FOLLOWUP: SDOT unveils ‘final design’ for Highland Park Way hill lane conversion

That map is from an SDOT announcement this afternoon that the department has finalized the design of the much-discussed Highland Park Way hill lane-conversion project and could start construction early next year. To describe the final design, SDOT offers these overview points:

Updated Design Highlights

-The curb will not be shifted along the full downhill section
-Semi-permanent concrete barriers will be used instead of a full curb shift to allow flexibility during emergencies
-Improved bike and pedestrian connections throughout the corridor
-New lane layout that maintains traffic flow, slows vehicle speeds, and reduces congestion near W Marginal Way SW

Features That Remain from Previous Design
-One downhill lane removed beginning at SW Holden St
-Wider, repaved shared-use path with upgraded lighting

The SDOT map above shows the final design for the northeast end of the project zone, the intersection with West Marginal Way SW, which SDOT says now includes:

-Protected bike lane extends all the way to the intersection

-Downhill lane expands to three lanes (left-turn lane and two through-lanes)

-Center median removed to fit the new lane configuration

-One westbound left turn lane removed on W Marginal Way SW

Other sections of the project are detailed, each with a map, on this webpage – here’s one of them, in an area that had been the subject of much discussion, where a residential street meets the downhill lanes:

SW Othello St Area

-Widened shared-use path
-Downhill protected bike lane with jersey barrier opening and bike pavement markings at intersection
-Single downhill travel lane
-Advanced warning signs for intersection
-No centerline markings to indicate turning movements

SDOT says construction will “begin as soon as February 2027.” The idea of removing a driving lane to install a bicycle lane dates back six years, though at the time it was proposed for the uphill side; it was eventually shelved, but resurfaced in a proposal for federal funding in 2022.

30 Replies to "FOLLOWUP: SDOT unveils 'final design' for Highland Park Way hill lane conversion"

  • Rob July 28, 2026 (5:07 pm)

    I mean this with all seriousness and no hyperbole. This is the dumbest thing I have ever seen in my life. 

  • KM July 28, 2026 (5:18 pm)

    Glad to see this moving forward finally!

  • Don Brubeck July 28, 2026 (6:05 pm)

    OK. Good compromises in response to community input. Now do it!   Be prepared to adjust it later if it needs it, but just do it.  

  • CarDriver July 28, 2026 (6:05 pm)

    Will SDOT install a counter to count the number of bikes going up or down hill? I’m guessing they have no idea now how many there are today.

    • bill July 28, 2026 (7:16 pm)

      Likely very few bikes because very few people are willing to use the crummy sidewalk. 

      That’s the thing about infrastructure improvements: Improve it and usage increases!
      • Alki resident July 28, 2026 (7:23 pm)

        The sidewalk is actually in good condition. Probably because nobody uses it.

      • Kyle July 28, 2026 (8:34 pm)

        A 100x increase in daily bike traffic at this location (insanely unlikely) would still be less than 20% of the transit and car users here. Additionally, the path could be improved and widened in the median without taking away a travel lane.

  • Jim Galt July 28, 2026 (6:07 pm)

    This is the stupidest thing I have ever seen.  SDOT has gone off the deep end.  This will result in more collisions and accidents, and I will be the first one here to say “I told you so” when it happens.

  • Jarf July 28, 2026 (6:57 pm)

    I was on the community Zoom call with SDOT when they reviewed the plan. They’re incompetent . They tried to sell this as a bike lane improvement, which nobody wants. They admitted that they just want a road diet, and the bike lane isn’t really needed. Which they should have said in the first place. One of the SDOT folks talked about the speed radar sign that clocks your speed when you’re driving up the hill. He used it as a data point indicating that people are speeding. Clearly he doesn’t live in the area, or drive up the hill. Anybody who lives here knows that that speed radar sign doesn’t work.  Never registers over 35mph. 

    • bill July 28, 2026 (7:13 pm)

      The display might be messed up and the logging is correct. I agree with you, no one drives under the speed limit.

  • Seth July 28, 2026 (7:21 pm)

    This is much needed. Before the age of ebikes this would have been dumb (which is why most of you guys probably see this big hill and think it won’t be used) but ebikes and scooters make this an option now and we should always strive to increase interconnectivity.  Even if it means y’all car drivers will lose a lane.

    • Kyle July 28, 2026 (8:32 pm)

      This is a false choice, plenty of room in the median to widen the path and keep the travel lane. Would have cost more to do it right though.

