West Seattle light rail moves ahead, remaining on ‘affordable’ list after Sound Transit Board’s marathon meeting

By Tracy Record
West Seattle Blog editor

Just concluded, after almost six hours, a marathon Sound Transit Board meeting centered on revising the ST3 plan.

Biggest headline for our area: West Seattle light rail, minus the Avalon station, moves forward, remaining on the “what’s affordable” list. There was little discussion or mention of West Seattle as the board went through the proposal and 13 amendments; perhaps the biggest news was board members unanimously committing to figuring out how to get light rail all the way to Ballard. “The math doesn’t work today but we’ll make it work,” was a statement from Pierce County board member Hunter George that summarized how that was going to happen, somehow. The transformation of West Seattle into a project considered “affordable” was held up as an example for what might be done to “make it work” for Ballard; George blurted that there was a time when he thought “West Seattle was cooked,” until various cuts and changes were made as part of what became known as ST’s Enterprise Initiative. ST’s Brad Owen noted that it took a full year of work to come up with those cuts and changes, and that the work came after a milestone in the WS project – the Record of Decision – that Ballard has not yet reached. Nonetheless, the commitment to Ballard was significant, acknowledged board member and Ballard-area Seattle City Councilmember Dan Strauss, who said he came to the meeting thinking he wouldn’t get that support. He got support not only for ensuring ST3 gets to Ballard, but also for setting a date for it, even though any date would be “unreliable,” staff warned, until the project is “baselined” in three years or so.

In closing comments, board member and King County Executive Girmay Zahilay noted this is basically the green light for West Seattle light rail, then turning to the lone West Seattleite on the board, County Councilmember Teresa Mosqueda, and asking, “Are you excited?” In her own remarks a few minutes later, Mosqueda noted that what’s happened so far was “no easy task” but also noted “this shows we are not powerless in the face of challenges. She called for “rolling up sleeves” and advancing work on West Seattle as well as other projects (board chair and Snohomish County Executive Dave Somers said WS is at 30 percent design).

Money challenges remain, in fact, and one amendment, by board member and Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson, reflected that; she wanted work to start on a “new revenue package.” Some other board members said it was too soon, and that ST has enough of a trust problem that it wouldn’t be right to ask people “to pay more for what they’ve already paid for.” The proposal had the option of a “sub-area-only” proposal, and a few non-Seattle board members said that if Seattle (or some other area) wanted to tax itself further for this, “go for it.”

But that discussion will be for another day, probably even some other year.

As part of today’s activity, the board is using pre-approved taxing authority, maxing out a rental-car tax to raise $300 million more.

Overall, though, “The real hard work begins now,” declared Somers just before the final vote on the amended resolution, which was 16 yes, 2 no (Strauss, who said it still hadn’t gone as far as he needed it to, and Bellevue board member Claudia Balducci, who said she thought it needed more work.) “We are excited to finally move forward,” said ST CEO (and West Seattleite) Dow Constantine after the vote.

ADDED 8:35 PM: Board members are sending out statements. From Councilmember Mosqueda, this passage specific to WS:

… For West Seattle, this vote makes it possible to officially initiate early pre-construction work, such as geotechnical testing like drilling to test soil stability for the bridge foundation and contracting with critical engineering and design consultants, laying the groundwork for us to be able to build the promised light rail in the near future. West Seattle light rail expansion is now poised to enter a new phase of project development, made possible by cost savings work done by Sound Transit that has already yielded nearly $2.6 billion in savings while retaining ridership and avoiding impacts on many businesses and residential properties. …

ADDED 9:46 PM – WHAT’S NEXT? We asked Councilmember Mosqueda and chief of staff Erin House, who the councilmember described as immersed in ST matters, “what’s next?”

