VIDEO: U.S. Rep. Pramila Jayapal’s close-to-home town hall

(WSB photos, video)

Our area’s U.S. House Rep. Pramila Jayapal, a West Seattle resident when not in D.C., held a town hall meeting Wednesday night in her home neighborhood. She and her constituents brought up a wide range of issues, from the Israel/Hamas war to college costs to health care to UAPs (aka UFOs).

Rep. Jayapal said the community meeting at The Hall at Fauntleroy was one of more than 100 town halls she’s had since taking office seven years ago. “We may not agree … but whatever it is, I want to talk about it.” We recorded the town hall in two parts – first, her half-hour introductory remarks:

For those who don’t have time to watch, here are our notes:

She said “funding for community-based projects” is part of the job – and that she has helped secure $50 million, with $17 million to come “as soon as we pass the government funding (legislation).” She mentioned food-bank funding and emergency housing as some of what that money goes toward. Other funding on which she’s worked included something showcased at a port event earlier in the day, %18 million toward truck electrification.

If you are associated with a nonprofit, she said, her office can help you look for federal grant money. And for individuals, they can help you navigate federal agencies. “Our job is to try to help you navigate what is sometimes just crazy bureaucracy,” or inaccessibility. They won’t necessarily be able to solve every problem for you but they can at least help you get an answer. This includes Social Security, Medicare, and immigration issues, she added. She hailed her staff’s tenacity in pursuing solutions for constituents. Specifically, she said, she’s hearing from constituents who have felt strong-armed into Medicare Advantage plans – or are having a tough time getting back onto traditional Medicare. She says she’s been pushing to get the federal government to crack down on Medicare Advantage-related fraud – she thinks those offerings shouldn’t even have Medicare in their name.

On other matters, she said this has been the least productive Congress ever – barely 20 bills passed by both houses and signed into law in 2023. Funding to keep the government running is usually finalized by year’s end, but isn’t yet – “this is the craziness we’re dealing with, we still have not funded the government.”

She accused the House’s Republican majority of holding the funding “hostage to their extreme ideas.” She says that includes solving the “broken” immigration system, but contends that the Republicans don’t want to do anything so the border mess will remain an election issue. She said immigration worked well decades ago when arrivals were allowed to work right away, and instead now they’re hung up in bureaucracy. Right now, Ukraine aid and border policies are all tangled up, she said. She also said they’re working to restore the child-tax credit to help lift families out of poverty, but that too is tied up with other matters.

She also mentioned the Foreign Intelligence Act, “protecting privacy,” with a bill passed out of the Judiciary Committee but still stuck on its way to get to the door. And the farm bill is awaiting reauthorization. She also said she will “not stop fighting” for abortion rights and gender-care rights, noting that she herself has had an abortion and is “proud mom of a trans daughter.” She moved from there to drug-cost issues, including capping insulin prices. Other issues she touched on: Some student-loan debt cancellation (see her website), infrastructure, tax-code changes, climate, antitrust enforcement. Also: “I know it isn’t enough and we have a lot more to do …” like ending the Senate’s filibuster rules. “You can’t just change the rulers, you’ve gotta change the rules.”

Then she got to the most intense current issue: “The terrible attack by Hamas on Israel, and Israel’s horrific war in Gaza, that’s happening right now.” She said she’s been calling for a ceasefire “to get to safety and peace for both Israelis and Palestinians. … Military action does not get us to where we need to go.” A ceasefire would mean more hostages could be released and “innocent civilians” won’t be killed, whether Palestinian or Israeli – “we have to see them as the same, they are the same.” She contended that Israel’s war on Hamas is only radicalizing more people. “We have to be thinking how we get to a durable peace in the Middle East,” where Israelis and Palestinians “live side by side.” She said she’s met with families “of dozens of hostages” … “I will continue to hold space for all the pain is out there … we have to get to peace … more military action only gets us more military action.” She was soundly applauded. In segueing to Q/A, she declared, “I’m fighting for freedom, for families, for faith” – not just religious faith, but “faith in our democracy,” the nation where she arrived at age 16.

From there, it was on to Q/A, which lasted almost an hour; the Israel/Hamas war was the most frequently mentioned issue, but far from the only one. Here’s the video, followed by our toplines:

First speaker in our video thanked Jayapal for her position on Gaza “and for also mentioning Ukraine,” for which the commenter advocated continuing aid, then asked, “How do we get more money (for Ukraine)?” Rep. Jayapal replied that it’s “tough” because “aid to Ukraine is something that Republicans say they’re not voting for.” She said she will have a tough time for voting for it if it’s “tied to bad border conditions” or a certain level of Israel military aid.

Second speaker wanted to talk about Alzheimer’s disease and thanked Jayapal for supporting a “national plan.” Jayapal promised to continue advocacy and support for resources.

