VIDEO: Will Seattle Public Schools start on time? Superintendent briefs media, says mediated talks ongoing

(Added: WSB photos)

3:04 PM: We’re at Seattle Public Schools HQ in SODO, where district superintendent Ben Shuldiner‘s media briefing is starting, two days before the scheduled start of school, which is in question because the district and its educators’ union haven’t yet reached a contract agreement. We’ll update with toplines as this continues.

Shuldiner says he’s glad that educators are in schools today, getting ready for the start of school, which he says “is the only thing I care about.” He says the talks are difficult because “We’re broke.” He says he’d love to “give money …to everyone,” if he had one. He says both sides are meeting right now, with the mediator present.

If a strike is called, though, “we are prepared,” and there will be meals available for kids, nonprofits that operate in schools will be able to operate, and they might have some “programming” for kids. But he say his “hope” is that school will still start on Wednesday.

On specific issues, he starts with special education, and says that it’s become a “place, not a service,” and he says that has to change. He said it’s “OK” that “folks didn’t like” the district’s first version of special education changes, and says they’ve made changes since then. They want to “try different ideas,” he said, and to “negotiat(e)” them.

He says things have “gotten better” since the mediation began. “We are working, we are working on negotiation, we are working on getting schools open on time. “Please know that negotiations are going on.”

First question: When did the talks resume, with the mediator? On Sunday, he said.

Second: Is the district opening childcare options if there’s a strike? “We are working on partners we already have to see what we can do about that.”

Third: Elaborate on the special-education proposal. He says it was intended as “rebalancing” so that students who need more support have more staff to provide it. He says they’re on “version 4” of the special education proposal.

Fourth: When was the first special education proposal made? A few weeks ago. Is changing special education a must? Yes, because it’s “so important for our children.” But it doesn’t necessarily have to happen immediately, he said. So now they’re trying to figure out if they can “create something now with a larger road map.” He said they “talked a lot about it” last night.

Fifth: What’s your confidence level that school will start Wednesday? He’s hopeful. He’s meeting with principals tonight. He suggests families take questions to their schools.

Sixth: We asked when tomorrow they’d make a call about whether there’ll be school on Wednesday. He said that’s up to the union – whether they decide to call a strike, and he suggested they wouldn’t announce there’s no school Wednesday unless the union says they’re striking. (So right now, there’s no particular deadline for making that call.)

Seventh question is about money, and he repeated “We’re broke” and that they don’t want to have to cut some other place to move money to an area.

Eighth question was about the stated hope of offering special education as a neighborhood-school model so that “students don’t have to move from school to school to school.”

Ninth question was different interpretations of the potential special education changes – staff cuts or not? He says it’s “complicated,” and there certainly is a way to view it that would make it look like cuts. “We’re not trying to balance the books on the backs of our children.” He says “version 4” … “changes the ratios, changes the model.”

Tenth question, what kind of pay increase? Shuldiner says the district has 8.8 percent over three years on the table, and isn’t going to say where the union is countering on that – “I think they’re working on that upstairs right now.” What’s the median teacher salary? He offers to get the reporter who asked the question info on that.

Eleventh question is about how inflation is affecting the wage offer – he elaborates that the offer is a “minimum” of 8.8 percent over three years. “This is not a pass-through,” he says, regarding state funding and the formulas. “We get about two-thirds of what the state gives us,” he explains, because Seattle is “super-expensive.”

Twelfth question was why SPS finally went public with its proposals – definitely because of the union’s public discussion, he said. Would he want negotiation to be that way? Maybe if it’s collaborative, going “super-public” could be a good thing.

Thirteenth question – is there an updated budget deficit number? Depends on what’s in the contract they work out. But next year, if changes aren’t made, “we’re insolvent.”

Fourteenth question – what does the mediator do? Goes from one side to next to “move the needle forward.”

Fifteenth question was a request to explain the salary “steps.”

Sixteenth question – how will athletics work if there’s a strike? Probably “won’t be able to do it” if union-member employees don’t show up, though he’s heard some may have ways around that.

3:04 PM NOTE: We recorded this all on video – it ran a bit longer than half an hour) and will add that when back at HQ. The district YouTube channel should have it too. Bottom line: Mediated talks are continuing right now.

5:21 PM: Our unedited video of the briefing and Q&A, with district Chief of Staff Bev Redmond introducing the superintendent:

33 Replies to "VIDEO: Will Seattle Public Schools start on time? Superintendent briefs media, says mediated talks ongoing"

  • Jon August 31, 2026 (3:29 pm)

    This man says so much while saying nothing at all. Stand with teachers. Stand with the teacher’s union and what they deem their needs to be in order to meet the needs of the students. Stand with the individuals who are in the room with students day in and day out understanding those students’ needs, instead of the overseers.

    • Melissa Westbrook August 31, 2026 (3:51 pm)

      So don’t believe anyone in SPS administration? Overseers is an interesting choice of word. What bothers me is that the teachers refuse to acknowledge the very large raise they received just 4 years ago and the district is now going to give them a bit more (plus the state bump). 

