JoB
beachrivegirl…
i would ask one question and that is this…
When Hillary said she was an opponent of NAFTA from the very beginning.. as she is quoted saying… was she talking about her role in the White House or was she taking about her role nearly 8 years later as a Senator from New York?
context does matter.
The position Hillary took in meetings during the formation of policy… and the position she took in light of the reality of how that policy worked out could well be two different things.
A question about her comment, it’s context and whether she still defends it would have added more weight to that article than calling her a liar without giving her any chance to defend herself.
An aside to that would be the comment that either she had experience in the White House and it counts as real experience that she can and should be held accountable for.. or she didn’t.
The anti-Clinton faction can’t play it both ways… as they currently do.