White Center/North Highline annexation vote? Council’s next step

Following up on last week’s City Council briefing on the potential costs of White Center/North Highline annexation, the Regional Development and Sustainability Committee took a closer look today. It was the first step toward deciding whether to seek an annexation vote this fall – to ask the 20,000 residents of the potential annexation area whether they want to become part of Seattle or not. The state Growth Management Act says urban services need to be delivered by cities, so unincorporated urban areas like this one have to either become part of a city, or create their own; the latter is considered unlikely, so the decision for WC is ultimately: Seattle or Burien? Under terms of a never-finalized agreement that both cities are nonetheless currently honoring, Seattle has dibs till the end of this year. For an annexation to happen this fall, a process including the state/county Boundary Review Board has to be triggered this spring, so the big decision for this committee will come at its next meeting March 18th. You can watch Seattle Channel video of this afternoon’s meeting (public comment 2:30 in, the full agenda item at 42:30, with an unrelated urban-forestry report inbetween) by going here; we also live-chronicled meeting highlights on partner site White Center Now. (Screen-grab images: Above left, Seattle annexation supporter Kathi Wheeler; above right, Burien annexation supporter Gill Loring.)

P.S. A commenter asks about the boundaries of the proposed annexation area; here’s a King County map showing the zone under discussion, known as “Area Y.”

10 Replies to "White Center/North Highline annexation vote? Council's next step"

  • Spikele March 1, 2011 (10:22 pm)

    What will happen to the blog and your neighbor to the South?

    • WSB March 2, 2011 (5:43 am)

      Spikele, we’ll continue to cover White Center no matter who eventually annexes it … TR

  • Drew March 2, 2011 (3:59 am)

    White Center is Burien NOT Seattle. PERIOD

  • Cclarue March 2, 2011 (6:52 am)

    I grew up in White Center, My moms address was and still is Seattle, so I disagree Drew. But I have mixed thoughts on the annexation. WC may be better off with Burien, I’d like WC to stay Wc though. But the current residents should be involved and active in the decision. Where are they ?Weshould hear from them.

    • WSB March 2, 2011 (7:17 am)

      I believe everyone – possibly one exception – who commented at yesterday’s council-committee meeting is a current resident.

  • Ex-Westwood Resident March 2, 2011 (9:33 am)

    What exactly are the boundaries (N, S, E, W) of the area that has the potential of becoming Seattle proper?

  • dsa March 2, 2011 (9:41 am)

    I so hope this doesn’t happen because Seattle will ruin the business climate their with new fees, taxes and regulations all in the name of improvement and benefits.

  • Jeff March 2, 2011 (9:48 am)

    Ex-Westwood Resident: It is a really complicated line believe it or not. Very very roughly, Roxbury to SW 112th, 30th SW to the Duwamish.

  • Ex-Westwood Resident March 2, 2011 (3:12 pm)

    No Kidding Jeff!!!!

    Thanks WSB!!!

    Thank God I don’t have to worry about once again living in the city of Seattle limits!!

    dsa – You are 100% correct. WC is slowly gaining respect and upscale businesses. Getting annexed to Seattle with their higher fees, taxes and regulations would slow or halt that progress.

Sorry, comment time is over.