DEVELOPMENT FOLLOWUP: Sign of life for long-shelved West Seattle project

New hope that redevelopment might finally happen at the long-vacant strip-mall/restaurant sites in the 5200 block of California SW. The demolition permit was renewed back in February; now two expired construction permits are being reviewed for renewal, and the city permit system has the explanatory notation “Ownership is working to obtain funds to move forward with the project.” The project as first proposed back in 2017 was for 18 rowhouse-style townhouses. Then in 2023, a senior-living complex was proposed instead, but that was scrapped. It’s been almost nine years since the strip mall’s previous major tenant moved further north into The Junction; as for the two ex-restaurants, the former Papa John’s closed in 2017, and Thaitan (on the corner) closed in 2019. Records indicate the combined redevelopment site hasn’t changed ownership since around the time of most of the closures.

17 Replies to "DEVELOPMENT FOLLOWUP: Sign of life for long-shelved West Seattle project"

  • No April 11, 2025 (11:10 pm)

    Great job, Seattle definitely needs more people and town houses and no more stores 👏👏👏

    • K April 12, 2025 (7:13 am)

      Ground-level retail is not so bad, but yes we definitely need housing more than this strip mall.

    • Possibly April 12, 2025 (10:15 am)

      Sounds like you should either leave or open a store.

    • Okay Boomer April 12, 2025 (12:28 pm)

      West Seattle, like everywhere else, needs more affordable housing. These won’t be affordable by many families’ standards, but they will help create opportunities for people (first time homebuyers) to afford a home in a world where that is really, really hard. – Name a situation where we need more of any kind of store because the existing options are too crowded.

    • Bbron April 12, 2025 (1:01 pm)

      yeah, it’s a lot better for the community that it stays as an abandoned and decaying strip mall 🙄 what’s another 8+ years of blight.

    • Allan April 14, 2025 (2:33 pm)

      Your Sarcasm is noted. 

  • John P Woods April 12, 2025 (8:12 am)

    Still don’t understand why Alaska Junction property owners like to keep store front properties vacant for so incredibly long. They could have had a tenant that could have given them at least a small profit 

    • My two cents April 13, 2025 (9:58 am)

      @john p woods … sounds like you have it down, you should buy some commercial property in the junction and let everyone know how easy it is to turn a “small profit” for these properties.

  • Eric 43 April 12, 2025 (8:30 am)

    I’d rather have the old Taco Bell building and ones next to fixed up then those ugly cheap overpriced town homes with no yards 

    • Km April 12, 2025 (10:55 am)

      Why does it bother you if someone else doesn’t have a yard? I have a single family home with a yard, and I have neighbors in single family homes with yards and their yards are god awful. 

    • Opiner April 12, 2025 (12:57 pm)

      Thanks for your opinion Eric.  

      What do you opine about our neighbors who have saved all their lives to buy a home, and the only home that they could afford is one of these “ugly, cheap overpriced townhomes with no yards?”  
      Is Eric 43’s home some unseen architectural masterpiece, beautiful, underpriced and with a large yard? 
      Who are you to judge what others choose?
      And remember, Craftsman houses were once available from Sears Catalog and people loathed their commonness destroying neighborhoods.

    • Lauren April 12, 2025 (7:58 pm)

      There’s no pleasing some people. I’m sure Eric also complains about “the homeless.”

  • Patrick April 12, 2025 (8:47 am)

    Moving forward with which project? Townhomes, senior living, or something else?

  • Liljack April 12, 2025 (10:25 am)

    Hoping they build as much housing as possible and fast. 18 townhomes doesn’t seem like enough for a lot that size. Bring on the housing and a crosswalk please.

  • Ts April 12, 2025 (3:52 pm)

    How about housing without the option to pay a fee vs having no income restricted units

  • WS Guy April 13, 2025 (6:02 pm)

    I hope a faceless development corporation with no connection to the neighborhood wrings every last dollar out of this.

    • WSB April 13, 2025 (9:59 pm)

      Don’t know about “faceless” but the owner since mid-last-decade is a Delaware-registered LLC with a Tennessee attorney.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published.