About today’s police response at The Whittaker (updated Friday)

11:30 PM THURSDAY: A few people texted to ask about a big police response at The Whittaker at midday today. All that we heard over police radio was that it involved a man believed to have a knife, in some sort of confrontation/dispute with armed security guards for the mixed-use complex, which includes the Whole Foods store. One person was reported detained. This was on our followup list for tomorrow but SPD released their preliminary summary tonight:

At 1149 hours, Officers were dispatched to a public parking garage for reports of a subject armed with a Taser and a knife, threatening a homeless person and armed security for that property. Officers quickly arrived and took control of the scene. During the investigation, officers learned the suspect, based on his own statements, targeted the victim because he was homeless. Management of the property also stated they’ve had issues with the suspect harassing the homeless in the parking garage. After interviewing all involved and reviewing video footage. It was determined the suspect lunged at the homeless person with a taser, attempting to tase them. The suspect was arrested for felony assault and malicious harassment.

We’ll be asking for the full narrative as well as trying to find out more about the suspect’s status.

ADDED 10:23 PM FRIDAY: Here’s the narrative we obtained from SPD:

U contacted the suspect XXXXXX who was standing inside of the parking lot a few feet from the victim. (Suspect) was told to walk toward officers, with his hands up. Before walking toward officers, (suspect) dropped his taser on the ground. While being placed in handcuffs, (Suspect) was told that he was being detained. The Victim, later identified as XXXX, was also told that he is being detained. Both parties were separated for further investigation.

While speaking to Suspect/1, he stated that he was an employee for a company to keep homeless people out of the parking lot. Suspect/1 was unable to tell me the name of his employer, but said that it was written on a piece of paper in his wallet. XXXX XXXX XXXX, #XXX-XXX-XXX, was written on the paper Suspect/1 stated as his employer. Officer XXXX #8720, was able to verify that Suspect/1 is not an employee of XXXX XXXX. Suspect/1 kept repeating himself, saying that homeless people keep returning and it’s his job to keep them off the property. I asked him to explain why he had a taser out, and he stated that Victim/1 pulled out his knife first. I asked why Victim/1 pull out his knife first, and he responded by saying he told Victim/1 to get the ‘f— out’ while standing about 5 feet away. Suspect/1 also stated that he did not lunge towards Victim/1

I spoke with the XXXX XXXX of Whole Foods, later identified as XXX, XXXX, #XXXX-XXX-XXXX. She stated that this is an ongoing issue with Suspect/1. She did not witness the incident but stated that as of today, she wants Suspect/1 to be officially trespassed. Suspect/1 was told not to enter Whole foods on 4755 Fauntleroy WY.

I contacted Victim/1 who stated that Suspect/1 randomly walked towards him telling him to get out of the parking lot. Victim/1 said Suspect/1 then kicked his $500 Samsung phone, which is now damaged. He said he tried to kick again towards him but missed. Victim/1 stated Suspect/1 then had a knife in his hand, and lunged towards him, but he was not physically assaulted. Victim/1 stated that Suspect/1 also used his taser in an aggressive manner towards him by ‘sparking’ it and waving it at him. Victim/1 also said that he has video footage of Suspect/1 using the knife and taser as a threat towards him. While viewing the video, Victim/1 stated that the Whole food security guards arrived after Suspect/1 used the knife towards him, but then shortly redacted his statement. Victim/1 said that he is now not sure if the knife was used towards him but said that Suspect/1 held the knife in his right hand. I personally did not see the knife in Suspect/1 right hand, from the video shown. I observed Suspect/1 holding a dog leash in his right hand and using the taser with his left hand. Suspect/1 sparked the taser about 2 times and reached his arm out with the taser towards Victim/1. Both individuals appeared to be standing from each other, no more than 6 feet. Victim/1 did state that he believed he was targeted because he is homeless.

Victim/1 appeared to fear for his life and stated that Suspect/1 is the same individual who harassed him about a month ago. I asked was that incident reported and Victim/1 stated no. Based on Suspect/1 statements of having what appears to be a fixation towards individuals who are unhoused, there is a bias.

Suspect/1 was read his Miranda rights and told he is under arrest. Suspect/1 was then searched and transported for booking at King County Jail. I have probable cause for RCW- 9A.36.021 ASSAULT 2, and SMC- 12A.06.115-Malicious harassment.

According to the report, the suspect is 74 years old and the victim is 69. The jail roster shows the suspect remains in the King County Jail tonight, bail set at $2,000 for investigation of two misdemeanors.

15 Replies to "About today's police response at The Whittaker (updated Friday)"

  • West Seattle Mad Sci Guy January 2, 2026 (7:47 am)

    Wonder if the homeless in question was the one that resides in the stairwell from the parking garage to the dividing road between the two buildings. The homeless guy kept writing long angry messages meant for management for trying to get him to leave (when he wasn’t punching in the walls of the stairwell). That was an ugly daily situation I’m glad I don’t have to walk through anymore M-F (or take the long route up the car ramp). I haven’t been back since June.

