Iraq disintegration

Home Forums Open Discussion Iraq disintegration

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 80 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #611656

    wakeflood
    Participant

    So, as many could/did predict, Iraq is in the process of disintegration into (likely) 3 warring territories that will destabilize its neighbors to some significant degree.

    We broke it…we bought it to the tune of 3-4 TRILLION dollars and thousands of dead and now we…what?

    If only somebody had stopped the madness that we knew would ensue. Thanks Cheney/Rumsfeld.

    Now watch the pundits blame Obama for this clusterf*ck of a situation.

    And for those who think walking away is the answer, how do you deal with the fact that the Frankenstein you created, ISIS is more sophisticated, better trained and armed than Al-Qaeda? You don’t think they want to mess with us?

    How about all those folks who built the drumbeat to the Iraq war just suit up and go over there and sort it out, eh? Rummy, Dickie, Judith, etc., etc. Fools, all.

    #809492

    Alki Warrior
    Participant

    Obama is gonna take care of it don’t worry..

    #809493

    wakeflood
    Participant

    Phew, for a second there, I thought you were gonna’ suggest a well-reasoned solution, AW…

    I stand corrected.

    #809494

    JanS
    Participant

    and they have come begging for our help…I have heard rumors that we will only help financially. I think they wanted drones, etc…I say, well, maybe not a good idea to help so much..fool me once….yeah, what did Bush say?

    #809495

    Smitty
    Participant

    “Now watch the pundits blame Obama for this clusterf*ck of a situation.”

    That actually should, but won’t happen. The media love him too much.

    Bush/Cheney for all their faults and poor decisions were very clear that we should have a presence in Iraq for a LONG while. I believe one of them was mocked for actually saying “forever”.

    But NO, let’s get out now and let the place collapse – and have all those deaths(US and otherwise) be for nothing. Leave the mess to the next poor sap to take the Oval Office.

    To be clear – this is not a thread over whether going into Iraq was right or wrong – I think we all know the answer to that – this is about doing what is right to keep the peace and do what we can to fix the damage we helped create.

    #809496

    clark5080
    Participant

    Apparently the O admin has known about this buildup and have been dragging their feet in doing something about it.

    #809497

    hammerhead
    Participant

    Needless to say this is extremely distressing.

    More than anything it is a HUGE slap in the faces of the men and women and their families who lost their lives and loved ones.

    #809498

    wakeflood
    Participant

    There are no good options, and most importantly, there HAVEN’T been since the day we invaded.

    All that is left to us is to spend uncounted millions or billions more indefinitely, and/or kill more soldiers and extremists and innocents until someday when we tire of it again.

    We’ll be spending money to kill extremists at a distance or close up, effectively creating more of them everyday we continue, just as we have for the last 12yrs.+. OR….

    …we’ll be spending the money to attempt to prevent them attacking us or our allies where we live. Which, as history shows, (supposedly) requires the facade of BOTH an invasive security state, AND a permanent war footing (read infinite budget) by the military.

    There’s your choices folks.

    Any of that sound like the country you envisioned living in a dozen years ago?

    #809499

    wakeflood
    Participant

    Hammerhead, who exactly is slapping these people in the face?

    You speak as if there’s some obvious solution to make this go away and we’re just too stupid to do it. Pray tell, exactly how do we not insult them?

    #809500

    wakeflood
    Participant

    We don’t have to look far to see how this plays out. We have examples within memory and in 20th century history.

    The British in Afghanistan

    The French in Vietnam

    America in Vietnam

    The Russians in Afghanistan

    You walk away and spend billions to hopefully contain the fire from a distance. What results? We have little control over that but then again, to assume THAT WE EVER DID is demonstrably foolish.

    Maybe someday we’ll get a better handle on how to not radicalize people who think us oppressive. I’m pretty sure it doesn’t include invasions.

    #809501

    dobro
    Participant

    “Bush/Cheney for all their faults and poor decisions were very clear that we should have a presence in Iraq for a LONG while.”

