SCHOOL CLOSURES? District cancels community meetings, as superintendent says, ‘We are retooling our plans’

Tomorrow, Seattle Public Schools was supposed to start a round of community meetings, including one in West Seattle on Wednesday, to talk about the recently announced school-closure proposals – for which most School Board directors had harsh words last week, at a meeting preceded by an anti-closure protest. Late today, the district sent families a new announcement: The meetings are canceled, announced superintendent Dr. Brent Jones, saying, “We are retooling our plans …’ Here’s his message in its entirety (thanks to the parent who forwarded it):

I am taking more time to reflect on plans to bring a consolidation recommendation this October. As a result, I am canceling the upcoming community meetings. A new schedule of engagement sessions will be released soon.

I understand the closure of schools is a very serious topic. After receiving thoughtful feedback from many of you, it is clear we need more time to carefully consider our next steps.

I am working closely with my leadership team to revise our strategy and ensure any decisions we make are sustainable and prioritize the well-being of our students, staff, and families, working together to meet our goals.

We will soon provide new opportunities for community engagement, focused on gathering your ideas and working together to resolve our challenges.

I want to assure you we are taking your concerns seriously. What we proposed last week were initial approaches, which we are now reworking. While our financial challenges are real and it’s our fiscal responsibility to resolve them, it is very clear we need more time to listen and earn your trust as we resolve our structural deficit and revisit our timeline.

I am sorry our proposed options created anxiety for many families who rely on the key programs and innovations within our schools. We are retooling our plans to address these concerns.

It is no secret we are facing tough times. We face a budget deficit that has gone on far too long. Over the past seven years alone, our enrollment has dropped by 4,000 students. Despite this, we still operate nearly the same number of school buildings, and we don’t expect enrollment numbers to rebound for many years. Like many school districts in Washington, the funding we receive from the state has failed to keep up with the costs of providing a quality education to Seattle’s students.

This has been a challenging time, especially the last few weeks, and our school system’s issues will take all of us to solve–in our city and in our legislature.

We stand committed to working alongside you throughout this process. We appreciate your partnership as we strive for equitable and thoughtful solutions that will strengthen the future of our schools and students.

West Seattle/South Park school-board director Gina Topp had moved her community-conversation meeting on Wednesday so as not to conflict with the district meeting. We’re checking with her to see if she’s sticking with the revised time for her meeting, and if she has any other comment.

30 Replies to "SCHOOL CLOSURES? District cancels community meetings, as superintendent says, 'We are retooling our plans'"

  • Duh September 23, 2024 (9:17 pm)

    We must invest in our children, invest in all of our future. Already, the stress this has caused is sad.

    • K September 24, 2024 (7:05 am)

      That requires taxes, and no one wants to pay those.  Instead, they insist the districts just find the tens of millions that are being wasted on…  not sure what…  colored paper or something, people have weird ideas of how they think the district spends money…  Anyway, you’ll hear all the people telling the districts to invest in kids by pulling themselves up by their bootstraps, and a lot of silence when the topic of taxes comes up.  Only police are allowed to get more money whenever they ask.  Schools must beg, and are often told no.  So we need to fix that first.

      • Kyle September 24, 2024 (1:33 pm)

        Doesn’t per pupil funding come from the state? How come no one else has as big of a per student budget deficit as Seattle?

        • Melissa Westbrook September 24, 2024 (3:41 pm)

          1) It’s the biggest district in the state so yes, their deficit is the biggest.2) Other districts like Maryvale are under state binding conditions at this point because of their deficit issues. 3) Yes, funding is per pupil and it doesn’t seem to have crossed the minds of senior leadership to find a way to stop the flow of students leaving and possibly get some back.

    • Zoe September 25, 2024 (1:59 pm)

      If they stopped ending every program that keeps middle/upper middle class families in the system for the sake of “equity” they would be in a better position. They don’t do anything productive downtown but talk platitudes about diversity, did that during the pandemic. It’s why we aren’t in the Seattle school system anymore. You don’t promote the growth of challenged students just by ripping down what works for better off ones. All those parents spend time and money in schools that benefit ALL students. Downtown needs a shake up maybe this will be the time.

  • Millie September 23, 2024 (9:48 pm)

    It seems both the SPS Superintendent and Board were unprepared for the response from parents and the public.  They are now retreating to do the analysis that should have been done before.  Kudos to everyone that took the time to go the SPS headquarters, appeared before the Board, wrote letters, comments in various blogs.  Our children and their education are too valuable to be used as “pawns”.

  • Orb September 23, 2024 (10:12 pm)

    Really hoping they bring a data-driven, realistic analysis with a new proposal that should’ve been done right the first time. Unfortunately I have little faith in the brains that have brought us here. Parents and community members will continue to fight for our kids and against mediocrity at the district and state level.

    • Frog September 24, 2024 (6:15 am)

      Do you think it’s possible to close 20 schools without public opposition just because the plan is data-driven?  I think the storm and fuss is based on values, not data and analysis.  The plan put forward by the district was reasonable if you accept the need to close 20 schools.  The problem was, a lot of parents don’t accept that at all.  If it’s just about data and analysis, then what three schools would you suggest closing in the southwest region instead of Boren, Stanislo, and Lafayette?  What is the data and analysis behind your choice?

      • Mel September 24, 2024 (12:23 pm)

        This, exactly. No parent is going to want their child’s school to close. So where do we go from here? The school district backing down makes them lose credibility in any analysis they did.

      • SPS parent September 24, 2024 (1:20 pm)

        The basic problem is that the analysis they did prioritized structures over kids. Small schools were kept open if they had a good building. Much larger schools would be shut just because they had older buildings. This is counter to how they spent the past year selling the plan, telling everyone that small schools don’t get as many resources and that’s not fair. The schools were all weighted equally, essentially, regardless of the number of students- a facility centric view. That, and they just clearly don’t like option schools.

