FOLLOWUP: District sticking with split-lunch plan, but offers ‘mitigations’ and task force

By Torin Record-Sand
Reporting for West Seattle Blog

As we first reported earlier this month, Seattle Public Schools sparked controversy with an abrupt announced that all comprehensive high schools (including West Seattle and Chief Sealth) must have two separate lunch periods. The announcement made a week and a half into the school year led to a districtwide walkout protest at district HQ on September 15th. But the district is moving ahead with the change, it was clear after a short discussion at Wednesday night’s special meeting of the School Board, and all schools must have split lunches in place by October 6.

The justification was simple. “We serve more lunches if there are multiple lunch periods.” said superintendent Fred Podesta. He provided statistics such as a case study from Cleveland High School that showed splitting the lunch period led to 31 percent more lunches being served to students, addressing the district’s persistent concerns about ood access. Other justifications were reiterated, such as the need for staff to take their own breaks in accordance with contracts, which were noted in the slide deck posted beoore the meeting.

Nonetheless, acknowledging the community backlash, the district plans some “mitigations” and will seek community engagement. Many complaints were from students feeling that the change would split personal availability and time to use for either extracurricular or personal matters: the ability to schedule a club meeting, meet with a teacher, do homework in advance of a class, or to be able to see friends. Some possibilities include a scheduled advisory time between students and teachers, more flexible choices for students in the time of their lunch period, and shifting club meeting times

It was noted that meetings are under way with student leaders from affected schools to ask them for feedback. Coordination with school principals on the implementation of the plan was promised too. Here’s a slide showing the status of that:

Associate superintendent Dr. Rocky Torres-Morales noted there are many different approaches on how to deal with the change, and these will be left to each respective school implementing the change. “Each school is their own school, there is no one size fits all decision.” he said.

Also discussed: The school lunch change as part of thei overall plan to re-evaluate the high school day this year and next. A task force will be dedicated to the re-evaluation, working on options for equitable access to credit-earning opportunities, protecting time for extracurricular activities, and reviewing school start and end times, among other goals.

The school board’s hope is that this upcoming process will be more transparent than what led to the lunch announcement. “This [the upcoming changes] is a serious topic, we won’t unwrap it like a Christmas gift in April, people need to hear about it along the way.” said superintendent Podesta. The recommendations on revisions to the high school day will be due from the task force in spring 2026.

14 Replies to "FOLLOWUP: District sticking with split-lunch plan, but offers 'mitigations' and task force"

  • Mike September 25, 2025 (3:57 am)

    Task force?  Is this a military operation?

    • WSB September 25, 2025 (9:12 am)

      That phrase is commonly used in civilian context. I just pulled an archive search and we’ve had 554 mentions of the phrase in 18 years (there was a West Seattle Bridge Task Force, among other things).

  • Julie September 25, 2025 (9:04 am)

    It’s so stupid that the school district didn’t start the school year with the number of lunches that they required instead of changing things in the fall!

    • IDC9 September 26, 2025 (12:51 am)

      Yes. It seems like this should have been sorted out and ready to implement on day 1 of the new school year.

  • SLJ September 25, 2025 (9:15 am)

    Obviously the most important thing is that the students have time to eat. Cleveland was cited as an example, but they already have 2 lunches. Were there issues at the schools with one lunch? If not, this should wait until next year, so the schedules don’t need to be changed. Having lunches split by grade level seems ideal for friends, and maybe some clubs, but that will take a lot of coordination. This should not be implemented once the school year starts, unless there are kids that aren’t able to get lunch (this has not been shown to be true as far as I know).

  • AlkiGal September 25, 2025 (9:52 am)

    Part of a good education is teaching adaptability and this will be a great lesson in that. My high school had 4,000 students with 8 lunch periods, 22 minutes/each – the sole purpose being scarf down some food to refuel and get back to the classroom…increasing to 2 lunch periods should not cause this much of an uprising. 

    • IDC9 September 26, 2025 (12:55 am)

      Did the students get enough time to actually eat their food (even if that meant scarfing it down)? The lines for hot lunch must have been quite long even as divided up as the lunch periods were. If the students were split evenly, there would have been 500 in the cafeteria each period. Assume the vast majority opted for hot lunch. Those lines must have been massive!

  • HTB September 25, 2025 (10:16 am)

    Still hard to understand why this wasn’t done before school started. Having said that, if Podesta and the district had just cited more lunches served as the reason from the outset, it would have saved a lot of trouble.

  • SPSParent September 25, 2025 (11:02 am)

    Was there anymore information given about the students that made up the 31% increase in school lunch’s at Cleveland? I am wondering how many of these students had been eating off campus (at home or out) and no longer had enough time to do that. How many had been bringing lunch from home to eat while at a club meeting? More data is needed to say that the 31% more lunches served even remotely represents students who didn’t have access to it with a one lunch schedule. Perhaps SPS just took away their other options. 

    • IDC9 September 26, 2025 (12:56 am)

      Were Cleveland students allowed to go off campus for lunch prior to this change? It seems most schools these days have closed campuses, which would prohibit that.

    • K September 26, 2025 (12:16 pm)

      Access is probably a big word to use for the situation.  What’s more likely is that they had “access” but that required waiting in a line so long they had to choose between lunch and doing homework, meeting a teacher, hanging out with friends, etc.  Shorter lunch lines makes food more accessible because then they don’t have to choose.

  • Kim September 25, 2025 (2:27 pm)

    If you go around a high school around lunch time which I have done for both Ballard High School and Sealth High School you can definitely see many students going off campus to buy food at fast food restaurants. Many students get free and reduced lunches and breakfast at schools. And it actually takes a long time to get through a lunch line to get your lunch and then finding someplace you can sit down to eat, when I was in high school it was difficult to find a place to sit down if you weren’t friends with the people sitting down at a table and one reason why I never ate lunch at school.  It’s just stupid in my opinion that the Seattle School District one of the biggest school district around doesn’t have their act together to figure out something like this before school starts. 

    • IDC9 September 26, 2025 (1:00 am)

      Will this change bring an end to the practice of students at Ballard and Sealth being able to go off campus for lunch? There is an argument to be made that a closed campus enhances student safety, but it sounds like going off campus for lunch was a good option for you. I’d hate to see it unnecessarily taken away for others who might benefit from it.

  • Wes September 26, 2025 (10:10 am)

    The biggest fail here was the lack of planning over the summer when this would have been better received and planned out with the eye on clubs and contracts.  SPS continues to get an F-.

Sorry, comment time is over.