CITY BUDGET APPROVED: From turns to turf, here’s how our area’s Councilmember Rob Saka changed it

By Tracy Record
West Seattle Blog editor

The City Council, sitting as the Select Budget Committee, voted this afternoon to pass a budget for the next two years. They’ve made dozens of changes since Mayor Bruce Harrell first sent them a budget proposal back in September. If you want to see how, this is the key document to read. Reading through it, we note that District 1 Councilmember Rob Saka‘s sponsored or co-sponsored changes include:

(WSB file photo)

*$2 million for what he’s calling the Delridge Safety Project, including likely removal of a divider that keeps drivers from turning left at Delridge/Holly (the budget item spells out, “for improvements to Delridge Way SW near the SW Holly St right-of-way to allow for left-turn ingress and egress from adjoining properties, including the Refugee and Immigrant Family Center Bilingual Preschool”)

*$1.5 million for turf at Fairmount Playfield

*$200,000 for neighborhood business districts

*$175,000 to eliminate angled parking at Duwamish Head, a longtime request of nearby residents concerned about street disorder and gatherings (the budget item spells out “to convert angled on-street parking on Harbor Ave SW
at Duwamish Head to parallel-only parking, and to restore parallel-only parking to Alki Ave SW adjacent
to this location”)

*$1 million for transit security, plus a report on implementing it

*SPD reports including officer recruitment/retention and sound-enforcing technology

*$50,000 for cleaning RV sites, plus a report on RV strategy

*A report on the pothole-repair program

*A report on attracting food retailers to food deserts

The Delridge project has been the subject of much discussion; it’s something that Saka pursued even before he was a council candidate. He defends it in the newsletter he sent out after the budget vote, including:

… I became aware that certain members of the organized opposition to this project is driven by fringe ideological framing and a purist “proxy war” of sorts that seeks to pit cars against cyclists, transit riders, or pedestrians. I wholeheartedly reject this divisive narrative. The Delridge Safety Project prioritizes inclusive safety improvements for ALL road users, not one mode of transportation choice over another. …

Saka’s newsletter also explains why the field at Fairmount Park was singled out for turf conversion, saying it traces back to the survey he circulated earlier in the year after “an extensive consultation process with five local youth recreational softball/baseball leagues,” and lists these results:

The voting results data for each of the eight candidate projects are as follows:

Fairmount Park Playfield: 137 votes, earning 31% of the total vote.

Riverview Playfield: 107 votes, earning 24.2% of the total vote.

Lincoln Park South Playfield: 46 votes, earning 10.4% of the total vote.

Hiawatha Playfield: 45 votes, earning 10.2% of the total vote.

EC Hughes Playfield: 38 votes, earning 8.6% of the total vote.

Highland Park Playfield: 27 votes, earning 6.1% of the total vote.

Bar-S Playfield: 24 votes, earning 5.4% of the total vote.

Walt Hundley Playfield: 19 votes, earning 4.3% of the total vote.

Saka’s newsletter lists other points that he considers key in the final budget.

P.S. One West Seattle budget point we noted early on, disbanding the Highland Park-based Mounted Police Unit as part of the SPD budget, never came up for reversal, so it appears that unit’s end is near.

107 Replies to "CITY BUDGET APPROVED: From turns to turf, here's how our area's Councilmember Rob Saka changed it"

  • K November 21, 2024 (6:37 pm)

    Saka voted to cut environmental programs and nine jobs from the Parks Department in order to fund a turf project at the field where he coaches Little League, adjacent to the school his kids attend, over the objections of constituents in District 1 as well as Parks advocates around the city. The survey was biased toward a result that would support turfing the field and he was told so at the time. There was no option in the survey to leave the fields as they are, which is constituents’ preference, per every open comment opportunity provided.   

    • Eric1 November 21, 2024 (7:56 pm)

      It is laughable that anybody complains about a person doing a $140K a year job. No way I take 4X that salary if you gave me the job just so I can get some turf in my neighborhood. But maybe you should run for City Council, you seem to have the free time.  Then you could do things your way.  Maybe get some transitional housing put near you. Move the SW Precinct near Alki, away from the people they oppress.   Wait, maybe move it south to Fauntleroy since the police oppress our summer visitors. All joking aside, nobody cares about a few million dollars when the budget is 8 billion.  I could easily cut the $100 million (1.25%) shortfall but you wouldn’t like it… Stop Seattle from giving 97 million to King County for the regional homeless authority – which we don’t control – 97% of the problem solved.   I would give you the grass field back and stop the oppressive security transfer money and call it even.

      • Brian K November 21, 2024 (9:30 pm)

        Saka’s a lawyer who was laid off from Meta before running for council. $140k/year is better than being unemployed, and spending our taxes to make his life a bit more convenient is probably icing on the cake!

      • Data November 22, 2024 (9:05 pm)

        According to the salary/wage data portal, Saka makes $79.53 an hour. This is closer to $165k. City of Seattle Wage Data | City of Seattle Open Data portal

  • K November 21, 2024 (6:44 pm)

    Can we also talk about the $1 million of city money he earmarked for an agency the city doesn’t even have jurisdiction over (Metro security)?  

