Search Results for 'Qu'

Home Forums Search Search Results for 'Qu'

Viewing 25 results - 51,351 through 51,375 (of 52,034 total)
  • Author
    Search Results
  • #616902
    RickB
    Member

    This was reinforced for me when buying a house and reading the legal property description. After detailing which portion of which quarter of which quarter (these things are kind of fun to try to decipher), it finished up with:

    “And except the West 30 feet thereof conveyed to King County, Washington, for road by deed recorded…”

    In this case I think the 30 feet starts at the center of the road and covers the lane of traffic, parking lane, green strip, and sidewalk…

    -Rick

    #616901
    digires
    Member

    Aha, thanks for the response. I found the statute that controls here. Apparently these are owned by the city. It is covered under Title 15 of Seattle Municipal Code:

    “D. “Public place” means and includes streets, avenues, ways, boulevards, drives, places, alleys, sidewalks, and planting (parking) strips, squares, triangles and right-of-way for public use and the space above or beneath its surface, whether or not opened or improved.”

    http://clerk.ci.seattle.wa.us/~scripts/nph-brs.exe?s1=&s2=planting+strip&S3=Title+adj+15&Sect4=AND&l=50&Sect3=PLURON&Sect5=CODE1&d=CODE&p=1&u=%2F%7Epublic%2Fcode1.htm&r=1&Sect6=HITOFF&f=G

    #616819
    GenHillOne
    Participant

    LOL, JoB – a PT Cruiser? Isn’t that like a V8?? Definitely a gas guzzler anyway. We rented one on vacation – super fun, but couldn’t believe how powerful it was. Had to really watch my lead foot and yes, it required a couple of trips to the gas station!

    digires
    Member

    Greetings, I am wondering on streets like those in the Admiral/California area where there is a house (or townhouses), then a sidewalk, and then a narrow strip of grass, then the street, who owns that narrow strip of grass? Is it deeded to the house, or does it belong to the city of Seattle?

    It seems that homeowners are expected to do upkeep on it, but my question is whether there are property rights to that strip?

    Thanks in advance for your help!

    John

    #616834
    Crowe
    Member

    New West Seattle group for families with babies & toddlers

    Posted in: Fun stuff to do

    The folks behind PEPS (Program for Early Parent Support) have just announced Little PEPperS, starting this spring in West Seattle, for parents with babies and toddlers (through 3 years old). Ahead, the full announcement, including how to sign up:

    Are you ready to come and play? Are you ready to meet other parents with infants and toddlers (0-3 years)? Come and wiggle, squiggle and giggle! Join us at our West Seattle location where over the year, there will be 4 sessions to choose from. Each session is 11 weeks long.

    A professional group leader oversees fun and informative morning activities for parents and their children. Special emphasis is on parent support, parenting 1, 2, or more children, pertinent discussion topics, singing, play and interactive activities. Come and bring one or more children. Still pregnant with #2 or 3? We welcome you!

    Location and Times

    Youngstown Cultural Arts Center

    4408 Delridge Way SW

    Tuesday mornings, 10 am to 11:30

    Reserve a Spot for Upcoming Session

    April 8 to June 17

    Cost

    $75 for the 11-week session. Scholarships are available.

    To Register

    Go to http://www.pepsgroup.org

    Questions? 206-547-8570, X21 (Mary)

    Mater Luna Postpartum Doula Service L.L.C.

    Jody Crowe

    Certified Postpartum Doula

    Embracing the tradition of postpartum care.

    #616849
    JenV
    Member

    and JoB- I vote for hosting it at Beverage Place Pub -maybe on a Sunday afternoon when it is kinda quiet. They are so accomodating there. My only restriction is I am out of town Easter weekend. This sounds like a lot of fun!

    #615522

    In reply to: Go Hillary

    JoB
    Participant

    village green…again.. where do i start?