    • k January 2, 2026 (10:23 am)

      Jesus.  Both the police and building management are saying the non-homeless man was at fault, and instigated the assault, and yet someone still has to make it the homeless guy’s fault anyway.

      Here’s your periodic reminder that homeless people are more likely to be victims of crimes than perpetrators, and that homeless people are far, FAR more likely to be victims of sexual assault, theft, and a raft of other crimes than their housed neighbors.

      • SWL January 2, 2026 (12:03 pm)

        “Here’s your periodic reminder that homeless people are more likely to be victims of crimes than perpetrators, and that homeless people are far, FAR more likely to be victims of sexual assault, theft, and a raft of other crimes than their housed neighbors.”
        Thanks for saying this, K! The stigma and culture of hatred directed at unhoused people really obscures this fact.

      • Mike January 2, 2026 (3:16 pm)

        Two things can be simultaneously true. That the arrested perp. Played cop and acted inappropriately, and that the homeless victim is a PIA who himself acts aggressively and inappropriately, as confirmed by others. Not sure why you find the comment so offensive?

        • Bick January 2, 2026 (6:02 pm)

          Confirmed by whom? Mad Sci said he wonders if it’s the same guy, and doesn’t seem to have any specific reason to believe it is. Robert said some homeless people in the area were making noise (not a crime) and smoking weed (an activity that’s perfectly legal for people with houses, and also who cares) – and again, no specific reason to think it’s the same guy. 

          • spooled January 2, 2026 (10:03 pm)

            If they’re doing those things on private property against the wishes of the owner/management/security (as is implied by an earlier comment) then those are problems that must be met with firm determination and consequence.  It is a pity that we lack the enforcement resources at the city level for this.

          • Robert January 4, 2026 (7:17 pm)

            Well, not illegal but alcohol and newer legalized drugs like cannabis are still a public nuisance. Consuming these products can also impair your ability to do a lot of things. Not just drive a car. It’s really really annoying.

    • Biankat January 3, 2026 (2:53 pm)

      This stairwell is atrocious. It’s still a complete mess. I park in the garage to use a business on Fauntleroy. There’s always disgusting food remnants, trash, clothing, grafiti and damage to the walls. Sometimes there’s a person sleeping too. One time there was spent matches and burnt paraphernalia sitting on the stairwell stoop, as if the ‘stair resident’ was trying to attempt something not good. I wish the building management could do something to address this. Seems a danger to the building, the residents AND building businesses. 

      • k January 3, 2026 (5:22 pm)

        None of this excuses a hate crime.

  • GH January 2, 2026 (9:18 am)

    Glad you’ve spent some time speculating wildly about reasons why the victim of an unprovoked assault might have deserved it? WTH

  • Robert January 2, 2026 (10:16 am)

    I was there yesterday just before this happened. There were a number of homeless people camped out in the parking garage in a parking stall making a lot of noise. It’s annoying that they do this and smoke cannabis. Having to smell and walk through it is annoying. Tasers can be deadly. To do it to a homeless person is just crazy though and the suspect is lucky the homeless person didn’t die from a taser reaction. 

  • East Coast Cynic January 2, 2026 (11:33 am)

    Sounds like the building management should take a stronger hand in dealing with homeless trespassers, which may preclude other people from getting involved.

  • anonyme January 2, 2026 (2:27 pm)

    Neither party was innocent here.  The homeless guy is both trespassing and engaging in harassing behavior.  The guy who went after him isn’t allowed to engage in vigilantism.  It’s a lose-lose situation.

  • Rats January 3, 2026 (5:33 pm)

    It’s private property so I don’t know why the property owner or management company is not doing anything. I have emailed the Whittaker a couple of times since early last year. No response.

  • Jinu January 16, 2026 (12:06 pm)

    This has been an issue and has been escalating for years. I work nearby and clients use the garage. Activity has become more concerning including holes punched in walls, defication and blood in the stairwell and elevator, violent threats written on the walls, and often the women feel unsafe to utilize Whittaker building parking, the elevator, and the stairwell. Some have been yelled at or lunged at by the one that camps on the stairs. The problem is the Whittaker is owned by a large real estate investment company called Kimco Realty, which has no single owner. Because no single owner is the face of the building or company, responsibility is diluted and the optics of what is going on doesn’t fall on one person or affect the reputation of a specific person. Hence, no one cares enough to help or make the property safer for residents and customers. Unfortunately my own company has reached out to Kimco dozens of times for years and have been told the same thing: “Oh, that’s unfortunate, we’ll work on it.” Then they pretend nothing happened. What might work? Source a well known Seattle journalist to select one of the owners of Kimco and push a PR campaign to make them infamous. Push them into the public and give the perception that they are the ones personally responsible for the neglect of the building. Then maybe they would care enough to take action. 

Sorry, comment time is over.