FOLLOWUP: Is added Alki Avenue parking a done deal? What does ‘additional outreach’ mean? Here’s how SDOT replied

(WSB photos, this afternoon)

After reading our coverage of last week’s SDOT announcement about adding 150 parking spaces along Alki Avenue after the conversion of angled parking to parallel parking is done, a nearby resident asked us whether this was a “done deal.” The language on the “fact sheet” provided by SDOT last week includes this paragraph:

…Re-establishing daytime on-street parking is proposed for the west/ water side of Alki Avenue SW, between the 1200 and 1700 blocks, where the street is wide enough. This would help offset the reduced parking at Duwamish Head and meet increased parking demand during summers. Changes could be installed in the summer of 2025. …

But also this:

Additional Alki Avenue SW outreach is planned for later this summer. We’ll engage the community to address questions and take feedback before finalizing and implementing a design.

So we asked SDOT two things today: #1, is the added street parking in the 1200 to 1700 blocks a “done deal,” and #2, what kind of “additional … outreach” is planned – for example, will there be a community meeting?

Regarding “is it a done deal?” the answer wasn’t clear:

Before installing the second phase of this project, we would like to hear how people feel about the change and any specific benefits or challenges that re-establishing parking on the water side of Alki Avenue SW might bring.

Regarding “additional outreach,” SDOT says “no meetings are planned”:

We appreciate the community’s interest and input regarding Councilmember Rob Saka‘s request to re-establish on-street parking on the waterside of Alki Avenue SW to offset some loss of parking at the Duwamish Head. We believe the current survey provides one effective way of gathering feedback from a diverse range of voices.

To ensure adjacent stakeholders are aware, we are also putting up A-frame signs within the area and sending emails to community leaders. Wider promotion through outlets like your media site and Councilmember Rob Saka helps capture a wide array of Alki visitors, businesses, and residents. The survey itself ensures participants can share their thoughts conveniently and at a time that works best for them, allowing for a comprehensive collection of opinions over the next few weeks. While no meetings are planned at this time, we’ll see if the current outreach generates significant interest or if there are populations that appear not to have been reached and determine if supplemental efforts should be considered.

So if you have an opinion of the added spaces, whatever it is, the survey is apparently your main opportunity for input. Since SDOT’s replies made it clear that the added spaces, like the diagonal removal, is by request of Councilmember Saka, here’s his contact info too.

91 Replies to "FOLLOWUP: Is added Alki Avenue parking a done deal? What does 'additional outreach' mean? Here's how SDOT replied"

  • Alki resident June 2, 2025 (9:26 pm)

    Looking forward to the added spots. 

  • An actual Alki resident June 2, 2025 (9:56 pm)

    Why do we think more parking is the solution? Especially when it blocks pristine ocean views? More parking = more traffic.The answer should be more transit options – more bus capacity and shuttle stops.This is a bad idea and folks should answer the survey to voice their concerns!

    • Kyle June 2, 2025 (10:54 pm)

      Are you really worried about the ocean view from your condo? When you get Metro onboard with restoring the 37 and adding more frequent bus service, sure then let’s talk about removing parking. This is a practical partial solution given the removal of parking in recent years while bus service was cut.  Otherwise my family could go years without a convenient way to visit this part of Seattle. Putting 3 kids on trailers and buying $2k e-bikes isn’t a convenient option either.

      • Foop June 3, 2025 (12:32 pm)

        A 2k e-bike is a step too far but a 20k car (exempting registration and maintenance) is fine? Okay.

        • Kyle June 3, 2025 (5:00 pm)

          I already own the car..but sure you go off on how I should outfit my family with e-bikes too.

          • walkerws June 5, 2025 (8:13 am)

            Kyle, you should outfit your family not only with ebikes but with ORCA cards. 

          • Kyle June 5, 2025 (9:21 am)

            Clearly my 3, 5, and 7 year old should all have their own Orca cards and E-bikes because you are against adding any parking on Alki and can’t comprehend that someone else’s needs to visit one of our Public parks is different than yours 🙄.

