May 1, 2008 at 7:40 pm
#617930
walfredo
Member
JoB-
Here are three of the arguments you made today:
#1- Mark Penn is an objective voice on who the best candidate from the democratic party should be. (is hill’s dad supporting her too?)
#2- That Obama in fact, is the candidate that is divisive, because he refuses to drop out of the race despite having a virtual lock on the nomination if he stays in.
#3- That, as the Clinton campaign argues, not only are only is it only the states that support her that count, but now also only the actual demographic group of people count. Latte sipping, black, elitist, losers votes are not worth a damn, nor are the states that support Obama.
Just wanted to point that out…