Today’s vote included funding for West Seattle design and construction in the 20-year plan, which enables the Board to authorize more specific steps authorizing expenditures in the coming weeks and months, including:

June

· Contract extensions for engineering, project management, and final design:
o Contract extension and budget authority for Engineering Design Services (EDS) final design (approximately $300M)
o Contract extension and budget authority for Project Management Support Services (approximately $35M)
o Budget authority for the project’s sustainability cost allocation (approximately $20M)
o Budget authority for miscellaneous final design costs (approximately $7M)

July

· Budget authority for property acquisition, construction services agreement with City of Seattle, and permit fees:
o Budget authority for real property acquisitions (approximately $380M)
o Construction services agreement with the City of Seattle (approximately $15M)
o Third-party coordination, include City of Seattle permit fees (approximately $9M)

September

· Contract extensions for engineering and design services
o Contract extension for systems-related EDS (approximately $27M)

October

· Budget authority for real property acquisitions (approximately $90M)

69 Replies to "West Seattle light rail moves ahead, remaining on 'affordable' list after Sound Transit Board's marathon meeting"

  • Derek May 28, 2026 (8:14 pm)

    Let’s GO!!!!

    • Adam May 28, 2026 (9:18 pm)

      You’ll never see it, Derek

      • Derek May 29, 2026 (12:09 am)

        Adam, your coping doesn’t concern me. This will be moving forward. Thank you Dow and ST!

        • Adam May 29, 2026 (7:15 am)

          I guess it just baffles me the low bar that you set for these folks. I understand you’re ideologically captured, but at some point when the date moves back again and again and again to a point where we’ll never actually ride it, why be so excited? But again, ideological capture. They can do as they please as long as they’re on your team. No amount of getting nothing done and costing more then it ever should have will be enough for you to ask questions. But you do you. We all get individual votes and can do as we please with them. 

          • Derek May 29, 2026 (11:52 am)

            Oh I do ask questions, namely around “why can’t this be built sooner” and “why are we delaying Ballard further.” But thank you for putting words in my mouth when I simply showed excitement for one less hurdle. No idea what your ideological assumptions are about here, but as you said, you do you.

          • Adam May 29, 2026 (5:17 pm)

            Derek, you’re on here all the time. Which is fine. It’s just you’ve shown your hand time and time again. You’re an apologist for the failed leadership you continually support, without fail. If you don’t EVER hold them to account, then you’re just a cheerleader for them, win or lose. But that’s what cheerleaders do. So you do you. 

          • K May 29, 2026 (12:39 pm)

            The bar is that they need to build the thing we voted for.  Yes, it’s a low bar, which is why suggesting they go even lower than that and don’t even deliver the mass transit we voted on and want, even after years of collecting our money is truly baffling to me.

  • Lauren May 28, 2026 (8:42 pm)

    Hallelujah!

  • Paul May 28, 2026 (8:45 pm)

    Fantastic news!

  • EVGuy May 28, 2026 (8:52 pm)

    Yes, shovel that monstrosity along – we’re only looking at a late 2030 opening even if everything goes swimmingly, which it won’t since WS isn’t a simple straight next-to-the-highway job. “Not powerless” indeed – what did you actually manage to accomplish? 

    • WSB May 29, 2026 (2:13 am)

      Actually late 2032 has been the projected date for some years now.

    • Alex May 29, 2026 (1:22 pm)

      Two years early? I would think only one year early. But also, I will NOT be using the light rail until the North End of West Seattle is fixed up. Right now it is absolutely screwed up. Our only good service (routes 56 and 57) only operate during peak-hours one-way. Route 50 would be good if it didn’t go down to the Alaska Junction! I hope when the light rail opens up Route 50 will be revised to skip the Alaska Junction and Delridge and just take Admiral Way straight down to the West Seattle Bridge. People in the Junction will be able to take the light rail to SODO. But if Metro doesn’t change bus service drastically, I will be super furious and I will be driving an electric car until the H Line is redirected to Admiral and Alki (after Ballard opens and the West Seattle Light Rail connects all the way into Downtown).

