FOLLOWUP: Sound Transit Board OKs three special-case property acquisitions for West Seattle project, gets briefed on ‘Enterprise Initiative’ that could lead to changes

Related to West Seattle’s light-rail plan, here are two notes from the Sound Transit Board meeting that just concluded:

PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS: Board members gave unanimous approval to staff’s plan to pursue acquisition of three parcels, after hearing that these were all special cases and that the bulk of acquisitions will await further decisions on how (or whether) to proceed with the project. One – as noted in our preview – is a Port of Seattle parcel in the 1000 block of SW Klickitat that the board was told is needed for “load testing” that could assist in the staff review of potential cost savings; the other two are residential parcels in the 3200 block of SW Genesee whose owners need to sell and move due to personal circumstances but, with the project pending, can’t find any non-ST buyers. Board members, particularly Seattle City Councilmember Dan Strauss, expressed concerns about what would happen to the residences once vacated; he was told that ST will look into finding “quality tenants.” He was also told a meeting next Monday will take a closer look at ST policies regarding acquired properties.

‘ENTERPRISE INITIATIVE’: The board also got a briefing on the status of this review that’s been in the works a while now, figuring out ways to bring the ST3 plan into line with ST’s financial resources. This has its roots in alarm over the revised $7 billion cost projection for the West Seattle extension, but its determinations will be applied to other projects, ST staff says – saying today that in essence it will eventually bring a “realignment” of the future plan, but in a different way than ST’s done “realignments” before. Here’s the slide deck that was presented; it acknowledges that changes in scope, or even “reconsideration” of some projects, are options, as are “potential revenue enhancements.” Ultimately, they hope to have a new plan by the middle of next year.

6 Replies to "FOLLOWUP: Sound Transit Board OKs three special-case property acquisitions for West Seattle project, gets briefed on 'Enterprise Initiative' that could lead to changes"

  • Dog Whisperer July 24, 2025 (11:23 pm)

    How about a property tax refund instead?

  • skeeter July 25, 2025 (9:40 am)

    I support transit.  I voted for ST3 in 2016.  But this is ridiculous and I can see why people are losing faith in Sound Transit.  Nine years after voter approval and we are “building a deep understanding of the scope and scale of challenges facing the agency…”  Unacceptable.  And then next year in 2026 we will “amend the (10-year old) ST3 System Plan and adopt a new Long-Range Plan.”  I’m really scratching my head.  It seems like we’ve wasted 10 years and we’re basically at the starting line after spending untold millions of dollars.    

  • AlkiBean July 25, 2025 (3:38 pm)

    Building up to the cancellation of Link to West Seattle.  At that cost I’m okay with that…ridiculous!

  • Karin Cumming July 26, 2025 (8:20 am)

    We were well on our way to having a monorail to West Seattle and Ballard over 20 years ago.  I voted against the current light rail project because, as reported in the media, it would give Sound Transit a blank check indefinitely, and the prognosis was not good back then.  I’m glad I sold my house in West Seattle and moved away at the end of 2016.

  • Noko Marie July 26, 2025 (4:53 pm)

    Ultimately, they hope to have a new plan by the middle of next year.”  Meanwhile, Sound Transit continues to tear apart the fabric of our community.   WS has been living under the cruel threat of eminent domain for years now.   Is Jefferson Square going to be demolished so Sound Transit can build a palatial 90′ deep “station”?  Businesses there are caught in limbo.  Many of them are finding that Sound Transit does NOT pay adequate relocation compensation for businesses (or for homes).  No one wants to buy a condemned property so it is significantly devalued.  Great for developers; devastating for people. Where can people  even relocate?  There is no space to build a new swimming pool if WSHC is claimed.  Two music schools that serve 1300 or more kids are on the route.    Seattle City CM Strauss, who also sits on the Sound Transit board, told an owner to move their business to Ballard where is plenty of space. West Seattle is dying a slow death.  Strauss says ST will fence and patrol condemned buildings.  Former Sound Transit Executive said “property acquisitions are like money in the bank.”

  • MarFaun July 28, 2025 (2:55 pm)

    We voted for transit improvement in 2016’s ST3 package. I support public transit.   But since 2016, Sound Transit has failed to meet its system ridership forecasts outside some central Seattle Line 1 segments, and most of that ridership is cannibalized from more flexible bus routes.ST3 money has been spent to pay off ST2, generate two EIS reports, ST presentations and media.  Both EIS’s state that the Downtown-West Seattle light rail segment (WSLE) won’t increase ridership, improve rider experience, or reduce congestion. But it will cost 5x more than voters approved, generate a carbon footprint that will never be mitigated, displace residents, do irreparable harm to the environment, close businesses and lose jobs. We’d expect the ST board to not just rethink the link extensions, but rethink how better transit can be delivered sooner, for less money and impacts.  We have asked CM/BM Strauss, CM Saka, & other ST board members, “If you had $7-$9 billion to spend on transit, would you build a four-mile rail stub, or electrify the entire Metro bus fleet, build a WS bridge off-ramp to the busway, build a transit-only lane for buses on the WS bridge-SR99 interchange, and still have money left over to improve city & regional public transit?  We’re still waiting for their answers.

Sorry, comment time is over.