REZONING: Here’s why the Alki Neighborhood Center idea might be back next year

As reported here Thursday, the City Council said “no” to a proposal to add eight more Neighborhood Centers – designated hubs of residential and business growth – to the updated Comprehensive Plan. But we also noted that the one West Seattle possibility on the list, Alki, might come back for consideration again. And a vote taken by the council late this afternoon paves the way for that possibility:

A resolution spelling out Comprehensive Plan changes that might be considered next year included, Resolution 32183, included a call for studying those eight potential Neighborhood Centers that won’t be in this year’s changes. District 1 Councilmember Rob Saka tried to get Alki crossed off that list, saying that the area just doesn’t meet the criteria for being a Neighborhood Center, in the absence of good transit, medical facilities, a grocery store, and due to geographic isolation and environmental risk. He also accused those who favored the ideas of being YITBYs – “yes in THEIR back yard.” Despite his intense imploring, his Amendment 1 to remove Alki failed – four councilmembers for (Saka, Kettle, Nelson, Rivera), four against (Hollingsworth, Juarez, Rinck, Strauss), one abstaining (Solomon). This doesn’t necessarily mean Alki, and/or any of the other seven (which are outside WS), will be proposed again as a Neighborhood Center, but it keeps the possibility alive. The Comprehensive Plan update that the council’s been voting on contains seven Neighborhood Centers in West Seattle, as we first reported when it was unveiled eleven months ago. Alki was one of three WS Neighborhood Centers considered but not proposed, the city explained at the time (the other two were Highland Park and “Sylvan Junction,” near Delridge’s Home Depot store).

17 Replies to "REZONING: Here's why the Alki Neighborhood Center idea might be back next year"

  • Dr Evil September 19, 2025 (7:02 pm)

    How about NO?

  • Derek September 19, 2025 (8:06 pm)

    Saka is such a joke. We are struggling so hard for housing and he just bends the knee for the rich. 

    • Delridge Engineer September 19, 2025 (8:47 pm)

      Do you think that new Alki real estate would be affordable? What’s there now is surprisingly affordable already because it is small and old. If you think new accessible housing will be built with a view you’re being naive. To be clear, Alki isn’t sacred to me, I don’t care. Be rational. . 

    • Rhonda September 19, 2025 (9:57 pm)

      In this case he’s bending the knee for the middle-class.

      • Gay September 20, 2025 (12:43 pm)

        Technically, bending the knee to the upper middle class. Based on several measures of income and education, the residents of Alki in Seattle are considered upper middle class. The median household income is significantly higher than both the national and broader Seattle averages. But yeah, bending the knee for certain. 

        • Steev September 20, 2025 (3:31 pm)

          Gay, I’m right behind Cactus and I’m broke.

          • K September 20, 2025 (6:42 pm)

            The median income is the median income, regardless of your personal circumstances.  Alki is a wealthier neighborhood than surrounding areas, even if you, personally, are not a wealthy person. 

        • CarDriver September 20, 2025 (6:17 pm)

          Gay;Derek. Retired factory worker here. Renter and on fixed income. Your “wealth” assertions are so off base and quite telling that you’re only lobbying for the developers and not concerned for the average citizen.

          • Gay September 21, 2025 (12:41 pm)

            Cardriver, I have no skin in this and these aren’t assumptions they are facts. From what you and Steev stated then a local center like this would be helpful to you both. 

          • Gay September 21, 2025 (1:50 pm)

            Cardriver, I have no skin in this. I posted facts not assumptions. It sounds like this center would benefit people who are not upper middle class on Alki. 

          • Frog September 21, 2025 (3:49 pm)

            Progressive urbanists always try to make it a class issue — whatever is bad for home owners is good for lower income.  But it’s not always true.  Alki has been a relatively dense neighborhood for a very long time, and has a lot of older rental housing that is both more spacious and cheaper than new stuff built in the Junction.  Most of those renters would eventually be pushed out if the area were rebuilt as six-story condos or expensive shiny new micro/studio/1BR apartments.

  • WSOwl September 19, 2025 (8:23 pm)

    Yes, upzone Alki!

  • Jim September 20, 2025 (2:14 am)

    Typical politician logic people absolutely don’t want it so they’ll keep trying again and again and again and again until they finally find a way to force it upon us whether we like it or not

    • Foop September 20, 2025 (11:14 am)

      Prosper absolutely want this. People want to live near Alki.

  • Alki resident September 20, 2025 (8:58 am)

    Saka is absolutely right- thank you for standing up to Rinck and her disastrous plan for Alki. Keep up the good work! 

  • Kyle September 20, 2025 (3:01 pm)

    Alki keeps removing parking, not adding transit, and not adding housing. Bravo.

  • MrsShaw September 20, 2025 (3:23 pm)

    Well, so much for having a multi-year public process to guide the future. In my opinion, to address Alki’s lack of ‘good’ transit, (Route 50 has seating for almost 50 people, plus standees!!), medical facilities, or a grocery store and it’s classification as a regional destination in an isolated locatio with multiple environmental risks, SDCI needs to provide a timely and efficient Neighborhood Center review process for the Alki community that includes quarterly in-person meetings that take place in ALKI, enhanced accessibility, frequent and professional communication with consistent knowledgable staff. Don’t forget the earthquake/tsunami disaster planning. Maybe CM Rinck can  attend the meetings. 

Sorry, comment time is over.