Admiral Neighborhood Association: Safeway project changes; more

“Full house!” as Admiral Neighborhood Association past president Mark Wainwright put it, arriving at the ANA meeting tonight at Admiral Congregational Church – more than two dozen people.

The evening’s main event was a somewhat tense appearance by the Admiral Safeway project team, explaining the recent, seemingly sudden change in the project (reported here two weeks ago) – doubling the number of the residential units in the building on the southeast side of the site, discarding the flex-work office component (we first reported the change when it appeared on the city’s Land Use Information Bulletin, and Safeway shared an explanation later that day).

Safeway’s Sara Corn and Fuller/Sears architect Bill Fuller explained that the change was the result of financing troubles unfolding after construction began; ANA president Katy Walum read an official statement gently chiding the team for not having given the group a heads-up. In turn, the Safeway team implored the ANA to bring any concerns to them in the weeks ahead rather than just debuting them before the City Council when the proposed change comes up for a future hearing. More on this, and other meeting topics, ahead:

Explaining what had gone awray, Corn said any residential component in a Safeway project has to be sold to another developer to handle. She recounted the details shared here, when the financing fell through for that building, after construction had begun. “We started soliciting developers (and they all said they) can’t find financing for officers … We did find an alternate partner that we have faith in that can continue the project, with 78 apartments … the hearing is in March … We want this done concurrently, and we did what we could to try to make it happened …” That hearing is before the City Council, it was clarified later; Corn believes the date is March 23rd. (We’ll be checking.) She explained that the council is being asked to amend the Master Use Permit for the project. (The comment period for the proposed change continues through this Thursday.)

She said it would be “a lot more difficult and a lot more expensive” if they just let that corner go until someone could restart the project sometime after the new store opens. “We’re hopeful that it will be approved” – if it isn’t, they’ll continue on with the store, but they’re not sure what else will happen. The store opening is targeted for August 12th, Corn said. Asked why the financing fell through, she said, “The office market just tanked. … Once (the bank) got to the point where they were going to fund, they just changed their mind.”

Fuller says the residential units will be 340-630 square foot units, all studios, alcove “one bedrooms,” and one bedrooms. The flex-work units were “still a good idea … but just not finance-able,” he said, adding that they’ve seen the same problem on other projects. Corn said there will be 58 parking spaces for the 78 apartments (in addition to the 160-plus spaces for the store and more than two dozen for the standalone retail building on the northwest side of the site). That drew some skepticism, but Corn and Fuller insisted it will balance out because of the building’s location in an area with a high “Walk Score” (92) that means it will draw people who rely on non-car forms of transportation, so the parking ratio will work. “It’s a walker’s paradise,” proclaimed Fuller. The new developers for the southeast building also handled the new 23rd/Madison store project for Safeway, said Corn, and tell the company they have 20-plus vacant spaces there currently. There are actually fewer units now than the office plus residential would have equaled, the development team acknowledged, after a question by Walum.

P.S. Fuller mentioned the before/after graphics documentation that they shared for publication here (those aren’t louvers, he explained, they’re “Juliet balconies”). Also the construction stage they’re at: On Thursday, they will pour the “post-tension slab” concrete for the roof section on which the top level of parking will rest.

“This is a horrible position for Safeway to be in,” Corn said. “We have to make a viable project … that can be built on time.” “If this has been going on for months,” asked longtime neighborhood activist Dennis Ross, “then why are we the last ones to know?” Fuller interjected: “Safeway’s not the bad guy here … Safeway got the ball dropped on them after they closed the store and demolished the store. … It’s the difference between this scheme, and nothing built next to the Safeway. I thought the flex-work was a cool idea, but banks chose not to finance that.”

President Walum read the official group statement noting that the ANA had participated in the process along and been “invested in the project” but had been discouraged by having been “left out of the loop” regarding this recent change. ANA wants to be restored to the position of “knowledgeable community consultants” getting earlier heads-up regarding key changes to the project. She reiterated that “we support (the project) but want to know that you support (ANA) in return.”

Also discussed tonight:

ADMIRAL-AREA CRIME TRENDS: Southwest Precinct Community Police Team Officer Ken Mazzuca said he recently walked the business district and talked to people about what’s going on – and he didn’t hear many complaints. He says he reviews Admiral-area reports daily “to get a feeling for what’s happening and what I need to do” and acknowledged that “if you’re a victim, one crime is one too many,” and that car prowls and residential burglaries are still happening, though not “spiking” at the moment, so that’s what he is paying the most attention to. As others from the SWP have said, he reiterated that “community involvement” is most important in fighting crime, particularly “timely reporting … and accurate information … what you’re really seeing, descriptions of vehicles, the plate, colors,” details that might stand out.