          • walkerws June 5, 2025 (10:39 am)

            @Kyle, well then in that case you should advocate for paid parking with reasonable rates so that parking will self-regulate and you’ll be able to find it readily. This is one spot where market solutions work very well. But also you can get cargo e-bikes, and every kid in the city should have an ORCA card.

    • Genuinely Curious June 2, 2025 (10:54 pm)

      I don’t understand why or how parking blocks “pristine ocean views”. For the walkers and bikers it should have no impact on their views (maybe a few extra car doors to avoid and kids learning to ride their bikes). Many of the houses/condos/apartments are multi-story so their views should be unimpeded as well. 

      • Seth June 3, 2025 (7:41 am)

        I dont live on alki, theres something to be said about a street thats not parked full to the brim with cars.  Less noise means more listening to nature, less chance of an accident for those who need to cross the street, less chance of breakins cause less targets, less polution cleaner air.

      • bill June 3, 2025 (10:06 am)

        “A few extra car doors to avoid” actually is a significant problem while avoiding kids learning to ride.

    • West seattle mama June 3, 2025 (5:12 am)

      Adding more transit isn’t an easily said option. As a mother I am not dragging my kid onto a bus to go to the beach for a couple of hours for the day just to have to drag my overly tired, exhausted, drained kid onto a bus to go home. That does sound appealing to me. If I were going for an hour or so without a kid that would be different. 

      • walkerws June 3, 2025 (9:18 am)

        Parents all over the world get there kids to and from the beach and other public places via transit. Your comment is American car-hypnotized culture in action

        • Brandon June 3, 2025 (12:32 pm)

          We don’t live all over the world we live in this America you blame…and no I’m not taking a bus I’m parking my SUV on the street

          • Pete June 3, 2025 (2:41 pm)

            That’s the spirit! 

          • walkerws June 3, 2025 (3:32 pm)

            I legitimately can’t tell if this comment is parody or not, which I guess says it all.

        • Kyle June 3, 2025 (5:26 pm)

          @walkerws the 37 has been suspended for the past few years. The 50 only goes to the West end of Alki and requires a transfer for much of West Seattle. Please focus on improving transit to Alki first.

          • Walkerws June 3, 2025 (5:33 pm)

            I agree on improving transit. But my comment was in response to Brandon’s absurd SUV comment. 

      • Kathy June 3, 2025 (4:22 pm)

        People with kids and equipment don’t want to park so far away in the proposed area and drag their kids “all that way”. They want to cruise the neighborhood close to the beach and businesses and will usually get a space somewhere close eventually. So adding so many spaces will just provide more spaces for people to hang out in their cars. 

    • Alki resident June 3, 2025 (8:10 am)

      There used to be parking spots right there and they were taken away. You must be new to the beach. And transit passing through will block pristine ocean views, not cars. 

    • David June 3, 2025 (4:21 pm)

      If you can see the ocean from Alki I would be amazed – it’s Elliott Bay for the record – you are not guaranteed a view anywhere in Seattle unless you purchase all property in the path of your wanted view

    • Shadowtripper June 5, 2025 (8:09 am)

      Parking is and always has been an issue during summer months on Alki.  WaterTaxi parking has increased the demand.   Wouldn’t it be prudent for the City of Seattle to copy what others have found effective in addressing these issues?   Seattle and the Port of Seattle own acres of seldom used land that could be transformed into paid parking for commuters and visitors to Alki.  It would also offset the lack of tax dollars that not enforcing vehicle license tabs, no gasoline tax (highway use tax) that electric vehicles now avoid.

  • Alki resident June 2, 2025 (9:58 pm)

    Please fill out the survey! Super disappointed. Adding more cars along this area creates so much more noise/congestion. I’m totally down for having more people enjoy this area but shouldn’t we be adding better bus routes and later ferry times instead? 

    • M.B. June 3, 2025 (8:33 am)

      What’s even worse is that car doors will swing into the path! This is really dangerous and isn’t being brought up loudly enough! This is covered by Seattle bike blog.

