WEST SEATTLE LIGHT RAIL: Next milestone delayed again, on eve of another ‘early acquisition’ vote

Thanks for the tip. Curiosity has run high about how the change of administrations in Washington, D.C., could affect local services that rely on federal funding, and now we have one sign: The federal “Record of Decision” for Sound Transit‘s West Seattle Link Extension has been delayed, again. The original timeline was that it could have happened as soon as a month after the ST Board made its final decision back in October about West Seattle light-rail routing and station locations; then the Federal Transit Authority‘s online dashboard showed a new date for the Record of Decision, due in late February, aka right about now – but a reader just pointed us to the federal website link showing it’s just changed again, to late April.

We have questions out to Sound Transit, including how, or whether, that affects work being done now on the project; the project website notes that when it’s issued, for example, final design can begin.

As we reported four days ago, the ST Board’s monthly meeting tomorrow is scheduled to include a vote on expanding the list of properties for which it’s pursuing early acquisition; the additions to the list would include the North Delridge buildings that house Mode Music Studios (WSB sponsor), Mode Music and Performing Arts, The Skylark, and Ounces, all on the site designated for the Delridge light-rail station. We also reported last week on Seattle Mayor Bruce Harrell, an ST Board member, issuing an executive order setting up city actions that might speed up the construction timeline.

21 Replies to "WEST SEATTLE LIGHT RAIL: Next milestone delayed again, on eve of another 'early acquisition' vote"

  • Also John February 26, 2025 (12:53 pm)

    I’ve been very curious how much Federal money the lightrail is relying on.    IMO the new administration will not give us a penny.

    • k February 26, 2025 (1:24 pm)

      I think “hoping for” is more accurate than “relying on.”  It can be funded without federal dollars, but it would be nice and save us all some cash if the feds kicked in the $2 billion previously discussed.  Agreed that we’re unlikely to see the money though.  At the rate they’re gutting various departments, even if they okay the expenditure there won’t be anyone left to write the check.

    • max34 February 26, 2025 (3:19 pm)

      John, they’re not relying on any, as noted.  Going through the NEPA process was required due to the potential impacts that triggered the EIS.   The FTA has delayed decisions and review on all environmental documents in their pipeline.  It was bad – due to lack of personnel –  before the new administration came in, and will be worse now.   This has nothing to do with the WSBLE project itself.  Although i HIGHLY doubt any projects in the ‘wrong’ states will get funding, assuming the CIG program even still exists in a few months.  

    • Peter February 26, 2025 (3:28 pm)

      Agreed. One more reason why this project should be terminated. We simply cannot afford it. 

      • Sick and tired February 26, 2025 (9:55 pm)

        Agreed. I don’t know why the principles for a family (only buy what you can afford) go out the window for governments.

  • T Rex February 26, 2025 (1:41 pm)

    This entire thing is like watching a Seinfeld episode, the show about nothing.  But it is graduating into Curb Your Enthusiasm.  

  • Jake February 26, 2025 (1:51 pm)

    WSB, will the Cettolin House historical status in Avalon area impact routing?

  • Marcus February 26, 2025 (3:41 pm)

    Too much money, too much impact. Run more buses for a much lower cost.

  • Sick and tired February 26, 2025 (8:46 pm)

    Maybe the federal dollars will go away and we can finally scrap this doomed project. One can hope!!!

    • Humm February 26, 2025 (9:08 pm)

      Appreciate you owning that opposition to transit goes hand in hand with reactionary MAGA ideology. If only your compatriots were equally honest.

    • Brad Garf February 27, 2025 (1:34 pm)

      That’s not how it works. Construction was approved via vote almost 10 years ago. If the Feds pull their funding, the costs will have to be allocated from elsewhere (i.e. higher local taxes, likely). Unless you want to get a “mulligan” vote on the ballot and convince everyone to change their minds, the light rail is going to be built and funded one way or another, and people on this site pretending otherwise are wasting everyone’s time.

  • Scott February 26, 2025 (9:49 pm)

    Light rail is only idealistic and simply too expensive at this point.  Bus transit is the realistic and practical solution. Scrap light rail and save our business, our community, and a hell of a lot of money too.

    • Kyle February 27, 2025 (9:04 am)

      To be fair no money would be saved. The money would go to building out other parts of sound transits network. West Seattle would continue to pay the ST taxes and just subsidize building everywhere else.

  • Scarlett February 27, 2025 (7:16 am)

    The FTA has signed off on other light rail projects where capital costs are outlandish, but the West Seattle extension capital cost per expected rider is obscene.  And I’ll again stress the human costs; one would think this at least give pause to those who regularly opine about the virtues of community.  

  • Furor Scribendi February 27, 2025 (10:15 am)

    I’m always surprised at maga-glee commenters celebrating possible mass transit defunding. Funding for the common good isn’t desirable, apparently, if they don’t exclusively benefit from it. Want wealth? Real estate values skyrocketed in areas around BART stations in CA, but not in areas that rejected BART. People want to live in areas with many transportation options. Light rail is good for a region, not just those riding the rails.Have these nay-sayers ever taken light rail, or even ridden a bus? Chances are they haven’t, or else they’d understand the short sightedness of their uninformed opinions writ large.

  • Scarlett February 27, 2025 (3:38 pm)

    The only chance to stop this runaway train is a veto referendum, a citizen ballot measure.  Even if enough signatures were collected to get it on the ballot, I doubt enough pro voters would change their mind as no one wants to admit that they were wrong.       

    • CAM February 27, 2025 (10:30 pm)

      Enjoy this list of recent veto referendums in WA and consider the light in which it casts your proposal:

      2020 – to remove sex education from schools

      2020 – to eliminate affirmative action in public employment

      2012 – to legalize same sex marriage

      2009 – to eliminate protections and rights for same sex domestic partnerships (which appears to have been initiated by a man whose son was arrested for participating in the Jan 6th insurrection and who when interviewed told the media that he couldn’t be prouder of his son who had an excellent grasp of right and wrong)

      2007 – to remove consumer protections against insurance companies making unreasonable denials of claims

      2004 – to repeal legislation funding charter schools (this one was probably not a negative)

      I’ll stop there because going farther back the sources get less specific/more limited on what each referendum would actually have achieved. 

  • wetone February 27, 2025 (8:37 pm)

    All I can say is if you think things are bad now, just wait for Dow Constantine to take charge soon. He’s leaving taxpayers in a huge mess with King County 10’s of millions in debt. Fits in perfectly for ST leader ;)

Sorry, comment time is over.