Home › Forums › Open Discussion › 20-cent bag fee will not take effect Jan 1
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 16, 2008 at 12:25 am #588069
DianeParticipantSeattle grocery-bag fee to go to citizen vote
~
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2008181474_webbagfee15m.html
~
Yay!!!
September 16, 2008 at 12:51 am #639148
beachdrivegirlParticipantYeah! Best news I have heard all day!
September 16, 2008 at 3:37 am #639149
JoBParticipantdid you ever wonder why the grocery council paid to get the signatures to put it to a vote?
it isn’t the administrative bother.. they add new products to their stores all of the time.
maybe it’s that they figured out you might not be doing so much impulse shopping if you were thinking about what would fit in your bags.
in the meantime, i continue to stop to pick up plastic bags in West Seattle streets to end the litter problem that doesn’t exist. I collect about 10 a week on average.
i wonder how many of them blow into the sound and endanger sea life?
September 16, 2008 at 6:36 am #639150
LBGMemberYes…Jo B one would wonder. Then again, maybe the sea life have actually put them to good use 20,000 leagues under the sea.
Or maybe…just maybe…they thought government shouldn’t be regulating plastic bag usage.
Deep thoughts by Jack Handy.
September 16, 2008 at 7:05 am #639151
FullTiltParticipantI think it is funny that the major backer of this is the plastic industry. Well not funny really, but sad. Really, it is that hard to take your own bag to the store? You can spend hundreds extra a year buying organic food, but carting along a bag or two is really that hard. It is OK for the state to tell me that I have to buy liquor at their stores, only smoke 25 feet from a building, wear a seat belt in a car, a helmet when I ride a bicycle, no trans fat when I cook, and no teenagers listening to music in the vicinity of adults, but carrying a bag makes us a nanny state? Are your serious?!?! Are you even listening to yourselves? People in Seattle totally fell prey to the marketing of the plastic industry, and are cheering about it. Hell yeah they don’t want you to pay for a bag. That is their bread and butter.
The point is that it is a waste of recourses to get new bags ever time you shop. Don’t even give that argument that it should be the shop owners choice. you didn’t give that to booze or cigarettes, so it is not going to cut it for your precious bags either. Jesus Christ, grow up and take a modicum of responsibility for your actions. Even if it looks like it, those bags don’t grow on trees. It is bad enough that we are competing with each other for oil to put in our cars, we do not need to fight each other over plastic bags.
September 16, 2008 at 2:53 pm #639152
GenHillOneParticipantJoB, I thought about you yesterday because while driving east on Genessee, I counted three bags blowing in the street. It struck me because I don’t usually see them, but thought about you picking them up on walks. Then I came upon what I’m sure was the culprit. I didn’t think to check if it was a recycling or garbage truck (our neighborhood had both pick-ups yesterday), but the crew was working their way down the street. Bag tax or no, and I know they are always in a hurry, I hope they are employing best pracices for keeping control of the bags that aren’t simply discarded on the side of the road.
September 16, 2008 at 3:07 pm #639153
JoBParticipantLBG..
if the government doesn’t regulate the plastic bag industry and somehow keep them out of the sound, how are we going to protect one of our most valuable resources?
isn’t that what government is for.. protecting infrastructure? The greatest infrastructure this nation has is it’s natural resources.
September 16, 2008 at 3:11 pm #639154
JoBParticipantGenHillOne…
i am stopping to pick them up when i am out and about in the car…
I never saw them much until i decided to stop and pick them up.. now i see more than i can safely stop to pick up.
the garbage company has already told us that loose plastic bags in the trash or recycling are a big problem.. they jam the machines and apparently they float away easily too…
All anyone has to do to stop that is stuff plastic bags inside one plastic bag and tie the top.
if people were willing to make that kind of effort..
we wouldn’t need a bag tax.
September 16, 2008 at 3:24 pm #639155
GenHillOneParticipantOh darn, now I feel guilty…you’ve set the bar! I’ll have to pull over next time and get them. It wasn’t like I was on the bridge or anything. I do stuff and tie when I recycle though – isn’t hard, so agreed that it would be nice if everyone did.