Third speaker was 11-year-old Maya. “I was wondering why there was a lot of older people here,” which drew laughter. “My dad was saying it’s because younger people are not as interested in politics these days, and I was wondering what can be done about that.” Big applause. Rep. Jayapal said, “We need you!” – to talk to her friends and make sure they understand that decisions being made now will affect them for many years.

Fourth speaker said he’s been following news about UAPs (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena, formerly UFOs). He said he didn’t know if they’re real but if they’re not, a lot of government money is being wasted on them, so he wanted her support for those trying to find out the truth. She recapped the July 2023 hearing, legislation that’s been proposed, and she said she supports protections for whistleblowers, which could be important in getting to the truth.

Fifth speaker read from a statement that related to the “war on terror” and watch lists; Rep. Jayapal asked her to contact her staff so they could help her offline.

Sixth speaker voiced a concern about health care, as an entrepreneur having a difficult time finding an affordable health-care option. Rep. Jayapal said she’s been fighting for universal health care “because one of the places that gets most screwed in our current system is small businesses.” She acknowledged that the Affordable Care Act was “good for a lot of people” but not everyone – those who are paying overpriced premiums for high-deductible policies are subsidizing private companies’ profits. She said “I don’t have an answer for you” but “we’re working on it.”

Seventh speaker identified herself as an immigration attorney who works with children and asked where things stand and whether there’s “any hope of an asylum system.” Jayapal said the status of what’s been negotiated is “unclear” on some things; regarding asylum, there is money in a pending bill to hire more people to help, but it’s not clear right now that the bill is going to go anywhere.

Eighth speaker brought up the “upcoming election” and voiced various fears – from the current administration’s support for the Mideast fighting to the Republicans’ attacks on the trans community, of which they said they are a member – “my tax dollars are going to this genocide.” Jayapal said she’s doing what she can; that was countered with, “You’re doing the bare minimum.” She countered that she’s one of few voices in Congress for a ceasefire.

Ninth speaker said that President Biden is losing support with young people because of the action in Gaza and said he should stop sending weapons and “accomplish a peace agreement” if he wants to regain that support.

Tenth speaker asked what’s the best way to communicate with politicians, especially those who don’t share the same views. And she wanted to know what Rep. Jayapal thinks about the “criminalization of homelessness.” The reply was that she doesn’t believe that can be allowed to happen – “we need to build more housing, invest in more housing … long-term supportive housing …” Regarding the first question, she said research helps, as does “organizing people in (other members’) districts” to speak to an issue of disagreement.

Eleventh speaker said she works at Neighborhood House. She said more assistance is needed for low-income families – people line up hours in advance – and “the price of groceries is so, so high.” Specifically, she advocated for supplemental funding to help with food. Rep. Jayapal said that was “never (before) a partisan thing” – yet now it is – “there are so many hungry people in our country.

Twelfth speaker was concerned about politicians who seem to have jobs for life. Rep. Jayapal said she agrees that term limits are important – like limits on how long you can hold positions leading committees.

Thirteenth speaker asked about the congresswoman’s “commitment to student-debt relief.” She said she’s fought for it before and is fighting for more, as well as backing a “College for All” bill that she says would make college tuition-free for everyone.

Fourteenth speaker asked about universal health care and wondered why the US has to “reinvent the wheel” instead of having a system like the EU. Rep. Jayapal said “it’s very hard to dismantle” the current system of private companies and private insurers when they have so many lobbyists. “Every time we try to move in this direction we get this massive pushback … I share your frustration.” She said that while it’s seen as a “far left” position here, it would be seen as “centrist” elsewhere in the world; the only way to change that, she said, is to “build a big movement” to force change.

Fifteenth speaker asked about walking and biking safety. “Local action can’t fix a nationwide issue,” she said, noting the preponderance of large SUVs, for example. Rep. Jayapal said some federal “Safe Streets” money was indeed allotted to Seattle, and said she’s cosponsoring a national commitment to zero fatalities by 2050. She said she also has signed a letter to the USDOT supporting walking/biking safety as criteria for grants.

Sixteenth speaker said he has voted Democrat for 40 years but is going to have a hard time voting for President Biden because of the current Mideast fighting. He asked Jayapal to convince him why he should. She said she can’t “make a moral argument about what America is doing in Gaza” and that she doesn’t agree with everything the president does but “we are in a space right now where the threats against our democracy are so real … if you think what’s happening now in Gaza is horrific, imagine what’s going to happen when Donald Trump gets into the White House. … Don’t step away from democracy.”

Seventeenth speaker said “our government’s a little too male, pale, and stale.” She then asked how much money and weapons the U.S. has provided to Israel, and said she’s disgusted about what’s happening in Gaza. She also complained about a particular political action committee that Jayapal described as “dark money.”

