DEVELOPMENT: City convenes neighborhood-requested online meeting for West Seattle project seeking Environmentally Critical Area exception

(Google Street View image of 2345 Hobart SW, from this past August)

City-convened public meetings about development sites are few and far between these days; not only has development slowed down, but design review has largely became a staff function, and that program had been the major reason for community meetings. Next week, though, a West Seattle development proposal is the subject of an online community meeting, and a neighborhood group is explaining why.

The site is at 2345 Hobart Avenue SW in Upper Alki [map], and the proposal is for one three-story house and one three-story triplex, plus six offstreet-parking spaces. The community meeting, online at 5 pm Wednesday, October 15th – requested by neighbors, per the comment file – is to address the project’s request for a variance because of the Environmentally Critical Area that’s part of the site.

Neighbors have formed a group called the Friends of Bonair Place, and a spokesperson told us, “The site proposed for development has a history of landslides, sinkholes and infrastructure issues going back to 1934 – 1935.” They note a WSB story covered a utility problem there in early 2009. “We are doing what we can to ensure that there is broader awareness of this public meeting for several reasons: 1) due to the unique conditions of this steep slope wooded site and the wider impact it could have beyond Hobart Ave, 2) because many neighbors near us were not sent the attached notice, and 3) because last year SDCI granted an ECA variance for a project adjacent to the proposed site. The variance was granted without a public meeting and is managed by a different Land Use Planner, David Sachs. (2349 Hobart Ave SW)” (Joe Hurley is the planner listed as working on the subject of next week’s meeting.)

The city’s file says the site originally went into the system in 2020 with a proposal for five townhouses. That followed various other proposals in previous years, according to city files, including one for eight units. The current proposal includes this site plan showing the developer’s calculations of how much of the Environmentally Critical Area the project would encroach on; it says the site totals 11,532 square feet, that 8,971 sf of that are ECA, and that they believe 1,315 sf of their buildings’ footprint would cut into that.

To participate in (or just watch) the 5 pm October 15 meeting, here’s the link; you can sign up here to comment during the meeting. The meeting notice also has a phone number and access code for participation.

4 Replies to "DEVELOPMENT: City convenes neighborhood-requested online meeting for West Seattle project seeking Environmentally Critical Area exception"

  • John October 9, 2025 (8:51 pm)

    After reading this and exploring the linked plans (thank you WSB!),
    I am saddened to see such organized NIMBYism.                                                    
    “Friends of Bonair Place” with their  “spokesperson” are attempting to deny new housing on a vacant parcel.  

    Yes it will encroach into the ECA, (but minimally) and virtually all of the other homes surrounding it above and below are also encroaching.  
    The difference being, the “Friends of Bonair Place” live in older homes, some 1920s era beach shacks while the proposal is required to comply with stringent new requirements.  
    I chuckled when I reread the WSB piece on the utility problem in the streets’ century old clay pipe that the un-named spokesperson cited as a reason to ban development, as new construction replaces and upgrades utilities.

    These are large vacant lots with a proposed small development footprint. The city is required to allow reasonable use of these lots.
    Sadly, opposition does little but drive up costs.  

    • WS Guy October 10, 2025 (2:43 am)

      I disagree.

  • ProbablyYourNeighbor October 9, 2025 (11:46 pm)

    While I can certainly understand not wanting something the size and shape of the proposed duplex in the neighborhood, y’all need to read and understand the geotechnical report and take a look at the planting plan. The recommendations in the geotech report show an abundance of caution and the most recent site plan seems to reflect those recommendations.

    It appears from a quick read of the landscape plans (I’m assuming that there’s an updated set coming since they still show the second building) that the only trees being removed are within the footprint of the proposed row houses, there are a handful of existing trees that will be left as snags ie root system undisturbed, and the developer is proposing to plant 20 trees on the site. Together with the proposed piles, that site is going to be much better off than it is now from a stability standpoint.

    PS – WSB, love y’all, it looks like the linked site plan is from 7/2024, current revision appears to be 10/2025. Now it’s a duplex/row houses and no separate house.

  • Wiseone October 11, 2025 (10:18 am)

    Just a reminder that trees, give off oxygen and our essential to our air quality in planet health. I would like to add that I have been active in land use for decades …and if you let one project in a green belt, you’re gonna be sorry because it’s going to destroy the green belt with more smd more development… it’s just a matter of time.  Do NOT allow construction in Green belts!  Absolutely no! They are needed for wildlife and Air Quality and are not to be compromised. Thank you to the people that are protecting our green belt. 

Sorry, comment time is over.