September 16, 2008 at 3:36 pm #639156
JoBParticipantGenHillOne…
i probably have more time when i am out doing errands than you:)
i don’t know why i decided one day that i would just start stopping to pick them up. maybe it was when beachdrivegirl told me they weren’t a litter problem here and i decided to show her.. yup, i can be that petty.
it’s a habit now… and i think it got to be one before i told her how many i was finding. So i really should thank her.
the real hero is the person who walks along the hiway and picks them up… they pick up far more in one walk than i do in a couple of weeks… even though we have work details out cleaning the hiways.
September 16, 2008 at 3:40 pm #639157
ellenaterMemberFull Tilt, I agree 100%. And I often forget my bags…but would not mind paying. I think there is some allure in the fresh new bag for people. At least there is in clothes shopping. Maybe that’s just for teenagers but I thing the bags can be like trophies sometimes…
As far as trash goes, i’ve been picking it up at Lincoln Park lately. I love that place so much and it does feel good to get rid of it. I have found a few things on the beach that would be really bad for the sea creatures. Makes me happy to know that everyone else does it too!
September 16, 2008 at 3:52 pm #639158
beachdrivegirlParticipantThe principal of the matter for me is that I did not get to vote on this. And it is not solving any issue at all. Why are they taxing paper bags? why are they not taxing bags used at a department store? And what about the plastic produce bag that i pick up??? This is not a real solution.
September 16, 2008 at 5:16 pm #639159
FullTiltParticipantWe don’t need to vote on everything. That is why we elect people, to make policies and decisions. This was not going to be a life altering ruling. The big waste of tax dollars is going to be putting this on a ballot.
September 16, 2008 at 5:22 pm #639160
charlabobParticipantFT, thank you for explaining representative democracy. I have never lived in a place where people could be so easily stirred up by being told, “YOU didn’t get to VOTE on it.” Face it people, once again, you’ve been conned by an industry into a position that will only help them. When will we learn?
September 16, 2008 at 5:56 pm #639161
RSMemberThank you, FullTilt!! My sentiments exactly. As a recent transplant, I find the “we have to vote on everything” mentality a little bizarre. That’s WHY I pay attention and vote in the elections- so that good people get into office and make good choices. If they do something really asinine, we recall them or vote them out of office in the next election. The bag tax whining doesn’t make sense to me, even the argument that there are other things the city could spend their money on trying to fix. That’s true on first glance, but the city’s resources are always going to be fungible and there’s always going to be something better they *could* be doing. Seems like a path to complete inaction and paralyzed government to me!
September 16, 2008 at 5:58 pm #639162
JenVMemberI blame that horse’s you know what Tim Eyman for the current “we get to vote on everything” thinking.
September 16, 2008 at 6:07 pm #639163
ZenguyParticipantFullTilt you beat me to it, I had it half typed and had to go to a meeting. I hate having to vote for judges, like I know which is most qualified.
And Jen you are right on Eyman is a horses arse, making money off of people’s greed and gutting our infrastructure.
September 16, 2008 at 7:24 pm #639164
SueParticipantThanks, FullTilt – I agree with you on this one. I’ve been keeping track of my own bag consumption. I haven’t taken a bag of any kind from any store for at least 3 months now, and even before that for the past year I’ve probably taken less than a dozen bags from a store. It’s really not that hard. I was out at the North Bend outlets this weekend and people were surprised that we had our own bags and kept remarking on it as we pulled them out. They’re not just for groceries.
September 16, 2008 at 7:42 pm #639165
AnonymousInactiveThe other examples cited protect public health or safety. ie, seatbelts, helmets. You can not dispute the facts showing these measures save lives. It is the job of government to protect the welfare of it’s citizens.
I think we should use our own bags. It’s a good idea. It would reduce trash. It would help the environment. We know they never biodegrade. It could possibly protect sea life. All noble ideals.
I don’t think it should be mandatory without a vote. It does not fall under a public safety umbrella. And all these good intentions aside, if we really cared about the environment, we’d ban cars, not bags.
Yes, you have to start somewhere. That’s where a vote comes in. It is an opinion about what the priority should be. I’d rather see hard un-recyclable plastic packaging banned way before a product which can be properly recycled, if we chose to.
