VIDEO: Seattle Mayor-elect Katie Wilson promises ‘to be a mayor for everyone’

(WSB photo by Torin Record-Sand, substituted for originally published phone photo)

2:31 PM: We are at the Labor Temple in Georgetown, where Mayor-elect Katie Wilson has just delivered her victory speech and answered a few media questions. No audience, just reporters and photographers.

She promised to be “a mayor for everyone,” including those who did not support her. She had warm words for outgoing Mayor Bruce Harrell despite the “bruising campaign” against her. How she won, she said, was the result of thousands of volunteers: “No one saw us coming!” We video-recorded the entire speech and will add it when back at HQ. (Added: Here it is:)

4:09 PM: While she offered words of gratitude and reflection, she did not offer specifics about her transition plan, saying those would be forthcoming next week. In Q&A, she was asked about how she plans to deal with the city’s budget deficit, whether she would propose new taxes, and she did say she would have city staff study the “progressive revenue” proposals that were “in (her) platform.” … She opened the speech by reiterating her campaign slogan, “This is YOUR city,” and saying she was “beyond delighted” to be speaking to Seattleites as their mayor-elect. She called Seattle “a spectacular city” and said she would lead it as the “community organizer” she’s long been.

She said what she wants to accomplish/facilitate as mayor includes “everyone in this great city of ours to have a roof over their head, universal child care, free K-8 summer care … world-class mass transit … great, safe public spaces where kids can run around with abandon … stable, affordable housing for renters … social housing … much more land and wealth to be stewarded by communities instead of corporations … a robust economy with thriving small businesses, great living-wage jobs and rights for workers … a city where everyone has the basics of a dignified life, including healthy food, access to health care … a city where your health or your life expectancy or your children’s future doesn’t depend on your zip code or your race … I believe that I will be stepping into office with a strong mandate to pursue this vision.”

P.S. A few more ballots were counted today – current results:

SEATTLE MAYOR
Katie Wilson – 138,673 – 50.20%
Bruce Harrell* – 136,655 – 49.47%

57 Replies to "VIDEO: Seattle Mayor-elect Katie Wilson promises 'to be a mayor for everyone'"

  • DC November 13, 2025 (4:32 pm)

    Congratulations Katie Wilson! I’m rooting for you and more importantly, I’m rooting for Seattle! 

  • Robert m November 13, 2025 (4:52 pm)

    Being mayor here is bit like being the California governor.  Everyone hates you no matter what you do.  I wish her the best and do appreciate most of the things she wants to do. But it’s a heck of an uphill battle on a low budget.  

    • aa November 14, 2025 (11:27 am)

      Speak for yourself Robert M, I don’t hate either of them.  

  • onion November 13, 2025 (5:46 pm)

    Wilson was a community organizer pushing to have her priorities adopted by the powers that be. Soon she will be the powers that be and every progressive interest group will be expecting her to be fully on board with their priorities and proposed solutions. Will she have the character to say no to those expecting her to be an easy yes, even when their asks are beyond the city’s financial capabilities? I’d be watching with a bowl of popcorn if I weren’t a taxpayer (and progressive) who sees an excessive amount of tax dollars squandered due to good intentions and poor execution.

  • Lucy November 13, 2025 (6:24 pm)

    I am a conservative in Seattle.  I believe in smaller government and accountability.  I believe everyone should do their best.  I believe people in need should get assistance, but that should never be long term.  I believe I should be able to defend myself, my loved ones and my property with force, if attacked or threatened.  I believe in safe streets, clean air and water and excellent schools.  I also believe in the rule of law.  Not just the laws I agree with.  

    Will Katie also represent me?

    • T Rex November 13, 2025 (6:52 pm)

      Great statements and a great question Lucy, I’m  a conservative as well. I don’t think this woman could ever answer these questions. Honestly, I don’t think Katie even knows who she represents. She just needs a hobby. Time will tell, stay strong my friend. 

      • SunriseHeights November 13, 2025 (7:46 pm)

        “This woman”…”needs a hobby”? Come on. Do better. 

