Anonymous
Reading the blog for so long, it would never occur to me that the coverage was for sensationalism. Everything so far, has been just the facts. I looked at the pics again and did not see them as graphic. At least of the people. Nothing identifying was shown. No injuries were shown. I took it as a reminder of what does and can happen on our streets.
We’ve often discussed in depth, speed and dangerous intersections. As well as the mundane of informing street blockage and places to avoid. Showing the property and vehicle damage is no different than the coverage of other tragic events such as the recent arson. Most of us around here aren’t looking at them in a disrespectful way.
All that being said, I’m sorry the pictures evoked a response of your own experiences that are sad or painful. That is unfortunate. I don’t think in this case, there is any malice or invasion of privacy intended. The news exist to inform.