  • Disgusted June 2, 2025 (10:51 pm)

    I’m angry, and my Alki neighbors are, too. Councilman Rob Saka and the Dept of Transportation have unilaterally decided to overturn 40+ years of no waterside parking along a short stretch of Alki Avenue without any messy community meetings, and then – with a straight face – issue an online survey which they won’t bother to read anyway. I don’t know what’s worse; Saka’s and SDOT’s flagrant dishonesty or their shamelessness. And what will they say when an ambulance can’t reach someone in need on a busy summer afternoon because their brilliant parking plan made no allowance for emergency traffic? If Saka and SDOT really want to hear how Alki residents feel, they should host a public meeting. 

    • Marc June 3, 2025 (2:18 am)

      It always seemed silly to me that somehow a privileged few had somehow gotten that stretch marked as no parking, glad to see it going back to the community as a whole providing much needed parking.

      • LaughingIn WS June 3, 2025 (6:51 am)

        Say it one more time for the folks who bought homes along a public waterfront expecting private neighborhood perks!!

      • walkerws June 3, 2025 (9:19 am)

        I don’t live along Alki but love using the path. I prefer the sections without parking along the path and wish all of it had no parking on the beach-side.

    • Alki resident June 3, 2025 (10:49 am)

      It’s a public beach and road. Non of my Alki neighbors or family are angry about this whatsoever. Its about time they bring back the parking that was once there. 

      • walkerws June 3, 2025 (11:52 am)

        It’s a public beach and path. So let’s make it nicer for the users of the beach by reducing unsightly, loud, polluting idling cars next to it :)

        • Alki resident June 3, 2025 (2:05 pm)

          Walker, so having loud unsightly cars parked just a few more feet down the way us ok, just not there right? There are very few unsightly, loud, polluting cars that cruise Alki. If you’re really worried about pollution, you should take it up with the port who’s ships sit idle 24/7 while loading and unloading cargo.

          • walkerws June 3, 2025 (2:40 pm)

            Honestly they should get rid of waterside parking for the whole stretch. And they should have aggressive speed bumps that will mess up a fool’s car to prevent cars from cruising so much.

          • Alki resident June 3, 2025 (3:21 pm)

            That’ll never happen and not sure why you’re so hateful towards people who want to enjoy their day at the beach or cruise by. 

          • Walkerws June 3, 2025 (4:29 pm)

            Well I’m not sure why you’re so hateful to people who just want to enjoy the beach without a scourge of cars

          • Hank June 3, 2025 (4:51 pm)

            It’s easier to enjoy the beach when there’s not a busy road right next to it. And no, I don’t live at Alki, nor am I waking distance, so please spare the accusations of elitism.

          • Walkerws June 3, 2025 (8:22 pm)

            It can happen if we all work together. Not sure why you’re so hateful towards pedestrians and cyclists.

  • Rhonda June 2, 2025 (11:28 pm)

    YES to more parking!

  • Jay June 3, 2025 (5:28 am)

    A cramped and crowded trail next to 20ft and 13ft vehicle lanes. Surely the solution is to keep the lanes wider than necessary, add more car storage, and keep the pedestrian spaces at the beach to an absolute minimum. It’s so frustrating how much we have to sacrifice to maintain 1960s road design standards in West Seattle.

  • North Admiral Cyclist June 3, 2025 (6:19 am)

    As I recall, about 20-25 years go the City revised Alki Ave. to eliminate much of the then existing parallel parking at the north end of the beach (near Duwamish Head) when they revised the bike lane, and separated the path for bikes and pedestrians.  Before that the cyclists/skaters and pedestrians shared one path.  Many of the condos were relatively new at that time and the complaint was that street parking was “blocking pristine views” – but also there were complaints about the parking at the north end (especially late at night) was adding to the “street” issues we still hear about today.  When the planned parking changes occur, we hope the SDOT updates the bike lane signing and paint markings to make it more obvious to non-cyclists as to its purpose for “wheeled users”   The Alki bike lane is one of the more popular bike lanes in Seattle with heavy usage.  With King County Metro’s cancelation of the 37 route bus service, biking along Alki is even more important.  Adding parking along Alki Ave will just make the bike lane more difficult to use as it gets more inundated with pedestrians, illegal venders, etc.  Today, cyclists can move over to Alki Ave. when the bike lane is unusable, but with more parallel parking that becomes impossible.  I would love the WS Blog to give an update as to the status of the “Alki Point Healthy Street” down near Constellation Park and  the lighthouse.  The city’s prior public information from their report in late 2024 said the Alki Point Healthy Street would be expanded in “2025”.  The City has not answered my inquiry about this subject, so maybe the Blog can find out.