    “Clinton/Bush dynasty”… what dynasty?

    have you not noticed that they don’t happen to be members of the same party and the legislative goals of the two were somewhat opposed… We had 4 years of Bush the father.. got smart… had 8 years of Bill Clinton… hampered by a republican congress… and then 8 years of Bush the son.

    There is no dynasty there (at least not in the Bushes themselves) in spite of all the hype. In fact, Bush the son has followed policies that have to make his dad cringe.. since they are policies he wisely decided not to follow.

    the Political advisors who were in both Bush White Houses.. now that’s a different story…

    And any Democratic nominee will share democratic advisors from the Clinton White House… those are “party” jobs…

    You speak of a family dynasty.. but the real dynasty is that of the political parties and the staff they pass on to each president.

    as for wanting to bring the 90s back… i don’t think so. Hillary isn’t advocating the 90s. She is advocating taking steps to return to both decency and prosperity.

    the idea that a new (even inspiring) face is what it will take to create change is bull. Inspiration is only the first step towards change… then you need an intimate knowledge of the system.

    the future is always built on the past and a good understanding of what brought you where you are gives you a much better understanding of what might have to be changed to get someplace else.

    “hillary spent the last 4 years of her time propagating the notion of a “vast right wing conspiracy” based on republican lies and smears”

    so.. you believe all of that was something she manufactured? That’s one take on things i guess… but i thought that was a Republican notion…

    Having paid attention to politics during that time.. i would say she/they were the target and she didn’t have to manufacture anything. Blaming her for that is like blaming the poor pedestrian who happened to be in the crosswalk when the drunk hit her…

    “now that the campaign has gone negative” …

    is this the first political campaign you have actually paid attention to? I don’t ask to put you down.. but so far this is the least negative campaign (even primaries) i have ever witnessed in 40+ years of paying attention to them.

    One of the benefits of a primary is that the “dirt” is exposed on all candidates before they match up with the other party’s candidate… that hasn’t happened in this campaign. And that’s really not a good thing. While it might make everyone feel better about the process it makes the democratic position ultimately weaker.

    One of the benefits of Hillary is that she has spent the last 20+ years of her life under the most intense scrutiny i have ever seen of any public figure. There is unlikely to be anything more to uncover. It will all be an old story.. rehashed once again.. but made less potent in the light of the current administration’s antics.

    Whereas.. no one has looked very closely at Obama’s legislative dealings and we know he came from one of the most corrupt political systems in the country… Chicago. Do you honestly believe that his record is so clean that there is nothing for the republicans to uncover? One of his old campaign managers (i think… i hope that’s all he was) is under indictment right now for some pretty underhanded dealings.

    I don’t think we have done Obama any favors by not getting anything he may have lurking out into the light… and allowing him the chance to deal with it in a less negative environment than the one he might face in the fall.

    Primaries have a dual purpose.. and that is to see who can gain public favor (and both candidates have) and to see who can stand up to the scrutiny of a campaign.

    If there is no scrutiny (what you would call dirty campaigning), how will we know? Because that isn’t the way it will be in the general election.

    “all this leads me to believe that Hillary will resort to any means necessary to reach her goals”

    does this meant that you think she will run an actual campaign and try to defeat her opponent? yup.. i think she will.

    “she “deserves” to be president; it’s her ‘right’ is how she comes across.

    Interesting.. now you accuse her of feeling entitled to be president.

    And you don’t think Obama does?

    She did earn the right to run by working tirelessly for her party for 40+ years. She built a political organization.. she solicited donations.. and she has been working herself ragged during her campaign. Quite frankly.. she looks like she needs more than a nap lately.

    Where does any of that become entitlement?

    “sounds earily similar to the way George W Bush thinks”

    That’s the second time you have equated Hillary Clinton and George Bush. Not good. Not good for your party.

    You are a democrat! Stop repeating Republican talking points and concentrate on what works about your candidate.