    • The King November 21, 2024 (9:11 pm)

      Prop 1 approved by voters in 2014 and the Seattle Transit Measure provided funding for more service within the city. The City also requests certain red bus (express) services, they also have to pay for security with the additions. Providing service without it really doesn’t seem like a good idea

  • Melissa November 21, 2024 (7:05 pm)

    $2 million to remove a speedbump that enhances public safety. $1.5 million for a turf playfield.  Only $200,000 for local businesses. What a disappointment he is.

    • flimflam November 22, 2024 (6:32 am)

      Hey now, don’t forget the $50k for a report on RV strategy!

    • Raincity November 22, 2024 (6:42 pm)

      Right and he noted that $2M for removing a safety improvement for his convenience was his top priority for his whole district which includes pioneer square Georgetown etc. HIS TOP PRIORITY? Like based on what? Are you kidding me? What a joke

  • Admiral Resident November 21, 2024 (7:12 pm)

    Preposterous waste of taxpayer money in pursuit of personal bugaboos that (in the case of the curb) actively harm transit and bike safety priorities.  Hope the people who voted for him are happy with what they’re getting out of it, because it’s somehow even more pathetic than I expected.

    • Greg November 23, 2024 (6:12 am)

      Our council member is comically bad.

  • Softball Parent November 21, 2024 (7:16 pm)

    Yay for Fairmount Park Playfield’s infield turf conversion! This is GREAT news for West Seattle’s young softball and baseball players. The infield is about 7500 square feet (only about 6% of Fairmount Park’s nearly 3 acre size) – that’s smaller than two city residential lots. The huge grass field for soccer is untouched. The “dirt” infield is unusable for much of the year – it’s a water logged mud pit from October through April (staying muddy for days after a spring rain) and a dusty sand trap from June through September.  Fairmount Park was chosen by the majority of those who answered the survey from Saka’s office: https://mailchi.mp/seattle.gov/olympics-edition-and-more-news-8483475?e=b58e99141f Thank you Mr. Saka for reaching out to the community for our input.I hope to see Parks Dept act fast on this – our players need better fields!

    • Kyle November 21, 2024 (8:15 pm)

      A popular lead of 30 votes on one poll is not the right way to make million dollar investment decisions. I’ve seen more fair decision making from an 8th grade student council.

    • SakaNOPE November 21, 2024 (8:38 pm)

      A majority of respondents didn’t select Fairmount park for turf. Probably not even a plurality of respondents selected Fairmount park, but he didn’t provide a ‘no turf’ option in the survey and didn’t publish the ‘other’ results, so we can’t know. 

    • Brian K November 21, 2024 (9:08 pm)

      I believe Saka is misleading us on this. When that survey was published, he mentioned wanting to change grass playfields to turf. I live close to Fairmount Park, and I’m really concerned about having the large grass soccer fields (and outfield at the softball area) turned to artificial turf. I said so in the survey as a comment – I wonder if he counted that as a vote for Fairmount Park!!9/13 email blast: “One issue that I’ve seen firsthand is that many parks currently have
      grass playfields, which can make it more difficult from an accessibility
      standpoint for those participating in sports.”
      And “Thus, we have a unique opportunity to gradually convert more of our grass playfields to turf.”11/21 email blast: “I sent out a community survey seeking input on which District 1
      softball/baseball field should have its infield converted from dirt to
      turf while keeping the grass outfield.”

    • Brian K November 21, 2024 (9:26 pm)

      Saka is misleading us on this. His 9/13 email blast (and survey) talked about the “unique opportunity to convert more of our grass playfields to turf“, while the one today mentions only the dirt infield? For $1.5 million?!? He’s either lying and wants to convert the soccer fields there (i.e. most of the park) or this is crazy expensive.I live near Fairmount Park and am really concerned about having a large portion of that park made into Astroturf. I commented that in the survey – I wonder if he marked me down as a vote for Fairmount Park!! Is there any way to get the results of that survey?

  • Derrick November 21, 2024 (7:25 pm)

    I am not sure I understand the rationale of eliminating parking for a popular destination in an attempt to reduce “disorder” and converting the multiple angled parking spaces at Duwamish Head into parallel parking. Wouldn’t a better use of that money be to bolster police patrols in the area to address the issue of disorder? Between that $175,000, the $2 million for a curb removal pet-project that worsens safety, a $1.5 million turf project we overwhelmingly oppose… it seems that there is PLENTY of money to divert from these projects to things that are much more desired like rebuilding Camp Long. 

    • WSB November 21, 2024 (7:55 pm)

      One note, Parks hasn’t even decided yet what to do about Camp Long (I asked again this week) … so that’s more likely a budget issue next year.

    • WS Res November 21, 2024 (8:21 pm)

      The rationale is “Rob Saka wants it.” That’s it, that’s the rationale. He’s a total self-dealer.

    • Marcus November 22, 2024 (6:24 am)

      Derrick advocating for increased police patrols to deter unruly behavior!! I congratulate him for his understanding of cause and effect.

  • Kyle November 21, 2024 (8:10 pm)

    Honestly Saka just ignoring the feedback of how this appears to be favoritism is the worst part. Someone who does tit for tat and favors as governing will rise no higher than where they currently are. The lack of a robust scoring system is astonishing. Losing my vote for the next election if he stays on this path.