      • helpermonkey November 14, 2025 (8:35 am)

        Your misogyny is pretty disgusting, my friend. 

      • Jake November 14, 2025 (10:29 am)

        Sexism in this and other threads need to stop, it’s 2025

    • Yes November 13, 2025 (6:58 pm)

      @Lucy: a lot of the promises require the streets to be safe. This requires enforcing laws. 

    • Hopeful November 13, 2025 (8:02 pm)

      @Lucy – I am also all of those things and worried she won’t support what is important to me and my tax dollars. I will remain hopeful. I will look ahead to the future for inspiration and look to the past for wisdom. I will raise my half full glass to a better future for my family, my community and those in Seattle. I will seek to serve alongside someone I may not agree with in hopes that we see true progress, not flawed, biased agendas.

    • Nolan November 13, 2025 (9:02 pm)

      Are you a conservative, or do you believe that the role of government is to guarantee clear air and water and good education?

      • Brandon November 13, 2025 (10:24 pm)

        Well, most of those things can be achieved without a large government body. I.e. charter schools instead of the public school system. But the bare minimum responsibilities of gov include establishing laws, maintaining order and security, and promoting the general welfare of citizens. Pretty much all what Lucy said. So clean air and water are kinda basic and simple, we needn’t go crazy and get carried away.

        • Nolan November 14, 2025 (10:23 am)

          Charter schools are empirically not good education.

          • Brandon November 14, 2025 (12:24 pm)

            And Yet. But hey, if youre right, you can replace the teachers much easier than in the public school system. Whether you agree with them or not, charter school have a clear incentive to NOT fail, whereas public schools ARE failing.

          • Ivan Weiss November 15, 2025 (8:09 am)

            “Charter schools have an incentive not to fail?” They fail anyway, Brandon, and the cold, hard numbers bear it out. Your argument is ridiculous on its face.

            https://www.k12dive.com/news/1-in-4-charters-close-fail-five-years/729992/

        • K November 14, 2025 (2:10 pm)

          Maintaining law and order is not, historically, the role of the government.  The United States did not even have its first organized police force until over 60 years after its founding.  The military’s role is supposed to be protecting national sovereignty, not policing citizens. 

      • Pete November 15, 2025 (12:58 am)

        Imagine thinking that conservatives want clean air and water. That gave me a chuckle. 

    • Keenan November 14, 2025 (7:17 am)

      Is this the right-wing version of one of those “In this house we believe” lawn signs I see all over the place?

      Listen Lucy.  I feel the same way as you about the Federal government (all three branches!)  My views are not being represented at all currently.  That’s why I moved to Seattle 15 years ago.  It’s one of the most left-leaning places in the country, and it STILL took 15 years of a revolving door of centrist chumps in the mayors office before we finally, FINALLY elected someone who approximates my own political beliefs.

      Can you PLEASE let  the majority of the people of Seattle have a chance without throwing a tantrum?  Almost everywhere else in Washington state and the entire United States have governments that align closer to your own laundry list of beliefs.  Maybe you’d be more comfortable elsewhere?

      • lucy November 14, 2025 (3:15 pm)

        Keenan,  You’re the newcomer here.  My family has been in West Seattle for over 100 years.  I’m not leaving.

        • SoLongDelridge November 14, 2025 (11:58 pm)

          Yeah, people who haven’t had ties to Seattle for multiple generations shouldn’t be allowed to vote!

    • Daniel November 14, 2025 (7:51 am)

      So on by one… “I believe in smaller government” – probably no, “accountability” – unclear exactly what you mean, but maybe?, “I believe everyone should do their best” – sure,  “I believe people in need should get assistance, but that should never be long term” – pretty much yea because there isn’t budget for long term support anyway, “I believe I should be able to defend myself, my loved ones and my property with force, if attacked or threatened” – yes insofar as Seattle mayor or city council don’t have the jurisdiction to go around state level laws on this matter, “I believe in safe streets, clean air and water and excellent schools” – yes, “I also believe in the rule of law. Not just the laws I agree with.” – depending on the crime you’re talking about, again this is out of jurisdiction for the mayor and in the hands of king county prosecution.  But at any rate it doesn’t sound like there’s a plan to gut SPD or anything.