    Your sole argument is that you are ready for someone a little more inspiring.

    You can simply say.. Hillary does not inspire me…

    I get that.

    if you truly beleive what you said….

    “I think she’d be a fine nomination and president”

    and you believe Obama would make a better president.. then say that.

    But this divisiveness needs to stop “for the good of the party”.

    When the dust settles… it’s going to be up to the losing side to help elect the party’s nominee.

    Will you be there if it isn’t your candidate… or will you have convinced yourself she doesn’t deserve to win and hand the presidency to the republicans?

    We’ve done it before.. we can certainly do it again.

    worth thinking about.

    #586513
    ViaAlki
    Member

    What do you do with too much time on your hands? You do a content analysis of WSB Forum and imagine a composite individual who embodies all the worst qualities a West Seattleite could imagine. If I was handing out awards, it would go to … the “name-calling condo developer who bulldozes old growth trees and whose unleashed pit bull has a taste for baby coyotes in Lincoln Park.” Your nominee?

    #615521

    In reply to: Go Hillary

    villagegreen
    Member

    I don’t think most Obama supporters want to ‘destroy her’ – I think she’d be a fine nomination and president – I just think Obama is a better candidate. I’m tired of the Clinton/Bush dynasty and I’m ready for a fresh start. I really don’t want to relive the 90’s and am not delusional in thinking that Hillary will be able to bring back the economic prosperity that Bill enjoyed. I know you probably haven’t fallen for the ‘bring back the good days’ thinking, but a large portion of Americans have. The 90’s are gone and it’s time to look to the future.

    I have ‘stopped and considered’ (as you requested) why some people want to ‘destory’ Hillary. I think a lot of Obama supporters are offended by the utter hypocrasy of her campaign tactics over the past 3 or 4 weeks. Please understand, it has absolutely nothing to do with her being a woman. A woman president would be fanastic, and long overdue. And it has nothing to do with how much worse the smear campaign will become once someone is nominated and has to go up against John McCain.

    She spent the last 4 years of her time with Bill in office propogating the notion of a ‘vast right wing conspiracy’ based on Republican lies and smears. Then she turns around a rips a page right out of the Republicans playbook by playing to people’s fears. She’s turned her campaign around not by talking about the issues, but by resorting to fearmongering and smear tactics. We expect this from Republicans, but it’s her utter hypocrisy that makes it so egregious in this case.

    And I also don’t think it’s good for the Democratic party. Now that the campaign has gone negative, both Hillary and Barack will be so beaten and bloodied by the time that one of them is nominated that neither will be in good shape to take on McCain. Why do the Republicans’ job for them? All this leads me to believe that Hillary will resort to any means necessary to reach her goals. She ‘deserves’ to be president; it’s her ‘right’ is how she comes across. And she’ll do anything to make it happen. Sounds earily similar to the way George W. Bush thinks (if you can call it thinking). I’m tired of that type of thinking and am ready for someone a little more inspiring.

    #616812
    Bernicki
    Member

    I resisted getting a minivan for a long time, opting for Subaru wagons instead. Finally, though, our trusty Subaru quit running, and since we have kids, the minivan made sense. We bought a used one a year and a half ago.

    I like the fact that I’m not hitting my head on the top of the car every time I reach in to buckle car seats. I like the cargo room in the back: we do lots of volunteering and gardening, and tables, boxes of food, bags of compost, etc. fit nicely. I like not having to squeeze five people and assorted car seats into a smaller car.

    But on the other hand…I’m a minivan driver. I used to be a young, hip urbanite, and now I drive a minivan. And it’s the only choice I have right now, because it’s the only vehicle we own. If I need to drive, I have to get into the…well…you know.

    Mini.

    Van.

    Oh, my aching self-image.

    #615519

    In reply to: Go Hillary

    JoB
    Participant

    if there was no hillary..

    i would probably be as excited about Obama as those who post here.

