TRANSPORTATION LEVY: Proposed additions before Tuesday vote include a West Seattle memorial

On Tuesday (July 2), city councilmembers are expected to vote on one last round of potential changes to the transportation levy intended to go to voters in November. The council committee reviewing and refining the levy is chaired by District 1 Councilmember Rob Saka, who announced his latest proposed revisions today. Checking the detailed documents for West Seattle specifics, you’ll see one addition: A tribute to Steve Hulsman, the 66-year-old West Seattle man killed in a collision with a driver on Marine View Drive last December. Mr. Hulsman’s brother-in-law John Good had been talking to the city about ceremonially renaming the section of street where he died; instead, he told us this morning, Councilmember Saka decided to propose, as spelled out in the amendment document, a “Protected Bike Lane project in West Seattle to be named in honor of Steve Hulsman.” The document does not specify a location; the only potential PBL project for West Seattle named in the levy is Highland Park Way SW, but the levy calls for many other to-be-identified-later safety projects around the city. Good showed us email from Councilmember Saka offering also to sponsor a proposal for a “secondary street naming” in memory of Mr. Hulsman, while saying that would take more time.

As for the rest of Saka’s latest levy revision, it still contains the West Seattle specifics we’ve previously mentioned – projects for 35th SW between Alaska and Morgan, Fauntleroy Way between 35th and Alaska, Olson/1st/2nd, plus sidewalks for SW Brandon between 26th SW and 30th SW, and transit-corridor work for sections of SW Oregon and SW Alaska in The Junction. Saka says his final proposal would result in a $1.55 billion levy, same as his previous proposal. Here are the categories into which that would break out:

i. $160.5 million for Vision Zero, School and Neighborhood Safety;
ii. $423 million for Street Maintenance and Modernization, including no less than $350 million for Arterial Roadway Maintenance;
iii. $221 million for Bridges and Structures;
iv. $151 million for Transit Corridors and Connections;
v. $193 million for Pedestrian Safety, including no less than $111 million for New Sidewalks and Sidewalk Alternatives and no less than $34 million for Sidewalk Safety Repair;
vi. $100 million for Signals and Operations;
vii. $113.5 million for Bicycle Safety;
viii. $66.5 million for People Streets and Public Spaces;
ix. $69 million for Climate and Resiliency, including no less than $32 million for
electric vehicle charging infrastructure;
x. $45 million for Freight and Goods Movement; and
xi. $7.5 million for Good Governance & Equitable Implementation Initiative

In the first year, council documents say, Saka’s version would cost the owner of a “median assessed value” home $499, compared to $467 for the mayor’s original $1.45 billion version. Other councilmembers’ amendments include a counterproposal from Councilmember Tammy Morales, totaling $1.7 billion, which would equal $546 in the first year for that “median value” homeowner. (The city says that’s an $804,000 assessed value, and that the expiring levy is costing a median-value homeowner $288 this year.) The meeting at which the final amendments will be discussed, and votes taken, is Tuesday at 9:30 am, and includes a public-comment period, as noted on the agenda (where all the proposed amendments are linked, too). Other ways to get comments to the council are listed here.

26 Replies to "TRANSPORTATION LEVY: Proposed additions before Tuesday vote include a West Seattle memorial"

  • Josh June 28, 2024 (10:33 pm)

    I appreciate the concept of putting more efforts into bicycle safety and appreciate the idea of honoring the memory of someone who was killed while cycling, I hope for more effort though towards improving bicycle infrastructure and safety than renaming a roadway. I hope that if this levy passes the changes to the original levy from Mr Saka include measures to reduce speeds and erratic driving on the sections like 35th from Alaska to Holly. When the levy passes if Sakas changes are included and end up including features like this I will consider that a job well done. 

  • Sunny.206 June 28, 2024 (10:48 pm)

    No, No, No way! No accountability, No more created congestion, lan. No, No, No way!

  • Whisky Woods June 29, 2024 (3:26 am)

    This will push the property tax on a median house to almost $10,000 per year.  Time to defund SDOT.

  • Felicia June 29, 2024 (6:57 am)

    Honoring him will not bring back the dead. But it’s better. This will serve  as relief to the bereaved family.

  • Anne June 29, 2024 (7:37 am)

    NO! 

  • Sammy June 29, 2024 (9:02 am)

    More property taxes? I can not afford the current property taxes. I feel like long term residents are being pushed out of West Seattle. The costs are too high and most of the money goes to schools which are poorly managed financially.

