- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 22, 2010 at 6:00 am #595285
JeraldParticipantJust wondering if there’s a backstory to Heavey not seeking the endorsement of the 34th District Dems. Anyone?
June 22, 2010 at 2:17 pm #697274
KenParticipanthttp://www.34dems.org/Docs-2010/Minutes-District-May-2010.pdf
Odd move and referred to as a “terrible mistake” by some of his supporters.
The only other media report I have found:
http://www.publicola.net/2010/05/13/mike-heaveys-non-withdrawal-withdrawal/
I guess you will have to ask him.
The 34th endorsement process was changed this year to make dual endorsement harder (if not impossible) and the nomination process was designed to produce only one candidate from the beginning.
June 22, 2010 at 2:52 pm #697275
WSBKeymasterThat’s our video compilation of highlights from our coverage of that night’s meeting – we knew it would be a big meeting so we hired Edgar from Captive Eye Media to come help us cover it and put together a TV-quality roundup. Drag the play bar to 1 minute in, and you will hear exactly what Heavey said while making his statement.
June 22, 2010 at 3:06 pm #697276
CMPParticipantHeavey actually came around my neighborhood a week or so ago passing out flyers. Even though he ignored my No Soliciting sign, I was still impressed with him going door to door to campaign…that’s dedication IMO!
June 22, 2010 at 3:09 pm #697277
CarsonParticipantAnyone that is willing to buck the establishment earns a solid look in my book. Maybe someday we can actually have a great 3rd party liberal!!!
June 22, 2010 at 3:19 pm #697278
DuckitudeMemberRight now, the most community-engaged candidate is McElroy, who actually shows up at important community meetings and sticks around and listens. I no longer have an official political affiliation, but anyone who strongly supports public campaign finance reform for all levels of elections, a federal initiative law, getting rid of the electoral college, primary campaign reform, and one-person-one-vote districting — they get my vote almost no matter what else they stand for.
.
The reason? There will be no reform without moving toward a true democracy in America. If you think the people rule in the US, you are so, so, wrong. The system is set up for a republic of the powerful (the monied)… not for a true democracy.
June 23, 2010 at 4:43 am #697279
Mike HeaveyMemberThe reason I withdrew from the 34th District proceeding was due to a rule change (as Ken points out) that procluded nothing more than a dual endorsement. I knew my support was in the bottom third so in an act of pragmatism I withdrew from the proceedings.
Since, I am proud to stay that I have been endorsed by multiple democratic organization since (KCYD, WAYD).
I am a Democrat thru and thru and fully support the Democratic platform. Here is a link to my King County Democrats Questionnaire:
http://wa-demchairs.org/kcdems/2010/heaveym.q1.pdf
(the 34th doesn’t have a standard candidate questionnaire, so the KC Dems is the default)
June 24, 2010 at 4:40 am #697280
HMC RichParticipantMr. Heavey. Thank You for the link you provided. It was very informative. You represent a lot of the views of my fellow West Seattle neighbors. Definitely not mine but I am a Republican. I wish you good health and happiness.
July 3, 2010 at 4:44 am #697281
JeraldParticipantThanks, everyone. Especially for the questionnaire link, Mike, it was very helpful. Good luck!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.