TEACHER TALKS: Union says district ‘walked away’ Saturday night

“SPS walked away from the table tonight.” So begins an update posted by the Seattle Education Association, saying contract talks have broken down with three days left until the scheduled start of classes at Seattle Public Schools. The two sides have been talking since June; the union says special-education staffing is a huge sticking point. As for why, the union has praised this unofficial website purporting to detail what the district has proposed; the district, meantime, has posted its own summary, date-stamped Saturday, here, addressing other issues too. That same page on the district website also promises daily media briefings starting Monday.

31 Replies to "TEACHER TALKS: Union says district 'walked away' Saturday night"

  • Sped Parent August 30, 2026 (5:55 am)

    Replacing Instructional Assistants with paras is NOT supporting Special Ed or Gen Ed students and teachers.  Either the district is intentionally misleading people with the claims that this will improve both, or they are genuinely completely ignorant of what those positions do.  Unfortunately it’s probably the latter.

    The teachers’ position that the bargaining table is not the place to introduce a complete overhaul of special education staffing is spot on.  To me it seems like they know the changes are bad but were hoping to introduce them under pressure to accept from the public, because people by default assume negotiations and strikes are always about money.

    • Sped IA/Paraeducator August 30, 2026 (8:40 am)

      Instructional assistants and paras are actually the same thing  What the district is proposing is actually to cut the amount of staff coverage we have AS WELL AS combine 4 programs in to two programs. This is incredibly dangerous for a multitude of reasons: -our ratios have already been negligent at best and we have continuously found it difficult to provide enough coverage for students with maladaptive behaviors at the same time as providing appropriate supports for those needing flexible help with specialized instruction. -the burn out rate and amount of injuries for Sped employees is obnoxiously higher than all other areas of education-the new model of support system they have in place would spread instructional assistants across multiple classrooms, far more than could cover as many students as are needed at once -classroom health/learning hygiene will sufferr immensely. Students that are in need of more quiet spaces to engage with Thier work without serious sensory stimuli interruptions are at serious risk of poor academic success rates alongside emotional/physical disregulation from overcrowded classrooms and increased behaviors in Thier learning environments -certified teacher caseloads will increase exponentially creating more off the clock work hours (most teachers I know already work in Thier time off). It will give them less time for appropriate family connections for families who children have interpersonalized education plans, behavioral intervention plans and 504 plans-student access to community connection (such as field trips and volunteer work that helps them prepare for adult transition services) will significantly decrease or even be diminished entirely due to a lack of safe staffing support in transit and community activities-students that are chronically absent, dealing with family crisis issues or need emotional support systems will be harmed from a lack of resources to accomplish the push in services that help aid them in engaging in more independent and responsible work accountability.-students that are more highly impacted by Thier neurodiversity who are in need of more frequent deescalation strategy will have less space to access them within classrooms, meaning they will have to travel further within the building to attend to Thier needs (often making for unsafe transfer conditions), isolating them further from Thier peers for longer periods of time. -the burn out of staff members will leave less engagement for taking on extra hours to support students in extra curricular activities (sports, music and clubs)-staff are at even higher risk for physical injury due to disregulated students, meaning more subs and consequently, more money spent to cover sick pay/injury pay and mental health leave at the same time as needing to cover the wages of sub hours for those students. As a Sped instructional assistant, we truly appreciate your support 🫶💗

      • Education August 30, 2026 (11:31 am)

        Suggestion (no snark intended): spell check and proof read your postings in the future as it would add to the credibility/readability of your position.

        • Please August 30, 2026 (7:35 pm)

          Please. Your perfectly edited, spelled and punctuated comment is ridiculous! That was a beautifully clear and very detailed sharing of the difficulties within classrooms, for teachers, their aides and all of our students. Thank you for your time, efforts, and all you give to our Sped children, Sped IA/Paraeducator! & Thank You so very much for sharing this info with us all. “Education,” i think you could use a solid dose of education in trying to see through others’ eyes. Being a perfect speaker, reader & writer of the English language does NOT prove you are educated, nor very smart, and certainly does not place you in a position to tell others how they “should be” in order to be heard!! Apologies for the rant, but truly, “Education,” you were utterly rude, in my humble opinion.

      • Mama bear to a distinct kiddo August 30, 2026 (11:41 am)

        100000% support all our IA, para – whatever they want to call them , teachers, support staff!   We’re ready to go back when the union meets “our” demands.  

    • Feet August 30, 2026 (9:39 am)

      As someone who works in public ed (not SPS) and has participated in bargaining: very charitable of you to assume it’s only one or the other. In my experience admins are both dishonest AND ignorant as to what classroom instruction actually looks like.