  • Bill at Duwamish Head May 28, 2026 (9:16 pm)

    I am looking forward to light rail for West Seattle and heading to Paris soon, where the Metro makes life so much better for residents and tourists. The removal of Avalon station seems less utilitarian for West Seattle residents. Most important part from this meeting, that causes a heart palpitation for me, is the numbers don’t pencil out, but we will make it work! What mechanism is in place for accountability for the next phase? The whole project has had appearantly zero accountability for the budget deficit so far in this whole build out. I only hope, as an old retired fart, that I will live to see it happen, and be able to use it!!!

  • Canton May 28, 2026 (10:04 pm)

    How about considering the economic and physical downfalls of other west coast mega transportation projects?… One should consider the vast accomplishments, of California high speed rail. That project has been a complete success so far… 🤔😉

    • Derek May 29, 2026 (12:08 am)

      So use one example as a failure and not countless others that didn’t fail? That one is going across a state not 3 miles. 

      • Adam May 29, 2026 (7:18 am)

        But D, you won’t let anyone use THIS example as a failure. So they use others. And then you say you need more examples. This is what ST hopes for: complacency in the face of failure. I’ve seen your comments on here for awhile. There’s no amount of underperforming by your team that’ll ever give you dissatisfaction. That’s exactly what they bank on. 

        • Derek May 29, 2026 (11:56 am)

          I’m sorry did we not just do an unprecedented engineering marvel across the lake, that is a resounding success and already seeing increasing ridership than predicted? Right here. In Seattle.

          • Brandon May 29, 2026 (4:18 pm)

            Delivered late, and over budget (again). But we’ll ignore that because we’re convinced trains havent gone over bridges before.

          • Adam May 29, 2026 (5:21 pm)

            No, we did not. And it’s BECAUSE we’re here in Seattle. We did something that should’ve cost far less, and in less time. If you take out cost and effort, then yes I’m very impressed. But they promise (blank) will happen by (blank) date, and we overwhelmingly approve via a vote. Then, we don’t hold them to account when none of it happens as promised. So they need more time and more money. Always.  So essentially their job appears, to me, to be to promise what the people want, and in exchange they get a blank check to operate as they please. We’re funding that blank check. I’m surprised you yourself don’t have questions. If they were more efficient in every way, you’d not only have these things you and I both wanted in the first place, but it would be done quickly and save a ton of loot for other things we have on the to-do list. I don’t disagree with what you want, mostly, I disagree with allowing them to just do as they want without question when it doesn’t arrive on time or on budget. Is that really too much to ask?

  • estoy aquí May 28, 2026 (10:28 pm)

    Tracy, absolutely outstanding summary. I attended most of the meeting over Zoom, leaving after the ST 18-member board voted on Amendment 11. They and staff put so much thought and effort into all of the amendments. Anyone who would like to know the details can go to the ST website for both the slide deck staff presented and a recording of the meeting itself. (The discussion of ST2026-11 and all of the proposed amendments only began at about 4, with public comment and then an executive session to discuss litigation taking up the time before then.) Board members, staff, and members of the public are encouraged to offer suggestions about how cost savings can be realized with all of these projects. 

    • WSB May 28, 2026 (11:03 pm)

      Sorry, I should have mentioned that while the meeting was six hours long, the first 2 1/2 hours were taken up by public comment followed by a multiple-times-extended executive session.

  • Scrap the Rail May 28, 2026 (10:36 pm)

    Hopefully, the $34.5 billion budget deficit and future funding blunders will keep West Seattle light rail-free forever. 

    • Charles Burlingame May 29, 2026 (6:21 pm)

      There is no budget deficit any longer. That was the entire point of the meeting.

  • Jim May 29, 2026 (2:07 am)

    Defund Sound Transit! We do not need pr want light rail in West Seattle. It makes no sense and is unnecessary

    • Alex May 29, 2026 (1:29 pm)

      I understand your frustration. I agree with part of that and that “spoiling” the Alaska Junction (yes, absolutely) without any bus restructures is outrageous. But at some point the Rapid H Line will be redirected to go up Admiral Way and to Alki instead of Downtown. The only problem is that won’t happen until West Seattle Light rail connects all the way into Downtown. So this means we could be waiting 5-7 years after the Light Rail opens in West Seattle before we have good bus service!