  • Mayor Saka November 21, 2024 (8:11 pm)

    Eliminating the angled parking at Alki is idiocy.  That’s the most-visited spot in the State besides SeaTac Airport and Bellevue Square.

  • SakaNOPE November 21, 2024 (8:14 pm)

    Installing turf at Fairmount Park Saka’s pet project, and the survey is a complete farse.

    His kids play sports on that field and he personally lobbied parents at the school for that project.

    Saka’s chief of staff told me that even though he didn’t provide an option in the survey to “not install turf”, a huge number of people selected “other” and voiced that they did not want want turf installed. This was months ago so I don’t remember exactly, but believe she said they had over a hundred, or possibly hundreds of such responses at that time.  I would not be surprised if the plurality of votes were to not install turf at all. But do we get to see those results? Of course not…

     Spending $1.5 million of tax payer money for his kids sports and another $2 million so he can make a left-hand turn across a bike lane into his other kid’s preschool is pure nepotism. 

    • WST98026 November 22, 2024 (5:27 am)

      Saka’s chief of staff is gone btw.They were quite lovely and way more helpful than him. Got their “I’ve moved on contact the councilmen directly” email earlier this week. Riverview was the obvious returf choice. An actual expansive sports field with actual parking and multi sportuse options I. I can tell you he never sat down with those who rent the fields in West Seattle to figure out where to get the most “bang for OUR buck”.Maybe High Point is a little too South for his personal liking though. 

      • WSB November 22, 2024 (9:16 pm)

        No, Saka’s chief of staff (Elaine Ikoma Ko) has not moved on, at least not as of yesterday. Former district relations director Leyla Gheisar has taken another job with the city – maybe that’s who you mean?

  • Jeff F. November 21, 2024 (8:27 pm)

    Saka somehow found $3.5 million for pet projects that directly affect him personally while cutting projects right and left that help all… Can’t wait to vote this clown out of office. 

  • Recall Saka for corruption November 21, 2024 (8:33 pm)

    This is just a disclaimer from one person but I’m sure others will be joining the official efforts to recall Rob Saka for corruption and misuse of city funds for personal benefit. I urge anyone who wants to hold our government representatives accountable to join the recall efforts. 

      1. Any other government employee who allocated funds to help their personal benefits would be charged and in prison. 
      • Walkerws November 21, 2024 (8:56 pm)

        Is there an organized group yet? I’d love to volunteer my time to collect signatures towards a recall of this corrupt joke of a council member 

      • Bill November 22, 2024 (11:48 pm)

        Trump, Gaetz et al – corruption has been voted into power, sanctified by religion and adjudicated by the Inferior Court. Get used to it. 

    1. Jort November 21, 2024 (8:43 pm)

      Setting aside what appears to be blatant self-dealing in Saka’s two most serious budget priorities (his kids’ playground and his kids’ preschool), there is zero evidence that removing the Delridge barrier will improve safety. Rob Saka has provided zero evidence to support this assertion. He also has provided zero evidence that the Delridge barrier contributes to ‘marginalization’ of immigrant communities. Zero. He has claimed this in a letter he wrote to SDOT before he ran for office, but provided zero evidence to support it. No testimony from preschool families. No studies from SDOT. No evidence that the barrier is a safety hazard. None. Zero. None. So, absent that evidence (and indignant scolding of online commentators from the Council dais is not evidence), we can only safely assume that Rob Saka is using demonstrably false excuses about safety and co-opting the language of social justice activists to resolve his own petty grudges and to secure taxpayer-funded handouts that personally benefit his kids’ school. If Mr. Saka is willing to provide evidence to support his assertions, believe me, I’m eager to hear it. But, please understand that I’m willing to wait a very long time for that evidence, because it doesn’t exist, and it never will. 

    2. 38thAve November 21, 2024 (8:52 pm)

      Let me fix self-dealing Saka’s statment: “The Delridge Safety Project prioritizes convenience for a small group of drivers over ALL OTHER road users, regardless of safety consequences and delays for transit riders.” 

    3. RS November 21, 2024 (9:08 pm)

      Was there more detail about this “sound-enforcing technology”? Was that for gunshot detection or – I hope – exhaust noise? I am aghast at some of these budget items but do support the parking revision at Alki and anything that could tamp down what is now constant and unbearable racing/exhaust noise/engine reviving and reckless driving that suddenly extends all up and down California Ave in North Admiral.

      • WSB November 21, 2024 (9:55 pm)

        The latter. It’s been an Alki topic for years. Loud motorcycles, loud music, etc.

        • RS November 21, 2024 (10:13 pm)

          Thank you! that’s heartening news. For those of us in Admiral who were affected by the gunfire outside our windows over the weekend, it’s been particularly awful to hear the constant backfiring exhaust this week. It has just been out of control since the end of the summer, and I don’t understand what’s changed.

    4. Parent November 21, 2024 (9:16 pm)

      I’m personally stoked for the new turf field. The turf fields at Delridge, WSHS, Walt Huntley, Madison and SWAC anre all in high demand in the fall, winter, and spring. Turf fields help our kids get outside and away from screens. This one is a win. Now I hope the city takes up off leash dog enforcement in parks to help maintain the fields and create even more kid friendly access.

