-
AuthorSearch Results
-
December 20, 2008 at 4:39 am #650934
In reply to: so you’re bored and you want to give your opinion…
charlabobParticipantDon’t go. At some point, you’ll want an excuse not to go (believe me!) And avoiding this horrible weather will allow you to establish a precedent. I wish I were kidding — I’m not; I commuted from Iowa to Michigan through storms for holidays throughout my first marriage. Probably why it’s my first, but not last, marriage. :-)
December 20, 2008 at 4:37 am #589095Topic: Amazon Fresh Deliveries?
in forum Open DiscussionSueParticipantHas anyone tried ordering from Amazon Fresh since the storms and actually had a delivery made? Their site said that deliveries may be delayed due to weather.
I have never used them before, but decided to try them this morning. The earliest delivery time I could get was Sunday afternoon. Fortunately what I ordered isn’t crucial, but I was curious if anyone’s deliveries are actually coming.
December 20, 2008 at 4:31 am #650967In reply to: Where to go in W. Seattle if power fails?
flowerpetalMemberI’m going to JoB’s cuz for sure she will have just pulled something out of the oven before the power goes out. From there I will walk to Ellenater’s cuz she will have booze. Next stop, Celeste for a nip of Kahlua; and then someone please help me sniff out Christopher’s so I can get some bacon.
Then we can all come back to my place. I’ve got a huge load of firewood and we will all move in close to the fire. Just don’t fall into my Christmas tree.
Jan, what have you got at your digs?
December 20, 2008 at 4:28 am #650880In reply to: Kids, Hills, Snow and cars
JoBParticipantkids sledding on streets with cars.. parked or otherwise.. creates a really dangerous situation.
did no-one see the bus story today? imagine that sliding through a throng of sledders.
No matter how much fun it might be, it just isn’t safe to sled anywhere that it is possible a car might be parked or might drive through.
If you must succumb to the temptation.. all cars should be removed from the street and parents should be at both ends of the hill turning away drivers…
if i had children and lived on one of those steep grades with a sheet of ice underneath.. my kids would be in the back yard.. with a house between them and the idiots on the road.
Peggy Sue.. i am sorry you feel you got trashed.. but the message that kids and cars don’t mix is not enough.
kid’s just plain shouldn’t be anywhere that they might encounter cars in this kind of weather. Under the best of circumstances with sober careful drivers at the wheel.. everyone slides… and sliding cars hit unintended targets.
parents.. it’s your job to make sure that unintended target isn’t your child… it’s too large a risk to take with their future.
December 20, 2008 at 4:28 am #650965In reply to: Where to go in W. Seattle if power fails?
Garden_nymphMemberI have been told that the fire stations welcome people in such circumstances. Sounds good to me- to cozy up to a firefighter!
December 20, 2008 at 4:24 am #651009In reply to: News from Alaska – Unrelated to the Weather!
flowerpetalMemberI’m certainly no fan of SP. However, I do find it difficult to laugh about someone’s drug addiction; even this one.
Now SP’s comments about it… which will likely include some huge gaffe, I will be right there to hoot and holler.
December 20, 2008 at 3:57 am #650878In reply to: Kids, Hills, Snow and cars
mellaw6565MemberI’ve been on these roads consistently over the past few days – probably more than most in W. Seattle. I don’t need a lecture or reminder from Peggy Sue about her road or hill – those of us with common sense know how to handle things.
All I want is for her to keep the kids out of the street and not tell the rest of us to watch out for them – we have the right of way and in light of the various newscasts the last 48 hours showing sledding injuries and discussing dangerous sled practices, I think her post was unnecessary and opposite of what’s being preached by experts and others.
December 20, 2008 at 3:39 am #650902In reply to: WestSide Baby needs help – tomorrow particularly
celeste17Participantbump
December 20, 2008 at 3:31 am #650832In reply to: NEWSFLASH….from the North Pole
ellenaterMemberlmao, GHO.
No, it’s not stolen. Fed-X is just dumb. 5 trucks passed me on my way down the hill. I think they just drive around town looking busy. I’ve yet to see anyone get out of a truck. Maybe they’re remote control trucks. Or maybe they’re sad that the UPS guys are cuter. At least when all is said and done I’ll have a MacBook and not a Dell. ;)
I WANT that cheesecake…
December 20, 2008 at 2:43 am #650875In reply to: Kids, Hills, Snow and cars
BookGalParticipant1. I do not appreciate the venomous nature nor the name calling responses to my initial post.
