Seen the signs? Here’s who’s proposing a ‘Highland Park Public Transformation Plan’ and why

By Tracy Record
West Seattle Blog editor

If you have something to say about the draft Seattle Transportation Plan, you have one more week to say it – October 23 is the deadline.

One West Seattle man is not only commenting – he’s proposing a neighborhood transportation transformation as his feedback, and he’s inviting you to travel along.

Maybe you’ve seen the flyers Jack Conness has posted in Highland Park and South Delridge, pointing you to his Highland Park Public Transformation Plan website:

After a reader saw one of Jack’s flyers and told us about it, we contacted Jack to find out more, and sat down with him for an early-morning chat at Fresh Flours Bakery in South Delridge. Jack is a relatively new arrival – two years ago – to south Highland Park, a former Californian who is originally from “90 miles west of Chicago.”

While he landed here with the thought that it might be a stepping stone to another area of Seattle, he says he’s “fallen in love with this neighborhood” and that’s why he is proposing a plan to make it safer. “I thought I could put something out there that might sway decisionmakers (and) instead of just submitting a comment myself, I could submit a comment with lots of people.” He also admits he’s a “bit weird and wonky” at heart.

His experience of getting around started with arriving here as a UW graduate student – during the West Seattle Bridge closure – and having to get to UW. That put him in the public transportation system, taking the bus to light rail to get to school. (He’s enamored with how Seattle is expanding its light-rail system, even knowing that’s more because the region is trying to catch up, than leaping ahead.)

He works in climate-change policy, so he’s interested in that aspect of transportation too, aware that to get people onto buses and rail they have to be more safe and available.

But right outside our doors, being able to walk and bike safely in neighborhoods is the first step (literally). So he’s outlined some ideas.

He lives near 14th and Roxbury, and crosses the latter “all the time” to get to the “incredible food and nightlife options” in White Center. “It’s a nightmare” and was even more so when the bridge closure made Roxbury another major detour route, leaving drivers “sitting on the crosswalk in their vehicles.” Another street that factors into his plan, SW Henderson, for which he proposes reconfiguration:

“It splits north and south Highland Park and feels like a freeway – built for speed.” No place to truly safely cross between 9th and 16th, he says, but families in south Highland Park have to cross it to get to Highland Park Elementary on SW Trenton. No kids in his family yet, but he and his wife cross with their dog. “It’s dangerous. Our neighbors have kids – not a fun trek to make. So how do we make it safer and friendlier” for everyone to cross? He also has ideas for Thistle, 16th, Roxbury, and 10th, with some raised crosswalks in the mix too.

Getting to Westcrest Park is another challenge. “It’s a great park but there’s no safe way to get there unless you’re driving.” And to those who are skeptical because they’re not seeing many people walking or biking now, Jack offers a line from a movie about professional baseball (in which he worked): “If you build it, they will come.” And that means more chances to interact with your neighbors.

He started getting the word out via posters because he figured people already walking and biking would be those most interested in his ideas. They had been barely up a week by the time we talked on Friday, and he’d already received almost 50 signatures. The first one, he recalled, “was an incredible feeling – somebody else feels the way I do.” He’s also already met with some interested residents who are “trying to find ways to get involved … I didn’t expect this outcome so quickly, I thought I was the only weird person out there.”

Jack has also talked with people who have long been involved and heard about “the battles they’ve had to fight.” He hopes he can add new energy to the fight. He is also encouraged by the new leadership in SDOT – this is the first year for director Greg Spotts – “I’ve been following what they’re up to … (things) can’t change overnight but I’m very much excited and motivated, so that’s part of why I wanted to get involved.” He’s requested one of the neighborhood walking tours Spotts has promised to attend.

But right now, he wants to find out who else is interested in signing on to his plan before he sends it to the city for consideration before the draft Seattle Transportation Plan becomes the official Seattle Transportation Plan. That won’t be the end of his efforts, though, but just the beginning. “The intent is, low-cost, low-barrier moves that can be made. This is step one of many more.”

We ask, if just one part of your plan can become reality for starters, what would it be? SW Henderson, Jack replies, seeing it as a “simple fix” with stop signs and bicycle infrastructure.

