VIDEO: ‘Build it all’ – Local leaders insist West Seattle, Ballard, and all Sound Transit 3 projects must be completed, despite newest cost projection

11:43 AM: We’re about to head back from Ballard, where Mayor Bruce Harrell led a lineup of local leaders in insisting that all of ST3 – including light-rail extensions to West Seattle and Ballard – must be built. The exhortation “Build it all” came from another speaker, regional labor leader Katie Garrow, but others said it in other ways; West Seattle was represented by County Councilmember Teresa Mosqueda, who declared, “Voters said yes in 2016; now our job is to deliver on that promise … if we fail [to complete all of ST3], we fail the entire region.” There was no hint of anything dramatic such as new taxes; there was some talk of what ST board member and King County Councilmember Claudia Balducci mentioned at last week’s ST board meeting (WSB coverage here), looking at whether the second downtown tunnel could be dropped, and the mayor noted that city councilmembers are about to take up legislation allocating dozens of city jobs to speeding up permitting and otherwise assisting with the project. (We asked if the city has estimated how much that might save ST; the mayor said no.) More details when we get back to HQ, including video of the event.

2:46 PM: Adding video as promised. First, above, Harrell’s opening remarks; below, the other two elected officials who spoke, City Councilmember Dan Strauss (whose district includes Ballard) and County Councilmember Teresa Mosqueda (whose district includes West Seattle):

As Harrell remarked afterward, Mosqueda “brought the fire” – she was the most fiery speaker at the event. The ST “spine” does not work without strong connections such as West Seattle and Ballard, she declared. Of note: Strauss is on the ST board; Mosqueda is not, though she told us afterward she has long wanted to be (no openings currently but that could change considering that two other County Councilmembers who are on the board are candidates for County Executive in the November election). Also of note, two elected officials stood behind Harrell but did not speak – Seattle City Council President Sara Nelson (who like Harrell faces a come-from-behind re-election fight in November) and County Councilmember Jorge Baron.

5:02 PM: Adding the final section of video – the two non-elected officials who spoke, Kirk Hovenkotter of the Transportation Choices Coalition and Katie Garrow of MLK Labor, plus media Q&A:

If you want to read the mayor’s-office version of what today was about, go here. As noted in that writeup, the proposals for city-staff resources will be presented at tomorrow morning’s meeting of the City Council’s Finance, Native Communities, and Tribal Governments Committee (9:30 am; documents linked in the agenda). Speaking of the council, one more note – if you’re wondering why West Seattle’s City Councilmember Rob Saka was not at today’s media event – it was held at the same time as the meeting of the Transportation Committee, which he chairs.

89 Replies to "VIDEO: 'Build it all' - Local leaders insist West Seattle, Ballard, and all Sound Transit 3 projects must be completed, despite newest cost projection"

  • Ron September 2, 2025 (12:06 pm)

    How does this make sense for them to keep focusing on WSLE right now when Sound Transit claims a 30 billion dollar shortfall. Ballard absolutely makes sense. This over 7 billion dollar project is beyond ridiculous.

    • walkerws September 2, 2025 (4:25 pm)

      Because this system will transport people for many many decades. It needs to be built.

      • LoveWS September 3, 2025 (12:46 pm)

        Agreed. It needs to be built to serve large numbers of people as designed.

      • Russ September 3, 2025 (5:40 pm)

        We’ll be lucky if we even have a functioning society “decades from now”. Meanwhile, tens of thousands of people live in poverty in the area while we waste money on pork-barrel projects because people who probably won’t even be in Seattle “decades from now” want to see their home values increase. 

      • WS mama! September 7, 2025 (7:40 pm)

        It doesn’t need to be built! People losing jobs, homes and the overall beauty of west seattle is being turned to trash. If a light rail is NEEDED put it on delridge and stop there. Plenty of buses get you to delridge with no hassle! Why are we making people lose their income in an already horrible economy?! That’s a bunch a trash! 

        • Derek September 8, 2025 (10:05 pm)

          Who is losing income? Last I checked home prices are skyrocketing and it’s a sellers market yet again. You do know they buy at market rate. The few having to get hundreds of thousands to move early are not why we are building it, we are building it for the immense density expected in California, Junction, Triangle, and Delridge corridors. 