      • Emma-Lou November 22, 2024 (8:22 am)

        The turf field at Delridge is terrible!!! I live a block away and it’s already getting messed up after a very short time. Not to mention its bad for you childrens health to play on the chemicals in that turf. It looks terrible up close. It’s made of little plastic trash looking worse than a little Lego model grass. The brown beads turn up in the rain and create little mounds. There’s burn spots from teens setting off fireworks. There tree root destruction. Yeah, NO! This is not a nice field. Maybe better than something else if you set a very low bar,which is where Saka resides.  Also, if your a dog owner in Delridge, keep your dogs OFF the field!! You people are the worst when it comes to field destruction! I see bad dog owners out there every single day. Ticket them and make some money for the parks budget. 

        • leashdogs November 22, 2024 (10:00 am)

          Increasing off leash dog enforcement (which seems to currently be zero) and ticketing offleash dog owners would be a great next position for Saka to take up. It seems to be one of the holy grail’s of West Seattle comment sections for 10+ years.

      • Tony November 22, 2024 (8:24 am)

        I’d be open to more turf fields so long as there is adjacent tree planting. 

    5. SMH November 21, 2024 (9:39 pm)

      Given all the challenges and issues confronting our West Seattle community, these budget priorities are incredibly disappointing and suggest Saka is either not listening or doesn’t care. 

    6. stef November 21, 2024 (10:18 pm)

      Is eliminating the angled parking a done deal?

      • WSB November 21, 2024 (10:56 pm)

        Now it is.

    7. Joe Z November 21, 2024 (10:41 pm)

      These two pet projects were the entire reason that Saka ran for council. But even worse is that the majority of the council and the mayor are seemingly ok with this. 

    8. WS Guy November 21, 2024 (10:48 pm)

      Rob Saka nailed it.  He has his priorities straight and truly cares about our families.

      • Walkerws November 22, 2024 (8:42 am)

        Rob Saka cares about his family only – at least ostensibly, since his curb removal will make everyone along Delridge including his family less safe. 

      • DavidT November 22, 2024 (11:41 am)

        I agree!

    9. North Delridge November 21, 2024 (11:29 pm)

      Never forget all of Saka’s primary opponents endorsed his general election opponent because of how little in principle he stands for.  His pet traffic project, which has been called out by many both through social media and to his office will go through at our expense.  Can’t believe anyone would support this! 

      • DavidT November 22, 2024 (11:44 am)

        Safe streets on Delridge are not pet projects. Please remember that children that are not in the multi-millionaire neighborhoods deserve life too.

        • K November 22, 2024 (12:06 pm)

          This project makes the street less safe, per every authority on traffic, street planning, and pedestrian safety.  It’s a pet project because we are making the area LESS safe, for the convenience of Mr. Saka.  Please remember that children and adults that are not in the multi-millionaire neighborhoods deserve life too.

        • Jort November 22, 2024 (12:50 pm)

          There has been zero evidence presented – of any kind whatsoever – that the current traffic barrier is a safety hazard. None. Just saying it is a safety issue does not make it a safety issue. This is primarily and wholly about Rob Saka exacting petty revenge against an agency that lengthened his personal commute time to his personal daycare. Even more insultingly, he uses the language of safety and racial equity to advance his personal allocation of taxpayer funds for his benefit. It’s disgusting and sick. 

        • walkerws November 22, 2024 (1:16 pm)

          This project makes them less safe. Rob Saka has yet to explain how this proposal makes them more safe, when all evidence points to the opposite. He is peddling lies, and thankfully only a small number of people buy his gibberish.

        • Sam November 22, 2024 (4:24 pm)

          I think you’re confused. He is removing safety infrastructure on Delridge so that he can personally take an illegal left turn from his preschool. Even in this national climate, this stands out as a brazen misuse of power.I honestly don’t know what voters expected from a Facebook lawyer.

    10. Jort November 21, 2024 (11:52 pm)

      Can you imagine – just imagine – if Lisa Herbold (or Kshama Sawant) allocated millions of taxpayer dollars to, for example, build a dog park for herself in the city park nearest to her home – and then pompously rebuffed any criticism of such an obviously self-dealing action as being “driven by fringe ideological framing and a purist “proxy war””? The comments on this very fine blog would have been apoplectic. People would have (rightly) lost their minds. This pithy newsletter garbage is absolutely insulting to his constituents. Just astonishingly insulting. Recalling politicians is hard to do in Seattle but – my god – this is blatant corruption. He is literally and nakedly steering your tax dollars to his personal benefit. If this was Lisa Herbold the comments would have been calling for her to be on trial at The Hague!

      • RickB November 22, 2024 (7:03 am)

        Agree 100% with this and your previous comment. Seattlites need to make their voices heard. Contact all the council members, mayor, and city-wide media. Maybe they’ll get enough heat to take the self-dealing projects back out of the budget.

        • K November 22, 2024 (10:28 am)

          Too late to take them out.  They rushed the budget so they could vote before Woo is replaced (by someone the voters actually chose, God forbid).  It’s final already.