2. No where in my post did I say I condone those who choose to go sledding etc on our street. It is their choice.
3. Drivers choose to speed up and down this street and there have been countless near accidents – regardless of the weather or road conditions.
4. Where exactly did I say in my post that I didn’t want cars being driven on the street because people were sledding, etc. on it?
5. FACT: The street is situated on a hill.
6. FACT: There IS a slab of ICE under the packed snow on the entire street (including near the curbs, and around the roundabouts).
7. FACT: The hill has a steep grade.
8. FACT: There are no parked cars on this particular street. Which may be why people have chosen to sled here?
9.FACT: We have heard a myriad of spinning tires, and have seen cars, trucks, and SUVs sliding around on the street since the snow fall last weekend.
10. LOGIC: this street is NOT entirely SAFE to drive DUE TO ROAD CONDITIONS and the steepness of the grade.
11. So, is it “ridiculous” that I only wanted to warn people that if they choose to drive, on any street – that they should exercise caution? Perhaps just slowing down and paying a little more attention? Taking in consideration the freezing temperatures, the condition of the (side) streets, and the possible unexpected appearance of youngsters sledding? It doesn’t matter that you have a clunker, a hybrid, a SUV, a 4-wheel drive, a sleigh, or a tank. Things happen, and they can happen very very quickly.
December 20, 2008 at 2:06 am #650947In reply to: Viaduct replacement – What do you think?
wingmeMemberwhat kills me about the elevated option is the decreased capacity (from the current 3 lanes and exits to 2 lanes, no exits). Why? because 3 lanes cost more money! with all the new migration to WS, 3 lanes would be a no-brainer. our mayor sure as hell didn’t think adding a couple billion on for a deep-bore tunnel was too costly, so i don’t get all the concerns about 2 more lanes. again, IT’S NOT ABOUT THE MONEY! it’s about room for waterfront development. and wait til the rest of seattle wakes up about how all this will affect our beloved pike place market. anyone remember the 70’s when it was last threatened?
December 20, 2008 at 1:59 am #650828In reply to: NEWSFLASH….from the North Pole
ellenaterMemberAnd UPS gets the job done! It’s werid but I think the UPS guys are cuter than the Fed-X (X as in “non existent”) guys. Must be the independent contractor thing. Damn you Apple! I bet Dell uses UPS!
December 20, 2008 at 1:56 am #650930In reply to: so you’re bored and you want to give your opinion…
ellenaterMemberso the Cliff Mass report had a link to his blog where I found this:
“From KATU weather site:
A WINTER STORM WATCH HAS BEEN ISSUED FOR MUCH OF OUR AREA INCLUDING THE PORTLAND METRO FOR SATURDAY AND SUNDAY. SNOW WILL BECOME POSSIBLE BY NOON SATURDAY AND IS EXPECTED TO TRANSITION INTO FREEZING RAIN BY EARLY SUNDAY MORNING. ICE ACCUMULATION WILL BE POSSIBLE THROUGH THE DAY SUNDAY. WARMING TEMPERATURES AND A TRANSITION TO RAIN LOOKS POSSIBLE SUNDAY EVENING. THIS STORM HAS THE POTENTIAL TO BRING DOWN TREES AND POWERLINES. PLEASE STAY UPDATED.”
The irony is, I think we could make it down but then my brother, who lives in just outside of Portland, wouldn’t be able to make it in. Or out, really. And if he isn’t coming, then the niece and nephew aren’t coming. :( It’s not looking good!
Thanks, wingme. Time to visit the liquor store.
If the rest of you go, BE CAREFUL.
December 20, 2008 at 1:46 am #650826In reply to: NEWSFLASH….from the North Pole
JanSParticipantOh, please let Santa start using UPS…I wanna see my cute bald blue-eyed UPS guy…makes my day – hehehehe
December 20, 2008 at 12:04 am #650867In reply to: Kids, Hills, Snow and cars
mellaw6565MemberPeggy Sue – your post is absolutely ridiculous.
December 19, 2008 at 11:33 pm #650921In reply to: so you’re bored and you want to give your opinion…
megMemberWe are headed to Cannon Beach in the am…so we were wondering the same thing. Curious if anyone has opinions (hopefully not hype!) about going to longview and then over & down?
December 19, 2008 at 11:31 pm #650917In reply to: so you’re bored and you want to give your opinion…
ellenaterMemberJen,
There’s supposed to be one there (Portland) earlier! But it’s hard to sort out fact from hype. The parka boys will look for any excuse to don their gay apparel. :)
I’m going to watch NWCN.