  • Al King September 2, 2025 (12:18 pm)

    It’s clear that the “build at all costs” chanting works. It will get built because ST now has the blank check with the clear understanding NOBODY will question or stand in the way of them spending ANY amount of money. Will be interesting to see the actual bill for the final amount. 

  • EVGuy September 2, 2025 (12:25 pm)

    If we don’t build 3 more miles of light rail, we fail EVERYONE!!1We could literally buy everyone their own personal car for cheaper than the project is forecast at now. We could have hundreds more busses – you know, the _existing_ way to go those three miles. 

    • walkerws September 2, 2025 (4:26 pm)

      It’s not just “3 more miles of light rail.” It’s a vital connection to a population center that is otherwise very dependent on cars and buses that can get snarled in traffic. 

      • Nothanks September 3, 2025 (9:15 pm)

        Its not vital to anything. it’s an absurd waste of money. we’ve  been fine for  the nearly 100 years since we had rail transport. it physically will not have any positive effect in the surrounding area. The current residential infrastructure can barely support the current population density. we can’t just keep building apartments when we cant support and protect the current population.  public transport doesnt work for the vast majority of people seattle will always be car dependent due to the climate,  and geography. this will not service enough people to have any return on investment. This state is incapable of keep a budget. Blank checks to everyone with zero accountability.

        • Neighbor September 6, 2025 (11:14 am)

          You have a very different definition of fine than I do.  Remember when the bridge shut down?  That wasn’t fine.  It will need to be replaced in the next decade or two.  The life is severely compromised.  Have you ever tried to cross the bridge at rush hour?  It is not “fine”, it is a disaster.

        • HonestCitizen September 9, 2025 (7:50 am)

          Completely agree! Have you seen the ridership? It’s anemic except on game days which does not constitute billions of dollars and additional dollars now on top of it all. Constantine getting the CEO job is also completely wrong the fox has been escorted into the hen house!

  • WS Taxpayer September 2, 2025 (12:57 pm)

    Super, delay something until it becomes exorbitantly expensive then say we have to do it even though we cant afford it.   Then, the next day complain about how the cost of living is too high…

    • K September 2, 2025 (2:06 pm)

      The people who did everything they could to delay and increase the cost of this are not the same people saying we need to build it anyway.

    • Jake September 2, 2025 (2:26 pm)

      Local government is not why your COL is high. You can blame corporations and private second 100% for that one. 

    • The King September 2, 2025 (6:23 pm)

      West Seattle was supposed to have light rail started about twenty years ago. Businesses were bought and told to leave. Then for reasons left to suspicion, the first line went to the airport. Business owners asked about getting their property back were told to show up at the auction like everyone else. Delays are brought about by another agency on a whim. I’m old enough to remember the roads that went to nowhere. Left unfinished because they ran out of money. Imagine that, it used to be run like a normal household 

      • Wsnative September 3, 2025 (9:34 pm)

        the monorail disaster $5 billion spent nothing to show for it… forced people from there homes at less than fair market value. Caused a few great local businesses to close. Had $800 or $1000 monorail car tabs cant remember but it was right after we voted for $30 tabs the first time. The late 90s early 2000s in Seattle were volatile to say the least with the WTO riots,  dotcom bust, y2k, 9/11, nisqually earthquake, boeing HQ relocation.just off the top of my head.  

  • Plf September 2, 2025 (12:59 pm)

    Leadership have already failed to be that over budget demonstrates that someone did poor planning and execution and yet we let the same foxes in the hen house going forward and to top let Dow get a lucrative job where he will enrich himself for do a crummy job if this was a private business the whole lot would be fired.  And it’s only going to get more expensive since the same group are at the helm

    • Gehbvfhgf September 2, 2025 (3:10 pm)

      Yeah it’s clearly “leadership” that has caused massive inflation over the last 9 years. Definitely not the impact of the rest of the world. You massively underestimate the nepotism in private business. No way would anybody be fired.Yes, it sucks that it’s gonna cost more than we thought. But it’s still necessary, and continuing the same plan is still better than starting from scratch and delaying further.

    • Dorothy Gesick September 4, 2025 (10:34 am)

      You are correct on all counts

  • Brandon September 2, 2025 (1:04 pm)

    Color me shocked. Let’s pour gasoline on a burning pile of money and pat ourselves on the back. Why not.

