Re: Amanda Knox GUILTY

#683433

jellyfish
Member

None of us here know if she was involved in the crime. But we do know that the case against her was influenced by both the Italian and British media, and that a lot of misinformation has been propagated. There was no substantial evidence to implicate this girl in the crime. Additionally, all of her behaviors can be reasonably explained.

Was she shown to be guilty BEYOND A SHADOW OF A DOUBT, or was she convicted on circumstantial evidence and due to public/media emotion? Personal opinion, or dislike for someone, should never have the power to send someone to prison. Otherwise, what protection do ANY of us have? What if the court convicted an innocent person, and people support the verdict simply because they don’t like the way she looked or behaved?