Salmon farming in nearby waters? King County Executive Dow Constantine seeks moratorium

In the wake of last August’s Atlantic salmon farm collapse in north Puget Sound, King County Executive Dow Constantine wants to ensure no new pens are built in waters over which the county has jurisdiction. The announcement:

Citing the threat to native salmon populations, King County Executive Dow Constantine today called for a six-month moratorium on allowing any new Atlantic fish farming facilities along marine shoreline in unincorporated King County.

“The hundreds of thousands of farmed, invasive Atlantic salmon that spilled into the Salish Sea in August threaten our native fish populations and our way of life,” said Executive Constantine. “Atlantic salmon don’t belong here. Beyond a six month moratorium, we need to ensure these operations can never again pose a threat to indigenous salmon already struggling to survive.”

Legislation enacting the moratorium will be transmitted to the King County Council (today). Indian tribes including the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe and Suquamish Tribe reviewed and approved the proposed moratorium to ensure it did not interfere with their local fisheries and treaty rights.

In the State of Washington, commercial net pens are required to obtain federal and state permits. Local governments like King County can also require permits as part of implementing shoreline master plans.

While the state has issued a moratorium on permits they administer for net pens, an applicant could still apply for and receive a county shorelines permit.

The moratorium announced by Executive Constantine will enable King County to review and strengthen its shoreline regulations to eliminate the risk of harm from non-native salmon farming to native salmon runs and sensitive shorelines.

King County rivers are home to seven native salmon species, including chinook, steelhead, and bull trout populations that are protected by the Endangered Species Act. Puget Sound is where these and other salmon species spend much of their lives, feeding for a year or more, before returning to their home streams to spawn.

King County and a host of partners, including treaty Indian tribes, cities, counties, and state and federal agencies have invested heavily in salmon-habitat preservation and restoration efforts.

Executive Constantine’s proposed moratorium coincides with a state-mandated review and update of King County’s Shoreline Master Program. The program includes policies, regulations and plans that manage the shorelines within King County’s jurisdiction, and is incorporated into the County’s comprehensive plan.

The Shoreline Master Program must be reviewed, updated and delivered to the Washington Department of Ecology by June 30, 2019.

The nearest Atlantic-salmon-farming facilities right now, according to what we’ve found out via research so far, are off Bainbridge Island, which is part of Kitsap County.

33 Replies to "Salmon farming in nearby waters? King County Executive Dow Constantine seeks moratorium"

  • anonyme November 27, 2017 (2:18 pm)

    There is absolutely no reason to farm Atlantic salmon in our waters.   The moratorium should be permanent.

  • Jack Spara November 27, 2017 (2:48 pm)

    Why don’t they farm Pacific salmon? I’m ignorant here?

    • Salmon November 27, 2017 (5:39 pm)

      One easy reason is that if you farm native salmon and there is an escape, you cause genetic damage because the farmed native fish (from a small number of parents) will interbreed with native salmon and reduce effective population size.

  • kg November 27, 2017 (3:34 pm)

    Why would they not farm native species? Do they taste better? Reach maturity faster?

  • Salmon November 27, 2017 (3:34 pm)

    Heavy on emotion but light on facts.

    • Chuck November 27, 2017 (4:29 pm)

      Feel free to share said “facts” here. Make sure to include things like the exponential increase in sea lice due to salmon farming. These lice attach themselves in abnormally high numbers on the wild salmon smolts as they are leaving their rivers, literally sucking the life right out of them. And that’s just one dire consequence of these pens; add in disease and escapement (Atlantics would be considered an invasive species in Pacific waters) and you’ve got all the reasons needed to call for a permanent ban. I trust those were the facts you meant?

      • Dale November 27, 2017 (4:52 pm)

        Touche. 

      • Salmon November 27, 2017 (5:19 pm)

        The letter was specifically referencing the net pen escapes, so I was referring to the hysteria about that. Lice and disease don’t have anything to do with that, and there’s no conclusive evidence that Atlantic salmon can establish themselves here.