    He is charismatic.. he inspires hope… what’s not to like?

    but there is hillary.. and while he inspires hope… i feel she can deliver hope… to those who need it most.

    It’s not often i am willing to attach my heart so firmly to a dream… but there it is.

    I am as passionate about the real change i think a woman who has learned to work the system… and reach across party lines to build consensus on issues that truly matter… this woman… can actually bring to the world… as those who support Obama are about him.

    I am passionate about what she has shown me she is capable of doing.. not what she promises to do.

    It’s not Saint Hillary… I don’t idealize the woman.. but i truly respect her. It has not been easy to get where she is. No other woman has ever managed to do so in the entire history of our nation. and if she fails, it will be a long time before another does.

    I know how quick many of you are to instantly villianize her… and that truly saddens me. I am appalled at the total lack of respect women (of any generation) are willing to show a woman who has worked so hard to get where she is.

    It is not ok to call her names that you wouldn’t want applied to yourself or your mothers just because she has been made the target of one of the vilest hate campaigns ever.

    If Hillary can be treated that way by the national press… and an entire nation can be taught that it is ok to continually scrutinize and look for any excuse to dismiss her.. then so can we.

    Yes, i know this is politics. But if those of you who are so continually offended at any offense to Obama actually turned the same critical eye to what you think is ok when applied to Hillary.. i think you would be appalled.

    Ask yourself what she did to “earn” such abuse… and all you will be able to come up with are characterizations fed to you by the evening news… she’s shrill… she’s a ballbuster… he husband cheated on her and she backed him up… she wouldn’t listen to her “betters” in congress who wanted to kill the health bill she brokered… she dared to broker anything….

    the truth is.. she stepped above herself. She took on more as a first lady than people were comfortable with. (she didnt’ stick to decorating and good works.. and when she turned to them she was lampooned for her efforts) and then she forgave the “rotten bastard” that half the country wasn’t able to forgive.

    She is one of those women who broke through barriers and made it possible for all women to do the things they take for granted today. And some of those same women find it impossible to give her credit for even that.

    If Hillary was male and had never been married to bill.. she would be the candidate that broke through barriers.. who idealistically stuck to her goals of bettering life for ordinary Americans.. who survived and surmounted public scandal. someone who would inspire hope.

    I don’t expect to change your minds. you are as driven by your dream as i am by mine.. but I do expect you to stop and consider why you think you can only defend your dream by destroying her.

    And to ask yourself if that is really in your best interests.

    #616810
    hlywdsm
    Member

    My question to you all of you owners is this…Do minivans go the speed limit? Because, every time I see one on the road I have to make an effort to not be in the same lane as the Minivan, because 99% of the time the thing is moving along about 3-8 mph under the speed limit. Just wanted to know if they build that feature into the vehicle, or is it just the minivan driver’s preference to control the speed limit of all the other drivers on the road?

    #616558
    Sue
    Participant

    Last year I was trying to get a crosswalk or streetlight at my intersection and had simply emailed the general email on the page that was linked to above. Someone got back to me, and then I had a “real live human” email address to write to about it. If you can get a few neighbors to also contact them about the same intersection you have in mind, it might have more impact. A few of us had been contacting them about the intersection at Fauntleroy & Dawson, and we recently got word that it’s on the schedule for a light in 2008, which was great news. It took a long time of investigating (they needed to look at history of the intersection, and then send crew out at a typical busy time to see what’s going on) and all other sorts of bureacratic stuff though. Can’t guarantee your outcome, but the more people contacting them about the same thing can’t hurt.

    #616708

    In reply to: Happy bday janS

    JanS
    Participant

    well, thanks , everyone. I requested a few days of sunshine for my BD, so there will be one more…get out and soak up that Vit. D :)

    #616643

    In reply to: TheHouse Revealed

    charlabob
    Participant

    Quote of the Day

    “In fact, the only people more smug and self-satisfied than Mac users are Mac users who support Barack Obama.”