    This is a crazy idea that is a result of their faults and poor decisions. We should never have been in Iraq in the first place.

    “I believe one of them was mocked for actually saying “forever”.”

    Mocking is the bare minimum the idiot that suggested that should endure.

    “But NO, let’s get out now and let the place collapse – and have all those deaths(US and otherwise) be for nothing.”

    Some people, incredibly, think this is a logical statement. FYI, all of those deaths are worth nothing RIGHT NOW! Thousands of our young people and, as you rightly mention, many others, died for war profiteers, political power egos, oil companies,and one particular pr*cks Daddy issues.But, somehow, to some people, it makes sense to send more people to die because…uh…uh…well, just because. Criminy.

    “…Leave the mess to the next poor sap to take the Oval Office.”

    Oh, you mean like GWB did?

    #809502

    dobro
    Participant

    In 2002 Brent Scowcroft warned that “to attack Iraq while the Middle East is in the terror that it is right now and America appears not to be dealing with something which to every Muslim is a real problem [the Israel/Palestine conflict] but instead go over here I think could turn the whole region into a cauldron…”

    Which is exactly what has happened. The Middle East is a cauldron. The idea of sending more American young people there to die is insane and should not get any traction.

    #809503

    wakeflood
    Participant

    But Dobro, how else could we kick ass and take names???

    Hubris, stupidity and a big credit card is a potent formula…for disaster.

    #809504

    dobro
    Participant

    Please pardon the cut and paste, but the folly of those who think we need to be in Iraq is well-stated here by blogger David Atkins…

    “Iraq is descending into the chaos that so many of us who opposed the war predicted. The human toll must be horrible, likely beyond the imagining of most living Americans.

    [This article] says the US should go back in and my mind boggles. When will we ever learn? The author’ makes two blatantly ludicrous assumptions:

    The first is that the US government could re-intervene with good intentions. Not only is that utterly naive, it’s impossible. For one thing, good intentions aren’t enough. As Bush convincingly demonstrated, you also have to know what you’re doing. Even now, even without right wing ideologues running foreign policy, this country hardly knows enough about Iraq to be effective. Nor does the US have a stable enough political culture to follow through.

    Also, who says the US has good intentions? After all, a genuinely serious American solution to Iraq begins by bringing to justice those responsible for the invasion. That would demonstrate actual good intentions by the present American government to the citizens of Iraq. Dream on.

    Assumption two is that the US has some kind of fairy dust that can help stave off catastrophe if we can just get a chance to sprinkle it around. There is no such thing. The American military would only make things far worse.

    And since we don’t know what we’re doing, since the criminals will get off, and since we have no magic powders, the US must stay out. That doesn’t preclude cooperation with an international coalition; it simply means that further unilateral military involvement is an absolutely terrible idea.

    Iraq today is a tragedy, plain and simple. We will only add to the horror Bush perpetrated by unilaterally returning.”

    #809505

    Smitty
    Participant

    I’m not sure returning is the right answer either. I wish I had the answer. It seems at the very least some air support is in order – but I know how that could be a slippery slope.

    My issue is pulling out in the first place and not leaving a force behind to make certain the Iraq government was stable and strong enough to defend itself. Erasing “red lines” and making horrible hostage “trades” certainly bolstered ISIS as well.

    Obama was dealt a horrible hand – no doubt. But I contend that while he certainly didn’t “create” this situation, he could have done more to keep it at bay.

    #809506

    JoB
    Participant

    Smitty..

    have you considered what size force we would have had to leave behind to “stabilize” the puppet government we supported?

    #809507

    dobro
    Participant

    “But I contend that while he certainly didn’t “create” this situation, he could have done more to keep it at bay.”

    Obama wanted to keep more troops there but was constrained by the status-of-forces agreement that GWBs admin negotiated. If you’ll recall, the Iraqi gov’t did not want and would not allow us to leave forces there.How could we pretend we were leaving a “democracy” there without honoring some of that gov’t’s wishes?