    • SPEP teacher August 30, 2026 (10:09 am)

      @SPED PARENT para and and IA are essentially synonyms.  From my reading it looks like they chose to use para when referring to what SPS generally calls an IA.  Confusing – yes!  Intentional???

  • Salary Increases? August 30, 2026 (7:41 am)

    SPS’s website says it’s offering 4% (average) plus 2-3% guaranteed. That could mean about 6-8% if a teacher is doing a decent job? This seems reasonable. What is the union wanting?

    “SPS is proposing a guaranteed salary increase of 2.6% in 2026-27, 3.6% in 2027-28, and 2.6%in 2028-29, totaling nearly 9% over 3 years. These increases would be in addition to annual salary-step increases, which average around 4% per year for eligible employees, recognizing educators’ contributions while allowing SPS to plan responsibly across multiple years.”

    • Mike August 30, 2026 (10:41 am)

      Focusing on the pay is missing the point — it’s the special education support changes. This has more information: https://spsforkids.org/

      • Jethro Marx August 30, 2026 (10:16 pm)

        This is the same AI slop link that was posted yesterday, why do you think it’s accurate?

    • Lagartija Nick August 30, 2026 (11:30 am)

      It seems quite clear from the union statement and the other comments here that Special Education support/staff is the sticking point and not salaries.

      • Salary Increases? August 31, 2026 (7:00 am)

        If it was only about special ed, then salary increases would have been something they could agree on and move on. Instead, the union came back asking for more money. SPS’s website yesterday listed shat they had already agreed on, and agreement on increases wasn’t reached yet. Plus…according to super Ben…the union came back and asked for even more $$$ on Saturday night. So…

  • Salary Increases? August 30, 2026 (7:48 am)

    Also what are the early release demands/offer (sorry, maybe it’s on the FB page but I didn’t go it). Surely we’re not looking to increase the amount early releases?…

  • Red for Ed August 30, 2026 (9:19 am)

    A few things I have to say about the district’s release in regards to our bargaining:*They did NOT propose VEBA. We did. They refused us the first round. *They are promising to hire 40 behavior support paras to send out to where high behaviors are occurring, however they fail to say they cannot fill the 5 positions that we already have. Even at a higher pay. There is no contingency plan for those infilled 40 positions. *Outside of a few paras linked to the Continuum A and Continuum B pathways, there would only be 70 positions for paraprofessionals to be sent out centrally. These would not be 70 “new” people. * Those 70 paras would not be guaranteed support in that building for more than a year. One year you may be in the North end, the next year might be in the West end. No guarantee of elementary or Secondary.*THERE IS NO SOLID PLAN for how we would be dispatched and how buildings could request more supports. *This model will only have 1 year for everyone to be hired, trained, and some sort of process to be thrown together. This monumental process should be researched, discussed on our Task Force and invite families to be part of this process as well. *Multi-language: they have offered improved supports for the first 33 students but does not add on that the next support would not kick in until there are over a hundred ML students in the building. The information on what SPS has offered is very misleading!

    • I can't believe I'm responding to this August 30, 2026 (10:43 am)

      “This model will only have 1 year for everyone to be hired, trained, and some sort of process to be thrown together.”That actually sounds like an absurdly generous amount of time to figure it out. 

  • Retired SPED teacher August 30, 2026 (9:43 am)

    Paras aka paraprofessionals and IAs aka instructional assistants are all the same, require the same OSPI requirements. 

  • Mel August 30, 2026 (10:48 am)

    This is the website that outlines some of the differences in the proposals WSB, your link goes to a FB page: https://spsforkids.org/

    • WSB August 30, 2026 (12:29 pm)

      Sorry, that’s the one I intended, would not usually use that platform for anything but had to link that to get the SEA’s update as they didn’t post one to their website, and erroneously cut/pasted the same link twice. Fixed.

  • seattle teacher August 30, 2026 (12:40 pm)

    WSB – I’m guessing the unofficial website you meant to link is https://spsforkids.org/. It provides nice visuals of the impacts of SPS’s proposed special ed cuts would have in classrooms. There is also an annotated response to the district’s bargaining summary that went out yesterday  here

    edit: I see the first link was just fixed – thanks!

    • WSB August 30, 2026 (12:54 pm)

      Already fixed, thank you!