        • K September 24, 2024 (7:50 pm)

          Some of the smaller schools in the city were kept because they are Title 1 schools, so the district gets more money for them.  If the goal is to fill a funding gap, you’re stopping the bleed more by keeping as many Title 1 schools as you can.  There were multiple considerations.

      • Melissa Westbrook September 24, 2024 (3:45 pm)

        Statistics and data can be twisted, you know.The 20 schools named, half of them have the longest waitlists to get in in the district. The district thinks it a good idea to close popular schools  while they are losing students? That’s not using data well.Boren STEM would be full if the district didn’t restrict their waitlist as they do for all Option Schools. My understanding is Lafayette is the biggest elementary in the district and very walkable. For a district that wants to save on transportation, that’s a big deal. That they both have shoddy buildings is a function of how the district decided to change direction in what buildings got renovated.

  • Andros September 24, 2024 (6:29 am)

    Maybe they should start cutting admin at the top of the SPS pyramid. There are too many administration people working in this organization. And they’re all working at the building down on Lander.

  • Morequestions September 24, 2024 (7:01 am)

    If the superintendent was hoping to decrease anxiety levels among parents, teachers, and staff I don’t really see how this statement helped. So little concrete information in this long statement. Are option A and B still on the table? 

  • Nix September 24, 2024 (7:33 am)

    To the writer, I would love to share some further feedback for investigation as a Thornton creek parent. Our principal Garret Kischner was put on a leave of absence only 2 weeks prior to school ending in June. No warning. No explanation. The email came from the district and not our school. I reached out to the district with no answer. I believe he was fighting for option schools to remain option schools. The district has replaced our principal 3 times since 2018 as what I believe was a long term plan to erase optional education choices.Our neighborhood school view ridge is a prison that has had multiple proven complaints against their leadership. We can’t let that happen to TC. 

    • Jeff September 24, 2024 (10:13 am)

      That only a couple years after he was voluntold that he was leaving Genesee Hill with effectively no notice or community input.

    • wsres September 24, 2024 (7:12 pm)

      Gerrit is not all he is thought to be. He moved to a school closer to his home. He may not have been fighting for what you think he was. 

  • Conan September 24, 2024 (8:14 am)

    Gotta wonder if the threat of closing schools was just a way to manipulate the public into supporting Reydal’s $3B ask (ie, vote for a tax increase).  

  • WS98 September 24, 2024 (8:23 am)

    Sensible reforms to the corporate tax system for profitable corporations are desperately needed to fix underfunding problems. School districts all over the country are in this ‘condition’ due to the implementation of corporate tax loopholes over several decades. Ever since, individual taxpayers have been saddled with paying the majority for public infrastructure. New corp tax rates/laws changed in 2018. T-Mobile for example, posted $17.9 billion in profits over the next five years…and received $80 million in taxes back (from all of us).

  • Sam September 24, 2024 (8:45 am)

    People who are outraged at SPS should really be directing their energy toward the state legislature. I think what SPS demonstrated here is that the budget gap in the school district is not going to be solved by spending cuts. Even these severe closures covered only about a third of that gap.  Seattle needs to be allowed to fully fund its schools.

  • Mel September 24, 2024 (8:47 am)

    SPS is getting $20k+ per student already. I believe we do have a problem with spending. I don’t love the idea of just throwing more money at the problem. 

    • K September 24, 2024 (7:47 pm)

      A daycare gets close to $28,000 per student per year, and those have no required curricula, less education required of teachers, no extracurriculars, no books, no labs, no librarians, no music or art classes, and so on.  I’m not sure what you think happens at a school, but $20,000 is not a lot of money.

      • SPS Parent September 24, 2024 (10:33 pm)

        Bad example. Daycares have much lower staff to kid ratios, because one person can’t take care of 25 babies. A better comparison is private school tuition, which is in the mid-20k range typically. SPS has a similar budget per student, but likely needier students than the avg private school student.

  • West Seattle Resident September 24, 2024 (9:57 am)

    Having been a parent and employee of SPS the layers of “supervisors/admin” doing minimal work is grotesque.  They are unaccountable for their time and work output.However, my biggest concern is safety.   You cannot enter the SPS admin building without security being there, cameras and sign-in with a different secret number changed daily to speak to all these “supervisors/admin”  however there are NO security, cameras, check-ins in many of our schools.   They are easily accessed and unsupported.    C’mon SPS show us you care about our kids and front line staff as much as you do yourselves. 

    • Melissa Westbrook September 24, 2024 (3:48 pm)

      After the violence at two high schools, Superintendent Jones said all schools were getting safety upgrades. What schools have you seen without cameras or check-ins?

      • West Seattle Resident September 24, 2024 (5:51 pm)

        Roxhill Annex to start.   No security…no card swipes….no check-ins….often no one in the office leaving teachers/paraps to respond to people at the door and also leaving no one in the office to answer phones in the event there is an emergency happening in the community.

  • Cc September 24, 2024 (2:00 pm)

    Has there been any confirmation on the meeting with Gina? It is not listed on the library website, but it still exists on the SPS calendar.

    • WSB September 24, 2024 (3:00 pm)

      She just answered our inquiry a bit earlier this afternoon and said there was a slight possibility of a special board meeting but otherwise her 5 pm meeting is on and she’d let us know soon for sure. I will publish an update when she does.

  • WS Educator September 24, 2024 (7:56 pm)

    I wonder how tax payers would feel about the hundreds of thousands of dollars wasted on hiring the consultant who did an incredibly ineffective job in coming up with the results.  

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published.