    — Peter Sagal, Wait, Wait, Don’t Tell Me on NPR Saturday afternoon.

    lol, hehehehe, :-)

    #616666

    In reply to: Super-Delegates

    JoB
    Participant

    charlabob….

    i went shopping.. bought veggies and sausage to put in a mexican inspired hominy soup for supper. think i will make cornbread too. I am still simmering:(

    there are some times i hate to be reminded of.. and we have had them both the last two days… vietnam and the horror that was and now ken starr and slimegate… both make me physically ill to think about.

    Neither will be on most under 30’s radar… and not on the radar of some of them over 30… it is impossible to read about them and understand them viscerally.

    just as it is impossible for today’s young women to understand what an insult Obama’s dismissive behavior is of Hillary right now… having never really experienced being marginalized that way…

    I am trying to be gracious… i know you really do have to live this long to acquire the memories we have… but part of me would like to just shake people silly.

    Making cornbread will generate more dishes…

    #616786

    In reply to: Happy Hour?

    barmargia
    Member

    West5 is good, I went to shadowland over the weekend and their menu for happy hour looks good. It’s not in West Seattle, but the melting pot up on Queen Anne has an awesome happy hour.

    #616663

    In reply to: Super-Delegates

    charlabob
    Participant

    JoB — I have more dishes and a litter box if you need more relief.

    I’m kind of horrified at the posting of that list at this point and the notion that it’s funny — first time I believed in the political generation gap.

    I have two things to say:

    since many of those people were victims of the relentless republican vendetta against everyone associated with Clinton, I, personally, would prefer to hold Ken Starr and his henchpeople responsible for their deaths. These people were killed by Ken Starr and the Republican Slime Machine.

    Why did they leave off the allegation that the Clintons are intimately involved with the Columbian Drug cartel. First time I’ve seen that missing on this very same document.

    NR, I’m sure no one on the Republican side will mind your reposting it — I’m a bit surprised that you want to, without at least some research.

    Meantime, I’ll be looking into the history of the Bush family, starting with Prescott. I hope we all find it equally amusing.

    the charla half who may rapidly be losing her sense of humor

    #615514

    In reply to: Go Hillary

    JoB
    Participant

    ok.. i followed this one too… and it appears to me what the daily KOS did was more substantial than any distortion i saw in that ad.

    and correct me if i am wrong.. but i have seen video of me which does not correctly reflect my skin color or size.. in fact, i can tell you for certain that the video i gave the link to on another thread didn’t accurately reflect either my skin color or that of the correspondent that day.. there was too much natural light in the mall for the lighting they used… and the camera angle distorted my size..

    and somehow though i am quite sure editing was used to make me look as frail as possible.. i don’t believe they bothered trying to make me appear fat or washed out.

    You will obviously see what you are looking for…

    but please tell me why you are spending so much time looking for some reason to vilify Hillary?

    I have only to read the news to find the latest scandal which will eventually attach itself to Obama.. and should since his assessment of the people he surrounds himself with are a direct reflection on how he might perform in his job.

    I haven’t seen that in a Clinton commercial…

    but don’t think that it will escape McCain.

    Saint Hillary? give me a break.

    #615512

    In reply to: Go Hillary

    JoB
    Participant

    beachdrivegirl… a net gain of 4 still keeps her in the race…

    If America’s democrats were so overwhelmingly behind Obama she would be finished.

    Kayleigh.. where do i start? It couldn’t be that her add highlighted that a person of experience might be who you want when the s… hits the fan?

    This race isn’t all about Obama and what makes him look good or bad… although i get that it is for you.

    It is not her job to make him look good… she is not in the race to be an end game set up for Obama. This is a campaign.. not a personality contest. She is not his running mate… they are fighting it out for the chance to become president.