  • Spooled June 29, 2024 (9:59 am)

    So the existing levy is just under $300 for the “average” homeowner (whatever that is) and the proposals have it increasing to $460-500ish ?!?!  This is an easy NO from me and I hope it is for others.  Has your income grown at a similar rate during the levy?  Whatever they asses my home at may as well be monopoly money because I’m not trying to sell it right now and couldn’t replace it for as much anyway.  Seattle needs to learn to live with less.  It’s what adults do when they want all the shiny things but can only afford a few.

    • WSB June 29, 2024 (3:00 pm)

      Not “average” – “mean” (corrected) median valuation (half cost more, half cost less), and the numbers ($800K+) are in the story. If you don’t know your residence’s assessed value, you can check via the King County Parcel Viewer.

      • Actually Mike June 29, 2024 (3:40 pm)

        Not to put too fine a point on it, but actually: The “mean” refers to the arithmetic average, calculated by totalling all values in a data set and dividing by the number of entries; “median” refers to the concept you’ve described as the “mean”, the midpoint in a set of values. If you and I are the only ones in an elevator, the “mean” income of the occupants is (my income) + (your income) divided by two; If Bill Gates then enters the elevator, the “mean” income just went through the roof because of his gazillions, but the “median” income would probably be whatever you make, assuming that you make less than Mr Gates does but more than I do.

  • Kate Wells June 29, 2024 (11:04 am)

    I hope a bike lane named in honor of Steve Hulsman brings his family peace. We should bolster that tribute by adequately funding bike safety. Council Member Saka’s amendment actually cuts funding from both the Bicycle Safety and Vision Zero, Schools and Neighborhood Safety budgets as compared to the mayor’s original proposal. The amendment brought forward by Council Member Morales will do a better job of preventing future tragedies and make Seattle a safer place to get around.

  • Kathy June 29, 2024 (11:19 am)

    Dear Rob Saka, At the Alki meeting last Wednesday you and representatives of SDOT, SPD, the Mayor’s office, the Alki Community Council and the audience all seemed to agree that public safety was our number one priority. If so, then why would you fund repaving of Fauntleroy Way without adding separate lanes for biking and safer sidewalks? It is extremely dangerous to bike in speeding traffic on Fauntleroy Way. How are potholes a threat to public safety other than when they occur in places designated for people walking and biking? And yet we still have no safe biking spaces on Fauntleroy Way between 35th and Alaska after 30 years of funded (and then defunded) planning and design for them. Shame.

    • Chemist June 29, 2024 (3:34 pm)

      Potholes contribute to gravel and debris all over the road surface and encourages drivers to swerve into less traveled areas of the roadway, including towards the edges and painted bike lanes.  You should also be aware that large projects taken on by SDOT are mandated to include bike infrastructure in the design or explain why it can’t be included, which may well mean bike lanes in a “repaving project”.

  • anonyme June 29, 2024 (12:41 pm)

    There appears to be a lot of redundancy across these “categories”, which is the usual way levies are deceptively framed so that voters don’t really know what they’re voting for.  Everyone then just votes yes, hoping some magic will happen this time.  If only.  It is also mind boggling that another 160 million of our tax dollars is being demanded to yet again fund Vision Zero – which, so far, has had ZERO results, with our streets being more dangerous than ever.  Take that 160 million and hire a fully staffed, full-time traffic enforcement unit.  Not only would our streets be safer, but we’d actually get some of our money back instead of flushing it down the toilet.  A big NO for me, but the levy will pass.  They always do.

    • WSB June 29, 2024 (1:05 pm)

      As has been explained many times, the shortage of police is NOT because of a shortage of funding. SPD has a lot of money ready and waiting to pay for people. They just need (a) to find, hire, and train those people as well as (b) for existing officers to quit leaving/retiring. The city has even allotted big bucks to an advertising/marketing campaign to try to attract more hires, as well as boosting salaries, adding hiring incentives, etc.

    • My two cents July 1, 2024 (12:47 pm)

      https://www.seattle.gov/transportation/projects-and-programs/safety-first/vision-zero/projectsNothing “hidden” about the status of Vision Zero and where the efforts are being directed.

  • Admiral-2009 June 29, 2024 (1:25 pm)

    The Levy amount is to large and will, if passed, increase rents and housing expenses significantly.  Per SMC 15.70.010, 020 and 030 the installation and maintenance of sidewalks is the responsibility of the abutting property owner!  It’s time for a reset on the request amount and a good place to start is with $145,000,000 noted for sidewalk and maintenance of them!

