Update: New California SW bike lane explained

That’s the view of a small section of the new California SW bike lane, as seen from one of the big chairs outside Caffe Ladro in Morgan Junction. Since we first told you about the new lane last Sunday, more work has been done, and one stretch of California SW just north of here (south of Fauntleroy Way) now has bike lanes on both sides of the street. We had sent an inquiry to SDOT after noting the bike lane wasn’t called for in the Bicycle Master Plan, which simply recommended “sharrows” in this area (they’ve been painted in the same area between the bike-lane-lined sections). Here’s the explanation we received today:

The recommendations for bicycle facilities in the Seattle Bicycle Master Plan were based on detailed field work and available data regarding traffic volumes, turning movements, speeds and other factors. However, the plan also recognized that “in most cases, the facilities and actions identified in the Plan will require additional traffic analysis….”

In this particular case, there is about 48′ from curb-to-curb on the stretch between Fauntleroy and Myrtle, yet the 2-way left-turn lane is only present between Fauntleroy and Willow. That provided some extra room on the section between Willow & Myrtle, so we were able to install bike lanes on both sides of the street for those 3 blocks. We also determined that there is enough roadway width (~40′) to upgrade to a climbing lane (bike lane going uphill, sharrows going down) between Myrtle and Ida. In general, we prefer to install bike lanes over sharrows if there is space available.

Also today, the city issued a midyear “Bridging the Gap update” news release regarding how much road work’s been done so far this year – read it here.

17 Replies to "Update: New California SW bike lane explained"

  • Brie July 22, 2009 (5:22 pm)

    In light of these new bikes lanes, I’m guessing the south portion of California Avenue isn’t going to be repaved any time soon – which is too bad because it is a pretty bumpy ride in some sections.

  • Scott July 22, 2009 (9:32 pm)

    Is anyone else as upset as I am about the addition of bike “sharows” and lanes?

  • JumboJim July 22, 2009 (10:12 pm)

    No.

    (Ok, prob. someone is. Just not me.)

  • Mr. X July 22, 2009 (10:52 pm)

    I would hope that SDOT keeps track of how many new bike riders this attracts. I suspect one will be able to count them using one’s own fingers, and perhaps their toes on a sunny day.

    On the other hand, I have no expectation that SDOT will accurately track the vehicle delays and reduced intersection levels of service that will result from narrowing this arterial street.

  • B July 22, 2009 (10:57 pm)

    I’m upset that they are sharows and not all lanes. Sharows don’t do much and seem like a waste of money.

  • Jeff July 22, 2009 (11:23 pm)

    Bike lanes sharrows: If you love them or hate them there are much much larger issues going on here. a) SDOT did not follow its own Bicycle Master Plan. b) Was this change ever open for public input and if so where? c)In light of SDOT’s fiasco last winter, it would do well to engender good will throughout the Seattle neighborhoods and not attempt to evade direct questions about their actions.

  • WSM July 23, 2009 (7:50 am)

    I hate the word sharrow. It’s sounds like some made up “feel-good” PC word.

    And when are bike riders going to start paying tabs? If they want to use the road, the should have to pay for it like the rest of us.

  • Krystal July 23, 2009 (8:44 am)

    What is a sharrow? If it is the blending of two words to create a new one, that’s pretty weird. Like Speidi and Brangelina. Who knew the city would catch on to the totally AWESOME trend…

  • Eddie July 23, 2009 (8:55 am)

    WSM – roads (and road maintenance, such as it is in Seattle) are paid for out of our (notice I said “our”, presuming you pay) property taxes. In other words, as a bike rider and property owner, I pay for that road. However, my bike does zero damage to that infrastructure. The car I drive, and pay fuel taxes for, does cause damage to the roads.

    Get over it. If you have to slow down for a second, or pay a little bit of extra attention because there is a bike rider on “our” road, then live with it. There’s room enough out there for all of us – and if we don’t use up all the fossil fuel and clean air, then there’s plenty for all too.

  • WSB July 23, 2009 (8:55 am)

    I don’t believe the term was invented here. We’ve linked to this before – the official city description from SDOT website:
    http://www.seattle.gov/Transportation/sharrows.htm
    High up in the Google results for the term is this item from 2007 in which folks from other parts of the country discuss them
    http://commutebybike.com/2007/01/23/sharrows-to-become-federal-standard/

  • RS July 23, 2009 (9:01 am)

    Well said, Eddie!! As both a cage driver and motorcyclist, I feel much safer when there are actual lanes for my pedal bike brethren. It reinforces that bikers should stay in the lanes and cars should give them space. Win-win, in my opinion.

  • 55rpm July 23, 2009 (9:54 am)

    I used the new lane on my ride home yesterday. It is great! I applaud the city for the “bike-friendly” improvements that are being made. It is one area where I can actually see something getting done.

  • AJP July 23, 2009 (10:22 am)

    Yay bike lanes! Biking is great!

  • J.Q.T. July 23, 2009 (10:41 am)

    Nope still not a word of appreciation from the 1% or so of the population that benefits from this subsidy. Excuse me, but you’re welcome.

  • Al July 23, 2009 (11:29 am)

    Jeff, see the below link for the history of the BMP and public input. The BMP is also up for revision soon (there will be schduled public meetings – one can always show up at the Seattle Bicycle Avisory Board the first Wednesday of each month as well) and they ALWAYS take public input (see links at BMP site for input contacts)…http://www.cityofseattle.net/transportation/bikemaster.htm

  • alywest July 23, 2009 (12:32 pm)

    I think our tax paying money could go to better use. Do they really think that this is going to be a high traveled bike lane? It’s all up hill, very steep hill!

  • bolo July 23, 2009 (1:38 pm)

    alywest, not all cyclists are afraid of climbing hills– even very steep hills! At least not in this city, where the cyclist must often (usually) navigate hills to get from point A to point B.

Sorry, comment time is over.