    • Iwhsudh September 2, 2025 (3:13 pm)

      Did an oil company write this? No, the rest of us don’t want more gasoline everywhere , we want trains! The burning pile of money is the ridiculous highway expansions on the east side which will solve nothing. In 5 years traffic will be even worse. They should’ve built transit instead, at the very least a dedicated busway in the 405 right of way.

  • Anne September 2, 2025 (1:04 pm)

    Of course Teresa Mosqeda says go ahead. No talk of how this  gigantic increase will be funded -but I’d be surprised if there isn’t an initiative in our future to raise property taxes to cover it. You really think there’s going to water down the project now? If folks are whining about housing costs now – wait until a huge increase in property taxes hits. 

    • Jake September 2, 2025 (2:25 pm)

      They talk so much about how it is funded. Sorry you are not listening or reading.

    • walkerws September 2, 2025 (4:28 pm)

      No talk of how all of the subsidized roads we drive on are funded…

  • Tax Payer September 2, 2025 (1:07 pm)

    And they should all be removed from office for saying so. 

    • walkerws September 2, 2025 (4:29 pm)

      What do you mean? This is one of the few things Harrell’s said that makes me like him more.

  • Scarlett September 2, 2025 (1:11 pm)

    Ah, how predictable, the aligning of special interests to push the money train down our collective throats. How about doing the decent thing and embracing a scaled down version that is more true to the original cost forecasts?  How about revisiting your rosy ridership predictions, now that we’ve seen somewhat lackluster ridership on new segments that have come on line since passage of the original ST3? How about showing some courageous principled leadership, you know the kind that has virtually disappeared everywhere in this country, locally or nationally?  

    • walkerws September 2, 2025 (4:29 pm)

      How about doing the decent thing and embracing a scaled down version of the subsidies we give to drivers. They should pay market rate for their roads and parking.

      • Ex-Westwood Resident September 2, 2025 (5:20 pm)

        I agree!!!

        Let’s make drivers pay more toward what the actual cost of road maintenance is.

        But if you are going to do that, I say we charge ALL, 100% of the riders, of the LLR what it actually costs to ride it!

        I think you’ll find that each trip on the LLR is subsidized between 80 and 90%.

        Let’s also charge ALL riders of ANY mass transit what it ACTUALLY costs to ride it!!!

        Fair is fair, right?

        Let’s also get FARE ENFORCEMENT of ALL who ride the LLR, ST and Metro busses!!!

        • Neighbor September 6, 2025 (11:20 am)

          I honestly can’t tell if this is satire.  You don’t have to drive on roads to benefit from roads.  I don’t own a car or have kids but I still happily pay my taxes that fund schools and roads because I benefit from both.  We should fund common goods collectively.  That’s what civilization and community are.

  • Unfortunate September 2, 2025 (1:31 pm)

    Great to hear, this something the city both wants and NEEDS. The people who fight against the light rail which the city voted for have always been blatantly dishonest, I’m glad he’s not listening to their NIMBY lies.

    • J September 2, 2025 (2:24 pm)

      Do you own or rent? Either way with this ridiculous build at any cost for a train that will require multiple transfers to get anywhere will inevitably raise your housing costs again and again and again. Seattle proves once again their leadership cares about those in the top percentage and any other story they try to spin is straight out of fantasy land! 

      • walkerws September 2, 2025 (4:30 pm)

        Why should it matter? I own a house and am glad for my taxes to pay for this much needed system that will require *one* transfer (please cut out the hyperbole). My taxes are already subsidizing roads and drivers, I’m happy for them to subsidize trains for all. Choo choo!

        • EVGuy September 2, 2025 (11:54 pm)

          Trains for all? Who are you kidding? Is freight going to go on the light rail? You going to get your Uber Eats meal via light rail?Are you going to go to the hospital on a light rail ambulance? Roads and drivers are the 99.9999% of transit usage, of course the vast majority of money should go towards it.     

    • Alki resident September 2, 2025 (2:35 pm)

      You must be an apartment dweller. Us homeowners will pay for this with more taxes. Not all of us want to pay into infinity with an unknown unlimited blank check.