    • Arbutus Enthusiast November 14, 2025 (8:57 am)

       I also believe in the rule of law.  Not just the laws I agree with.” Great, it’s good to know you’ll cooperate with, and 100% support, any laws passed or enacted by the new progressive Seattle majority, even if you don’t agree with them! Sheesh.Have any of you “Seattle conservatives” considered Idaho or Wyoming? They don’t take care of people long-term, you can shoot your guns any time you want. I’m sure they’d welcome people fed up with caring for others with open arms. Consider it!

      • Daniel November 14, 2025 (11:38 am)

        Idaho and Washington have very similar laws r.e. shooting guns.  Both have state preemption of local laws, both are “stand your ground” and “castle doctrine” or whatever.  Idaho may have more wording about proportional force, but in practice Washington is similar there.  Washington now has stricter laws on which guns you can buy, but when it comes to using them, it’s very similar.

    • David Kerlick November 14, 2025 (9:18 am)

      I support the rule of law.What do you think about lawless ICE, abduction in unmarked vehicles,  and the persecution of  minorities? 

  • Oxymoron much? November 13, 2025 (6:25 pm)

    “My staff will be exploring progressive tax options…” Did I hear her correctly? You know, ’cause I’m a Boomer and my hearing is not so good anymore,,. But the combination of “tax” and “progressive” is just the same excuse for leadership the democrats have ever offered in this city, much less state. So, “no plan” is what I’m hearing. Loud and clear. 

    • WSB November 13, 2025 (6:39 pm)

      She also talked about reviewing city spending and ending programs that don’t make sense. (No specifics identified yet.)

    • Nolan November 13, 2025 (10:32 pm)

      What’s your best argument against the (implied) claim that progressive taxation has no plan behind it? I’d love to better understand how informed your position is.

    • Keenan November 14, 2025 (7:27 am)

      Hey there Oxy.  Or should I call you Mr. Moron?

      It seems the word “taxes” has triggered you so hard you decided to just imagine a scenario in your head so you could argue in bad faith.Let me explain it to you, at boomer speed.  Progressive taxes mean those with more wealth pay more.  This is in direct response to the ENORMOUS wealth inequality in this country that has been growing since the 1970s and still is accelerating faster every year.  We are currently at a level of wealth disparity greater than any other era in American history, including the Gilded Aged and 1920s.

      1 in 14 people in Seattle are millionaires.  Over 50,000 of them!  We have a dozen billionaires!  And several hundred-billionaires!  All while people are literally starving and dying on the street.  The majority of voters in Seattle are sick of it, and the we’ve spoken loud and clear: the wealthy WILL pay their fair share in Seattle moving forward, whether you like it or not!

      • wscommuter November 14, 2025 (2:38 pm)

        Ironic, you insulting “Oxy” with your “moron” usage.  I’m not a boomer, but don’t much care for age-prejudice anymore than I do for other kinds.  So I’ll make a leap and assume you’re a know-it-all Gen-something, and thus further assume you are in need of a juice box and a participation trophy.  Let’s start with truth, just for the heck of it.  Your “1 in 14 people in Seattle are millionaires” is the very kind of ignorant, feel-good silliness that feeds the far-left (I say this as a liberal-but-not-progressive Democrat).  I’m guessing your silly statistic is really “1 in 14 Seattleites own a house worth $1M or more.”  Which sounds impressive, I guess, except virtually every one of those folks also have a, you know, mortgage.  So their net worth is not measurable by house value.   And the vast majority of those folks,  who may be well-compensated, are far from what you imply about “millionaires” who can be taxed to solve the world’s problems.  You are correct – a razor-thin majority of those who bothered to vote elected Ms. Wilson, fair and square.  Time will tell if she can be an effective mayor or not.  But I’m also guessing the far-left is going to be pretty disappointed when they learn that their tax-the-rich fantasies don’t pan out.  And so when that happens, what next?    