    • WSParent August 31, 2026 (3:58 pm)

      Speaking as someone who has been both a teacher and a principal – for the first time in well over a decade, we have a superintendent who is actually making sense and living in financial reality. 

      • Really? August 31, 2026 (4:19 pm)

        A superintendent who makes 9% more than the previous one – $365,000 base plus an additional $60k in retirement contributions.Call the hypocrisy for what it is! 

        • Neighbor August 31, 2026 (10:27 pm)

          Fine, let’s pay him zero. We can take his $425,000 annually and…divide it up amongst all the employees? That’s a drop in the bucket. You wouldn’t say a CEO with thousands of employees making $425,000 is overpaid. That’s what the superintendent is. It’s time to focus on actually solving the budget issues 

        • Walterego September 1, 2026 (10:39 am)

          Superintendent Schuldiner’s total compensation falls outside the top 3 in WA (behind Renton, Lake Washington, and Issaquah) even though SPS is by far the largest district in the state. Across similar sized urban districts (~40k-60k), it’s about mid-to-upper tier even though we have a far higher cost of living. If you want to attract and retain top talent, you have to compensate accordingly.

      • Really? August 31, 2026 (4:24 pm)

        A superintendent who makes 9% more than the previous one – $365,000 base plus an additional $60k in retirement contributions.Call the hypocrisy for what it is! 

      • westseattlebob August 31, 2026 (5:38 pm)

        This exactly!!!  It’s about time we had fiscal responsibility and accountability with SPS. It’s refreshing to finally have someone at the helm at least trying something rather than the status quo

    • Jethro Marx August 31, 2026 (4:38 pm)

      Jon, do you have any connection to the union? If the people commenting here aren’t willing to acknowledge their role in this little saga it’s hard to take people seriously. I’m just a parent, and over the last decade have been disappointed more or less equally by teachers and administrators at SPS.

    • Parent August 31, 2026 (6:30 pm)

      I don’t understand when people say “stand with the teachers.” Of course we stand with the teachers but we also stand with the school district which has inadequate funds to fund operations. It doesn’t have to be one or the other—this isn’t a private company hoarding resources. Were it merely a question of giving the teachers what they want or believe is right then it would be an easy answer, but it isn’t. What I have yet to hear from SEA is what cuts they would make that would result in the best scenario for teachers and students while bringing the budget down $87M to close the deficit. 

  • Gatewood Parent August 31, 2026 (4:13 pm)

    Teacher salaries have zero correlation  to educational outcomes.  WA is 2nd in the nation for salaries, SPS being the highest in the state, and 31st in outcomes, as reported by NPR.This is a cynical money grab because the union, who’s leader is being investigated for abusing special needs children, knows cuts are coming.

    • Brian August 31, 2026 (4:43 pm)

      If you toss in a wild abuse allegation with zero substantiation, it really takes the wind out of the rest of your claims. Big swing and big miss. 

      • Adam August 31, 2026 (6:22 pm)

        She was under investigation when she was elected. It was fairly controversial then, and rightly so. Maybe you need new sources, Brian. A quick google search brought up tons of stories about it. 

      • SLJ August 31, 2026 (7:26 pm)

        The abuse allegations have been reported in the Seattle Times. That doesn’t necessarily have anything to do with the negotiations, but it isn’t a “wild accusation.”

        • k September 1, 2026 (11:06 am)

          The Seattle Times is not exactly a beacon of looking into whether or not an allegation has any merit before publishing stories implying malfeasance (see also: recent articles about Katie Wilson “recall”).

          Gatewood Parent’s wild allegation is that this is a union money grab.  That IS a wild allegation.  They’re ready to accept a COLA raise lower than inflation.

          Teachers have allegations made against them all the time so an investigation is not inherently alarming to those close to the system who are used to it.  Special needs parents also have to deal with higher numbers of allegations made by the school and called into CPS.  In both cases, most are unfounded. 

          Once the report was concluded and did find some wrongdoing (but not about the core allegation of having left the bruises found on the child’s arm), the union membership began a petition to recall her as president.

          But back to the main point, I agree that the allegations Gatewood Parent is making about this supposed money grab are a bit ridiculous and being overly sensational really does turn one off to any real point they may have had.

    • CC August 31, 2026 (6:39 pm)

      *whoseBut sure, let’s not fund teaching.

    • Actualperson August 31, 2026 (6:41 pm)

      Gatewood Parent.  You’ve got people lined up that will fulfill your utopia of teachers making minimum wage with zero benefits?

      • No but August 31, 2026 (9:29 pm)

        Unfortunately this kind of attitude is what would make me consider going private. It is the feeling of being held hostage and the sense that the kids are not actually being prioritized. 

  • some lurker August 31, 2026 (4:31 pm)

    I would like someone to unpack this — he starts with special education, and says that it’s become a “place, not a service,” — because in the next breath he will talk about collapsing service pathways that will make Special Education anything but a service. By combining groups of students with different support needs while lowering the ratio of support staff to students, this looks a lot like gutting the protections of federal and state law for those students and making it a “one size fits no one” model.