His plan also suggests a bike path araund Highland Park Elementary and the park next to it – “imagine if you could safely send your kid out on that bike path … It’s an incredible community that’s continuing to grow (and) invite more people in.”

And the people, he believes, is who should take precedence on the streets – it’s not good enough, in his view, to have “greenways” which are supposed to be shared streets where “you have to trust drivers” so the signage confers “a false sense of security.” Other halfway measures aren’t enough, either: “Crosswalks with a flag are a policy failure.”

You can see Jack’s full proposal here. Here’s where you can sign on, if you support it. (Or if you want to submit your own comment on the draft Seattle Transportation Plan, you can go here.) Wherever his ideas go, he’s optimistic: “The future is bright.”

23 Replies to "Seen the signs? Here's who's proposing a 'Highland Park Public Transformation Plan' and why"

  • Bus October 16, 2023 (11:50 pm)

    It would be AMAZING to get rid of the parking on Henderson!  It makes it so hard for pedestrians to cross safely and there is plenty of available parking on side streets.  Also love the protected bike lanes.  Would this plan mean removing the speed cushions?

  • Scrappy October 17, 2023 (12:43 am)

    Thank you Jack and welcome to the neighborhood! 

  • JC October 17, 2023 (6:43 am)

    Signed on! Pedestrian-friendly efforts help everyone in the city feel safer and happier by making our communities more human-focused. Thanks Jack!

  • Delridge Resident October 17, 2023 (7:15 am)

    Signed. Thanks so much for your advocacy, Jack. It’s so encouraging to know we have good people among us!

  • DRW October 17, 2023 (7:41 am)

    Get rid of parking on Henderson?! Have you seen the side streets? On 18th between Henderson and Barton you cant even fit a smart car anymore. Its packed after building all of those townhouses with no parking.

  • MOSH October 17, 2023 (8:22 am)

    Right on, Jack. I like how you think.

  • Kyle October 17, 2023 (8:53 am)

    We can agree though that the +20 all way stops would be incredibly cumbersome? I enjoy walking and biking in the neighborhood, but I also drive too. This would lead to anger for all the stop and go when 90% of the time no walkers or bikers would be present. I’ve found the flashing crosswalk lights to be effective and wouldn’t lead to aggressive behavior or people just starting to ignore stop signs when no one is present.The school used to have a crossing guard for crossing Henderson but no one has filled that position since before the pandemic.

    • FedUpPed October 17, 2023 (3:55 pm)

      “flashing crosswalk lights to be effective” after saying this, i don’t believe you walk that often. flashing lights are a suggestion to drivers. all too often i have to wait multiple cars worth that pass thru the flashing lights b/c it’s up to the driver to decide to stop or not. Stop signs are clear and simple, and violations (tho they’re never enforced…) are clear. any # of stop signs will have a negligible impact on your commute. you are already supposed to be going 20 (25?) mph. at that speed, the amount of time lost to accelerate/decelerate won’t be noticed when it comes to your destination. being at 1 red light would be more time than getting thru all those signs. stop signs are only cumbersome if 1) you want to drive faster than posted limit or 2) you want to decide who to stop for. as an exclusive ped/PT/biker, there can’t be enough stop signs b/c a few seconds increase of someone’s commute is nothing compared to the safety and security brought by moving towards more pedestrian-centered infrastructure.    

      • Kyle October 17, 2023 (8:02 pm)

        I use the ped crossing lights on 16th all the time. Sometimes I have to wait 2.5 seconds for a car to finish going thru. It seems to be a sane and reasonable safety feature instead of a stop sign every block on 16th like proposed in this plan lol.

  • Debbie October 17, 2023 (9:08 am)

    Thank you!  Signed

  • DC October 17, 2023 (9:35 am)

    Love this! Great to see ground up local advocacy for safer more pleasant streets. I’ll be looking for opportunities to join the effort!

  • Dillon October 17, 2023 (11:13 am)

    Love the initiative, a protected bike lane around Highland park would be a huge addition to a very popular area for families and kids. Would help me be safer on my morning bike commute as well!