  • North Admiral Cyclist May 29, 2026 (5:39 am)

    If we only listened to the naysayers, we’d never get anywhere.  If we tried to build the high level bridge to West Seattle today, we’d have a few cranky people criticizing it.  Thanks to Jeanette Williams, with help from Maggie, Seattle got it funded and built.  Back then, Seattle got the new low live bridge built too.  Where would West Seattle be today without those two critical connections to the mainland?  The high level and low level bridges are part of West Seattle’s past and present.  Light rail, and the water taxi, are important components of West Seattle’s future.

  • Marcus May 29, 2026 (6:37 am)

    We don’t have the money and we are in debt and the costs are rising every year. But we want it wah, waaaaahhhhhh, wah. How can our society teach the principles of saving, debt management and want vs need when our leaders ignore common monetary sense. Not  to mention that being a blue state we will get absolutely no money from the maga government. 

    • DC May 29, 2026 (1:51 pm)

      ST is not in debt. In fact, it has a few billion in the bank. It would only become in debt over 20 years if everything were built as planned as of yesterday morning. This new plan is meant to address that. 

  • Tomas May 29, 2026 (7:09 am)

    Happy it’s coming to West Seattle at all, but frankly not bringing it down to Westwood where there’s already a transit hub is quite the mistake, and leaves out a huge swath of the population that would probably use the light rail the most

    • k May 29, 2026 (9:19 am)

      Ideally it would go all the way to White Center and continue down to Burien.  There have been discussions about extending south after these segments are done.  Maybe by 2060.

      • BlairJ May 29, 2026 (4:08 pm)

        ST3 included some funds for studies to continue future planning beyond ST3:

        On page 7 of ST3 System Plan “High-capacity transit (HCT) studies in the Sound Transit 3 Plan include connecting West Seattle to Burien and on to Renton via Tukwila”

        On page 2 of High Capacity Transit Planning Studies “HCT Study: Light Rail Extending from West Seattle to Burien, connecting to Renton via Tukwila.  This study would examine a light rail extension from West Seattle to Renton via Burien and Tukwila”

        And on page 1 of C-13: West Seattle/Junction to Burien Transit Center LRT “This project would build light rail from Alaska Junction in West
        Seattle to the Burien Transit Center in an aerial alignment with
        six stations.”

        None of this can get built until approved by voters in a future ballot measure, and would likely not happen for a long time.  And of course it would cost a huge amount of money.  But it is a part of the long range vision.

  • Javier May 29, 2026 (7:17 am)

    This is great news indeed! Thank you Sound Transit board!

  • GF May 29, 2026 (7:17 am)

    I have a question. Although they are eliminating the Avolon station does the design allow to add it back in later if deemed a viable stop again?

    • WSB May 29, 2026 (9:09 am)

      No. Its elimination changes the alignment.

      • Casey May 29, 2026 (1:48 pm)

        Did ST provide what the cost savings for eliminating Avalon are? When I looked into it, Avalon elimination was combined with cost savings from reconfiguring the Alaska Junction station. Its unfortunate that eliminating the station means it can never be built in the future. It seems like the ST Board is jumping on this without any real consideration for what this means for the area right around the Avalon Station. It’s crazy that they’ve even purchased properties for this station already and now they won’t be using them. 

        • WSB May 29, 2026 (3:54 pm)

          We’ve reported that in previous stories. But it could have changed along with the alignment between the Delridge station and the tunnel portal.

  • Kyle May 29, 2026 (7:24 am)

    Katie Wilson’s amendment was for a new “revenue package”?! After they ran the last one $30B+ into the red?! Other board members were right to point out this is a trust issue.

  • Keenan May 29, 2026 (7:41 am)

    A 6 hour meeting to confirm a fraction of what we already voted for 10 years ago.  Great, I guess.

    BUILD THE TRAIN ALREADY.

  • ex-westwood resident May 29, 2026 (8:43 am)

    And NO mention on how they are going to overcome the $34.5
    BILLION
    shortfall!!!