He was asked about the Jeremy Peck disappearance/death case and said he hadn’t really been involved in that; group members said they were concerned because he was reported to have been last seen at the Admiral Pub, early the morning of December 24th. He also was asked about the Admiral Theater burglary and said that investigation continues as well but he doesn’t have updated details. One more notable not-so-long ago Admiral crime, the Island View Apartments car vandalism, came up; Officer Mazzuca and Crime Prevention Coordinator Benjamin Kinlow are planning to walk through the property with its management soon to assess for safety and crime-prevention factors. The crime itself remains unsolved.

CRIME PREVENTION: Coordinator Kinlow spoke to ANA about his impending retirement, with the same message he has been sharing with other community groups: Carry on with neighborhood-based, neighbor-to-neighbor prevention even after he’s gone, no matter how the city decides to handle its piece of the crime-prevention picture, and make sure your Block Watch gets involved with the West Seattle Blockwatch Captains Network. Attendees gave him a round of applause.

MEMBERSHIP DUES: ANA is going to start charging dues, as some neighborhood organizations do – $15/year, “to make people feel like they are members and invested in something, but not necessarily so steep that certain people would not be able to afford it,” as Walum explained, though she’s also happy to hear from people who feel they can’t afford that sum.

REACHING OUT TO OTHER GROUPS: Members of the ANA executive committee are pledged to attend other community groups’ meetings over the next two months, to see what they can learn from those groups, and maybe vice versa. Diane Vincent noted she had been to Highland Park Action Committee and Morgan Community Association in recent weeks (and was particularly impressed with HPAC’s pre-meeting potluck).

CANDIDATES’ FORUM: ANA will be organizing one for a meeting this spring.

47TH & ADMIRAL WAY: No signal in the foreseeable future, reported Marc Jacobs after talking with the city – just not enough pedestrian volume. There’s some new paint and signage, though, as Karl de Jong pointed out.

ADOPT-A-STREET CLEANUP: Saturday, February 26th, meet at 9 am at Metropolitan Market (WSB sponsor) – free breakfast before the cleanup and free sack lunches afterward, “we go for a walk and pick up some litter along the way,” Walum elaborated.

SUMMER CONCERTS AT HIAWATHA: Sponsorships are being solicited and accepted – with PCC (WSB sponsor) signing on again, and WSB (we’ve co-sponsored the past two years) too, as well as Head-To-Toe Spa – and ANA’s Dave Weitzel has just begun rounding up sponsors. Walum is still accepting band applications.

SOUTHWEST DISTRICT COUNCIL RECAP: Walum and de Jong recapped the major topics from last week’s meeting, which they both attended, including the downtown seawall presentation – reminding all that a comment period is under way – and the West Seattle Triangle overview (which has been superseded by last night’s open house, including the presentation materials just published on the city website today). As de Jong noted, “Though it’s not within the jurisdiction of (ANA), it’s important to see how the process is going … and how (DPD) is interacting with neighborhood groups.”

The Admiral Neighborhood Association meets the second Tuesday of the month, 7 pm, lower-level meeting room at Admiral Church.

15 Replies to "Admiral Neighborhood Association: Safeway project changes; more"

  • Tony S February 9, 2011 (7:33 am)

    While I would welcome the flex-work spaces, really how big of an impact overall to the area is this switch? I’m thinking there’s a bit of an overreaction to this news. Work/live spaces continue to sit empty all over the city including right down on Harbor Ave next to the 7-Eleven. No financial institution is going to loan money on what is considered a very risky venture these days. I don’t find a conversion to apartments a monstrous difference, since either way these spaces are designed to be inhabited. Is my impression of what a “flex work” space is incorrect?

    Thanks!

  • Alki Area February 9, 2011 (8:42 am)

    Those “flex work” spaces are mostly a flop. The idea was cute, to increase the ability of folks to start small businesses, but they are rarely functional. I understand why you couldn’t get a loan to build MORE of them (considering the existing ones are mostly unused).

  • Neighbor February 9, 2011 (9:30 am)

    So what responsibility do developers have for the increase traffic on our roads, water usage, and even the higher usage of our parks? Is this new usage reflected in their taxes or permits? WS is getting more congested every day yet we don’t require a park and ride or a light rail?

  • ZS February 9, 2011 (9:49 am)

    Agree with Neighbor. Why not just build the store only? We cannot just add more residents to WS without reviewing the impact. The bridge is brutal already at rush hour.