      • DavidT November 22, 2024 (11:41 am)

        Can’t agree with this post. I feel like there is a lot of “never Saka, angst” in the post. I believe that these items, if put forward by another councilmember, would be praised. The things Rob Saka put forward are good things that help the families in West Seattle.  It is not wrong to want to give our children safe places to play throughout the year, without fear of broken ankles. It is not wrong to want a safer Delridge for drivers and pedestrians.  These are things the “we”, the residents of West Seattle, asked for.  I’ve been here for 20 years, and during that time spoke with the previous councilmember numerous times. I never saw action.  Rob Saka is standing for us and building a city that puts people first.

        • JN November 22, 2024 (12:39 pm)

          DavidT,
          Please address the Delridge curb removal so many are commenting on?
          Saka is making Delridge less safe  by changing the design and construction of the bike lane and allowing left turns across Delridge solely for access to one address.  Saka is spending $2 million to dismantle the recently completed safety improvements. I wrote Saka concerning this and he has not replied.

        • cwit November 22, 2024 (1:50 pm)

          DavidT – serious question.  What’s your take on the removal of the curb median on Delridge and how do you see it improving safety for drivers and pedestrians?  I see people stating they like it and that it improves safety, but I want to know specifically how it is improving things for them.

        • DC November 22, 2024 (4:17 pm)

          Let me guess, you either are one of the handful of people who drive to the preschool and want to turn across traffic or you never walk/bike/bus down Delridge. The project in no way increases safety. Rob is lying for his self benefit. 

        • bill November 22, 2024 (4:17 pm)

          Overruling the professional judgement of SDOT’s engineers will not make Delridge safer for pedestrians and drivers.

    11. NotMe November 21, 2024 (11:59 pm)

      That list of ball fields and the votes make me wonder if the leagues voted in ways so the ones they use don’t get ruined by a turf field replacement. The ones on the list that I feel are used most for baseball and softball had the fewest votes. 

      • junctioneer November 22, 2024 (7:38 am)

        That’s true. Also, however, baseball games are a last resort there because the Fairmount playfield is notoriously awful, and thus would benefit more strongly than other options… still wasn’t my pick though

      • Softball Parent November 22, 2024 (7:48 am)

        Fairmount was a great choice – decent, accessible bathrooms for all, there two adjacent playgrounds for players and siblings, and of course the huge grass field for other uses. This is a win.  Leagues didn’t vote; people did. People who know that dirt infields are unplayable when wet, and often dangerous when rock-hard. People who know that turf infields are usable year-round. Perhaps Fairmount received more votes than the other playfields because it is in more need that others. “Ruined” by turf is laughable, and so are the conditions of the eight or so other unusable muddy playfields that were listed.  

        • turfy November 22, 2024 (10:05 am)

          Agree, turf the infields of all of the fields listed in the survey and our kids will have way more options to play organized sports year round, which would decrease screen and social media time. Maybe we can get some lights on these fields too, perhaps the city can get the Mariners to pay for some in West Seattle like they did in Rainier Beach? Turf at Riverview and Bar S would be an outstanding improvement.

        • K November 22, 2024 (10:32 am)

          People voted for no turf at all, but Saka ignored those results.  A plurality of people who were okay with replacement (by far the minority), chose Fairmount Park field.  Saka is misrepresenting the feedback he got already, he doesn’t need your help in parroting the false narrative that this is something the community wanted.  

          • turfy November 22, 2024 (12:19 pm)

            Please, to the haters who claim the survey was biased, FOIA every document and email that relates to the survey and post the results for all to see. I’d love to know if it was biased. Here is the city link to begin a FOIA request, select legislative branch.  I still support turfing playfields that are largely unusable for many months out of the year. I’m glad Garfield is getting more turf infields as part of this too. I think city leaders do need help making decisions based on community feedback. I am a member of the community, I took the time to vote on his survey, my feedback is in support of turfing more playfields to benefit the community. I also told him to add increased enforcement of off leash dog rules in the parks, that seems to be something west seattle comment sections have asked for endlessly for years and increases kid friendly access.

            • K November 23, 2024 (9:15 pm)

              Not including a “no turf anywhere” option is bias.  When the framing of the survey is “we need turf, tell us where”, that is bias.  The results of a biased survey are worthless, and it’s disingenuous to say “such and such field got the most votes” when the feedback you got overwhelmingly said “no turf anywhere” or came from a biased survey.  

        • DavidT November 22, 2024 (11:33 am)

          Agreed!  Thank you Rob Saka for prioritizing our kids!

          • Allistu November 23, 2024 (11:37 am)

            It would be nice if our winners and losers society realized that unstructured play is far better to develop imagination and thought without requiring an athletic skill. As well kids need to feel safe while getting around before they are allowed to drive cars. This includes making it safer to get to school.

    12. Spike November 22, 2024 (12:19 am)

      Remember when every other candidate in the primary race endorsed Saka’s opponent Maren Costa in the general election? Somehow he still won,  and I think we’re seeing why they all had concerns.

      • Jay November 22, 2024 (9:19 am)

        Saka was the reactionary choice, change for the sake of change. Along with Ann Davidson, who ran on prosecuting felony cases that her office doesn’t even have jurisdiction over. How many felony cases has she prosecuted as Seattle’s city attorney? The full zero that she was allowed to prosecute. Like yeah, the current city leadership isn’t ideal. But to elect fake-populist reactionaries to upset that system isn’t the way to fix it, they say what people want to hear and then when elected just focus on their own pet projects and issues.