    • GHill August 30, 2026 (10:54 pm)

      The way this website talks about disabled students reinforces harmful ideas about disability. Presenting disabled students primarily through crisis, danger, disruption, and burden reinforces stereotypes that disabled children are inherently disruptive or dangerous.The problem isn’t that the website is raising concerns about special education staffing. Those concerns deserve serious attention. The problem is that it sometimes makes disabled students themselves sound like the problem that staffing cuts create, rather than framing disabled students as children whose educational rights and access are being threatened by inadequate staffing.I agree with the site’s core concern that cutting instructional assistants and reducing specialized staffing without a transparent implementation plan could seriously harm students. I also agree that special education is chronically underfunded and that educators need to be heard. My concern is with how we are talking about disabled students while making that argument.We should be careful not to describe disabled children primarily through behavior crises, toileting, medical needs, safety incidents, or the burden they place on teachers. Those are support needs—not characteristics that should define a child.We can advocate strongly for adequate staffing and resources without portraying disabled students as the source of the problem.Please consider this perspective before sharing or promoting this website. Even when the underlying concerns are valid, the way we frame disability matters, and this framing can perpetuate harmful stereotypes about disabled children.

  • Chuck Watermans August 30, 2026 (1:15 pm)

    Time for the state legislature to jump in and ban school union strikes. Thanks for agreeing, have a nice Sunday.

  • SPS Teacher August 30, 2026 (2:37 pm)

    I’m really encouraged by the lack of attacks on this comment section. I imagine it feels really scary for parents to think about heading into a strike, I hope our whole community knows how much we want to be in schools with our students.The SPED restructuring is the biggest sticking point for us. Hearing from my SPED educator colleagues has made it very clear that the only think we can do is stay strong for our most vulnerable students who would be impacted most by the changes outlined in the above website.Thanks families and Seattle community members who can see the nuances!

  • Kp August 30, 2026 (5:33 pm)

    Just asking: where is the money coming from? Am I reading correctly the Seattle School District is hundreds of millions of dollars in debt. Another school district is dipping into the rainy day fund to settle their teachers contract. Are these districts banking on the millionaire tax before it fails? 

  • Seattle Professor August 30, 2026 (7:58 pm)

    Seems like we need to reschedule union bargaining to a point where the start of school is not used as leverage or stop the ability all together of a strike that impacts the school schedule through legislative action.As Paul Benton used to say, “it’s for the kids, but not, because you spent a 3 month summer snorkeling in the catacombs.”

    • Lisa August 31, 2026 (7:37 am)

      Can’t tell if this comment is another dig on this thread at educators’ time off. In a work centered culture, I kind of get it, but most people don’t know that educators now have to cram 12 months of learn into 9 months. The break is now a lifeline to sanity. It’s not like it used to be. Also, Paraeducators aren’t paid at all for summer break, winter break, etc. No one complains about pro athletes getting time off and they get paid millions. It’s ridiculous really. 

  • SPS parent August 30, 2026 (9:45 pm)

    The Superintendent sent this very long email to SPS families tonight (8/30, 8:12pm) about bargaining:https://app.smore.com/n/kmv5t-a-message-from-ben-shuldiner?ref=email

    • WSB August 30, 2026 (9:50 pm)

      Yes, they also sent a media advisory about that and I’m writing an update currently. Thank you!

    • The Real JP August 30, 2026 (11:40 pm)

      $118,716 for 180 days of work. That’s not half bad…

      • Lisa in Arbor Heights August 31, 2026 (7:21 am)

        Agreed, but no one says that about pro athletes ( am thinking hockey which has a similar schedule) and their millions. Seems teachers only get those comments. 

  • Lisa in Arbor Heights August 31, 2026 (7:19 am)

    I work in Highline Public Schools and they call us Paras. When I worked in Seattle Public Schools I was an Instructional assistant. Same thing. Think paramedic, paralegal, paraeducator. In Highline we have a separate union from the teachers, unlike in Seattle. Pros and cons there. We’re up for a new contract that just failed it’s first round too. No talks of strike. (Paras in Tumwater, I think, just voted to strike) It’s not about the small amount of funding the district has, it’s how they’re choosing to spread it around. Paras/IAs typically get the leftovers and are often overlooked or unseen, most working hard for non- living, hourly wages ( unpaid breaks…summer…spring) Many people don’t know who we are or what we do and that adds to the issue. It’s worth looking up Mamdani ‘s recent goings on in New York with paras. The city council tried to give them a pay boost because the union wasn’t getting anywhere and he took it away citing that union protocols needed to be followed. I see that, but what if protocols aren’t getting them paid a living wage? I know a lot of teachers who want us to get a living wage and they’d gladly give up a bit to do it. 

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published.