        • Lauren November 15, 2025 (1:55 pm)

          Current population of Seattle is about 816,600. As of 2024 there were an estimated 54,200 millionaires ()source). So that’s 1 in 15. Simple math. 

          • Westy November 16, 2025 (7:19 am)

            Here is the link to the  methodology used to tabulate “Seattle millionaires”.  First, you will note that it’s not only Seattle, but includes Mercer island, Kirkland, Bellevue, etc — who knows how many millionaires are actually in Seattle. Second, it makes assumptions based on various inputs (housing prices, job titles on LinkedIn) that are far from true data on an individual’s liquid holdings (how would they get this anyway). This claim is bogus, as per usual when people grab on to these talking points without looking at the underlying data.  https://www.henleyglobal.com/publications/usa-wealth-report-2025/methodology

    • Jay November 14, 2025 (9:28 am)

      The people of Seattle just voted for a more progressive business tax structure. 

  • WestSide 4 life November 13, 2025 (6:34 pm)

    Full sweep for the progressives. God help us..

  • WSOwl November 13, 2025 (7:07 pm)

    Very happy with the election results!

  • jw November 13, 2025 (7:53 pm)

    Where is J.P. Patches, he was great Mayor of our fine city back in the day.  Hey, he even lived at the city dump (not free loading).  He always gave great advice to our young ones. He even had great group of Patches Pals.

    • K November 13, 2025 (9:14 pm)

      He hasn’t been on TV for 44 years. 

  • Bmc November 13, 2025 (8:05 pm)

    She won by 18 votes? wow……………….

    • WSB November 13, 2025 (8:07 pm)

      No, what it says above – a direct cut/paste from the King County Elections website – is that she leads by TWO-THOUSAND-AND-EIGHTEEN votes.

  • B November 13, 2025 (9:38 pm)

    I hope that Mayor-elect Wilson will take a hard look at the potentially large fraud problem at the King County DCHS, to ensure that Seattle’s new progressive administration does not repeat the  mistakes made there.   King county property taxes have increased significantly in recent years to help fund that department which supports many progressive interests.  It appears that the department is not terribly concerned with how they are spending our tax money, as there seems to be a  large amount of fraud and waste occurring.  Hard to tell for sure because they are also not completing adequate audits of their payments and contractors.

    https://www.king5.com/article/news/local/council-member-dchs-culture-silence-grant-misuse/281-c8753b15-206f-427c-a478-a2ec67b55bcb

    • Jake November 14, 2025 (1:01 pm)

      Shouldn’t you direct this to Girmay and not Katie?

      • B November 14, 2025 (9:07 pm)

        I think Girmay is well aware.  I’m concerned with Seattle.  I don’t want our city to throw money at problems and then not follow through as King County has done.   The problems at King County offer a good example of how to dishearten your constituents, which I would not like to see happen in our city.

    • Mellow Kitty November 15, 2025 (7:40 am)

      Am I reading this correctly? You want fraud investigations on the mayor elect’s policies? Explain to me how that works. She’s not even in office yet. How could she have possibly commiting fraud in office? 

  • Rob November 14, 2025 (7:09 am)

    Her real major test will come in June with FIFA world cup coming to Seattle.  How will she present the city? Next  will be the 30 million dollar law suit against the city from store owners in the international district. Wait an see.

  • Cat Lady Who Votes November 14, 2025 (4:14 pm)