      • DavidT November 22, 2024 (12:12 pm)

        Thankfully, district 1 made the right choice. Special interests lost, the people won.  #TeamSaka

    13. Meeee November 22, 2024 (6:58 am)

      Disgusted with Saka.

    14. Mike H. November 22, 2024 (8:25 am)

      Rob Saka is an embarrassment.  Come on, West Seattle. If he wants to be a traffic engineer, go back to school and apply for the job. 

    15. Gabe November 22, 2024 (8:26 am)

      Rob Sock-it-to-ya 

    16. Lauri November 22, 2024 (9:12 am)

      As Jort said, this would be front page/top of the hour, outrage-inspiring news if Sawant or Herbold had proposed these costly, nakedly self-serving changes. The $2 million “Rob Saka commute adjustment” on Delridge would pay for how many hungry constituents’ meals?

      Saka, no matter what you tell yourself to get a good night’s sleep, you are a selfish, entitled man and unqualified to be a public servant.

      • DavidT November 22, 2024 (11:32 am)

        It’s a shame that some on this thread resort to name calling.  Rob Saka gave up a lucrative position in the private sector to serve in government. He is a good man who is doing what he can to make all of us safer.I was a resident in District 1 under the previous councilmember that was mentioned. I went to her office to speak to her in person on multiple occasions. Sadly, she never took action on any of the concerns that were brought to her attention.  I’m not here to throw her under the bus, but I will say that my experience with Saka is that he listens, he cares, and he takes action.  He is the leader that puts people before special interests. He deserves our support and he has mine.

        • K November 22, 2024 (12:13 pm)

          He didn’t give his position up, they gave him up.  He was not employed when he ran for office.  I’m happy for you that you’ve been able to get Saka’s ear; most of your neighbors have had the opposite experience.  Based on your comments here, it sounds like agreeing with Saka is probably why he’s willing to talk to you, which just reinforces the image he has created for himself: that he doesn’t care what the majority wants, he just wants someone to nod and sign off on the things that are important to him personally.  I’m sure he’s glad for your signature.  Now we can go from saying “literally no one wants” to “three people want.”

        • bill November 22, 2024 (4:19 pm)

          A handful of preschool families (and do all of them drive to the preschool) is pretty much the definition of a special interest.

        • Eva November 22, 2024 (9:17 pm)

          DavidT, he was laid off as so many others in May 2023.You can read his story here: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/robsaka_a-few-friends-have-urged-me-to-be-more-open-activity-7112566370633973760-Q2X8/ 

    17. wetone November 22, 2024 (9:49 am)

      What amazes me is how many people of Seattle keep voting the same and to tax themselves along with passing levy’s giving city open checkbook spending with little information and zero accountability to where money goes. Seattle government loves it as they know most voters in this city never research initiatives and just believe what is told to them from tv ads, mayor and many other elected officials. Then the same people complain as their cost to live here rise as city’s poor spending habits grow. 

    18. brewcity November 22, 2024 (10:01 am)

      Really sad to see both that it costs 2 million to remove a barrier, and that we would spend all the time doing studies to add the barrier in the first place, but we can just rip it out on one council members whim. Where’s the Seattle process when you need it?

    19. TreeHouse November 22, 2024 (10:37 am)

      How did Saka make it into office? I think it’s important to highlight how ridiculous this guy is by including his email to SDOT related to this $2M curb removal pet project he is pushing for during a major budget shortfall year:

      “Historically, barriers have been used to exclude, isolate, divide, discriminate against, project power over, subjugate, render less than status to, punish, segregate, humiliate/embarrass, harass, degrade, and so much more. More recently, the Trump administration sought to build an enormous wall on the southern border with Mexico – presumably, to exclude certain individuals deemed ‘undesirable’ in the name of national security,” Saka wrote. “That is why SDOT’s ill-advised concrete barrier placed directly in front of RIFC (despite our strong feedback against) has only re-traumatized many members of the RIFC community. It is triggering for many of our members.”

      How is a traffic curb meant to increase safety and traffic flow triggering or re-traumatizing to marginalized groups? I hate that our politics have gotten us here. What a bunch of nonsense. Being a leader is not what it once was. 

      • K November 22, 2024 (12:17 pm)

        He promised to say nice things to the police, eliminate crime in Seattle forever and lock up a bunch of people.  Not in specific terms like that, because he refused to take a strong position on anything, but he made all the correct insinuations about police and crime, and people voted with their Feelings about Bad Guys.  The answer to your second series of questions is one Ska refuses to answer, because that assertion it based on nothing.  He is hoping to bully people into getting his way by using leftist buzz words, not because what he is saying is based in fact.

      • WS Res November 22, 2024 (12:59 pm)

        The real estate and business lobbies bought themselves astroturf (irony!) “neighborhood interest groups” and paid for a ton of advertising in an off-year election when many fewer people vote. It’s the same story for most of the other council positions. Note that when an even-year special election happened, the progressive candidate won out by a landslide. Saka would have had no chance were city council elections in even years, which is why this council refused to make that change even after the WA Legislature finally allowed it due to years of lobbying by the electorate.Saka is a grifter and a liar who repurposes language of social justice as a very poor smokescreen for his own interests.