September 16, 2008 at 7:44 pm #639166
beachdrivegirlParticipantThank you JT! You have hit everything right on… i think sometimes people just like an “idea” b/c it makes them feel important… and they dont think about better ideas out there.
September 16, 2008 at 8:15 pm #639167
DianeParticipantExcellent points JT; totally agree; thanks for the input
~
Fantastic article today re the biggest waste producer
~
We recycle cans and bottles, why not buildings?
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/opinion/2008182437_peterop16.html
~
plastic bags are but a drip in the vast waste bucket, and a great distraction from the biggest culprits of preventable waste that ends up in landfills; developers who dump construction and demolition debris
~
why not penalize developers for dumping all that waste
~
and provide incentives for developers that reuse, recycle demolition and building waste
~
that would make a HUGE difference
September 16, 2008 at 8:18 pm #639168
walfredoMemberI don’t think its a victory for plastic bags, as much as it is for individual freedoms, taxation with representation. I don’t see what harm a vote could be, if this really is the will of the people.
It also hopefully would open up a broader discussion of whether this fixes any of the problems we face with packaging and waste, and what actual solutions might exist to deal with them.
September 16, 2008 at 8:22 pm #639169
charlabobParticipantWe have taxation with representation; we elect people who vote on things. If we don’t like what they do, we can run against them, vote them out, or even recall them. (There’s a serious attempt in California to recall Schwatzenegger — who beat the Democrat before him, who was recalled.)
Maybe the City Council blew this one — maybe they didn’t. The question is, what is the affect of voting (or revoting) on every decision we disagree with? What do we trust our representatives with? If the answer is pretty much nothing, why would anyone good ever run?
September 16, 2008 at 8:33 pm #639170
JoBParticipantDianne,
i think it’s a great idea to recycle everything..
and i think the idea of a recycling tax on dumping recyclable construction waste is a great idea… because it is obvious that the cash benefits of gleaning by those who are wiling to remove recyclable construction materials have not outweighed the hassle yet.
Beachdrivegirl..
no, a 20 cent fee for plastic bags won’t solve the recycling problem with plastic and paper bags… but it sure would make an impact.
Just taking about it has already made an impact. There is now a code on the produce sheet of older self serve cashier stands that allows you to weigh your bag and use it at checkout. That wasn’t there prior to the pending imposition of a bag fee.
JT…
Which of the pollution regulations have we voted on? Among other things, plastic bags migrating into the ocean are a pollution issue where they impact wildlife
and a garbage issue where they don’t. We have a lovely garbage dump in the middle of the Pacific Ocean that someone is going to have to clean up… I guess that’s us when it migrates to our shores.
did i miss the vote on garbage collection? plastic bags end up as a garbage problem…. so ubiquitous that it isn’t even noticed unless an individual makes a pledge to pick them up and begins to notice them.
Will we vote for increasing garbage collection on our city streets and hiways and beaches to alleviate the problem?
personal comment…
I really don’t understand the opposition here. The best i can come up with is a very juvenille..
You can’t make me!
I don’t know what the election on this will cost, but my guess is that whatever it’s cost, that money would have gone a long way towards providing public services.
I, for one, am not happy about being forced to absorb the costs for what should have been a no brainer for citizens who profess to be concerned about their environment.. or even citizens who don’t want their garbage bills increasing..
This was a fee that should have been every independent libertarians dream come true.. you get to decide whether or not you pay and make your own choices accordingly.
Instead, the grocery and plastic industries spent a lot of money making sure the rest of us will spend a lot of money that will produce absolutely nothing.
Now.. is that what you call a solution?
September 16, 2008 at 8:43 pm #639171
DianeParticipantFortunately part of our democratic process is ALSO the option to go directly to the people for a vote on the issue when/if the folks we voted into office fail us; if the majority did not care about this, they would not have gotten enough signatures
~
(i.e., this is exactly what we had to do to get the smoke-free law passed; our city, county, state elected officials continually failed us so we had to go directly to the people; if it were not for the initiative process, we would probably still have stinky, smoky public places)
~
and the city council members who passed this ridiculous law, who I voted for, will NOT be getting my vote next time; the one stand-out maverick, Jan Drago, will for sure get my vote
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.