Surprise second wave of salmon spawners breaks Fauntleroy Creek record

(Competition was intense as sizable fish competed for spawning sites)

Story by Judy Pickens
Photos by Tom Trulin
Special to West Seattle Blog

Since 1994 when the first coho spawners in modern history came into Fauntleroy Creek, the count has ranged from 0 to 274, with 20 per year being typical. This year, however, the count hit an all-time high: 347.

Records were also broken elsewhere in central Puget Sound, including east West Seattle’s Longfellow Creek. The reason could be that these fish found ample food during their two years in saltwater, or because of other factors yet to be determined.

On Nov. 1, volunteer watchers began documenting the first of 19 spawners in the lower creek. With no more fish for a week, the Fauntleroy Watershed Council called off the watch on Nov. 10. Dennis Hinton, Tom Trulin, and Mark Sears continued to check, just in case especially high tides brought in more.

(Mark Sears made sure drift logs did not block spawner access to the mouth of the creek)

“More” proved to be an understatement. On Nov. 14, a second wave of vigorous two- to seven-pound spawners began pouring in from Fauntleroy Cove. The daily count ranged from 76 on Nov. 15 to none by Nov. 24.

The council had hosted an open creek for the general public during the first wave. Now without watchers on duty every day to ensure visitor safety, organizers instead invited volunteers to stop by and bring guests. All told, at least 400 visitors came during spawning season, including student groups ranging from preschool to high school.

With so many fish trying to leave fertilized eggs in the gravel, tens of thousands of eggs were lost to birds and other predators. How much “home hatch” results will be evident in mid winter when any surviving fry will emerge from the gravel to start feeding in the creek.

(Dennis Hinton with a board full of tick marks)

“The real benefit of such a glut of spawners is what it indicates about water quality,” said veteran watcher Dennis Hinton. “Hatcheries would have released most of these fish as smolts. Without a home creek or river to return to, spawners sniff for clean water.

“The fact that they found it here is a testament to how successful this community and our agency partners have been in restoring this small urban creek to health and keeping it that way.”

The council will have more extensive summary of spawning season in its 2024 annual report; watch for it in late January at fauntleroywatershed.org.

22 Replies to "Surprise second wave of salmon spawners breaks Fauntleroy Creek record"

  • BRN November 26, 2024 (12:43 pm)

    I love this news! Thank you to all involved, and thank you WSB for reporting!

    • John November 26, 2024 (1:28 pm)

      Absolutely agree!    It gives me some hope.  Thank you to the workers. 

    • Heidi Davis November 27, 2024 (8:21 pm)

      We saw 5 spawning salmon in Lacamas Creek Lewis county last night. We have not seen fish in decades. So uplifting! 

  • Sillygoose November 26, 2024 (1:21 pm)

    Thank you to those that give so much of their time so we can live amongst salmon.  Your devotion is  very commendable!!  BRAVO 

  • Jethro Marx November 26, 2024 (3:01 pm)

    Any data on whether wild fish are in the mix? It would be interesting to get a tag on the “home hatch” to see how they fare out at sea.

    • Kersti Muul November 26, 2024 (6:05 pm)

      Could check otoliths 

    • JAM November 26, 2024 (8:21 pm)

      When doing volunteer fish watching in those first few weeks I saw at least one fish with it’s adipose fin attached. Typically hatcheries remove the adipose fins, so that’s a good sign that some wild fish might have been in the mix!

      • George D November 26, 2024 (9:35 pm)

        That is correct. I have worked hatcheries in the spring for a few years. If the andipose fin is visible it’s a native. 

        • Salvelinus Confluentus November 27, 2024 (11:00 am)

          There are many many unmarked hatchery fish released in Puget Sound every year. 

        • Thomas November 27, 2024 (3:44 pm)

          That’s not necessarily true, there are some hatcheries that don’t clip adipose fins. 

      • Jethro Marx November 26, 2024 (11:33 pm)

        I was imagining I could see a fin on the fish pictured above but cannot actually.

  • DC November 26, 2024 (4:03 pm)

    Wonderful news! WSB, you mention record numbers in Longfellow as well. Any additional information on that? The Longfellow Creek NDS project may be showing some early benefits!

    • WSB November 26, 2024 (5:02 pm)

      I’ll have to follow up with Puget SoundKeeper, which had a survey open – I reported on it a bit earlier this season.

  • Me November 26, 2024 (4:29 pm)

    Love it! This is great news. Thank you to all involved.

  • bolo November 26, 2024 (4:29 pm)

    “Records were also broken elsewhere in central Puget Sound, including east West Seattle’s Longfellow Creek. The reason could be that these fish found ample food during their two years in saltwater, or because of other factors yet to be determined.”

    Must have been the drumming!

    PS: Mark Sears is a WS Gem!

  • George D November 26, 2024 (9:31 pm)

    I was down in California when they started removing 4 dams on the Klamath river. I’m home back in Washington now for a few months but friends have said that the salmon immediately began returning. Whereas it has been very low to zero returns for quite a few years.I know it’s not related but it sure gives hope.

  • John November 27, 2024 (5:34 am)

    There are still salmon in Longfellow Creek. I spotted five under the Yancy street bridge yesterday. To my knowledge, Longfellow is not stocked with fry so there is a chance that these are “wild” fish but I will leave it to the experts to chime in on that.

  • Mike Dey November 27, 2024 (6:39 am)

    From my understanding there were some wild salmon in the mix but the majority were hatchery.  Previous returns have also been a mix with the majority being hatchery fish.  Perhaps the returning wilds have banners they hang out saying “party this way”!    Just kidding. 

  • Judy P. November 27, 2024 (9:35 am)

    This spawning season again raised the question: Do hatcheries clip or not?  Responses we consulted this week confirmed that some still do and some don’t.  The state’s Soos Creek hatchery from which we get all the Salmon in the Schools eggs for West Seattle still clips all smolts it releases to go right out to saltwater.  That means clipped spawners that came into Fauntleroy Creek this season could have come from that hatchery.  Unclipped spawners could have multiple origins.  They could have originated as fry by SIS students OR been home hatch from spawning in this creek OR wild spawners that came in here instead of going to their natal waters OR smolts released by a hatchery that doesn’t clip.To avoid potentially damaging them, we count but do not clip or tag smolts leaving Fauntleroy Creek.  Consequently, the only way to know a spawner’s origin for sure is to examine the otolith, a structure in the inner ear.  To do so would require harvesting, then examining under magnification – the type of study that’s never risen to the top of our priorities for grant funding.  Nor has an agency doing such a study approached us to have our spawners included. Salmon have been creatures of mystery for millions of years.  I’m happy to let another year go by with some of that mystery intact.

  • John November 27, 2024 (4:17 pm)

    It appears to me the fish in the picture is a Stealhead.  Needless to say glad that water quality is getting better.. There may still be hope.

    • Salvelinus confluentus November 28, 2024 (7:30 am)

      No, definitely a coho. And the adipose fin is visible on the fish in the foreground. 

  • erikkindem@comcast.net November 27, 2024 (9:59 pm)

    fantastic development!  thanks to all who are tracking, counting, and stewarding the creek.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published.