    For those of you who are already all doom and gloom before Wilson has even been inaugurated (and before the election was called, for that matter), may I remind you of the existence of our City Council — the group of people making policies requiring way more of our attention and scrutiny than the mayor. The city will survive a Wilson administration. Even Bruce said so in his concession speech. Yet many of you will continue to complain in the comments as it is your prerogative to do. But as you are doing so, I would encourage those of you criticizing Wilson despite the multiple documented scandals peppering Harrell’s career to examine why you were so willing to overlook his issues and hold her to a different standard. I’m not talking about her perceived lack of experience; her experience is different than his, but she does have experience to offer that has been overlooked and underplayed in a field where inexperienced men consistently get a chance for whatever reason. We have already tried the establishment politicians as leaders in our city and they have proven they don’t have things any better figured out than anyone else, so why not give someone else with fresh ideas a try? And while we are at it, let’s examine how we speak about her while we do because some of y’all are letting your internalized misogyny show and it’s not a good look for a vibrant neighborhood in one of the most beautiful and diverse cities in America. Life is dynamic. Things are going to change. Cities are not an exception to this, so if something as minor as who our mayor is has you ready to reserve a U-haul, I hope you find the stagnation you crave wherever you go next and may you survive the local economic challenges of whatever place you land. If you’re going to stay here though (and despite our differences I hope you do), maybe try being part of the solution by helping contribute to the success of our city in whatever capacity you can, which requires getting off the internet every so often and going out into our community. Meanwhile, huzzah to progress and cheers to Seattle for being a beautiful place to build a life despite its flaws. 

    • K.S. November 15, 2025 (1:28 pm)

      Cat Lady Who Votes, thank you for the intelligent and beautifully articulated response to all the inappropriate, misogynistic comments here and all over media against Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson. Mayor Katie Wilson leads with the values, integrity and talent that bridge together all political groups in government to creatively implement solutions. My family heritage runs deep over 100’s of years on this land and she represents Seattle’s values. Welcome Mayor Katie Wilson! 

  • HighlandParkGuy11 November 14, 2025 (8:38 pm)

    It’s been a while since our city has made national news due to embarrassing and extreme policies/incidents. I think it’s time we kick things up a notch here 😼

  • Rachel November 15, 2025 (10:59 am)

    First of all, West Seattle Blog has the best local coverage!  Thank you!!   Not the person I voted for but here she is and I do wish her the most success for good of our city and everyone that lives here!

  • Shawn November 15, 2025 (11:43 am)

    I didn’t know she was a self identified socialist when I voted for her. I probably would have still held my nose and voted for her anyway because I’m so pissed off at Harrell, but ffs can we just get some houses and trains and parking enforcement without dragging national level political terms into local stuff? You can be pro-capitalism and prefer a lighter weight national government, and be an urbanist at the same time.  I expect DIFFERENT LEVELS OF SUPPORT from local, state, and federal government. I expect a lot from my city, thus an urbanist. It’s a weird place to be in because it seems like everyone wants to treat it as an Us or Them sports rivalry instead of the important business of governance.

  • Feeling hopeful November 15, 2025 (12:02 pm)

    I am really excited and hopeful!

  • N November 15, 2025 (5:29 pm)

    Grew up in West Seattle.  Great place.That said, My mind is simply Boggled that there is not a vote recount for this Mayor’s election.   The numbers are So Close.  Why not double check it? Just to be safe? No matter who wins, election integrity is important.  

    • Ivan Weiss November 15, 2025 (8:16 pm)

      Maybe you should read, uh, THE LAW. THE LAW says if the margin is greater than 2,000 votes (check) OR greater than one-half of 1 percent (check), then there is no recount. Got it?

    • Nolan November 15, 2025 (9:46 pm)

      A recount has never shifted the final result by more than a couple hundred votes. It’s a simple matter of probability that a recount won’t matter when one candidate is winning by thousands.

    • Actualperson November 16, 2025 (8:38 am)

      Update to Ivan’s comment. He is CORRECT, however, the Harrell campaign had the legal right to get a recount. He would have had to pay for it. Clearly, he and his campaign knew that there was no chance of enough changes for him to win so they were unwilling to pay to recount. 

  • Homeless need November 16, 2025 (11:43 am)

    Move On — Welcome to the New MayorSeattle is looking toward a new future, focusing on homelessness and street safety.

    We need more shelters for people experiencing homelessness—simple, effective options like the Second Chance Homeless Camp in White Center. Seattle has plenty of vacant land and a budget of about $191 million for the homeless. With that, the city could purchase many 10’×10′ cabins and place them on city-owned properties to provide safe, temporary housing.

Leave a Reply to Shawn Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.