgParticipantMarch 26, 2012 at 7:15 pm #752198
kootchmanMemberno dhg… read it slowwwwwly. It’s as funny to call Obama a Kim Jong-un as it is calling him a centrist. Under the rules of universal recogniton.. he is a lefty now, he has been a lefty in the past, and if we give him a second term.. he will return to the left when he can craft his leftist agenda. I said only in NK would he be considered a centrist… that’s how far his doctrinaire is. If I was to compare him to Kim Jong-un.. I would have said.. Obama is like Kim Jong-un. He can’t be anyway…. we have a republican congress.
March 26, 2012 at 8:47 pm #752199
JVMemberThis place has really turned into Bizarro World. Where can I read a new article nearly every day about crimes committed by Occupiers?
DHG, here in Bizarro world, we have the Internet. Which has google. Which will instantly take you to stories about occupier arrests this very weekend. I know, shocking!
I’m kind of a ” teach a man to fish” type of person, but i will link the stories if you would like me to.
March 26, 2012 at 9:00 pm #752200
JanSParticipantwell..some might find it funny to compare Obama to Hitler, too, but it doesn’t make it right…it just shows an ignorant sense of humor
March 26, 2012 at 9:31 pm #752201
JVMemberJan, I’m sure you were equally outraged by Bush/Hitler comparisons. Lots of ignorance was flowing at that time.
Either way, kootch didn’t make that comparison.
Kootch, what’s with their “offended” reaction we seem to be getting lately? “Well I never!!!”. It seems to be used any time they don’t want to confront an issue.
March 26, 2012 at 10:56 pm #752202
DBPMemberThe truth is that people connected with the Occupy movement (and that would include me) need to start confronting problems within the movement. One of these problems is a tendency by some (!) people to do stuff that is likely to be misunderstood or outright opposed by the general public.
My group, West Seattle Neighbors for Peace and Justice, is loosely affiliated with the Occupy movement, so I’m willing to take some ownership of what goes on with Occupy as a whole. Yeah. We basked in the glory of the early successes, so now that those successes are behind us, and the movement’s looking a little threadbare, it’s time for a reckoning.
Having said that, though, I think one thing people need to understand is that the folks in the Occupy West Seattle group have almost nothing to do with what goes on New York City or elsewhere. And that’s just the nature of the movement. It’s a global phenomenon with thousands of local “chapters” that are affiliated in only the loosest way with each other or with any “national” organization.
JV seems to be suggesting that all local groups should disassociate themselves with the New York group, or maybe even the Occupy movement as a whole, because of what happened in New York recently.
JV, is that what you’re suggesting? I don’t want to put words in your mouth . . .
–David
Â
March 26, 2012 at 11:36 pm #752203
JVMemberDBP, let me start by saying that was probably some of your best work. Seriously. Almost like you and i are two West Seattle guys just having a conversation! :). Anyway, I appreciate your tone, and I’m glad we can discuss this.
Yes, that is somewhat correct. Partly because it would be better for your group, and partly for selfish reasons.
I’ll go into more detail later when I get to my computer.
March 27, 2012 at 3:25 am #752204
DBPMemberWe are supposed to have happy feet that the “kids” are now 26 years old before they are asked to grab adulthood, get out of the house, get jobs and buy their own damn insurance.
Kids stick around home longer now for lots of reasons. It’s not just the economy that’s changed; it’s the whole culture. When a trend spans several decades you have to look deeper than just “Who’s the President?” or “Who’s running Congress?” to find an explanation.
Another example: National Debt Crisis
Yes, the national debt’s been increasing alarmingly for some time now. You’re gonna have to go deeper for an explanation than just, “It’s Obama’s fault.”
BTY: You’re the one who keeps calling him the “Messiah,” kootch — not us. Yeah, we fell for the “Hope” and “Change” thing. So what? We never said he was God. Give it a rest, please.
Â
March 27, 2012 at 3:55 am #752205
kootchmanMemberIf they are kick em’ out. It’s time to be an adult. It’s a culture thing alright…
March 27, 2012 at 3:58 am #752206
miwsParticipantThis is the City…..Wesseattle Warshington…she carries a badge….her name is JaN….

;-)
Mike
March 27, 2012 at 4:03 am #752207
dobroParticipantSome people around here are gonna be real sad when Obama beats Romney by 8 points in November. They’ll probably be ready to revolt but I’m sure they’ll get the proper permits first.
March 27, 2012 at 4:22 am #752208
DBPMemberkootch, you don’t have to answer this question but . . . how old is your “critter,” exactly?
March 27, 2012 at 5:09 am #752209
redblackParticipantJV:
earth to JV:
I’m kind of a ” teach a man to fish” type of person, but i will link the stories if you would like me to.
but are you kind of a “shoot an abortion doctor” kind of pro-life type of person?
you never answered my question about how “a few bad apples” speak for the entirety of the “protest movement.”
look. you can make smart-assed comments about liberals all day long, then claim that the tone is all wrong, then never apologize for being an ass yourself, then act all innocent when someone calls you on it.
but i’ll still be here.
and if i’m not, someone else will.
