VIDEO: Seattle Police, politicians show off Real-Time Crime Center. Will its cameras come to West Seattle?

The Seattle Police Real-Time Crime Center has been mentioned multiple times in community meetings in recent months, held up as an example of how SPD is working harder, and differently, to crack cases. But what is it and what does it do? We and other media crews were invited to SPD headquarters today for an explanation and demonstration. The heart of the latter was an SPD-produced video showing highlights of how the RTCC – located in the HQ building downtown – was used to arrest a suspect after an assault in North Seattle. But first, the center’s commander Capt. Jim Britt explained how it works:

After correcting a playback problem, they then showed the video:

And before that, Capt. Britt gave a top-level overview promising privacy protections were part of their operations:

While SPD stressed that some areas in public did not qualify for privacy protection, like sidewalks, the camera system does have privacy masking for some things such as residential upper-level windows. The demonstration was preceded by comments from newly confirmed SPD Chief Shon Barnes:

Mayor Bruce Harrell and Public Safety Committee chair Councilmember Bob Kettle spoke too; Council president Sara Nelson and Councilmember Maritza Rivera were also there but did not take turns at the microphone.

The major question for us was, when will … or will … it be deployed in West Seattle cases? WS is not in immediate line for city-installed, city-controlled surveillance cameras; the next installments are set for other parts of the city including Capitol Hill and the stadium zone. But the system’s capability to tap into private security cameras, with permission, as well as other city cameras such as traffic cams is what will eventually enable its use in areas without SPD-controlled cameras.

The RTCC is currently staffed 19 hours a day (8 am to 3 am) and is expected to expand to 24/7 next year. You can read the city’s official news release about today’s event and the RTCC here.

23 Replies to "VIDEO: Seattle Police, politicians show off Real-Time Crime Center. Will its cameras come to West Seattle?"

  • Derek July 15, 2025 (3:47 pm)

    No one asked for this and no one wants to pay for it. This is just going to hurt marginalized communities like cameras already do in major cities across the U.S. and further drive poverty in those areas. Waste of money.

    • EJ July 16, 2025 (8:24 pm)

      Give me a break. The only people who need to fear this are criminals. The right of the public to be able to enjoy a safe and clean neighborhood vastly outweighs the rights of criminals to commit crimes in privacy.

    • Rhonda July 18, 2025 (12:19 am)

      For once I agree with you 100%, Derek.

  • WSCurmudgeon July 15, 2025 (4:10 pm)

    How beauteous mankind is!

    O brave new world

    That has such people in’t!

       — Bill Shakespeare (Miranda)

    • K to the F July 15, 2025 (4:37 pm)

      Want to surveil us? Have probable cause and get a narrow, purpose-focused, warrant. We don’t need a police force who have been under consent decree for the better part of the last decade and who’s members participated in the Jan. 6 coup attempt to have unfettered access to monitor and stalk us. Heck no!

      • Anne July 15, 2025 (7:34 pm)

        Yes- yes we do need these cameras. 

        • Jethro Marx July 15, 2025 (10:31 pm)

          Will the cameras free us from fear or only make us feel better?  Be real.

  • Christopher B. July 15, 2025 (4:20 pm)

    Personally, after more than two decades as a Seattle resident I can think of too many stories of horrible crimes being committed against people, with no one being held responsible. Given the existing, massive private video infrastructure that already records everything from shopping in stores, to ATM withdrawals and bank visits, to restaurant visits, etc. (not to mention the surveillance economy of ISPs and social media sites recording and commoditizing absolutely everything we do with our computers and devices), I feel like it would be illogical for me to be up in arms about limited  law enforcement video monitoring in PUBLIC places where there already is no reasonable expectation of privacy. 

    • The King July 15, 2025 (5:17 pm)

      What if Donald Trump ordered these cameras be put in place? People would lose their minds 

    • CarDriver July 15, 2025 (5:37 pm)

      Agree! I’m always amazed at commentators that don’t want police videotaping them but are fine with EVERYONE else watching them. Never hear them say that they’ve confronted the business/homeowner/city traffic cameras with their demand to know what they’re doing with the video.