  • sun*e February 9, 2011 (9:53 am)

    After all of the meetings to get this project approved and started it’s unfortunate that the financing for some of it fell through now. I would just hate to see another development not develop, i.e. (W)hole Foods and the building on the corner of 35th and Avalon. It’s so depressing to see progress start and stop and sit empty or as a giant hole. Anything to keep the “construction” ball rolling – if it’s necessary to change the flex work spaces to residential units then hopefully it’ll happen. In looking at the exterior changes, you can hardly tell the difference. Let’s hope the transition for the interior goes as smoothly.

  • alkisun February 9, 2011 (10:21 am)

    Didn’t you see this coming???
    We have located our grocery stores now. Stay with them.

  • Paul February 9, 2011 (12:04 pm)

    I just want to give a shout out to the actual construction workers that are building this with their own sweat. The suits sipping on their latte’s should not get all the press

  • dsa February 9, 2011 (12:30 pm)

    The only fair compromise would be no net difference in the number of parking stalls between the original plan and a revised plan.
    .
    This would require Safeway to reduce the number of residential units by offering more floor space per each, ie upgrade.

  • justcurious February 9, 2011 (3:00 pm)

    Can anyone tell me what the city requires in the number of parking spaces for a given number of residential units? There was a plan for apartments across from RiteAid before the downturn. The plan showed fewer parking spots than apartments. That seemed so wrong to me.

  • 22blades February 9, 2011 (3:12 pm)

    “They” implore for a dialogue before bringing it to the City Council but they had the opportunity to bring it to the area residents as well. As for the impact on the neighborhood, I would think the concerns should NOT be dismissed.

    It seems that the neighborhoods get cast as the bad guys when developers lack the foresight and start projects they can’t perform on… There WERE alternatives before they tore it down. It’s like one of us building a Taj Mahal before we got the financing lined up. But hey, but they’re from Pleasanton, California. They don’t live here.

    Bait & Switch.

  • JanS February 9, 2011 (6:48 pm)

    How many of you actually live right next to these new apartments? I do. Directly across the street. Yes, it will impact me directly. My only concern is the 58 parking spaces for 78 units. They’re dreaming if they think there will only be that number of cars, and residents will resort to parking on the precious little street parking that there is now. We have commuters driving to the street, parking and taking the bus. We have businesses from Calif. Ave. parking their business vehicles on the street. And, when the store is open, we have shoppers who park on the street instead of the parking lot. All perfectly legal. But..I work at home. I see clients here. And there is no parking for these clients a lot of the time ( don’t even get me started about the construction guys saying people can’t park on the street because all the spaces are taken up by construction workers).

    I’m extremely impressed by the progress that they’re making on this new store.But I think Safeway was less than forthcoming about the impact this is having on the direct neighbors…the incredible noise at times, the building shaking worse than in an earthquake, the traffic (parking) impact.We are being very patient…but it’s ongoing from 7am until 5pm.

    Now..about those apartments…I was under the impression that they were required to build housing as part of this project, that it couldn’t just be a store. Is that a wrong assumption?

  • nighthawk February 9, 2011 (7:21 pm)

    I thought a few years back that developers were required to have 1.5 spaces per dwelling for new buildings. the idea being that most people would have 1 car and some 2. maybe some none but usually that would be enough to not force people to park on the street much.

    Then I think the city with pressure from developers reduced it because it was such a “hardship” for them and cost to much and the city said this would encourage people to take public transit…

    that is the short version and I’m not even sure I’m all that accurate, it was just something in the back of my head.

  • Neighbor February 9, 2011 (9:31 pm)

    We need answers before this is allowed to continue.

  • 22blades February 10, 2011 (12:06 pm)

    I agree with JanS & nighthawk. 42nd AV SW was already bad when Safeway was still there, and then they added a gas station. I also negotiate the impromptou Park-N-Ride lot across the street from the Belvidere Overlook everyday which is becoming unsafe. People just don’t behave as tidy as plans call for. That is why there were fudge factors instead of shoehorning in numbers & cars like they do now.

  • Tony S February 10, 2011 (12:50 pm)

    That gas station has been there since the 1970’s. It originally opened as “Gas ‘N Go”.

    The Safeway has been there since the 1960’s, when it moved from it’s former location (the building that Blockbuster is in now).

    I agree that too few parking spaces is a problem, but until the city ceases its war on cars and we get political realignment that fairly balances the bike (4%) vs. car (96%) commuters, you’ll have arrangements like this.

Sorry, comment time is over.