March 27, 2012 at 5:10 am #752210
redblackParticipantdobro:
Some people around here are gonna be real sad when Obama beats Romney by 8 points in November. They’ll probably be ready to revolt but I’m sure they’ll get the proper permits first.
i’m thinking obama by 12.
50-38, plus a third-party split for republicans.
go, tea party, go!
but, you know, i never hear the media talk about how obama won the presidency by a larger majority than any president since – what – JFK?
not even saint reagan won 50% of the electorate.
March 27, 2012 at 5:12 am #752211
JanSParticipantI’m going to say this once and once only…Kootch..give me an effing break. When have I corrected your punctuation and your spelling. Yet, every time I answer to someone else on here, you have some damned snarky thing to say about me. Pretend I don’t exist and I’ll do the same for you. Either that or I’m outta here permanently. You tend to ruin every damned thread that’s started, and I seem to be the target. I disagree with you on most things, so what. I am extremely sick and tired of the barbs directed at me. I don’t put you on ignore because I don’t like to stifle the threads like that, but geez, you certainly have become a jerk when it comes to me. So..let’s make a deal. I won’t respond to anything you say if you leave me alone..deal? Thanks..it’ll make you seem like less of a jerk. This may get me kicked off or at least censured, but ya know what/ I don’t give a damn. Leave me and my comments to others alone..OK?
And, yeah..I’m a bit miffed.
March 27, 2012 at 5:14 am #752212
JoBParticipantkootch..
yes, you should have happy feet that kids who live at home are covered by their parent’s insurance till they are 26 and don’t have to depend upon johnQ for their health care.
March 27, 2012 at 5:18 am #752213
redblackParticipantjan:
don’t even think about leaving. you contribute more to this community through sheer strength of will – on your worst day! – than 80% of this community contributes on its best day.
and that includes me.
some people just don’t know how to behave. leave it to us knuckle-bruisers to deal with them, and just go on being your polite, pretty, informative self.
[redacted]
March 27, 2012 at 4:13 pm #752214
JVMemberDBP, I owed you an answer from before, so here it is.
Yes, your group is wise to remove itself from Occupy because you may share some of their goals, but you don’t share their tactics, and shouldn’t be weighed down by their reputation. If your West Seattle Neighbors group had something to say, I would listen…probably disagree, but I’d listen. =) Because you are our neighbors, and unless you’re out damaging property, I respect your right to protest.
Second, in my opinion, Occupy has become angrier because their whole movement seems to be based on somebody else being responsible for what they don’t have. It’s a terrible way to go through life, and it takes a lot to get over that. I have to teach my kids to be responsible for themselves every day. It’s easier to blame somebody else, but it’s a recipe for long-term unhappiness.
My selfish reasons; as a West Seattle resident, tell me if the following scenario is that far fetched;
A well meaning West Seattle Occupy group advertises a protest in The Junction this weekend. The advertisement reaches all around the Seattle area, and come Saturday, the protest is several times larger than they had expected. And it not only includes the local nice old ladies, but it also includes some (say 5%) of the “other” types of people that are drawn to this type of event. Now, it just takes a few bad apples to do a lot of damage, but why invite those bad apples to our neighborhood? Why would you want to have to explain to the local businesses that you were part of the protest, but you weren’t the one who threw a rock through their window.
I guess to summarize, if the above event was a West Seattle Neighbors organized event, you’d probably get a smaller turn out, but a higher quality turn out because it wouldn’t attract those who may share your ideas, but have more aggressive tactics.
DBP, I’m interested to hear your thoughts on this. I think this is a more realistic scenario than many people admit, even if it is coming from a rabid Conservative like myself.
March 27, 2012 at 8:27 pm #752215
kootchmanMemberI would be extremely disappointed if at 26 critter was unable to cut her path through the woods. As a reward for being such an up and coming young republican… tickets to Hunger Games! Taking from the federal government is like getting in the car with strangers for candy.
March 27, 2012 at 8:34 pm #752216
kootchmanMemberFood inflation 14% this year
Gas prices … up another 7 cents this week
Unemployment – 8.3 per cent (officially)
Wage gains – none existant
College tuition increases 2012 – 14%
Health care costs, increase 9%
Total student debt, 1.1 trillion
percentage of adults 24-35 living at home? 25%
Yikes! http://moneyland.time.com/2012/02/09/fewest-young-adults-in-60-years-have-jobs/
Be interesting to see how that motivates the base. Ya gonna sell 4 more years of that?
8 points? I don’t think so…
March 28, 2012 at 2:11 pm #752217
redblackParticipantthe thing is, kootch, can you pin those on obama?
most – if not all – of that inflation is the result of free market forces.
March 29, 2012 at 10:36 pm #752218
DBPMemberResponse to JV’s post at #118:
First, these are all very good points, regardless of what quarter they come from, the “rabid conservative” quarter included. ;-)
Believe me, we in West Seattle Neighbors for Peace think about this stuff all the time and so does Occupy! My sources tell me that, from almost the first moment, the Occupy Seattle group has been having a continuous debate about what methods they will use/tolerate/endorse.