    This is politics.. pure and simple. Obama and his campaign have been indulging in the same tactics. His letter with a truly biased viewpoint on her stand on NAFTA is just one example. They are both ruthless. they are politicians.

    And if that ad plants suspicion in anyone’s mind that they might not want him on the other end of the line when trouble hits… then maybe his candidacy isn’t such a great idea after all.

    Hasn’t it occurred to you yet that this subject is going to come up again if and when Obama meets McCain.. and it is not likely to be so tastefully done.

    If you are offended now.. you are going to be righteously livid when McCain’s campaign gets through with him… they won’t be pulling any punches and his lack of experience won’t be the only thing they use. they will find a way to use his color and his parental background against him.

    I don’t know what you think the democratic party is Kayleigh, but that add didn’t betray the one i have belonged to for the last 35 years…

    it is clear that it offended you.. and it may have offended others as well… but it didn’t betray any principle i hold. And i am quite clear about my principles.

    We live in very frightening times Kayleigh. The presidency isn’t just about presenting a “uniting” figure to the world.. or “signaling change”… (though i am not sure at all how a black man is more change for this country than a woman)… it is also about that middle of the night call.

    America needs to be thinking about who is going to take it and what they will do next.

    And as a candidate, it is actually Hillary’s job to point that out.

    You keep thinking that there is some high road in politics… and that America would be better off if candidates would just follow it…but i have seen good candidates fall right off the end of that road more than once…

    Toughen up if you want your candidate in the white house.

    #616493
    Jerald
    Participant

    I don’t know this stuff either, so have a probably dumb question or two. We have several networked computers, plus kids (our own and visitors) who use wifi in our house. Does the IP address vary depending on which computer I’m on? Is it attached to me personally or does everyone in our house have the same?

    #616657

    In reply to: Super-Delegates

    beachdrivegirl
    Participant

    This does not have to do with the superdelegates…but found to funny (really not trying to bash Clinton…but is humerous) and had to post it somewhere…

    a quick refresher course lest we forget what has happened to many ‘friends’ of the Clintons .

    1-James McDougal – Clinton’s convicted Whitewater partner died of an apparent heart attack, while in solitary confinement. He was a key witness in Ken Starr’s investigation.

    2 -Mary Mahoney – A former White House intern was murdered July 1997 at a Starbucks Coffee Shop in Georgetown. The murder happened just after she was to go public with her story of sexual harassment in the White House .

    3 – Vince Foster – Former White House councilor, and colleague of Hillary Clinton at Little Rock’s Rose Law firm. Died of a gunshot wound to the head, ruled a suicide.

    4 – Ron Brown – Secretary of Commerce and former DNC Chairman. Reported to have died by impact in a plane crash. A pathologist close to the investigation reported that there was a hole in the top of Brown’s skull resembling a gunshot wound. At the time of his death Brown was being investigated, and spoke publicly of his willingness to cut a deal with prosecutors. The rest of the people on the plane also died. A few days later the air Traffic controller commited suicide.

    5 – C. Victor Raiser II- Raiser, a major player in the Clinton fund raising organization died in a private plane crash in July 1992.

    6 -Paul Tulley – Democratic National Committee Political Director found dead in a hotel room in Little Rock , September 1992. Described by Clinton as a ‘Dear friend and trusted advisor’.

    7 -Ed Willey – Clinton fund raiser, found dead November 1993 deep in the woods in VA of a gunshot wound to the head. Ruled a suicide. Ed Willey died on the same day his wife Kathleen Willey claimed Bill Clinton groped her in the oval office in the White House . Ed Willey was involved in several Clinton fund raising events.

    8 -Jerry Parks -Head of Clinton’s gubernatorial security team in Little Rock . Gunned down in his car at a deserted intersection outside Little Rock. Park’s son said his father was building a dossier on Clinton. He allegedly threatened to reveal this information. After he died the files were mysteriously removed from his house.