      • turfy November 22, 2024 (9:04 pm)

        He got into office because 3,000 more people voted for him than his opponent. He had roughly 19% more support from voters than his opponent, which in modern politics is a massive margin. Hopefully we can get a budget for some added lighting on playfields next to increase their usable hours in winter.

        • Alkistu November 23, 2024 (11:29 am)

          Unstructured play is a proven activity that promotes imagination, thought development and does not require winners and losers. It doesn’t require a lot of infrastructure or anything artificial. It is totally inclusive even if you’re not a proven athlete.

    20. Bbron November 22, 2024 (10:38 am)

      I watched the public comments and council discussion on the Delridhr Improvement Project”. There were folks talking about how thankful that safety was being considered on Delridge, but then would talk about other areas aside from the section near Holly that Saka is focusing on. In the legistrar document, it is specific about the left-hand turn with safety never being used, but in the “added amendment” search and in his newsletters, safety is brought up. Did the amendment change, or is Saka actively misleading people? I can’t for the life of me understand how the curb removal could ever be safer for any mode of transit. I have yet to hear what exactly the extent of the impact to those that go to the preschool was (having to take 23rd for a block to make right hand turns?). Saka brought up there was no other area impacted like the school, but folks driving to the Delridge community center from the South (less well off) have to do a similar go-further-to-turn-around-to-make-a-right as the preschool. Saka talked about how the decision wasn’t “data-driven” by SDOT, yet he offers nothing; I trust traffic engineers to be more knowledgeable (and this driven by data) on this than a Facebook lawyer that hasn’t disclosed if he even has traffic folks that he talks to on these things. Saka spent so much of the council time talking about how there’s no conflict of ethics (no pecuniary benefit as he loved to say) yet it’s easy to see that without any data or clarifications on how this serves more than a handful of drivers this can be an ego-driven crusade to make up for a failed attempt to legally represent the preschool. It doesn’t make any sense, and Saka refuses to reply to a follow-up email of mine that asks for the concrete plan here instead of the “it’s for safety” lie.

    21. TMJ November 22, 2024 (11:21 am)

      Good job Councilmember Saka!  More please :)

      • walkerws November 22, 2024 (1:22 pm)

        Saka’s disdain for public road safety in Delridge is not deserving of a good job – it is deserving of a recall petition, which is coming sooner than you think.

    22. DavidT November 22, 2024 (11:26 am)

      Thank you Rob Saka and fellow councilmembers for returning the council to a body that listens to the people. We asked for public safety increases and you listened. I’ve been a resident in West Seattle for over 20 years (in Seattle as a whole my entire life).  As a West Seattle resident I’ve had the honor and privilege of working with youth and I can honestly say that Rob Saka was listening when we told him that we care about our kids.  On Delridge, the street safety renovations will make the corridor safer for pedestrians and drivers. For kids and families attending Boren school or the daycare, visiting the stores and small businesses, this is a good thing.  Regarding turfing the park, thank you Rob Saka!  What a blessing that our kids can play on the fields all year long without fear of twisting an ankle in the mud.And thank you for supporting our police department and those that stand in the gap between me, my children, and those that would do us harm. I am so glad that Rob Saka is my councilmember!

      • Arbor Heights Resident November 22, 2024 (12:15 pm)

        “Listens to the people”, what a joke. No mention at all in his newsletter of the many people who responded saying they DON’T want polluting plastic “turf” in our parks. All he cares about is making his own life slightly more convenient at the expense of everyone else.

      • cwit November 22, 2024 (1:57 pm)

        DavidT – How will removal of the curb median increase the safety of pedestrians and drivers?  This is a serious question.  I understand there are people that are for it but I haven’t heard an explanation of how it increases safety and I’d like to understand that.

      • Alkistu November 23, 2024 (11:24 am)

        Artificial turf actually causes more injuries.

      • cljskis November 23, 2024 (4:27 pm)

        As Physical Therapist I can tell you without reservation that artificial turf is far more dangerous and will contribute to an increase in ACL ruptures, especially among young female athletes. Improving the grass and infield using natural materials is a far better solution. Removing the hard median at Delridge will absolutely negatively impact the safety of anyone not traveling in cars. Saka has always been anti- Bike and hates anything that he finds inconvenient to him. Another dead bicyclist is a small price to pay for the ability to make an illegal left turn after all,

        • WS Res November 23, 2024 (6:18 pm)

          artificial turf is far more dangerous and will contribute to an increase in ACL ruptures, especially among young female athletes”  Yep. It also contains PFAS, an endocrine disruptor. 

