So, it costs far less to retrofit the Mann building (less than $300k) than to retrofit Meany (multi-millions)…yet the school district is moving students from Mann to Meany?
I had heard similar complaints about other Seattle schools a few months ago when the closures were being discussed…that the district was closing schools that just had tons of money invested into them.
Is it the school superintendent that’s in charge of this type of spending and decision-making? I’m tired of paying property taxes when that money is being grossly mismanaged. It’s great to create construction jobs and all that, but this is ridiculous.