December 19, 2008 at 11:21 pm #650901In reply to: WestSide Baby needs help – tomorrow particularly
celeste17ParticipantIf anyone is going and can pick me up I can give some time. And I have a package of diapers in my car for them. Was going to give them at the Holiday Get Together and haven’t been able to drop them off.
December 19, 2008 at 11:13 pm #650864In reply to: Kids, Hills, Snow and cars
beachdrivegirlParticipantDitto to charlabob.
PeggySue if you had posted this in April I would assume this was a fools day joke. I pray that if you use that type of judgement that you are not a parent. It is absolutely asine to expect cars to stay off the streets b/c you would like the opportunity to play in them.
For those that understand safety here are a few parks in West Seattle that are a bit better suited for playing than in the street.
A. Alki Beach Park – http://www.seattle.gov – (206) 684-4075 – 13 reviews
B. City of Seattle Parks & Recreation Department: Environmental-Education – http://www.ci.seattle.wa.us – (206) 684-7434 – 2 reviews
C. Lincoln Park – http://www.seattle.gov – (206) 684-4075 – 9 reviews
D. City of Seattle Parks & Recreation Department: High Point – http://www.seattle.gov – (206) 684-7422 – More
E. Skyline Secure Park – http://www.skylinesecurepark.com – (206) 769-6966 – More
F. Fauntleroy Park – http://www.seattle.gov – (206) 684-4075 – More
G. White Center Park – king.wsu.edu – (206) 296-4542 – More
H. County of King King County Parks and Recreation: Lakewood Park SW – maps.google.com – (206) 205-5275 – More
I. Lowman Beach Park – maps.google.com – (206) 684-4075 – 2 reviews
J. Luna Park Hoa
December 19, 2008 at 10:46 pm #589087Topic: WestSide Baby needs help – tomorrow particularly
in forum Open DiscussionWSBKeymasterJust posted this in the main “Friday afternoon” story but also wanted to call it out here. Thanks in advance to anyone who can help. From Nancy Woodland at WestSide Baby:
>>The weather has impacted our operations this week to a near standstill.
This is especially concerning timing with orders waiting for children
expecting warm clothes and toys for Christmas. We need extra hands to help
us sort the many donations we’ve received (yeah!) and to fill orders for
pick up by our agency partners on Monday. We’ve been closed for most of
this week but will be open on Saturday from 10am to 3pm for volunteers,
donations and pick-ups. Although our parking lot can be treacherous we’re
inviting people to make their way to White Center to help out if they are
comfortable driving. Because of the volume, we’d love to have adult or
experienced volunteers only so that we can make the most of the time we’ll
have tomorrow before the snow hits again. Even an hour or two makes a huge
difference.
Because of this week’s unpredictability, please call our phone in the
morning or check our website if there is concerning weather between this
afternoon and tomorrow. Of course, today our voicemail outgoing message
isn’t working properly so we hope that will be a good tool for communication
tomorrow.
We also plan to be open Monday 9-3 (weather permitting) and possibly on
Tuesday too. Thanks so much to everyone who supports WestSide Baby!>>
December 19, 2008 at 9:34 pm #649598In reply to: Only the lonely
JanSParticipantHey, I agree. And…how easy was that to talk with them, sitting at the next table. Who initiated that conversation? I suppose I’m just a friendly person. If I’m out with a female friend, and there is a male person at the next table, if I want to initiate a conversation, I will. It doesn’t necessarily mean that I’m looking to get picked up….it means that I’m friendly. I suppose it’s nice if you find out the other person is not “taken”, and you hit it off, but…unless you’re specifically out looking to hook up, good conversation is just that, good conversation. There is nothing scary about men (well, most of them), and I say the same thing about most women – not scary.
I think that approaching someone at the bar who one finds attractive is equally difficult for either sex. And who likes a pick-up line anyway. But making conversation like you did last night with your friend is a much better approach. And who knows where it would go. And I see nothing wrong with women initiating that kind of conversation. And if the guy(s) you bring into the conversation is non-responsive, then he’s not worth your time any way.
December 19, 2008 at 9:17 pm #650790In reply to: Shoveling Sidewalks — For good or ill?
