WEST SEATTLE LIGHT RAIL: No committee vote today after all – here’s what did happen

The Sound Transit Board‘s Executive Committee didn’t vote this afternoon on an ST revision after all, but the push is still on for a full board vote two weeks from today. The board’s chair, Snohomish County executive Dave Somers, said a vote wouldn’t be appropriate because too many amendments had either been, or were expected to be, proposed.

This afternoon’s discussion did shine more light on issues brought up by board members at their regular monthly meeting last week. For example – why are they updating the plan now? ST’s Alex Krieg said the ST3 plan approved by voters in 2016 required a plan update when the plan is out of alignment with the available funding, and they’ve certainly arrived at that point. They can afford $57 billion worth of projects, both fully and partly funded, and West Seattle light rail – currently priced, even without the Avalon station, at $6.8 billion – would be on the fully funded list. But unless they adopted a complete new plan, they wouldn’t be allowed to spend all the money they’d need to spend to get West Seattle on the track to completion.

Krieg insisted that the proposed revision doesn’t cancel or eliminate anything, and there’s still room and time to add things back – like the Ballard Link Extension, for example, with a price tag of $7 billion to $9 billion for the segment from Seattle Center to Market Street, which is left hanging in the proposed revision. Though he’s not on the Executive Committee, board member Dan Strauss – who represents Ballard on the City Council – was there to say he won’t settle for that. And Mayor Katie Wilson, a board member who is on the committee, said she wanted to at least see a date for when they envisioned completing Ballard in this revision. (Theoretically West Seattle, “fully funded,” is still on track for 2032 completion, although board chair Somers took issue at one point with the frequent usage of “shovel-ready” to describe it, saying “major construction” actually wouldn’t start until 2028.)

One date of note: CFO Hughey Newsom noted that the revision would extend the end date of ST3 financing from 2046 to 2052.

And he pointed out that the revised plan would totally max out their expected financing – not counting a 10 percent so any change in costs, for example, could throw it “out of alignment” again and require yet another revision.

In board comments, committee member Ryan Mello, Pierce County Executive, declared the board needs to take action – “delay will only add cost and risk and is not our friend.”

King County Executive Girmay Zahilay, also a committee member, said he supports a vote at the May 28 board meeting too.

Along the way, Somers pointed out that even a vote on this ST3 revision is not a final commitment to West Seattle or any other project – those would be separate votes. So here’s what happens next:

10 Replies to "WEST SEATTLE LIGHT RAIL: No committee vote today after all - here's what did happen"

  • CarDriver May 14, 2026 (5:14 pm)

    Doesn’t give me a warm and fuzzy that they won’t rule out more financial “surprises”. When they come for our ankles you’ll know it’s to shake the money tree.

  • K to the F May 14, 2026 (5:41 pm)

    So disillusioned by how much this process and the ST3 costs have got away from ST. No one wants to make the call to spend 5x what was initially forecast/specced and it’s just vote after vote and community input after community input. I fear, at this point, we’re being slowly setup for the West Seattle spur to be cut entirely. For the initial costs it was worth it. Now, I can’t say I feel it is.

    • skeeter May 14, 2026 (7:54 pm)

      Good comment K TO THE F.  I voted yes on ST3.  But costs have ballooned so much I’ve lost much (but not all) faith in Sound Transit.  It’s such a mess and now every mayor and ST board member is just fighting for the light rail *their* city was promised.  It’s like Hunger Games — the only way you can win is if everyone else loses.  Community input is worthless at this point.  Sound Transit should go hire a person from Oregon or Idaho with no agenda or preference to study ST3 and impartially decide what should be built and what should be scrapped.             

  • Dr Wu May 14, 2026 (6:51 pm)

    After reading this WEST SEATTLE BLOG article, I smell a rat. 

  • pophouse May 14, 2026 (6:55 pm)

    Every place that has invested in public transportation has reaped rewards. We need this to be done yesterday. Continued waiting and listening to negative voices will only make the costs go up more. 

  • 1994 May 14, 2026 (9:14 pm)

    How much money is ST losing because people are not purchasing their license plate tabs yearly? Today I saw a Honda Accord buzzing about on Roxbury with a license tab  year 2017!!!   ST has missed out on 10 years of taxes for that car.  

    • AdmiralE May 14, 2026 (9:50 pm)

      It’s rampant everywhere! I take my dog for a short walk and see at least a half dozen in 10 minutes. Then I get out on the road and my head explodes… Why isn’t this enforced?

      • WSB May 14, 2026 (10:01 pm)

        It is. Just listen to the scanner. Somebody was pulled over minutes ago for no rear plate (turned out the car’s registration was clear and current, they just tried to get away with not displaying their plate).

  • WS Person May 14, 2026 (9:24 pm)

    So weird to me that people continue to champion the need for this one costs have become so astronomical. At some point it doesn’t matter whether there’s a benefit. The costs to taxpayers has become so outrageous. Shudder it and explore other options.

    • OTOH May 14, 2026 (10:53 pm)

      It is kind of weird we want light rail. It has been discussed since the 80s around here. It has been a long held promise that we’ve voted on and approved in one form or another many times, so many I’ve lost count. What happens is an idea comes around, gets voted for, gets rolling then dies. We pay for it, in part but don’t get our money back if it doesn’t get realized. Then they start again. Remember the movie Singles? The thing is if we stop now to figure out a plan, not plan a,b, c or d but something like plan h, it’ll take ~10 years for a plan and 5 to 10 times more than what we are spending now for any option that would actually serve this community to even get close to where we are now. (gondolas don’t count). It’ll cost more tomorrow than today. Let’s cut our losses and actually make this happen in full now. 

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published.