    23. HoHoHo November 22, 2024 (1:18 pm)

      Saka is unbelievable, I didn’t vote for him and can’t wait to vote him out. The $2 million Delridge Safety Project, is ALL about removing the divider and nothing else. It was installed to increase road safety for pedestrians/cyclists and expedite travel for buses. The thing is after spending time, effort and money on removing the divider …the left turn that was illegal before it was installed will STILL be illegal.  Turf is not needed at Fairmount Playfield – period. There’s nothing wrong with the grass fields, I’ve coached soccer there for years. The funds should be used to replace the ancient nasty turf at Walt Hundley instead of grass fields. It would be way cheaper to replace the ball infield with proper sand/silt/clay materials used all over the country. It’s disingenuous for Saka to circulate surveys to certain local youth recreational leagues. A survey should go to all community members. It’s stupid to eliminate angled parking at Duwamish Head, this is a simple exercise of entitled NIMBY’s living nearby. We live in WS, park there all the time and so do tourists. Call the police like everyone else if you have an issue with noise. No details on spending $1 million for transit security? It shouldn’t even be possible to earmark funds without full specification. Sound-enforcing technology for cleaning RV sites…sounds like a short-term band-aid and WTH does that even mean. The various ‘report writing’ sounds like lipstick on the pig antics. It’s not ‘fringe ideology’ nor a ‘proxy war’ when MANY individual members of our community are posting ‘opposition’ to nonsensical and wasteful ‘projects’ on public forums. Oh, and it would be no problem to fund the Mounted Police Unit for years to come using some of this wasted money. SPD considers this unit to be a KEY part of community relations. Many classroom field trips to the barns, the Unit participates in countless community events/celebrations and LEST WE FORGET, it’s documented as an integral part of honoring fallen law enforcement officers.

    24. Wowsa November 22, 2024 (1:18 pm)

      I can’t stop thinking about these comments Saka made in 2021 about that median.

       “Historically, barriers have been used to exclude, isolate, divide, discriminate against, project power over, subjugate, render less than status to, punish, segregate, humiliate/embarrass, harass, degrade, and so much more. More recently, the Trump administration sought to build an enormous wall on the southern border with Mexico – presumably, to exclude certain individuals deemed ‘undesirable’ in the name of national security,” Saka wrote. “That is why SDOT’s ill-advised concrete barrier placed directly in front of RIFC (despite our strong feedback against) has only re-traumatized many members of the RIFC community. It is triggering for many of our members.”

    25. Kish November 22, 2024 (1:35 pm)

      Rob Saka only opposes that traffic curb because he has to turn right and take an extra minute to circle the block in order to get to his house from his children’s daycare. Notice he isn’t opposing any similar curb or center median along Delridge (of which there are *plenty*). And it’s down right disgusting to compare this traffic curb to the border wall and claim that it is “triggering” to the community. Are the sidewalk curb or the bus stop curb, both of which are physically closer to the RIFC building, also triggering? Is the fence around RIFC triggering? Are the walls of the building itself triggering? I work every day with refugees from war-torn countries, and it’s unbelievable that Saka would co-opt the pain and suffering they have been through to get a traffic curb removed. 

      • Alkistu November 23, 2024 (11:20 am)

        It seems CM Saka prioritizes making life easier for people sitting comfortably in their warm cars with the music playing and probably on the phone.

    26. WSB November 22, 2024 (2:44 pm)

      One screen name per discussion, please. Too many people are trying to post in this one with multiple screen names to look like multiple people. Thanks. – TR

      • Alt accounts November 22, 2024 (9:39 pm)

        Is David T an alt account for Rob Saka himself?

    27. bike commuter November 22, 2024 (4:14 pm)

      The curb removal needs to have a real study,  just like putting it in did.  simple. done.The people wanting to turn left are being lazy,  they don’t want to drive to the next intersection do the u turn and them make a right into this business.  This is simply a convenience that is being given to one business.  Where is the study that its safer? its also going to block traffic while people wait to make that left.  Snarling it for everyone.  Go to the light wait in the turn lane allowing traffic to flow around you.  I am also most disheartened by the use of social justice language to try justify this project.  Way out of line.Do the study.  If its safer make the change.  No study no change.

    28. Alki Parent November 22, 2024 (5:06 pm)

      Pet projects when everyone is worried about budget shortfalls…not a good look. 

    29. Alkistu November 22, 2024 (7:09 pm)

      Perhaps the question West Seattle needs to consider is, are CM Saka’s priorities the same as what the most of us would prioritize. I would rather see 2 million go into controlling the speeders or perhaps more than 200 k to help our local businesses with better environments for foot traffic. The Admiral Junction will soon have empty buildings on 3 corners and a gas station on the fourth. Team sports and athletic fields are great for those who are physically gifted or want to beat someone, but safe routes to school affects all children.  Open spaces whether in parks or in business districts and neighborhoods are more inclusive rather than exclusive. What do you think our priorities are? 

    30. BJG November 24, 2024 (1:11 pm)

      It’s hard to imagine that Saka has managed to create this much anger and ill will in his short time in office. It took Herbold much longer to get there. He deserves this all!When we met him in the Junction campaigning, he really was the soul of selfless outreach to the community, a new voice for the grassroots. Oops! We gave him our support, and our  Democracy Dollars. Then we couldn’t get his attention to help solve a neighborhood safety issue involving city property after our repeated contacts. It’s our problem he said.  It was an easy fix and could avoid a big city injury payout later. Now we see what matters to him. It’s not us.Bye bye, Rob Saka!

    31. Justin November 27, 2024 (11:12 am)

      $2M to remove a curb on Delridge is like if you prompted Chat GPT: what’s the dumbest way to spend $2M in West Seattle and have the absolute least impact on anyone. 

    Leave a reply

    Your email address will not be published.