FOLLOWUP: Will the city clear Roxhill Park encampments after latest shooting?

(WSB photo, Wednesday)

Though police have not specifically said whether Wednesday’s Roxhill Park shooting was related to the park’s encampments,
neighbors say their safety concerns were increasing even before the shooting that sent a 40-year-old man to the hospital. So we asked key city reps today if Roxhill Park has a clearance planned. Here’s what spokesperson Caitlin Moran from the Human Services Department and Unified Care Team said:

HSD typically does not share exact dates of encampment resolutions due to staff safety and possible changes in scheduling. However, resolutions may be expedited following incidents of violence.

UCT is awaiting information on the shooting from the Seattle Police Department to inform next steps.

We also asked District 1 City Councilmember Rob Saka‘s staff if this has been on his radar. Yes, said staffer Michael Taylor-Judd, while indicating that those concerned should be pressuring the mayor:

YES, our office has communicated with our contacts in several City departments and the councilmember has spoken directly with department leadership when he has the opportunity to convey the concerns of our neighbors in D1. He and I were also just out in the immediate neighborhood earlier this summer walking the paths in Roxhill Park and hearing the concerns of residents in nearby Village Green Retirement Home. He also heard directly from nearby neighbors while knocking a few doors in the afternoon and we have received emails in our office since then.

We take this very seriously, and we convey the same messages that our first responders share with residents in the Southwest Precinct — “If you see something, say something.” Neighbors have been encouraged to regularly contact 911 — especially to report when they see violent behavior, illlegal drug use, and unauthorized campfires that violate our current citywide burn ban.

We need partnership from the Executive Branch, however. Councilmember Saka cannot direct the public safety departments or Unified Care Team to respond. That authority resides with the Mayor’s Office, and we hope she is hearing from our neighbors just like we are, and that she is also aware of how urgent it is to address this situation before someone else is injured in the park.

27 Replies to "FOLLOWUP: Will the city clear Roxhill Park encampments after latest shooting?"

  • Actualperson August 20, 2026 (5:05 pm)

    Will be shocked if the city actually clears out this encampment. Will be double shocked if the city prevents another encampment from moving right in.

    • Kyle August 20, 2026 (10:02 pm)

      The woods behind Home Depot and the RVs on Sylvan way have already re-camped.

  • Josh August 20, 2026 (5:11 pm)

    Tracy, thank you so much for all you do. Your followup and eyes on our neighborhood are so appreciated- and invaluable. We are so lucky to have you!

  • Kt August 20, 2026 (5:27 pm)

    And sadly mow down that forrested area or more encampment will pop up later.

    Turn area into pea patch

    • 1994 August 20, 2026 (9:16 pm)

      Turning it into a pea patch is a most excellent idea! Much better then waiting for the city to take action after violence has occurred: However, resolutions may be expedited following incidents of violence.

    • South Delridge August 20, 2026 (10:18 pm)

      It’s a protected bog thing so they cant do that I think. Longfellow creek runs through it probably

      • sixbuck August 20, 2026 (11:50 pm)

        Longfellow Creek starts there. So much for protecting salmon habitat. 

    • Near Neighbor August 20, 2026 (10:43 pm)

      There’s a huge problem with that, the entire park is a protected area. It’s all peat bogs.

    • Mellow Kitty August 21, 2026 (9:21 am)

      Nothing like a pound of prevention for an ounce of cure. That makes as much sense as taking bus shelters away because homeless people sit there. The homeless people find a new place to go. The rest of us are stuck standing in the rain. May as well cut down the forest to prevent forest fires. 

  • Jay August 20, 2026 (5:55 pm)
    • 18.12.250 – Camping.

      It is unlawful to camp in any park except at places set aside and posted for such purposes by the Superintendent.(Ord. 106615 § 13, 1977.)

    • flimflam August 21, 2026 (2:47 pm)

      Yup, should be fairly simple to enforce laws already on the books….

  • k August 20, 2026 (6:00 pm)

    Weird that Saka never punted to the mayor before there was a woman in office, despite the presence of some persistent and problematic areas within encampments, including acts of violence, during Harrell’s term.  I’m so sick of Saka’s posturing.  That is not leadership.  District 1 deserves someone who cares about the community, gets involved, and can take a stand on their own, without being blown wherever the political winds have shifted.