    • AD June 29, 2024 (4:03 pm)

      That section of code refers to council resolutions addressing the sidewalk or conditions, not general public works projects such as bring sidewalks into neighborhoods that don’t have them.  For example, City Council has, in past years, required more sidewalk building and restoration from developers and constructions companies.  When they passed that resolution, the property owners (via the builders or contractors) became responsible for sidewalk restoration after their project, or upgrading sidewalks at corner lots with ADA ramps where applicable, etc.  The code you referenced does not mean property owners are responsible for building city sidewalks in front of their houses.

  • Millie June 29, 2024 (6:49 pm)

    Thank you Anonyme for your succinct comments.  It has always baffled me how the city/county/school could put together a levy (any levy) proposal and not be able to identify which projects (i.e., what bridge, major road) repair/replacement was used for cost estimates.  Surely, SDOT has identified their work program for the eight-year levy?  Surely, they budget their projects following the same accounting principles we homeowners do – prioritize needed/wanted vs. projected costs vs. budget available.   You can’t go to the bank and get a loan without this documentation.    On another topic, one needs to remember this is would not be the only levy on the property tax statement – you have the housing, mental health, parks, libraries, etc., etc.  All these levy amounts are cumulative ultimately resulting in the $10,000+ tax statement.  One day the taxpayer “golden goose” will not be there!  Who knows we may be living on the street due to our inability to pay all the costs being passed to homeowners and renters.

    • K June 29, 2024 (7:32 pm)

      Here’s a breakdown of projects by category.  It took me 5 seconds to google this.  https://seattle.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=F&ID=12946826&GUID=C0830284-7B76-46C1-B839-6A847FAFF776.  Any other information you’re looking for regarding taxpayer-funded projects is also available to the public.  There are laws requiring the city to disclose how your money is spent (you can actually look up details down to “individual janitor at Seattle Center” level if you want.  Every penny is documented).  My house is about median price and our tax bill is nowhere near $10,000 so congratulations on your above-average house, but most of us won’t have a tax bill like yours.

      • WSB June 29, 2024 (8:35 pm)

        We’ve linked those documents before (that one is from an earlier version). What SDOT DOESN’T have – and I’ve asked for them – are documents with the full details, such as, “70 half-blocks of sideways, including x hundred block of x street, x hundred block of x avenue, etc.” (times 70, or 100, whatever). The projects we’ve listed for West Seattle, for example, are just the very toplines. Dating all the way back to the draft levy presentation in April, I asked SDOT, “-Where are the 250 blocks of new sidewalks?
        -Where would the 5 new greenways be?
        -Where would the 40 signals that get major attention be?”

        and the reply was, “We’ve outlined major capital projects, but the specific locations for smaller projects over the next 8 years are still being determined. These project decisions will be guided by the recently released Seattle Transportation Plan and our asset management strategy, which is helping us pinpoint and prioritize where investments are most needed. We’re also maintaining flexibility to engage with community members to identify their priorities within their neighborhoods.”

    • anonyme June 30, 2024 (6:49 am)

      I’m concerned not only about the details within the categories, but the definitions of the categories themselves.  For example, what is the difference between Vision Zero and pedestrian safety?  WTH is “good governance”?  And why is $60+million needed for “people streets”?  Here’s a thought: do away with all the esoteric categories and just restore the infrastructure we already have to a high quality standard.   I’ve also not heard anything from SDOT about the detrimental effect of covering ever more land with concrete & asphalt.  The permeable sidewalks installed about 6 years ago on 35th in Arbor Heights are crumbling; the workmanship on that project was terrible.  I wonder how much money is spent redundantly on repairing crappy projects?  There just isn’t anything I trust about SDOT, including their constant demands for incredible sums of money, squandered on questionable and poorly executed projects, with few visible results.

  • Joe Z July 1, 2024 (10:01 am)

    I know it’s going to be a tough blow to SDOT if this isn’t funded, but I’m inclined to vote no and send it back to the drawing board. For a council that claims to be about accountability, this measure is the complete opposite of that. It’s a blank check. 

  • Le July 2, 2024 (4:10 am)

    An over 80% increase versus 33% inflation over the same time period?  If this makes to the ballot in November, vote no and make the council go back to the drawing board. 

Sorry, comment time is over.