  • AT October 17, 2023 (1:38 pm)

    I think Jack has a bright future with SDOT.  But hear me out:  what if, instead of adding more concrete barriers and hazards to arterials, bike traffic used residential streets where possible?  Bikes are quiet and would not disturb residential areas while riders would be safer in less traffic & without busses and trucks.  I think some of the  barriers that have been installed around the city just make it harder to see pedestrians in all the visual clutter.

    • FedUpPed October 17, 2023 (3:57 pm)

      “hazards to arterials” hazards to who? bikes on residential streets would be fantastic! unfortunately drivers don’t obey the “streets closed” signs, zoom thru streets, and make it still an unsafe environment at times. i’d be in 100% agreement with you if residential streets were closed off to car traffic.

      • AT October 17, 2023 (4:27 pm)

        Hazards as in more stuff for cars to hit (then flip over), or bikes passing each other to hit.  If painted lines aren’t effective, maybe a few lines of raised road-marker dots would be a happy medium between paint and concrete?

        • bill October 17, 2023 (9:19 pm)

          The only effective deterrent to drivers (not cars) is concrete, and lots of it. Inside a car you may regard road furniture as hazards; from a bike I like drivers being corralled away from me.

    • bill October 17, 2023 (9:13 pm)

      Arterials in Seattle generally follow the easiest paths through our hills. Which is precisely where a commuting cyclist trying to get somewhere would prefer to ride, not to mention recreational cyclists who don’t want to sweat up every hill in sight. 

  • BlairJ October 17, 2023 (2:42 pm)

    My first thought after seeing these posters and visiting the website was, “Where was the community input?”  Obviously, a lot of work went into this proposal.  But the website does not invite or have any means for feedback and alternate ideas.  It is presented as a completed proposal with the only options being to agree to it or ignore it.  The best way to gain community buy-in for a proposal is to encourage early widespread involvement in the identification of problems, development of potential solutions, and examination of the pros and cons of those various possible solutions.

    • Cs in HP October 17, 2023 (5:58 pm)

      I totally agree with Blair, great ideas- these are in line with things the community has been asking the city about for years, but the Seattle process means you have to ask for everyone’s opinion and there has to be so much money available, and then very few things get done, except for those blasted Street Closed signs everywhere-  that was a unilateral decision made during Covid. This is nicely imagined and presented- becoming a part of the community dialogue would be a good option- I’m sure that Highland Park Action Committee would welcome your vision and energy. Joining forces would also help you get familiar with the plans that already exist, the things people are already pursuing and advocating for, and what has been done already.  Cloverdale, for example- connects highland park and westcrest for pedestrians. And bike paths around the park are nice in theory but removal of our grassy areas and pervious surfaces has some broader implications and causes a lot of strife for some…. So yeah, I agree with Blair, community input is part of the deal here. 

      • MyRoad October 18, 2023 (7:35 am)

        the bike path would use road surface. ain’t no grass or people-used surfaces there. complaining about the streets closed signs? guess you’re one of the folks I see driving thru them anyway as non local traffic. street closed? but I’m driving!

    • nonni October 18, 2023 (5:59 pm)

      You can give input via the ‘contact’ button on his site’s top banner. I got the impression that perhaps Jack doesn’t drive at all, and wouldn’t object to street parking removal on his own street –which, incidentally, is not among the roads from which he suggests deleting parking lanes. Cyclists and pedestrians deserve to feel safe, but unless you can remove automobile traffic universally, a better approach is to remain cautious at every intersection, like we did as kids (who should always be taught not to play in traffic).

  • Galen Van Horn October 18, 2023 (9:20 am)

    I think this is a great way to START a community conversation. No one is saying it needs to be all this or nothing. It’s so helpful to have a well thought out picture of what things could look like to spark discussion.also it looks like the “bike path around the park” is meant to be on the surface streets- so not taking away green space.

  • Henderson resident October 18, 2023 (12:58 pm)

    If they remodel and get rid of the parking for bike lanes where are we as members of the community who only have access to park on Henderson going to park!? 

Sorry, comment time is over.