    • Alex August 20, 2026 (9:25 pm)

      Ok, let me explain to you the difference between the Executive branch and the Legislative branch…

  • bob August 20, 2026 (6:04 pm)

    no.

  • Delridge Dude August 20, 2026 (6:20 pm)

    I completely agree!  Neighbors, we need to be on the horn to the Mayor’ office NOW!

  • Rhonda August 20, 2026 (6:51 pm)

    Last night driving home from QFC at midnight the entire area from Barton to Roxbury was in a cloud of heavy, toxic illegal campfire smoke from this encampment.

  • Sweep Roxhill Park August 20, 2026 (8:41 pm)

    I just spoke to fireman at the park. Sorry about my English I’m still working on it. There’s currently another big fire with lots of smoke. He say they are putting it out and it’s from the encampment. I ask the policeman why they are allowed and he said they aren’t but they just keep lighting fires as soon as the firemen put them out. This is also what we see all day and night. Why aren’t they being arrested for arson? Its VERY dry and the retirement home very close to the encampment can burn down if those big trees catch fire.

  • j_patrol August 20, 2026 (8:46 pm)

    “If you see something, say something. Neighbors have been encouraged to regularly contact 911 — especially to report when they see violent behavior, illegal drug use, and unauthorized campfires that violate our current citywide burn ban.”

    Umm, for years and years and years people have called to complain about this park with zero action, and very little patrolling.

  • sixbuck August 20, 2026 (10:12 pm)

    Seeing as the housing-refused have lit the park on fire tonight, my guess would still be no. 

  • Ronald August 20, 2026 (10:15 pm)

    Survey says…NOPE…

  • South delridge August 20, 2026 (10:22 pm)

    They need to find them someplace to stay. Clearing the encampment will just move them from place to place and reset any progress they have made to try to move up In life. They need stable housing and services and employment help at least. Services especially for mental health and addiction. If you take away the customer base, dealers won’t make enough money to make it worthwhile. South Delridge has improved a lot in the past decade or so, but I think that’s because of gentrification and rising prices which is not good, but it’s a lot safer and your stuff doesn’t get tagged as much.

    • anonyme August 21, 2026 (6:37 am)

      There isn’t enough housing for those who pay for it much less for those who don’t.  And most of these campers refuse services.  Any camper should be removed as soon as they set up, not months or years after crime and environmental destruction have taken a toll on the neighborhood.  The choice should be to accept services or leave; the fact that the options aren’t perfect or don’t allow for continued drug use and crime is not an excuse.  This phenomenon does not exist in a vacuum.  It exists because it is enabled.

  • grilled cheese August 21, 2026 (10:30 am)

    We need more police patrolling these difficult areas of West Seattle 24 hours a day. That is what we pay them to do. I live a couple of blocks from the precinct, and the police car lot is always full. I never see police cars patrolling West Seattle or issuing tickets. It feels like the wild west. Please step up and help the community.

  • Informer August 21, 2026 (10:38 am)

    Work on getting rid of the drugs, addicts will follow the supply, and move on. Housing later. Give Katie Wilson an earful!  She has got to go! No drugs, less homeless. Sounds simplistic but put in the all out effort.

  • wsn00b August 21, 2026 (11:32 am)

    Step 1: Do nothing. Wait for it to get really badStep 2: Somebody diesStep 3: Do something minimal while posturingStep 4: Go to Step 1

  • Jim P. August 21, 2026 (3:08 pm)

    I think we need to stop the harmful fiction that these are just people like us who only need a hand up.I suspect, if you checked, every one of those people has been offered a hand dozens of times if not more.Past a certain point, the vagrancy laws need to return.  Refuse shelter or a job or drug treatment more than a couple of times and it is time to clear out.Society’s duty to help only goes so far and if help is repeatedly refused, you are on your own and the road out of town is waiting.

  • Neighbor August 21, 2026 (4:49 pm)

    Come somebody explain to me why we can’t arrest these people? We’re aware of multiple crimes being committed in this area. It may well turn out that the proper place for these people to stay is jail. 

Sorry, comment time is over.