    THAT should tell you that they are cooking up another scheme
    to raise our taxes.

    Remember that they can raise our PROPERTY TAXES 1% per year
    (for now) without going to the voters for approval.

    Mark my words, next legislative session they will ask, and get
    permission to RAISE our PROPERTY TAX at LEAST 3% per year without voter
    approval. This is on top of a $100 BILLION “ST4” initiative.

  • JULZ May 29, 2026 (8:49 am)

    Get this going ASAP. My rental is in the path and I’m ready to sell. 

    • Lisa May 29, 2026 (6:29 pm)

      Glad this works for you, but there are many residents and businesses who DON’T want to move. Some will never see fair market value for their properties and businesses nor be properly reimbursed for expenses for having to move.

  • RD May 29, 2026 (9:05 am)

    What a scam! These estimated costs by month above are ridiculous. Sound Transit needs a audit by outside audit firm. I am 💯 percent sure fraud and mismanagement will be found. To start on West Seattle and leave Ballard half done is crazy what a waste of money. 

    • lil-pur May 29, 2026 (5:28 pm)

      If they have another audit, they will find more missing funds and no idea where it went?

    • RW May 30, 2026 (9:40 am)

      Agree! The money should be used to complete Ballard and other more vital. West Seattle can continue functioning just fine with bus service. Never made sense that commuters will have to take the bus to get to the W.S. Junction station, then get off the bus to get on the light rail to continue on. I’d prefer to just stay on the bus. There will also not be any commuter parking near the Junction, so even more cars parking on and clogging the side streets surrounding the Junction.

  • Shadowtripper May 29, 2026 (9:21 am)

    Great news!  So how about the board acquire one of the paid parking lots in the junction and build a transit, bicycle & parking garage so commuters will be able to use it whenever it is completed.  PLUS it would increase the available parking in the junction today without spilling over in the residential area surrounding the junction.

    • WSB May 29, 2026 (10:47 am)

      There will be no garages. (Unless some private developer wants to build one.) That’s been made abundantly and repeatedly clear over the decade. (Not for the Ballard extension, either.)

  • S. J. May 29, 2026 (9:27 am)

    Where does protecting nature enter this debate? For years I’ve stood up for saving the Park on 22nd by the bridge and even more important, the north end of the Duwamish Greenbelt with old growth trees and heron rookery. At the W. Seattle meeting a few weeks ago I submitted the question of what was Sound Transit planning to do to protect them? At the end of the meeting when the submitted questions were answered they chose not to answer mine. In the future when crossing the bridge how would you like to see a tall concrete wall where once stood a forest?

    • heartless May 29, 2026 (1:35 pm)

      Urban density and mass transit are some of the best things for “protecting nature.” 

      Fitting a lot of people into a small space helps preserve surrounding swaths of nature. 

      So to answer your final question, while I might prefer to see a forest in the middle of Seattle, I know that’s an insane use of space and incredibly harmful to nature in the larger picture. 

      I’d much rather have a dense, urban space where people can walk, bike and use transit, with vast areas of untouched nature nearby, than sprawling suburbs as far as the eye can see–the latter is fundamentally, documentably, worse for the environment.

  • Tax Payer May 29, 2026 (9:30 am)

    The most corrupt and inept governmental agency in the nation. Not even close.  And you all just applaud it. 

    • Tax payer too May 30, 2026 (8:43 am)

      the most corrupt and inept governmental agency in the nation (ever) is currently in the White House.

  • WSBReader May 29, 2026 (9:49 am)

    I’m so excited for the light rail!

  • Aaron G May 29, 2026 (9:57 am)

    Very much looking forward to light rail coming to West Seattle!

  • WS Guy May 29, 2026 (10:44 am)

    They should not give away the land that they seize through eminent domain for free to developers.  That would be one way to reduce their deficit.  This is a transit program not a housing program.

    • Derek May 29, 2026 (12:10 pm)

      Actually it IS a housing program too. TOD is baked into ST thanks to a 2015 state ballot measure. 80% of surplus land adjacent to the transit centers can be developed. It has been a tremendous success and already worth nearly 2 billion in land value. The amenities for child care and job training and medical alone are worth it.