      • Renter who pays property taxes just like homeowners do September 2, 2025 (3:17 pm)

        Renters also pay taxes. Only a stupid landlord would just eat property taxes and not pass them on to renters. And yet, this is a worthwhile investment in the city’s and region’s infrastructure. If you’re worried about the cost, maybe we can cut 10% of the highway budget, those guys have never recouped a single dollar they’ve spent. Transit at least shows a better ROI on economic development and housing affordability.

      • pelicans September 2, 2025 (3:46 pm)

        Alki Resident, please don’t perpetuate ignorant stereotypes about renters and blame them for this mess.  Property taxes go up and rents naturally follow.  Anyone who pays rent knows that, to the point of pain. We’re all the city’s, county’s, state’s bottomless ATM’s. 

      • Unfortunate September 2, 2025 (3:50 pm)

        You pretending as if renters don’t pay taxes is an excellent example of the dishonesty I was talking about. I dunno if you meant to prove my point, but thanks for doing so!

        • Alki resident September 2, 2025 (6:00 pm)

          I’m not pretending anything. Renters do not pay the same as homeowners, plain and simple. You can pretend that homeowners don’t have added costs to their homes all you want but we all know that’s not the case. If you need a full plumbing system because the old one failed, do you think the tenant will be paying for that? That costs thousands. 

          • bill September 2, 2025 (7:11 pm)

            Alki Resident: Renters pay through higher rent the share of repairs they benefit from while they live in a rental. They move out and the next renters pay their share, etc. Homeowners pay the immediate cost but they have benefitted from the plumbing for all the years they have lived in the house, they will benefit for all the additional years they live there, they will benefit from increased property value when they sell, and they will benefit from reduced capital gain tax because the repairs increase their basis. Or do you not understand real estate finance? You have saved all your repair and improvement receipts over the years if your taxes get audited, yes?

          • Alki resident September 2, 2025 (9:17 pm)

            Not every landlord charges “ high rent” and once again the tenants certainly don’t cover costs for repairs in the rental house. Not much more to argue about but you clearly don’t have real estate. 

          • K September 2, 2025 (8:42 pm)

            Renters pay more than homeowners, and if you think otherwise you haven’t rented in a LONG time.  Rents far exceed mortgages for similar housing.  My home i have a $2300 mortgage for (which includes taxes) has a market rate rental value of $3400.  Yes, i do maintenance, but in my worst year it’s never been almost $1000 a month.  Owners pass all utilities and any other fees they can imagine and legally charge onto tenants.  And then the owners reap the benefits building equity over time, with no investment necessary on their part.  That homeowners pay more than renters is absolute garbage, and if you really believe that I have a bridge to sell you.  You can add it to your rental portfolio.

      • Foop September 2, 2025 (4:52 pm)

        What a disgusting and classist remark from Alki resident. Be a better neighbor.

      • Burgerman September 2, 2025 (10:54 pm)

        Everyone, you can’t argue with a rich Trumpite about money. The number one thing they care about is their money, how much they can get on the backs of others, and how selfish they can be with the money they have. Don’t even engage. The walls of the echo chamber are too thick.

    • Brandon September 2, 2025 (2:52 pm)

      If the leaders are now openly addressing the budgeting issues and reliability problems that other people have been proclaiming for years, who is lying exactly? The ones who were right all along? Or the ones who said those people were wrong until they had to admit it themselves and then ask for more money while acting surperior? Methinks the voters were lied to and now have to buy the farm for a wolf in sheep’s clothing.

  • WS Person September 2, 2025 (1:43 pm)

    “There was no hint of anything dramatic such as new taxes”Of course not, they know people are fatigued and broken from all the taxes they keep putting on homeowners.  They’ll still tax them.  They just don’t talk about it anymore.  

    • Foop September 2, 2025 (2:56 pm)

      Most of this comes from car tabs, property taxes here are a drop in the bucket compared to our other horribly regressive focus on sales tax.

      • walkerws September 2, 2025 (4:31 pm)

        We need a state income tax a decade ago.

  • Anymouse September 2, 2025 (2:11 pm)

    This is a classic blunder – under estimate costs and over estimate revenue.  The average cost of ST3 per taxpayer in the three county region per year is $1700.  My guess the reason the Board selected Dow is he is a master at raising taxes.  After watching him as King Cty Executive, he raised every tax he could and was beseeching the legislature for more taxing authority.Let’s just keep a watchful eye on this  slick bunch of professional politicians.