Eighteenth speaker (first joking that he’s a “pale male” but “not stale.”) said that with crime in Seattle, a lot of people are “buying weapons, and I’m concerned about that.” Then he segued into concern about college costs

Nineteenth speaker wanted to know how Rep. Jayapal would “fight for a free Palestine even after a ceasefire.”

Twentieth speaker, identifying himself as a naturalized American, wanted to know what she’s doing about “moving country-of-origin quotas.”

Twenty-first and final speaker had a letter to submit for her signature – she asked that it be provided to her staff.

Rep. Jayapal then delivered some quick answers to the final questions. For public safety, she said services are needed as well as gun-law reform. Regarding college costs, state and federal aid used to cover 70 percent of the cost – now they cover 30 percent, as the federal government has disinvested in education, so correcting that is important. Regarding Palestine, she said she agrees it’s troubling that there’s no discussion of the lasting peace, of a two-state solution, everything is focused on the military situation right now. Regarding the immigration question, she said things are rather convoluted right now – per-country caps are disproportionate – “these are really big issues” that are part of the immigration-reform proposal.

And after an hour and a half, she wrapped up, offering words of thanks (and photo ops).

CONTACTING REP. JAYAPAL: Contact info for her Seattle and D.C. offices is here; getting help with a federal agency, as she discussed, is addressed here.

25 Replies to "VIDEO: U.S. Rep. Pramila Jayapal's close-to-home town hall"

  • Jason January 26, 2024 (7:25 am)

    Love Pramila! So lucky she’s our rep. 

  • Lauren January 26, 2024 (7:29 am)

    Proud to call her my representative. 

  • Scarlett January 26, 2024 (8:50 am)

    It appears that Ms. Jayapal is back in line with funding  Ukraine’s war effort, which of course is simply a geopolitical play to weaken Russia and BRICS, a competing currency against the dollar.   

    • DC January 26, 2024 (12:18 pm)

      Remind me Scarlett, who invaded whom? Oh, that’s right, Russia invaded the sovereign nation of Ukraine and continues to bomb and kill civilians to steal Ukrainian land. If you think Russia should have free reign to invade sovereign nations, steal their kids, and kill their citizens, then at least have the guts to say it.

      • Scarlett January 26, 2024 (5:59 pm)

        I don’t know about you, DC, but I want to live in a civilian democracy where the power to declare war and conduct military operations oversease requires approval of elected members of Congress.  I don’t want to live in an  military “junta” where the generals sidestep our democracy and take our tax dollars for their military adventurism.      I want to live in the kind of nation our founders  envisioned when they escaped another empire, the British Empire. 

        • Charles in Town January 26, 2024 (6:26 pm)

          100% Scarlett

        • bill January 26, 2024 (8:52 pm)

          Not quite sure how to refute you, Scarlett, since your grip on events and law is less than firm, but I shall try. The power to declare war does lie with Congress, it is one of Congress’ powers enumerated in the Constitution. Congress has found various ways to evade declaring war since Dec 8, 1941, and largely left military interventions to the President (who, to be picky, is not the Commander in Chief since we are not in a declared war). The President runs the executive branch, not your imagined cabal of unnamed generals, and the military is very clear on that — you must not know any military officers. As for the founders’ glorious vision, that encompassed tolerance of slavery, voting restricted to males, distrust of direct democracy (see Senators selected by States’ legislatures plus the Electoral College), and freedom from the Crown’s restrictions on what the very wealthiest colonists were allowed to do the native inhabitants in the way of land grabs.

          • Scarlett January 27, 2024 (12:27 am)

            I didn’t think I needed to add the obvious caveat that the founders had moral failings since it was tangential to the idea of elected officials being accountable to the people – their skewed understanding of “people” notwithstanding.   I’m still not quite sure what your position is. You seem to be arguing that supplying Ukraine with advisors, military intelligence, military weaponry, all of which can result in Russian casaulties and reshape borders, is justified on historical precedents and does not constitute war, technically, and does not require congressional approval.  Be careful.  Vietnam was the poster child for mission creep (we never declared war) and we know how that turned out. 

            Here’s a little tidbit straight from the Pentagon, the citadel of doublespeak, from a few months back to justify military aid to Ukraine:  

            “It helps to prevent a larger conflict in the region and deter potential aggression elsewhere, while strengthening our defense industrial base and creating highly skilled jobs for the American people.”  

            So, on top of doing the exact opposite of “deterring aggression elsewhere,” war is a great for the economy.  

    • Jay January 26, 2024 (1:52 pm)

      It’s a good geopolitical play from a military point of view. A Javelin costs $178,000 and destroys a $3.5 million T-90 tank. Every dollar we’re spending on lethal aid is destroying many times more value in Russian equipment. This conflict has knocked Russia out of near-peer status in terms of military and economic power and has made Russia’s vision of recapturing former USSR states an impossibility. It has also made it clear to China that their window to invade Taiwan is closed.

