Fauntleroy Creek volunteers joyous over a record salmon-release year, saddened by vandalism

release5

Story by Tracy Record
Photos by Patrick Sand
West Seattle Blog co-publishers

Students and stewards are in the midst of a record-setting salmon-release season at Fauntleroy Creek, with more than 800 students participating in 22 release events.

But their work is being jeopardized by vandals, we’ve learned today – painful and criminal in any event, particularly so because this is all work involving students and volunteers, along an urban salmon stream whose survival is by no means guaranteed.

More on that shortly – first, here’s what the work is all about.

judyskidslong

That group of 50 fifth-graders from West Seattle Elementary is one of the school groups scheduled to visit Fauntleroy Creek this spring to release coho fry into the creek. Speaking with them in the photo is creek/watershed steward Judy Pickens, who has long volunteered with the Salmon in the Schools program. She and husband Phil Sweetland ferry salmon eggs to local classrooms in one mad dash every school year, and then for the next step, students and teachers bring the fry to the creek.

thesalmon

And off they go, with volunteer Denny Hinton‘s help:

release3

Some classes turn salmon-raising and -releasing into an even larger learning experience. A recent visit by Arbor Heights Elementary included not only a release, but also a presentation by students who are studying the creek:

fishkids

In our photo are Harriet and Hannah Mae, Arbor Heights fifth-graders who, as Pickens explains, are along with classmates delving into the mystery of what’s happening with the hundreds of thousands of coho salmon that have not come back into Puget Sound from the ocean.”

fishkidslong

They gathered on a creekside patio with Pickens, who notes, “The fall 2015 return was nearly non-existent and the fall 2016 return is expected to be at least as dismal. Under the direction of teacher Angie Nall and aided by scientists from Seattle Public Utilities, the students explored El Niño warming off the coast that killed the prey coho need to survive, ocean acidification, and pollution from stormwater runoff.”

There have been glimmers of hope. In fall 2012, more than 200 spawners returned. Every fall, volunteers take up their spots along the creek and watch with hope.

For them and for the salmon, it’s enough of an upstream swim, they don’t need any more challenges. Which brings us to the vandalism. Pickens reports two recent incidents: “One was ripping the net from our smolt trap in the upper creek. We have the trap in place in order to know how many coho have matured to migrate to saltwater – a gauge of both food abundance and water quality. A volunteer checks that trap daily and was able to make repairs within hours of the vandalism so that this important monitoring could continue.

“The other was digging stones out from a derelict section of concrete pipe imbedded in sediment at the salmon-release site. A few days ago, our volunteers discovered a sizable hole in the pipe that was diverting much-needed water from where children release their fish. A volunteer hydrologist temporarily plugged the hole with stones so that flow was restored and releases could continue. Then someone removed the stones, requiring another fix. A long-term fix can’t happen until a period of low flow this summer, so we need the pipe left alone. ‘Volunteer’ appears a lot in this report, an indication of the community’s commitment to salmon in Fauntleroy Creek and the students who cap their salmon study on release day.”

babysalmon

Pickens concludes, “If responsible park users can be on the lookout for destructive behaviors, we can stop this senseless vandalism.”

9 Replies to "Fauntleroy Creek volunteers joyous over a record salmon-release year, saddened by vandalism"

  • Chuck May 10, 2016 (11:06 am)

    Someone either has an issue with hatcheries and their detrimental effects on wild fish, or just doesn’t like all the increased traffic in their neighborhood. Or, the saboteur is just a bored kid looking to ruin things for others. Either way, I hope they knock it off.

    The lessons learned by these youngsters in their classroom (relating to the wild world still at their doorstep) far outweighs any negative effects a few hundred tank-raised fish will do to harm wild stocks. Kudos to all involved.

  • Abdul May 10, 2016 (11:35 am)

    Can you share a picture of the pipe & damage?  There are ways to quickly repair some pipe using bands, saddles and gaskets.  I assume that the ‘scientist’ from SPU might involve one of their maintenance crew chiefs to come up with an innovative and inexpensive quick fix.

    • Judy May 10, 2016 (2:46 pm)

      We’ve kept our Seattle Parks crew chief informed about the pipe and have been working with a skilled hydrologist to assess the situation.  Thanks for your ideas.  I think we have it covered.  Unfortunately, the section of old pipe has become integral to bank and bed stability, an especially concerning situation since a major bridge is involved.  We’ll likely need the lower flow of summer to install whatever seems like the best bet.

  • Dennis Hinton May 10, 2016 (1:11 pm)

    Great story and pix, Tracy and Patrick. Thanks for your support of a good cause.

  • Wondering May 10, 2016 (1:31 pm)

    I wonder if the areas are specifically marked and explained? I wonder if the people doing the damage mistakenly think they’re helping? And perhaps even if they are just being malicious, they could rethink their actions if they understand what’s happening better? 

    • Greg May 10, 2016 (3:50 pm)

      I had the same thought. The trap removal doesn’t sound like vandalism; it sounds like someone observed the trap, thought it was causing harm, and took an immediate action to resolve it.

  • Dennis Hinton May 10, 2016 (5:39 pm)

    The sites are clearly marked. The sign at the smolt trap says:

    Salmon Study Underway. The damage was clearly done by a person
    or persons not trying to do good. The good is that some 800
    kids this year are participating in a program  that exposes them to
    the “wild” in their own neighborhood and the values of  sustaining
    that environment.
  • dsa May 10, 2016 (10:16 pm)

    I have not been there, so I do not know the answer to this question.  But do the signs clearly state not to disturb *anything*?  What may seem obvious to you is not necessarily obvious to strangers to the project.

    • Judy May 11, 2016 (7:33 am)

      Your generosity toward this person or persons is commendable but, in both instances of the past week, the damage was clearly on purpose.  Both sites had a sign – one noting the salmon study and the other noting “baby salmon in the creek.”  Experience has shown that, with more explicit signage, we would risk the very tampering or damage we sought to avoid.  Fortunately, we have forest stewards and other volunteers, responsible park users, and at this season, lots of engaged children to spot when something is wrong.

Sorry, comment time is over.