  • Scarlett September 2, 2025 (2:21 pm)

    Reading these comments is like listening to a child demand an expensive train set for Xmas – the full layout – and then get angry because parents can’t afford it.    

    • walkerws September 2, 2025 (4:32 pm)

      Reading half of these comments is like listening to a child demand an expensive toy car for Christmas – and then get angry that their parents might buy their sibling a toy train set too.

      • LoveWS September 3, 2025 (12:55 pm)

        I disagree.  Insisting that promises be kept is a reasonable and mature position. It’s what we all voted to support and what we all paid in to get. It will be good for WS and Ballard to be better connected to the rest of the city and to outlying areas to the north, east and south. Connection to the University of Washington is great for future Dawgs growing up in West Seattle and Ballard too.

  • Jake September 2, 2025 (2:24 pm)

    The one good thing Harrell has ever done. Too little too late though. This MUST be built. Speed it up and lower the costs. No brainer. End Seattle Process. 

  • Robert September 2, 2025 (2:41 pm)

    All of you folks whining about the money – Please sell your house to a developer so they can build a six plex on your lot.take your money and move to Arkansas, or Missouri, some place your money will go far and you’ll never be bothered by train noise.meanwhile, I’ll stay here , pay the increased taxes and watch my homes value keep increasing. Oh, and I’ll live in a globally important metropolitan area…. With a train.

    • Alki resident September 2, 2025 (3:32 pm)

      I don’t remember seeing one complaint about train noise. We already have actual train noise in Seattle. This is about the amount they’re expecting aka a blank check to cover the insane cost of this train. I’m sorry your answer to everything is “ just move”. The handful of commenters love saying that. 

      • walkerws September 2, 2025 (4:32 pm)

        There’s already a blanker check to cover the insane cost of roads and parking. 

        • Alki resident September 2, 2025 (5:55 pm)

          A” blanker check”? We’ll always have roads that need repairs. That had nothing to do with the fact that Sound Transit will be raking  us over the coals for years to come for a train that goes to SODO. You don’t seem to mind being ripped off though so kudos to you. 

    • K September 2, 2025 (4:22 pm)

      Those people are going to be mad when they see what taxes are like in so many other states.  You can tell how long someone has lived here by how melodramatic they get over the “crippling” taxes, lol.

  • Ray West September 2, 2025 (3:13 pm)

    “West Seattle was represented by County Councilmember Teresa Mosqueda, who declared, ‘Voters said yes in 2016; now our job is to deliver on that promise … if we fail [to complete all of ST3], we fail the entire region.’ ” This is NOT the $2 Billion project that people voted for and what we have now “is” a total failure. This has become unaffordable, at least for us homeowners who will be footing most of the bill. Of course those will be paying the least are the most vocal for wanting its completion. It’s time to shut this debacle down for good. 

  • Dennis September 2, 2025 (3:20 pm)

    Ballard makes sense but West Seattle doesn’t make any sense to build. I don’t know that it made any sense in the first place. How many dollars is that per additional rider or per minute saved? Maybe start with enhanced bus rapid transit and add rail if the ridership comes. That can be delivered way way faster. 

    • K September 2, 2025 (4:35 pm)

      It makes sense because we have choke points coming onto the peninsula via roads, there’s no meaningful way to improve capacity on the bridges, there are traffic jams even on good days with the current population, and any incident near either bridge cripples the other with extra traffic to the point that everyone might as well just stay put.  West Seattle DESPERATELY needs another grade separated option to get on and off the peninsula, and one that runs a lot more frequently than the water taxi.

  • Kadoo September 2, 2025 (3:37 pm)

    I was a fan until I realized the C line would stop going downtown once light rail was in operation here. The C line is so efficient! I like light rail but having to transfer at SODO to get downtown is a negative. Plus now the higher cost now to complete the project. I am no longer for this project but I’m sure it will be built and we will pay for it. 

  • AJ September 2, 2025 (4:06 pm)

    So what’s the “new cost estimate”?   I didn’t see a number.