        • Chuck November 28, 2017 (6:09 pm)

          Um, just because it wasn’t in the letter doesn’t mean that disease and lice aren’t issues. But keep selling you pro-farming stance. I just don’t see too many here buying.

          And I sure hope they’re not buying those fish in the store; their diet is full of who-knows-what? Antibiotics and hormones, no doubt. You see, they are just getting around to TESTING all the recently captured fish that had escaped to find out just how full of disease and harmful additives they are full of. Seems the salmon farming industry isn’t too keen on sharing what they know.

          As for your argument that “they’re cheaper,” sure. I’ll give you that. But at what cost? Sorry, but saving the wild fish stocks and the clean waters (fresh and salt) they need is the only real answer. Shortcuts are dangerous. Sorry if it hurts your personal checking account (just my guess).

          Now if you’ll excuse me, I’m going to go donate to Save Bristol Bay dot org. Seems there’s these (Canadian) miners in Alaska who’d like to put a huge open pit copper mine on the headwaters  of one of the world’s last remaining wild salmon fisheries. I’m sure they think they can just raise farmed fish after the earthen dam full of polluted tailings breaks wide open. And here’s a funny little secret: there has never been an open pit mine that hasn’t polluted. They don’t put that in the brochure, tho.

          Sorry to be so heavy here, but the enough is enough. At some point we have to start paying attention to our NATURAL world, and quick trying to outsmart it. Just say NO to farmed salmon.

      • Salmon November 27, 2017 (5:29 pm)

        See Eric1 comment below. It is largely about knowing enough about both sides of the equation. Yes there are bad things about farmed salmon but does it outweigh the negatives about eating wild salmon or farming native salmon? These kinds of decisions require a lot more critical thought and hard work than just freaking out and yelling Lice! and Invasive!

      • Toni November 27, 2017 (6:27 pm)

        To all of you whom have posted facts, thank you. I have read some articles and find this to be a disgusting and harmful way to provide fish for public consumption. Any food source that is called “farm raised” should be questionable as to wether it is fit for human consumption. Peace….

        • Salmon November 27, 2017 (7:53 pm)

          Hard to live off of wild-caught tofu but yes that would be great if possible. Just not very practical, and most of the human population would die without farming.

  • Jeannie November 27, 2017 (4:23 pm)

    Coincidentally, the Environmental Defense Fund just sent me a Seafood Selector. Tops on the “Worst Choices” list is Atlantic Salmon (farmed). As noted in Dow Constantine’s statement, let’s remember the spill of farmed, invasive Atlantic Salmon last summer. As anonyme says, let’s keep this moratorium permanent.

    As for farm versus wild salmon, here’s some info from the Cleveland Clinic about why wild salmon is better for your health than farmed:

    https://tinyurl.com/y79ou9ss

    Also, this organization, among several others, is doing good work:

    http://wildfishconservancy.org/

    As for emotion versus facts, it IS about facts. Science is about facts, and there are scientific reasons for this moratorium. I hardly consider it an “emotional” decision!



    • Salmon November 27, 2017 (7:46 pm)

      It’s more nuanced than that. Is this about what is best for humans or what is best for wild fish and orcas? If we just care about ourselves, then yes let’s eat all the wild fish in the ocean. If it’s about the struggling wild salmon, then maybe eating them is a bad idea. 

    • Salmon November 27, 2017 (7:49 pm)

      Some other considerations…

      -Farmed fish is generally cheaper than wild fish, so it is more affordable for less affluent people

      -Eating farmed fish is better for your health than eating no fish at all (Google it).

  • cjboffoli November 27, 2017 (4:23 pm)

    I wonder if there actually were any pending plans for commercial salmon fishing pens in King County waters?  Or is this just perhaps some optical gain at low political cost?  Perhaps Executive Constantine might address what more can be done about King County’s continued annual discharge of hundreds of millions of gallons of raw sewage and untreated stormwater into local waterways.  That seems more urgent than hypothetical non-native salmon pens.

    • WSB November 27, 2017 (4:49 pm)

      Best I could do was look to see if any exist. Will take a deeper dive, pun not intended, later to see if anything had been proposed.

