Puns for intellectuals

Home Forums Open Discussion Puns for intellectuals

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 25 posts - 101 through 125 (of 209 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #745974

    JanS
    Participant

    as in..kill the messenger? er…shoot the messenger?

    #745975

    miws
    Participant

    That’s odd. The first thing that came to my mind was k— . . .

    I think I was thinkin’ the same thing you were thinkin’ DBP.

    Mike

    #745976

    DBP
    Member

    Yeah.

    Ted Kaczynski, right?

    #745977

    DBP
    Member

    Utter Nonsense for 800:

     

     

    #745978

    mirabile
    Member

    XXX

    ?

    #745979

    mirabile
    Member

    No! Drr!

    Malcolm in the Middle!

    #745980

    DBP
    Member

    Yaaayyy!!! You did it, mirabile!

    You uttered nonsense.

     

         

     

    #745981

    DBP
    Member
    #745982

    huh
    Member

    You put a lot of work into this, so I’ll wait to answer.

    #745983

    DBP
    Member

    Yeah, maybe we can just have a count of who knows it and who doesn’t . . .

    #745984

    munchkin22
    Member

    OK, make that 3 people, we guessed it as well.

    Still a great one.

    #745985

    DBP
    Member

    OK, so this one was not that tough. I could have made it tougher if I’d wanted. But I didn’t want.

    BTY: These are not puns; they’re rebuses.

    According to Google, a rebus is “a puzzle in which words are represented by combinations of pictures and individual letters.”

    Rebuses are interesting (to me, anyway) because they span at least three areas of the brain: (a) the visual cortex, (b) the linguistic cortex, and (c) the hippocampus (memory).

    Every brain solves rebuses differently, though, so if you could somehow unwind the exact method by which your brain solved this one, then you’d have a significant bit of your personal cognitive genome, right there.

    Consider:

    A twenty-something might not get this rebus, even if he’s able to solve all the separate parts. And the reason for that lies with his hippocampus. Not that there’s anything wrong with his hippocampus, mind you. It’s just that it might not be . . . how shall I say it . . . mature enough. ;-)

    Meanwhile, some older folks who “theoretically” know the answer and have delighted in saying it out loud dozens of times (whimsical thing that it is) STILL won’t get it, because they’re thrown off-track by a single clue.

    Some people would have a very hard time solving this if I abstracted (made harder) just the first picture, while others might get even if I abstracted most of them beyond recognition — as long as I left at least two consecutive clues as they are.

    A few highly dedicated (or highly unusual) people could get it even if all the visual clues were completely abstracted.

    How would they do that? —By ignoring the visual clues completely and counting syllables.

    In other words, they’d solve it using the linguistic cortex alone.

    Yes, it can be done.

    Such is the power of the mind.

    #745986

    miws
    Participant

    Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious.

    Mike

    #745987

    Andy
    Participant

    That’s a bit of a mess, because California is crossed out, which means it is not California, which means that California – or Cali – can’t be part of the answer.

    #745988

    DBP
    Member

    Excellent point, Andy. California is a bit of a mess, isn’t it?

    You’re getting your memes crossed, though, aren’t you? In your mind, you swapped the red line that bisects Calif / ornia with a circle/bar symbol that equates to “NO!” (as in NO SMOKING!)

    I thought of that when I was designing the puzzle, and took pains to ensure that the line’s end points fell somewhere short of the edges of the picture. But at the same, I kept it red.

    Which gave me just enough string to tease a cat, without hanging it.

    ;-)

    #745989

    Andy
    Participant

    Is the word “California” somewhere on that picture? Might just be it isn’t showing up for me. All I see is the state with a line through it.

    I rarely get accused of thinking too literally, but I am almost literally in as divided a state as California on how to take this one.

    #745990

    DBP
    Member

    It’s a two-step process. You have to convert the picture to the word first, then do the whack job.

    Same deal for Malcolm. Only for him, you’re subtracting first, then adding.

    #745991

    Andy
    Participant

    So hang on here – because there is a picture of California I am supposed to decide that it is not a picture of California but instead the word California, and that it is written diagonally, and that even though the picture no longer exists, the line still does, and the line divides the invisible word between the “i” and the “f?”

    Is that all?

    Not that I am trying to argue anything here, I mean, this is all for fun, and I haven’t had the time or the inclination to run off at the fingers on these forums for a while. But man, man, that’s a bit of a stretch.

    I’m not sayin’, I’m just sayin’. What was I sayin’? Oh yeah, I’m just sayin’ that I got to “Superman Not-California,” wondered where the heck that one was going, and just stopped because my boss was standing behind me.

    #745992

    DBP
    Member

    OK, here’s what you do, Andy:

    First . . . thank the Good Lord that you even HAVE a boss. Because that means you also have a JOB.

    Which in turn means that you don’t have to sit at a computer for 8 hours pretending to be working on something meaningful in exchange for $0.00, like I do.

    Second . . . whenever you encounter something counterintuitive, baffling, or just plain stoopid in one of my postings, open your e-mail program and copy my comments into the body of an e-mail message from some coworker who’s been dead for several years. Then you can study my remarks at your leisure and decide for yourself whether my medication needs to be adjusted.

    If the boss comes snooping around, asking about what’s so interesting all of a sudden, just show him the e-mail and go:

    You know, it’s weird. This is the last thing [John Q. Coworker, deceased] sent me — just before he passed on. But I don’t understand it. It just looks like a bunch of gobbledygook. Do you think it could be some kind of message from beyond the grave?

     

    #745993

    DBP
    Member

     

       

    Or, for the sticklers out there:

       

     

    #745994

    DBP
    Member

    Easier one today:

     

     

           

     

    #745995

    miws
    Participant

    #121: That’s It(t) in a nutshell.

    Itt! WTF are you doing in that nutshell?!?

    Mike

    #745996

    DBP
    Member

    Thank you, Thing.

    Er . . . I mean . . . Thank you, Mike.

    #745997

    miws
    Participant
    #745998

    DBP
    Member
Viewing 25 posts - 101 through 125 (of 209 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.