  • Nate September 2, 2025 (4:12 pm)

    I for one agree. We can’t add more roads in our region because it is built out. Adding more roads would be equally expensive to adding this transit and since much of this will be tunneled, we wont have to drop as many private homes and businesses to fit the rail lines. Our only option is to fully connect the region with transit. Delaying these routes because they’re expensive now will mean they coat more later, traffic gets worse, and the region becomes more unaffordable. People seem to think this is expensive so we should pause it to save money but theyre also complaining that this is what happened to the already elevated price. Your answer is to repeat the same again? Isnt that the definition of Insanity?

    • Brandon September 2, 2025 (6:08 pm)

      1. You don’t need to re-zone WS and add to its density when the train is running routes you can already build out. The argument for one is the reliance on the other and visa versa.  So, we might as well justify building a train all the way to White Center, Burien, and Vashon Island with this logic.
      2. You don’t need a train to do a metros job at less cost. But wait, where’d those busses go? Cancelled because of low ridership? But we’re adding a new train after lower-than-expected ridership in promised areas? Huh..
      3. You want traffic to free up, stop reducing every route to 1 lane, with lower posted speeds, closed safe roads, and speed bumps everywhere.  It’s a manufactured traffic problem to justify a train, funny how that works.
      4. They haven’t been able to prove budgeting success and a timely delivery of the past projects so why should we reward the with more? Give me your wallet. I promise I’ll give you my word I’ll provide you with a problem ridden train. Don’t trust me? But you trust them?
      5. Put a room full of adults who have a train on the mind and from it together and the decision will be an over-expensive train.  Put a group of 6-year-olds together and you might just notice there’s more than one answer if anybody cared to address them.  But wait, then we wouldn’t have a population reliant on one sole solution no matter the cost.

  • wetone September 2, 2025 (5:09 pm)

    $7 billion cost today for a 4 mile section rail is crazy talk and wouldn’t even be point of discussion anywhere in world but Seattle Wa. As mentioned people in ST3 area are paying roughly $1700. per year today for a system that will be used by less than 2% of people living in said areas. This is today’s cost…. How about 10yrs from now ? Between this and our Inslee gas tax that does basically zero towards improving environment, blue collar workers (ones that need to travel for work) will be wiped out shortly and forced to move from area. Not what we voted for……and should be a new vote, Dow will never let that happen tho as he likes his $$$$$ ;)

  • Admiral2009 September 2, 2025 (5:38 pm)

    Car Tabs are a major funding source that is not getting all the money that is due.  I estimate upwards of $50 million a year because a significant portion of vehicle owners are not paying the required Car Tab fees.  What is ST and other government agencies doing to collect this revenue from vehicle owners?  

  • anonyme September 2, 2025 (6:02 pm)

    What an absolutely shameless and tone deaf pronouncement.  What voters said “yes” to in 2016 bears no resemblance to the massive ballooning boondoggle voters are now having shoved down their throats and out through their empty pockets.

  • Admiral2009 September 2, 2025 (7:04 pm)

    Car Tab fees are a major funding source for ST.  A significant amount of vehicle tabs are past due.  What is ST and other government agencies doing to collect the Car Tab fees?  I figure up $25,000,000 to $50,000,000 a year in lost revenue.  

  • West Seattleite September 2, 2025 (7:25 pm)

    We just can’t keep building roads, there just isn’t enough space, unless you want to start tunneling AND car tunnels cost more than train tunnels as they have to be larger. They have been painfully slow throughout this entire process, every stage has had delays because of reviews, reports, etc. All of these could have been expedited, but the city has chosen not to. Proof of this is in a statement in this article:the mayor noted that city councilmembers are about to take up legislation allocating dozens of city jobs to speeding up permitting and otherwise assisting with the project. Had they done this earlier, much of the work would have been completed, or at least contracted at the expected rate and this wouldn’t have been an issue. Or the city could have stated that transit is a ‘normal’ use for land, meaning that each mile wouldn’t require special review. Yes complete the West Seattle line, relieve the idling cars on I5, Delridge, the bridge, Fauntleroy, etc. Speed trips for everyone, make it possible for folks to go out for a night without worrying about trying to find parking…So many benefits that simply can not be gained by other options. 