HuindekmiParticipantSome of the comments on here remind of back when wearing seat belts first became mandatory. People opposed to the idea would rationalize their choice with an analogy like: “A friend of mine (alt: cousin, guy I know, guy I read about in the paper, etc.) was in an accident where a semi (or other large item) fell over onto the car. He saw it coming and dove down onto the floorboards. The car was crushed, but he came out unscathed. If he was wearing a seat belt, he wouldn’t have been able to do that. And that’s why I’ll never wear a seat belt.”
Basically, taking a rare case, citing it as the norm and justifying their behavior using that one bad example. Ignoring the fact that seat belts improve a driver’s safety in the vast number of cases.
Same basic thing here. Someone doesn’t like clearing their sidewalks and justifies it by citing the rare case above.
Walking the dog this morning, I got to see all the possible results. There were the few people who shoveled the sidewalks and put down de-icer. Those guys are great. It’s like there wasn’t a storm at all.
The next best were the people who shoveled but didn’t put down salt. There were a few scattered spots where the snow got packed down and didn’t clear off completely, but the sidewalk as a whole had much better traction. And today, now that the sun is out, the dark pavement absorbs the sunlight, warms up and clears off the last remaining bits.
Then there were the people who didn’t bother to shovel, but threw a bunch of salt into the 6″ of snow on their walks. That made an interesting mix of slush and solid ice. Seriously, this makes absolutely no sense.
And the vast majority didn’t do anything. Their walks were uneven packed snow and sheer ice that developed in areas of heavy traffic or southern exposure. Difficult to walk on, and only going to become a bigger mess tonight after the sun thaws parts and then have it refreeze even worse. If we then get a another snow storm on top of that – you’ll be taking your life into your hands trying to walk on it.
The legal advice given above is a rationalization. Nothing more.
If you don’t clear your walks and someone slips and falls, you are liable. The odds of that happening are much greater than if you had obeyed the law and cleared the walks of snow and ice. Attempting to follow the law would be taken into account as a mitigating circumstance in the one rare case cited above – likely resulting in lowered liability.
So, if you’re worried about legal liability w/r/t icy sidewalks — you’re much better off obeying the law and clearing the snow and ice from your sidewalks.
December 19, 2008 at 9:07 pm #650553In reply to: HUGE RANT! Dish Network
ZenguyParticipantBottom line, I have a contract with Dish! I do not have a contract with Fisher.
I expect Dish to provide the service for which I pay them, if a subcontractor raises the prices I expect I will pay more. But do not cut off service.
And using their venue to try and pass around propaganda is just wrong as well.
December 19, 2008 at 8:53 pm #650552In reply to: HUGE RANT! Dish Network
BonnieParticipantVery interesting discussion.
I heard that the reason Verizon isn’t in Seattle is because the city of Seattle has a contract with Comcast and Verizon can’t break into our market. Don’t know if it is true or not.
Might be time to just give up the tv and save $80-$100 a month!
December 19, 2008 at 8:47 pm #650789In reply to: Shoveling Sidewalks — For good or ill?
cakeitseasyMemberHave your sidewalks cleared is your civic duty.
It’s like, what, 60 feet of sidewalk or less on average? Takes like what, 20 minutes if you’re able bodied?
I’ve heard some excuses in my day, but…*raspberry*!. Science? Lawyers? You must really hate shoveling. Sure, virgin snow has some traction…but that doesn’t last long and then you really have a dangerous,icy, uneven, mess in a long cold snap.
Look,some people can’t shovel their walks (old, sick, out of town, don’t have a shovel, are from Hawaii and don’t know how, whatever…in which case, you should hire someone to do it) but others do nothing because they are used to it melting right away, or are just plain negligent or do a poor job, resulting in the aforementioned slippy/clear situation. But for the love of snow, don’t try to justify not having your sidewalk shoveled with merely a few inches on the ground (this isn’t Buffalo!). What about people who have to push wheels on sidewalks? Walkers, strollers, deliveries…wheelchairs? It takes about as much effort as clearing the car. (unless your sidewalk area is unusually large for Seattle). So… slip the neighbor teen $10 to do it if you can’t/won’t.
It’s simple really. Get out there and shovel *fresh* snow *before* it gets trampled or melty/freezy. Do a good job, and you’ll be rewarded with nice, dry, bare sidewalk. Probably won’t even need salt or sand, just maintain with sweeping until the temps go up. Voila, you’re a good citizen. Or, at least do it for the Postman, and his cold, wet feet…and wheelchairs.
btw, my walkway and sidewalk are still bone dry. Just a few tiny patches of ice on the stairway and some snow dust blowing around. No salt or sand.
-
AuthorSearch Results
West Seattle, Washington
30 Saturday