    Obama takes credit for ending the Iraq war but the endgame of that war was negotiated by GWB and firmly in place when Obama took the reins and the Iraqis would not budge.

    #809508

    dobro
    Participant

    “Going in and occupying Iraq, thus unilaterally exceeding the United Nations’ mandate, would have destroyed the precedent of international response to aggression that we hoped to establish. Had we gone the invasion route, the United States could conceivably still be an occupying power in a bitterly hostile land.”

    — George H. W. Bush, in his 1998 memoir A World Transformed

    #809509

    dobro
    Participant

    “My issue is pulling out in the first place and not leaving a force behind to make certain the Iraq government was stable and strong enough to defend itself.”

    The reason Obama didn’t leave troops is because the Maliki gov’t insisted that if Americans soldiers were left in Iraq they’d have to be subject to Iraqi laws and justice system. You can imagine how that went over.

    The gov’t was stable when we left. The Maliki admin, rather than being inclusive and sharing oil money with all parties (Sunni, Shia, etc) immediately made a power grab and shut out their religious enemies. GWB and his evil cronies opened a Pandoras box that Obama has been trying to balance his whole term in office with no help from the Repub warpigs that started it all. The Iraq and Afghanistan wars, 9/11,and the Patriot Act are all the legacy of the worst POTUS in American history, GWB.

    #809510

    wakeflood
    Participant

    One of the things that drives me crazy is that media outlets – and not just Faux News – still give voice to these fools who created the mess.

    Some of them should be in jail for treason, instead they get speaker’s fees and draw salaries from various and sundry right wing entities as if their opinions are something more than what they really are – attempts to whitewash their incompetence and rehabilitate their public images.

    Nice how that works, eh?

    #809511

    wakeflood
    Participant

    As Dobro reasonably points out, Maliki was damaged goods from the get-go but since we had to pick someone to prop up, he was the most connected and seemingly, most friendly.

    What he is, is exactly what people knew him to be long before the invasion – a greedy opportunist.

    But hey, Iraq’s not really a country anyway. It’s an artificial grouping of disparate religious groups with an arbitrary border. (Which frankly describes many countries, including the U.S.) Maybe it’s time to negotiate the breakup of separate states. I’m not even sure which group has a functional claim on their Mesopotamian roots. (It ain’t the Kurds but they want to be part of Turkey anyway.)

    The question in this scenario is who aligns with Syria and who aligns with Iran and does that just mean Iran rolls on Assad the week after the truce?

    All of which is to say, nice job GWB. Mission Accomplished.

    #809512

    Alki Warrior
    Participant

    The Iraqi army we supposedly trained to fight was tearing off their uniforms, throwing their guns away and running as fast as they could when they saw the ISIS approaching. Bunch of pansies…lol

    #809513

    F16CrewChief
    Member

    Intelligence is a form of progression.

    Humanity has hit a road block. Either we advance or we simply kill each other and the resources used to do it?

    -More guns to stop guns.

    -Restart wars.

    -Drill baby, DRILL!

    -Welcome to Walgreens, can I fill all those prescriptions for you?

    -It’s snowing, see global warming is a liberal lie!

    -Bullet proof shields for our kids instead of text books.

    -Glucose, fructose, corn syrup….YUMMM!!!!

    -Oh yeah, more guns to protect us from all those other guns.

    -I get my news from a social media meme.

    -I educate myself from social media meme’s.

    Humanity is getting dumber and dumber. Mother Nature doesn’t have to get rid of us, we’re too stupid to survive anymore.

    #809514

    wakeflood
    Participant

    I hear you F-16, I just wish we didn’t have to burn down the innocent flora and fauna on the way.

    Any of the higher mammals left will slow clap/finslap the last one of us fools to go.

    #809515

    Alki Warrior
    Participant

    Don’t worry F16, Jesus will save us from our own stupidity.

Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 80 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.