  • Eric1 November 27, 2017 (4:36 pm)

    There are lots of good reasons to farm Atlantic salmon.  First, as we have seen, there is minimal effects from escapes.  No interbreeding with natives or new spawning populations. Second, if you stop farming Atlantic salmon,  then you have to eat the natives.  Since most local stocks are in decline, that isn’t very smart.  Eat Alaska salmon?  Sure except a lot of those are BC, or PNW salmon caught in Alaskan waters.  It sounds good but really it isn’t. 

    .

    Basically farmed salmon is a case of pick your poison.  Opinions vary but many do not consider the consequences of NOT farming salmon.  Besides, as long as we can foist Atlantics on the unsuspecting,  the more natives for the rest of us….  including Orcas.

  • TJ November 27, 2017 (5:20 pm)

    Lots of fear emotion driving the anti-farmed side rather than actual realized consequences. As mentioned above, these farmed fish are stupid, with no instints at all and do not breed or mingle with native fish. Personally, I don’t eat farmed salmon, but there is a growing market for it. People love salmon, and combined with a growing human population here and declining wild salmon population this is a great option to feed people. Dow can grandstand all he wants and make yet another cute environmental stand, but here’s to hoping he will be able to pull out the binoculars and see more pens pop up across the sound

    • Salmon November 27, 2017 (7:41 pm)

      Yes farmed salmon eat food, sometimes ocean-derived food. But what do you think wild fish eat and from where do you think their food is derived?

  • seaopgal November 27, 2017 (8:01 pm)

    This moratorium supports the county’s shoreline review process as well as efforts in the legislature to phase out fish farming. I’m all in favor. No one actually needs to eat salmon — farmed OR wild (except the orcas). We can live without it. And we should … at least while we focus our efforts on recovering wild populations.

  • Salmon November 27, 2017 (8:29 pm)

    I agree we don’t need to eat salmon but how do we get the human population to stop eating it? I’d be interested in a fishing moratorium but it’s politically difficult to enact.

  • TJ November 27, 2017 (9:14 pm)

    Mandating that people now can’t eat something is comical and unrealistic and something you might hear from North Korea. People should welcome farm raised salmon as a food source to complement reduced wild quotas. I admit that I don’t know a lot about orcas, and put humans first, but I have seen plenty of videos of orcas killing sea lions, which makes me wonder why they are supposedely lacking food when the data I’ve seen says sea lion and seal populations are up?

    • WSB November 27, 2017 (9:28 pm)

      Southern Resident Killer Whales – the endangered local population – do not eat marine mammals. Transient orcas do. They are distinct populations.

    • Salmon November 27, 2017 (10:32 pm)

      Seals and sea lions eat wild salmon.

      Humans eat wild salmon.

      More seals, more sea lions, more humans = More competition for the same food.

      Resident orcas eat wild salmon.

  • anonyme November 28, 2017 (6:42 am)

    Fact: humans do not need to eat salmon to survive.  And if more consumers were aware of parasites in fish, such as lice and worms (halibut is especially worm-ridden), their appetites might be reduced.  Poor folk can’t afford filet mignon or lobster either; what’s the mandate for that?

    It is insane to risk another accident that can reasonably be predicted to cause environmental devastation.  The argument that there isn’t an 100% guarantee of harm, and therefore the greed should be allowed to spread unchecked, is absurd.  Sounds like Wall Street talking.

    • hyperbole abounds November 28, 2017 (8:40 am)

      “Reasonably be predicted to cause environmental devastation”. 

      How?
       

    • Salmon November 28, 2017 (2:22 pm)

      Anonyme–I’m not sure I understand your argument. So do we need to ban everything that isn’t necessary for human survival? 

      What makes you believe that releases of farmed Atlantic salmon cause “environmental devastation”? Here are some links from some reputable sources if you want to gain some basic knowledge on this subject.

      http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/aquaculture/archive/10myths.html

      http://wdfw.wa.gov/ais/salmo_salar/

Sorry, comment time is over.