    • Al King January 26, 2024 (3:36 pm)

      Scarlett. Here’s your chance to extoll the virtues of Russia and why it’s a shining beacon for all to admire. Educate us. 

      • Sigh January 26, 2024 (7:08 pm)

        Dude, don’t waste your time.  Scarlett’s comments are clearly based on reading opinion pieces and not any academic-level understanding of politics, world history, and especially not economics, given that weird comment about comment about competing with the US dollar.  Everyone with common sense knows  that supporting another country in their fight for freedom is a far cry from starting our own war without congressional approval.  “Conducting military operations overseas” does not require a declaration of war.  Scarlett may want to live in a country where it works otherwise, and I wish them the best of luck in that country, but the laws of the United States give that power to the Commander-in-Chief, not congress.

        • bradley January 26, 2024 (10:55 pm)

          Or, maybe those billions could have been used to feed and house people in need.  How many billions have we sent to Ukraine?  Oh but that’s ok because we have the rich to tax.

  • Shanti January 26, 2024 (9:43 am)

    Not proud to call her my rep. I voted for her before but never again. 

  • Alki resident January 26, 2024 (12:28 pm)

    She’ll be out of office soon. She’s anti cop, pro Palestine and hasn’t done anything for our city. She doesn’t speak for me  or my family. 

    • Mr J January 26, 2024 (1:03 pm)

      Are you saying you’re pro-genocide? Palestine is not Hamas. 

    • Jeff January 26, 2024 (1:21 pm)

      Being pro Palestine is a good thing and I am happy she speaks for me! I will be canceling out your vote…

    • Jay January 26, 2024 (1:45 pm)

      She’s not anti-cop, she supports police reform. And pro-Palestine (which means calling for a ceasefire and opposing genocide) being bad is a hard sell to Gen Z and Millennials. You’re speaking for your kids, but I wouldn’t assume they share your positions. They might just not feel like talking about it to avoid drama.

      • Alki resident January 26, 2024 (3:25 pm)

        My kids are 24-35 yrs old and we’re on the same page thank you. She is anti gun, anti police and when asked to address the situation about the daycare downtown that had a shooting in front of it, she didn’t respond. Again she doesn’t represent a lot of my friends and non of my family. 

  • Robert January 26, 2024 (12:50 pm)

    She’s on the far left of Congress and the US. So her actual influence is very limited. She stresses a series of successes and bring-home-the-bacon actions that are simply mainstream Democratic positions.  Her views on immigration, public safety and Israel are out of touch with the rest of the country. Who knows, given recent voting in Seattle that removed just about all the people she endorsed, maybe she will begin to have problems in 2024, 26. 

    • Jay January 26, 2024 (1:42 pm)

      This comment about her being out of touch is ironically out of touch itself. 50% of Biden voters recognize the actions against Gaza as genocide, and Democrats are getting crucified on TikTok and other Gen Z social media over this issue. An overwhelming majority of people under 40 and people outside of the Liberal and Conservative bubbles support progressive positions, and dismissing them isn’t going to drive high voter turnout in November. Gen Z sees their elders doing bad things in the name of partisan politics and they have a hard time bringing themselves to vote for things that Rs and Ds have in common like union busting, genocide, insurance company corruption, tax cuts for the rich, etc. Seattle saw a shift towards Republican style politics because young people see participating in the current system as pointless.

      • wscommuter January 26, 2024 (4:15 pm)

        Not sure what your point is.  Because older people are bad, young people choose to remain impotent?  One would think all these much wiser and more virtuous young people would flex their demographic weight and participate by doing the low hanging fruit of voting to change what their “elders” are screwing up so badly.  Or not.     

    • Jason January 26, 2024 (2:22 pm)

      Far left of Congress? Meh, she’s pretty lukewarm and standard issue lib to me. The “squad” isn’t even “far left” as far left usually means supporting social equality and anti-capitalist. No rep, even AOC, comes close to that.  I long for the day people don’t speak in rhetoric. All these reps in the left-ish wing of Congress are still lib and pro capitalism.

  • Arbor Heights Resident January 26, 2024 (2:31 pm)

    I’m glad to have a representative who is willing to take the political risk to stand up to the Israel lobby and their brutal apartheid regime. Unlike Biden, she has my vote in 2024!

    • Rhonda January 26, 2024 (9:29 pm)

      You who else “stands up to the Israel Lobby”? Hamas, ISIS, Hezbollah, white supremacists, Iran, the Taliban, the KKK, etc. You and Jayapal have some pretty terrifying allies.

      • Foop January 27, 2024 (9:12 am)

        lol, this comment is unhinged.

Sorry, comment time is over.