And please also believe me when I tell you that this debate is not something new on the Left; in fact it has a rich history going back at least as far as the Quakers and the struggle to abolish slavery.
As to your worst-case scenario for the Junction protest, I should say that the protest was largely an Occupy-inspired event, with WSNPJ in a supporting role. I know many of the people involved, however, and I know that they would not sanction any violence. So there’s that.
So the next question is: Well, what if some Occupy outliers* just show up and start throwing rocks? What do you do then?
—OK . . . here’s what you do when something like that happens: First you de-escalate the violence using common sense and non-violence training that you’ve already received. And if that doesn’t work, you shut down the event and leave. Then you explain what happened to the public as openly and quickly as possible, disassociating yourself from the troublemakers and their methods, and promising to do better in the future.
If something like what you describe had happened, JV, you’d better believe that WSNPJ would have gone to Occupy West Seattle immediately and said: “Hey, you’ve got to get these people out of your group and clarify your position on non-violence right now, or we’re going to sever ties.”
************************************************************************************
So, I hope that answers your question about what WSNPJ would do. I don’t officially speak for the group, but I’m pretty sure everyone in it would agree with me. It’s pretty common sense stuff actually.
I’ll speak more about WSNPJ and about my personal position on non-violent protest in an upcoming post. I’ll also speak more on this issue of political associations generally, because I understand that there was more to your question than what I’ve spoken to above.
*I don’t expect you to start digging into the history of political violence on the Left, JV, but it probably wouldn’t hurt, at least if you want to make sense of what’s been happening with Occupy now.
“History doesn’t repeat itself,” as Mark Twain probably didn’t say . . . “but it does rhyme.”
It might also interest you to know some of the more violent groups from the 1960s and ’70s were packed with police infiltrators and provacateurs. It’s almost certain there are a few provacateurs inside the Occupy movement as well. So please don’t assume that every rock-throwing or poop-dumping incident you hear about was really perpetrated by Occupiers. It could just be someone trying to discredit the movement.
Luckily, the best strategy for progressive social change also happens to be the best defense against police infiltration and provocation.
And that strategy is . . . (drum roll, please) . . .
Non-violence.
         Â

TBC . . .
March 30, 2012 at 2:13 am #752219
JoBParticipantEvery time i open this topic i want to say something..
and for 122 posts I have managed to contain myself
but tonight is the night!
There is no problem with Occupiers.
yup.
you read that right.
There is no problem with Occupiers.
There is a problem with media that sensationlizes the Occupy movement
There is a problem with people who make assumptions about the Occupy movement and then build arguments based on those assumptions
There are even individuals within the Occupy movement who behave badly
but as a group
There is no problem with Occupiers
There! I said it.
I will try to keep the lid reasonably on for the next 122 posts.
March 30, 2012 at 9:07 pm #752220
DBPMemberThe West Seattle Neighbors for Peace and Justice is holding a two-hour “De-escalation Workshop” in place of our regular meeting this Sunday. Members of Occupy West Seattle have been invited. How many will come, I can’t say. But next week I’ll let you know how it went.
Interestingly, the de-escalation workshop came about not because of anything Occupy did but because last month some drunken arsehole approached our vigil in the Junction and tried to kick the shit out of me. (I gently fended him off, but it was kinda scary there for a sec.)
It’s not the first time someone’s assaulted us either physically or verbally, so I asked the group to work out some plan of action for when this kind of attack happens again in the future, which it undoubtedly will.
In any case, now I want to say a few words about why I joined this group.
***********************************************************************************
Ironically, I was once a great supporter/practitioner of violence, on both the personal and political levels.
How could this have happened? you ask. —Frankly, I don’t know. I was raised in a nice home by nice parents. (Nice grandparents, too.)
Let’s just call it a character flaw and leave it at that.
Anyway, along about fifteen years ago, after reflecting upon what an angry and unhappy person I was, I decided to make a change: I enrolled in an anger-management class. After graduating from that class, I renounced personal violence. Unfortunately, my anger at “the system” (read: the world and everything in it) raged on. But there was hope . . .
Knowing that I still needed help with the anger, and wanting to stay involved with direct-action politics, as I had been since my college days,
I went looking for something that would answer for both. In 2004, I found it, in the West Seattle Neighbors for Peace and Justice. Since being in that group, and studying and practicing non-violence on a regular basis, I have moved steadily away from anger and have deepened my commitment to non-violence as both a political and a personal creed.
Oh, I’ve still got plenty of anger issues to work out (can you tell?) but I can’t begin to explain how much easier it is for me to do that when I’m surrounded by friends and mentors who actively eschew violence and will not tolerate it in themselves or among their friends and political associates.
Or their government.
Â
March 30, 2012 at 9:13 pm #752221
DBPMemberAnd certain people and animals have also been
especially helpful to me along the way.
Â

Â
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