  • Erik July 15, 2025 (4:51 pm)

    Id be all for them putting cameras along Alki, North Delridge, and White Center.            

  • TMJ July 15, 2025 (5:37 pm)

    Cameras on Alki please, and throughout Seattle.  Too many unsolved crimes.  I think it would make the city much safer.  

  • Alki resident July 15, 2025 (6:22 pm)

    Agree, cameras on Alki would be welcome. 

  • Eric1 July 15, 2025 (8:08 pm)

    I am all for additional aids in the enforcement of the law.  However, this is only the police side of the equation.  We need prosecutors that will bring the appropriate criminal charges and not plea bargain with repeat offenders.  We also need a court system and legislature that sees incarceration as a way of keeping the law abiding public safe and not as unjust punishment to misunderstood souls.  I don’t need vengeance from the government, I just want safety and order.   If you follow simple behaviors and don’t take things that are not yours and you don’t engage in activities that might hurt others it will pretty much keep you out of jail.   It really isn’t that hard to do.  When in doubt, check if there is a law against that activity; If there is, it is probably a dumb idea.  I should not have to lock my doors nor worry about my family’s safety but unfortunately, the plethora of repeat offenders is all the proof you need that the current system needs improvement. 

    • wscommuter July 16, 2025 (11:18 am)

      Would you care to provide actual facts to back up your thesis that prosecutors don’t bring appropriate criminal charges?  Are you privy to the police reports submitted to KCPO and the charging decisions that flow from those?  Are you privy to the discussions on charge resolution?  Do you even know what the KCPO charging requirements are?  Can you provide data to support your thesis that judges don’t impose the penalties that are proscribed by the legislature?  

  • Marcus July 15, 2025 (9:16 pm)

    When I do travel it is in countries which do have live feed video surveillance.  I have felt a lot safer in those countries. Bring it on!

  • 1994 July 15, 2025 (9:54 pm)

    THIS IS  WHY CAMERAS ARE NEEDED – see WSB post this morning:Patrol officers responded to reports of a robbery near 61st Avenue Southwest and Alki Avenue Southwest. Police arrived and investigated the incident. Officers determined that a man and woman were robbed at gunpoint by two suspects, armed with a handgun and a possible rifle. The suspects ordered both victims to the ground and stole their wallet and cell phone. The suspects fled in an older sedan with tinted windows. The suspect and vehicle descriptions matched those of another armed robbery in John sector [North Seattle] less than two hours earlier.

  • Hoss July 15, 2025 (10:09 pm)

    Safety requires putting the bad guys in jail.  I wish it was like Singapore where law violators are not prioritized over the safety of the general public.  The issue is not  about cameras, it is about holding people accountable.

  • Mike July 16, 2025 (7:18 am)

    No

  • 40 yrs your Sr July 16, 2025 (10:04 am)

    Although I don’t agree with cameras, SPD needs to do something to catch up with crime. LEO’s don’t want to work in Seattle or WA and courts making deals for reduced sentences/release all contribute to getting cameras. 

  • Niko July 16, 2025 (3:56 pm)

    More surveillance less action Big brother is watching

  • JBone July 17, 2025 (7:56 am)

    You can’t take my fingerprints, that’s an invasion of privacy!You can’t collect my DNA, that’s an invasion of privacy!You can’t use a camera to record crime, that’s an invasion of privacy!The tools we use to police our society have always evolved and adapted to new technology. Anything that helps them, helps us. Go for it, SPD!

  • WestSide 4 life July 18, 2025 (8:17 pm)

    Absolutely !!  Although it may not deter career criminals ( we have our wonderful legal system for that ) it may help some of the criminal activities.. Similar to a Lock.. ” Locks keep honest people honest ” 

Sorry, comment time is over.