Trial continues today for 2 of Steve Bushaw’s alleged murderers

By Tracy Record
West Seattle Blog editor

This afternoon at the King County Courthouse, pre-testimony proceedings in the trial of Brandon Chaney and Bryce Huber are scheduled to resume.

Huber (left) and Chaney (right), are two of the four men who were charged with gunning down 26-year-old Steve Bushaw along California north of Edmunds in The Junction on Super Bowl night in 2009. The other two, Danny O’Neal and John Sylve, already have pleaded guilty. As mentioned earlier, we were in court as proceedings began Monday afternoon.

Toplines: The case has a new prosecutor, Jeff Baird, because the one originally assigned to the case, James Konat – who won the case against South Park killer/rapist Isaiah Kalebu earlier this summer – was taken off it amid a controversy over racist remarks he made in an unrelated case in which a conviction was overturned as a result. Baird gained fame last decade for leading the Green River Killer prosecution team. His first major announcement in this case: Seeking to drop the “conspiracy to commit murder” charge against Chaney and Huber.

Chaney’s lawyer James Rowe didn’t object, so his client now is on trial for one charge – 1st-degree murder with firearm enhancement – but Huber’s lawyer Anthony Savage did object, saying the alleged conspiracy was going to figure into his defense, and dropping the charge “disarms” him of a contention he planned to pursue. Judge Joan DuBuque gave Savage until first thing this morning to cite case law to support his argument against dropping the conspiracy charge.

She also suggested the defense lawyers would want to read the trial brief that Baird had turned in – hinting that it would raise a number of issues that might take days to hash out – and when court reconvenes today, everyone will have “a better sense of what there is to argue about.”

All that means this may not get to jury selection for a while.

The trial originally was set to start in January – then suddenly, Sylve and O’Neal pleaded guilty, and that led to delays. It was pushed further back when Konat was still on the case, so as not to conflict with the South Park murder/rapes trial. Even Judge DuBuque acknowledged yesterday, “This [Bushaw murder] case has been proceeding in a piecemeal fashion.”

It’s also a complicated case – and as noted again in court yesterday, evidence will include a copious amount of cell-phone records – with the general allegation that Bushaw was killed because Huber believed he had been involved in a home-invasion robbery; Sylve and O’Neal allegedly were the triggermen, and Chaney the getaway driver.

(Photo credit: January 2011, by Christopher Boffoli for WSB)

7 Replies to "Trial continues today for 2 of Steve Bushaw's alleged murderers"

  • Anonymous July 19, 2011 (10:52 am)

    …”alleged racism” by the former prosectuor, James Konat? I believe telling a jury that black people don’t make credible witnesses is clear-cut racism. The writer of this article (and any future articles) should stick to reporting the facts instead of cheerleading for the prosecution and downplaying their “alleged” misconduct. I would venture a guess that if there was a defense attorney taking an “indefinite leave” for misconduct he sure wouldn’t have a blog writer citing recent cases he won.

    These men deserve a fair trial and quite possibly Konat was taken off this case because he could not guarantee something that is a constitutional right.

    • WSB July 19, 2011 (11:42 am)

      Hi, anonymous, thanks. Reading a different account of the story, yes, you are correct. Will remove the “alleged.” The remark I see cited is something I wouldn’t allow in comments on our site because we have a rather vigorous anti-racism (sexism/etc.) policy, and I would have called it that flat-out too. As for citing the Kalebu case, yes, if either of the defense attorneys had made news recently in one of the highest-profile cases in years, I would mention that too. – TR

  • JimmyG July 19, 2011 (8:13 pm)

    Jeff Baird didn’t “gain fame” for leading the Ridgway prosecution team, he has been well-known in the criminal justice and press corps for many years before the Green River arrest and prosecution.
    Baird has led the Most Dangerous Offender Project in the KC Prosecutor’s Office for years.
    Nobody prepares for cases more thoroughly than him, and very few come close to his courtroom skills.

    As to Konat, any family of a murder victim that was lucky enough to have him assigned to their loved ones case knew he was doing the job because he had a deep-seated drive to see the bad guys put away.
    His record of wins stands as testament to his abilities.

  • Anonymous July 19, 2011 (9:50 pm)

    TR – thank you for the quick fix. Make no mistake about it, your reporting is appreciated.

  • EF July 19, 2011 (9:51 pm)

    I think the use of the word alleged is just used by habit to keep from being slanderous, am I right wsb? Or maybe I’m not getting the point of anonymous comment

  • Rose July 19, 2011 (10:43 pm)

    Will someone please explain to me why Mr. Baird, the prosecutor, wants to drop the conspiracy charge? Is it so that the jury cannot decide to find the defendents guilty of conspiracy and not the other charges that the two first defendents plead guilty to? In reading over the reports, it seems that conspiracy to commit murder is the only charge that cell phone records and hear-say and seeing a person at the scene of the crime, but unarmed, ect. could have some merit in this case. Without that I don’t understand how they could charge murder with an enhanced firearm when they weren’t carrying firearms, just the other two who already plead guilty to that.

  • Anonymous1 July 20, 2011 (1:30 am)

    Anonymous – You are 100% correct. Everyone vilifies the defense and blindly assumes LE officials, DPA’s and other public servants are above reproach. Just another example “guilty until proven innocent”.

Sorry, comment time is over.