    9 -James Bunch – Died from a gunshot suicide. It was reported that he had a ‘Black Book’ of people which contained names of influential people who

    11 -Kathy Ferguson- Ex-wife of Arkansas Trooper Danny Ferguson, was found dead in May 1994, in her living room with a gunshot to her head. It was ruled a suicide even though there were several packed suitcases, as if she were going somewhere. Danny Ferguson was a co-defendant along with Bill Clinton in the Paula Jones lawsuit. Kathy Ferguson was a possible corroborating witness for Paula Jones.

    12 -Bill Shelton – Arkansas State Trooper and fiancee of Kathy Ferguson. Critical of the suicide ruling of his fiancee, he was found dead in June, 1994 of a gunshot wound also ruled a suicide at the grave site of his fiancee.

    13 -Gandy Baugh – Attorney for Clinton’s friend Dan Lassater, died by jumping out a window of a tall building January, 1994. His client was a convicted drug distributor.

    14 -Florence Martin – Accountant & sub-contractor for the CIA, was related to the Barry Seal Mena , Arkansas Airport drug smuggling case. He died of three gunshot wounds.

    15 – Suzanne Coleman – Reportedly had an affair with Clinton when he was Arkansas Attorney General. Died of a gunshot wound to the back of the head, ruled a suicide. Was pregnant at the time of her death.

    16 -Paula Grober – Clinton’s speech interpreter for the deaf from 1978 until her death December 9, 1992. She died in a one car accident.

    17 -Danny Casolaro – Investigative reporter. Investigating Mena Airport and Arkansas Development Finance Authority. He slit his wrists, apparently, in the middle of his investigation.

    18 – Paul Wilcher – Attorney investigating corruption at Mena Airport with Casolaro and the 1980 ‘October Surprise’ was found dead on a toilet June 22, 1993 in his Washington DC apartment. Had delivered a report to Janet Reno 3 weeks before his death.

    19 -Jon Parnell Walker – Whitewater investigator for Resolution Trust Corp. Jumped to his death from his Arlington , Virginia apartment balcony August15, 1993. He was investigating the Morgan Guaranty scandal.

    20 -Barbara Wise – Commerce Department staffer. Worked closely with Ron Brown and John Huang. Cause of death unknown. Died November 29, 1996. Her bruised, nude body was found locked in her office at the Department of Commerce.

    21 -Charles Meissner -Assistant Secretary of Commerce who gave John Huang special security clearance, died shortly thereafter in a small plane crash.

    22 -Dr. Stanley Heard – Chairman of the National Chiropractic Health Care Advisory Committee died with his attorney Steve Dickson in a small plane crash. Dr. Heard, in addition to serving on Clinton’s advisory council personally treated Clinton’s mother, stepfather and brother.

    23 -Barry Seal -Drug running TWA pilot out of Mena Arkansas , death was no accident.

    24 -Johnny Lawhorn Jr. – Mechanic, found a check made out to Bill Clinton in the trunk of a car left at his repair shop. He was found dead after his car had hit a utility pole.

    25 -Stanley Huggins – Investigated Madison Guaranty. His death was a purported suicide and his report was never released.

    26 – Hershell Friday – Attorney and Clinton fund raiser died March 1, 1994 when his plane exploded.

    27 -Kevin Ives & Don Henry – Known as ‘The boys on the track’ case. Reports say the boys may have stumbled upon the Mena Arkansas airport drug operation. A controversial case, the initial report of death said, due to falling asleep on railroad tracks. Later reports claim the 2 boys had been slain before being placed on the tracks. Many linked to the case died before their testimony could come before a Grand Jury.

    THE FOLLOWING PERSONS HAD INFORMATION ON THE IVES/HENRY CASE:

    28 -Keith Coney – Died when his motorcycle slammed into the back of a truck, 7/88.

    29 -Keith McMaskle – Died stabbed 113 times, Nov, 1988

    30 -Gregory Collins – Died from a gunshot wound January 1989.