    I also hope we start school on time but someone should be asking him to explain that. As for the “very large raise” educators received in previous contracts, have you looked at the cost of living in this area? 1:5 SPS employees live outside the city they work in and we know they are not working from home, as that ended. So those dollars are paid from Seattle taxes and spent outside the city, to say nothing of the environmental costs of commuting.

    But go off I guess, that professionals, many with masters degrees who also have continuing education requirements, like doctors and lawyers, should get a decent salary. School salaries are public information: you can see what your child’s teachers make, their principal, all of them. Don’t take anyone’s word for $142,584 salaries. 

    • Brandon August 31, 2026 (9:50 pm)

      Read his letter to parents from a day or so ago. Its unpacked there a bit.

  • k August 31, 2026 (4:47 pm)

    Special education and salaries are not the only options for cuts in the budget.  The district has a LOT of bloat in their office they are unwilling to touch.  What about cuts to athletics?  The district goes right for the most vulnerable, the ones who have the least advocacy because actually making touch decisions (like cutting district staff, athletics, or his own salary) is just too hard.  If Schuldiner can’t be a little more creative in how to balance the budget, we need to find someone who can actually do the job to replace him.

  • pophouse August 31, 2026 (5:06 pm)

    The average teacher salary in seattle, with years of education and experience is about 75% of the *starting* salary of a cop with no education or experience, before add-ons like overtime which is abundant. The teachers are not being greedy, they are merely trying to survive in the community they serve. 

  • Dave August 31, 2026 (5:12 pm)

    NYC and Seattle slugging it out for more overhead, higher salaries without outcomes being changed. 

    • Actualperson August 31, 2026 (6:34 pm)

      Dave. Meaning you’d like to cut teachers’ salaries and benifits?

      • Dave August 31, 2026 (8:26 pm)

        No, but it would be great to see the overhead come down, way down. Police, fire, and education are the biggest parts of the budget and deserve scrutiny

  • retired teacher August 31, 2026 (5:34 pm)

    WORK TO RULE***WORK TO RULE.I cannot say this enough and did when I was a teacher.  Instead of a strike do a WORK TO RULE.Negations continue yet school begins and all union peeps work only and EXACTLY what the contract states.Walk in together and leave together at contract time…take real lunch breaks in lunch room…remove everything from the classroom that the district did not purchase (no alphabet charts in primary for starters)…no writing college or employment letters of recommendations, IEPs not written as those take lots of time, mostly personal time, large classrooms without support become crowd control.It is then the Joe Public sees how much teachers do without pay…during uncontracted hours..and taking money from their pockets to buy things.High school teachers won’t have time to input grades for college applications and teachers who tutor and assist students in their classrooms during their lunch time is over…WORK TO RULE  keeps the wheels moving without punishing kids who only have school as a safe placeand once the system fails, as it does under WORK TO RULE  negations will happen quickly.I’ve have worked under WORK TO RULE as well as strikes.  Strikes divide all entities.   

  • WSOwl August 31, 2026 (6:31 pm)

    SPS is actually a top-notch district for those discussing outcomes, https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/seattle-has-the-no-1-big-city-school-district-we-should-act-like-it/

  • Corvid August 31, 2026 (7:55 pm)

    Think you can solve the school district’s budget deficit?  What would you cut?  Try it here:https://www.sps-by-the-numbers.com/analyses/who_what_to_axe.htmlThis was created by Albert Wong, an SPS parent and data enthusiast, using published budget data from the district.  Note what the biggest circles are.

  • Derek August 31, 2026 (8:38 pm)

    I stand with teachers ✊

  • Admiral Mom August 31, 2026 (10:15 pm)

    Come on! Stop using kids as pawns. The union knows that they are doing because they know how to play the game well. Step 1 manipulate the narrative, step 2 pull on the public’s heartstrings, step 3 pretend to fight for the kids (unions by definition are there to protect the best interest of ADULTS, not kids, step 4 get what you want.But Shuldiner is not playing. He is ok and will unmask any false narratives and call things by their name. It’s east coast style. Seattle is not prepared to be told the truth. 

  • Jeff S September 1, 2026 (10:46 am)

    Remember cops got a 46% raise. Teachers can’t even get a cost of living raise… Shows you what the city actually cares about. 

  • Sura Hart September 1, 2026 (10:52 am)

    To “Retired Teacher”: Thank you for your dedication, service and wisdom born from experience! YES to WORK TO RULE!  Although I don’t know that most people/parents know what happens inside a classroom, during, before or after school; they don’t know what happens in teachers’ homes before or after school, or at Target when teachers are buying school supplies with their own money. I think they might need to just do open classrooms and crowd control with NOTHING else. Although, I don’t know that most people/parents would pay enough attention to the issue unless it actually affects their lives … which means: kids at home and not at school. (says another retired teacher, with a sigh…) ….and maybe the PTA can provide daycare for the kids that don’t have anyplace to go while their parents work?

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published.