  • Sam July 28, 2026 (7:32 pm)

    I will drive downhill at precisely 25mph

  • Foop July 28, 2026 (7:40 pm)

    I see plenty of poor folks on bike navigating the awkward sidewalk and crosswalks. This will be awesome. The downhill section is exciting, I. Ant get my partner to bike down this hill with how aggressive cars are now and we love going to south town pie or Loretta’s on nice days.

  • Ginny July 28, 2026 (8:01 pm)

    Dear City Representatives,I am writing to provide feedback regarding the proposal to remove a major thoroughfare lane in Seattle to install a new bike lane.As a resident who will be impacted by this change, I have strong concerns about the removal of a vehicle lane on such a critical roadway. While the city regularly requests input from neighborhood residents and those in outlying areas, there is a widespread perception that community feedback is overlooked and that original plans are implemented regardless of public response.I urge the city to genuinely consider the input of the community and re-evaluate this project, as removing a major thoroughfare lane will significantly impact traffic and daily commutes

    • k July 29, 2026 (12:10 pm)

      The community feedback posted here in the West Seattle Blog comments section probably isn’t looked at or given the same weight as feedback submitted to SDOT or city councilmembers because the West Seattle Blog comments section is not an official communications channel for the city.  I have left plenty of feedback about this road, and I am glad they listened and are fixing it.  

      • WSB July 29, 2026 (12:17 pm)

        Yes, our site IS looked at, and has even been referenced in official documents as one of the ways they gauge public sentiment. BUT that said, of course the OFFICIAL feedback methods are the absolute best way to get your views in front of the decisionmakers, whether they go your way or not.

  • Chemist July 28, 2026 (8:12 pm)

    So one thing that doesn’t look to be highlighted in the announcement (aside from at the Marginal Way intersection) is that there’s barrier openings to allow the bus to pull to the curb/the bus stops will block the downhill bike lane, unless the bus doesn’t pull over far enough so that it ends up situated in a way that takes up two lanes.  I also noticed they’re installing center median flexible posts along the curve.

  • Scotti July 28, 2026 (8:26 pm)

    Born and bred here, and for many years in this Highland Park neighborhood. This city gets dumber the day. 

  • Kyle July 28, 2026 (8:31 pm)

    Wow I guess the majority of their users doesn’t matter to SDOT.

  • Gatewoodgal July 28, 2026 (8:43 pm)

    The fact that the Holden intersection didn’t even have a light until 2020 bridge closure still blows my mind. This hill is super unsafe with everyone going fast up and down. Glad to see some additional progress. 

  • EH July 28, 2026 (8:53 pm)

    Woohoo! I bike on the sidewalk sometimes to get to South Park or Georgetown, and it’s horrible. The sidewalk is so cracked and bumpy. It will be awesome to have a bike lane there, I will definitely bike this route more often with a protected lane. 

  • Delridge resident July 28, 2026 (9:11 pm)

    This is an insane idea divorced from reality. They are making travel worse for 99% of the people that use this thoroughfare (drivers) to benefit a tiny number of people that will bike on this hill. This is a city where it rains 8 months out of the year, most people don’t want to be outside peddling in the elements up and down slick wet hills even if they have a new bike lane like this and an e-bike. All for bike lanes but not when they will be hardly used 

  • CJ July 28, 2026 (9:47 pm)

    This is a great plan. I sometimes brave the downhill on bike right now, but the state of the current downhill surface is an active impediment in my mind to doing it more often. Super jarring. Build it, and we will come.

  • Richard Ghrave July 28, 2026 (9:50 pm)

    I, for one, am happy to see this change. This will save lives. I’m pleased that SDOT is moving forward despite all of the whining and hysteria about this project. Give me a break. It was ridiculous watching and reading the coverage. Everyone wants safe streets, but nobody wants to slow down. 

  • Jay July 28, 2026 (10:38 pm)

    This is great news. And an opportunity for NIMBYs to learn coping skills as they watch cyclists pass by their car stuck in traffic. 🙂

  • 1994 July 28, 2026 (11:16 pm)

    And when a bike rider in this improved bike lane is injured, sue the city! Happened on Green Lake way with the city paying millions. 

  • KinesthesiaAmnesia July 29, 2026 (11:36 am)

    My family has been bicycling and walking up and down this hill for generations. We’re all very glad to see safer passage here!

  • Look Both Ways July 29, 2026 (11:57 am)

    All this from a dept which just re-striped passing / dashed line markers into divided islands, as well as down tight S-curved hills. The contradiction and incompetence of SDOT is stark. They have one focus — spending their budget. The only way to correct their wasted agendas is to vote against any future tax levy.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published.