  • ltfd May 29, 2026 (11:46 am)

    Within 10 years, driverless electric ride-share vehicles will make the “light rail” a boondoggle (more than it already is).

    • WSB May 29, 2026 (1:08 pm)

      Since you mention it – having just spent some time in San Francisco, I can report that Waymos (a frequent sight) and Zoox haven’t put BART (light rail) and Muni (streetcars and buses) out of business yet. One challenge that would have to be overcome: Size. Robocars are still car-sized. Perhaps that will change; I think back to the “People Mover” at Disneyland’s Tomorrowland decades ago …

      • Scarlett May 29, 2026 (4:34 pm)

        You’re right, I was recently in SF and the city is swarming with Waymo, even more so in Santa Monica.  Every time I’d stop at light in Santa Monica it seemed there was a headless Waymo next lane over or in front of me. 

      • Scarlett May 29, 2026 (9:03 pm)

        Sidenote:  On the subject, Miami has the Metromover, an automated elevated monorail that circulates around the downtown core.  Haven’t been to Miami for many years, and not sure what the ridership is like.    

  • Squarely May 29, 2026 (12:30 pm)

    Keep on dreaming….it is ain’t going to happenSometimes it is good to have a dream!!

  • west seattleite May 29, 2026 (4:29 pm)

    I feel for Ballard, they really need faster commuter service.  It’s so crowded there. The cuts in WS to make light rail affordable kind of shrinks it to not much more than Rapidride. It’s so fast to DT. 

  • 22blades May 29, 2026 (5:56 pm)

    Do I want it?Absolutely.Do I have confidence that this project will look, cost & deliver as remotely envisioned? Absolutely, positively NO.Another chapter of the Seattle SMSA contractor/developer welfare diaspora. 

    • k May 29, 2026 (8:33 pm)

      We literally know what the project will look like.  They are other segments already up and running. The West Seattle light rail will look like the rest of it.  It’s not a different project.

  • RR May 29, 2026 (7:52 pm)

    Does Jefferson Square stay or go?

    • WSB May 29, 2026 (8:11 pm)

      Stays.

      • RR May 30, 2026 (9:00 am)

        Thank you

  • Munki Munks May 30, 2026 (7:15 am)

    SkyLink NOW!

  • Brock Lee May 30, 2026 (8:12 am)

    Imagine stepping into a cabin the moment you arrive at the Alaska Junction SkyLink station (one of 6 stations), then gliding over tree tops and traffic for a scenic 14 minute ride to the SODO station. Imagine SkyLink! It’s time for real leadership.

  • Scarlett June 1, 2026 (9:38 am)

    Maybe someday Kalshi will allow some of you to bet on the probability of hyper-local events, like whether West Seattle light rail will get built, or not.   From my jaded perspective, WS light rail is mostly a grotesquely expensive bauble for an affluent neighborhood; it might be the best thing since sliced bread for some, but far far from a transformative transportation remedy for the majority.  Ironically,  marketing light rail as a remedy may actually encourage suburban sprawl, and offset its so-called appeal in densely populated neighborhoods.   Something for some of you to ponder. 

  • Marfaun June 2, 2026 (9:01 pm)

    $1.5-$2 billion per mile to carry 5400 rail riders per day 4 miles to SODO until 2042-45, at $3000 cost per rider, vs. $15 per rider for Metro buses that carry 27,000 riders per day all the way to downtown. WS lite rail looks like a better investment of our tax dollars, right?. But wait — the Ballard-downtown rail line (BLE) would carry 100,000 or more riders per day… except… CEO (& West Seattleite) Dow thinks a lower ridership light rail line is a better transit investment than a high ridership line, so GO West Seattle!!  Now Mayor (& ST board member) Wilson wants more money for buses. Coincidence? Or realizing light rail has failed since 1996 to meet its overall ridership forecasts, and buses get the job done better?

Sorry, comment time is over.