    31 -Jeff Rhodes – He was shot, mutilated and found burned in a trash dump in April 1989.

    33 -James Milan – Found decapitated. However, the Coroner ruled his death was due to ‘natural causes’.

    34 -Jordan Kettleson – Was found shot to death in the front seat of his pickup truck in June 1990.

    35 -Richard Winters – A suspect in the Ives / Henry deaths. He was killed in a set-up robbery July 1989.

    THE FOLLOWING CLINTON BODYGUARDS ARE DEAD:

    36 -Major William S. Barkley Jr.

    37 -Captain Scott J . Reynolds

    38 -Sgt. Brian Hanley

    39 -Sgt. Tim Sabel

    40 -Major General William Robertson

    41 -Col. William Densberger

    42 -Col. Robert Kelly

    43 -Spec. Gary Rhodes

    44 -Steve Willis

    45 -Robert Williams

    46 -Conway LeBleu

    47 -Todd McKeehan

    Quite an impressive list! Pass this on. Let the public become aware of what happens to

    #616656

    In reply to: Super-Delegates

    beachdrivegirl
    Participant

    It’s interesting to see, despite what SNL might say, just how much they media has allowed her and her campaign to shape the context of the argument. The story the entire time he was winning 11 states in a row, was that she had such a huge lead in Texas and Ohio that she would be able to even out any potential gains from the primaries leading up to it. Well, he won 11 states in a row and the closest margin of the 11 was 58-42, and he netted over 130 pledged delagates in doing that, and took a decent sized lead. Her “firewall” as her campaign called it was last night, and as her campaign was quoted saying in Febraury- they expected to be even in pledge delegates after Texas and Ohio. Well, last night was her big “triumph” and she netted 4 delegates, and still trails by over 130 pledged delegates. To make that up, she had have to do what she did last night 33 more times, just to tie. That was 4 states- there are only 12 left, to win in pledged delegates she would have to win 70-30 in all 12 remaining states. That’s how big his lead is. She clearly failed miserably at her campaigns own stated objectives, and is now hopelessly behind in pledged delegates without enough states to make it up. But her “moral” victory last night is the only story covered and I heard a number of “experts” say the race is “essentially tied” now! The media has it out for Clinton? Not sure I buy it…

    #615511

    In reply to: Go Hillary

    beachdrivegirl
    Participant

    Just a bit more… It’s interesting to see, despite what SNL might say, just how much they media has allowed her and her campaign to shape the context of the argument. The story the entire time he was winning 11 states in a row, was that she had such a huge lead in Texas and Ohio that she would be able to even out any potential gains from the primaries leading up to it. Well, he won 11 states in a row and the closest margin of the 11 was 58-42, and he netted over 130 pledged delagates in doing that, and took a decent sized lead. Her “firewall” as her campaign called it was last night, and as her campaign was quoted saying in Febraury- they expected to be even in pledge delegates after Texas and Ohio. Well, last night was her big “triumph” and she netted 4 delegates, and still trails by over 130 pledged delegates. To make that up, she had have to do what she did last night 33 more times, just to tie. That was 4 states- there are only 12 left, to win in pledged delegates she would have to win 70-30 in all 12 remaining states. That’s how big his lead is. She clearly failed miserably at her campaigns own stated objectives, and is now hopelessly behind in pledged delegates without enough states to make it up. But her “moral” victory last night is the only story covered and I heard a number of “experts” say the race is “essentially tied” now! The media has it out for Clinton? Not sure I buy it…

    #615510

    In reply to: Go Hillary

    beachdrivegirl
    Participant

    Sorry but the wins yesterday really werent quite as big as some had though. Out of 370 delegates it is now beign projected that Hillary gained 187 with Barack gainign 183. That is only a net gain of 4 delegates.

Viewing 25 results - 51,351 through 51,375 (of 52,034 total)