  • Keenan September 3, 2025 (9:10 am)

    I voted YES for ST3 in 2014, shortly after I bought my townhome in the Junction area.  In the 11 years since, my home has nearly DOUBLED in value.  Once the West Seattle line is completed, my home value will greatly increase once again.So any homeowner in this thread complaining about “taxes” is ignorant of the facts, greedy, acting in bad faith, or some combination of the three.   At least be honest and say you want to keep it as hard to get in and out of West Seattle as possible for people poorer than you, so you can keep the status quo.  News flash, the city of Seattle is growing and will continue to grow.  You chose to buy a home IN THE CITY LIMITS.  Yes, it’s ridiculous that we all voted on this 11 years ago and not a single foot of track has been laid down. Yes, inflation happened and was always inevitable.  But NO, this topic is not going back up for debate.  The West Seattle line WILL BE COMPLETED. Whine and complain with your NIMBY friends as much as you want, WE WILL DEFEAT YOU.

    • Brandon September 3, 2025 (11:43 am)

      Pot meet kettle. Saying others are preventing people from moving into town whist admitting pricing will skyrocket and nobody will afford to actually buy a home there, so they’ll have to rent and be at the whim of the landlords this city seems to have problems with. Also, funny you mentioned poor people coming and going in WS, when your choices are going to either force them out or entrap them.  What a life. “You want a house? Too bad. NIMBY, we’re doing a train and you’re going to like it.”

      • Keenan September 3, 2025 (2:41 pm)

        Incomprehensible mumbo jumbo. How is building a metro train line to downtown “trapping” renters? My comment was mocking homeowners in this thread complaining about taxes, when financially speaking they have already benefited greatly from owning property in West Seattle and will reap even greater rewards once the train is built! So pay your taxes, proudly! Build the ST3 we democratically voted for! Don’t be a NIMBY obstructionist, its un democratic and un American!

    • Russ September 3, 2025 (5:37 pm)

      I have been in Seattle for twenty years and have rented the entire time. Your home increasing in value, while you did NOTHING, has only increased rent for the rest of us and made it harder for us to buy a house. This comment of yours is ignorant and insulting. No one, literally NO ONE, cares about how this might increase your house’s value. 

      • EVGuy September 3, 2025 (10:44 pm)

        This comment is ignorant of actual home ownership. If you do “NOTHING” to your house, guess what – it’s going to fall apart on you. It requires constant maintenance, which costs lots of money, and until you actually SELL the house you gain nothing from any increases in value – except more tax burden.  Not every home magically increase in value either, it’s not some money printing machine. 

        • Russ September 4, 2025 (10:27 pm)

          Thanks, Tesla guy! I was totally clueless about the maintenance costs of homes! I have never known anyone who has owned a home! I have never looked into housing costs in Seattle, and how they have trended upwards! Actually, spoiler, I live with my wife who owns a home and you, and everyone else on this blog…I mean, good lord, are we all stuck in 2009?

  • Russ Gray September 3, 2025 (5:34 pm)

    Voters voted for this in…2016. How many of those voters are still here? How many of them have changed their mind since then? Claiming a mandate because of a decision that is a decade old, before our country began to descend into economic chaos, before the pandemic, before the return of the current federal administration is absurd. Also, I hope to all of the powers that be that we don’t award this project to some awful company like Jansen. I have zero faith in this being done well. 

    • Neighbor September 5, 2025 (3:34 pm)

      I voted for this in 2016, I am still here, and I don’t regret anything.

  • Scarlett September 3, 2025 (6:42 pm)

    You don’t stop the money train and all the special interests who are lined up at the trough to be slopped down.  This has little to do with easing traffic congestion or substantially expanding access to public transportation – because we all know it will do neither – this is a simply moving money around the local economy, out of one pocket into another, an economic shot in the arm, mostly for select “arms.” Next time just dig a hole in the ground and hire people to fill it in some godforsaken place, there is considerably less hassle and fighting, less displacement, less regulatory paperwork, and fewer environmental studies. 

    • Russ September 3, 2025 (7:04 pm)

      Totally agree! Well-said. 

    • walkerws September 4, 2025 (9:18 am)

      Transit never has anything to do with easing traffic congestion. It provides an alternative to traffic congestion. No one will take you anti-transit folks seriously if you can’t comprehend the basics of transit in the first place.

  • North Admiral Cyclist September 5, 2025 (3:36 pm)

    Luckily our Mayor is not living life like some of the Sound Transit naysayers – like it’s still 1973.

Leave a Reply to Renter who pays property taxes just like homeowners do Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.