    • WSB June 3, 2025 (9:12 am)

      That was in relation to the road work involved with the pump-station project, which isn’t over yet.

      • North Admiral Cyclist June 3, 2025 (1:38 pm)

        Yes, understood.  I was mostly thinking about the “2025 Planned Projects” from page 47 of the 2024 Alki Pt Healthy Street Evaluation Report.  In particular Items 3, 4 and 5, which seem to be outside the area of the ongoing street work for the pump station.  Hopefully, the 2025 improvements all get done (i.e., Items 1-5) at the end of the pump-station street work.

  • Alki Jack June 3, 2025 (7:01 am)

    What enjoyment is a drive down Alki Avenue when you can’t see the water because of all the cars & vans parked on the waterside of the road.  That’s why it’s been that way for over 40 years, so people could enjoy the view. 

    • Pam June 3, 2025 (12:01 pm)

      You shouldn’t be looking at the water while driving on a busy street with stop and go traffic and pedestrians crossing. Pay attention to the road. If you want to enjoy the view park in one of the new spots. 

      • walkerws June 4, 2025 (11:28 am)

        I’ve seen drivers actively photographing out their car window while driving along Alki. And they’re often suffering from enough Main Character Syndrome to be offended when someone yells out that they should get off their phones.

  • Westseattlebornnraised June 3, 2025 (7:02 am)

    I’m all for the more parking alki definitely needs it. My car club will appreciate it as well . Also who’s really taking the bus to the beach???? Nobody.

    • walkerws June 3, 2025 (9:20 am)

      I take the bus to the beach, and I object to the existence of a “car club” 

    • bill June 3, 2025 (10:09 am)

      Nobody is taking the bus to the beach because there are no busses going to the beach. If Alki Ave were removed nobody could drive to the beach. See how that works?

      • Foop June 3, 2025 (12:35 pm)

        The 50 and the water taxis shuttles go there, I’d rather Saka put his energy into advocating for more transit but I expect nothing of the abject failure he’s proven to be.

        • Kyle June 3, 2025 (5:30 pm)

          The 50 does not go to this part of Alki ave…

  • Born in WS June 3, 2025 (8:17 am)

    When I was in high school there was parking along the length of Alki. This was the big party spot. It would take at least 90 minutes to travel from Harbor Avenue down to Spuds. Then we’d loop around and do it again. Everybody parked along the streets partying out of their cars with their stereos blasting. Girls in bikinis, everybody rubbernecking, cops everywhere. Sadly they put up the no cruising signs and later took the parking away.  Let’s make Alki Great Again!

  • Derek June 3, 2025 (8:31 am)

    NO to parking. Need to wipe the car mindset from our brains. More pedestrian and walkable Alki, PLEASE! More bus routes! All the way to Beach Drive and up Jacobsen or down to Lowman and over to Fauntleroy. Begging for this or similar route to come back. 

    • Goodtime June 3, 2025 (3:52 pm)

      Like That’ll happen….  Let’s lose the cellphone mindset too!!

  • TurningTide June 3, 2025 (8:44 am)

    Yes to more parking along this stretch.

    Angry neighbors, already abusing planting strips for parking, are now expressing even more entitlement.  
    Of course they don’t want strangers parked across Alki from their  residences.  
    Let this be a reminder that Seattle makes no concessions, be they structures, trees or parked vehicles, to view protections.  

    • Jay June 3, 2025 (10:28 am)

      Seattle topped all the trees (which kills the tree over a few years) going up Bonaire to give wealthy homeowners a better view. The topping loophole for killing view-blocking trees is pretty commonly used by the city to make it look like a compromise. 

      • Topped! June 4, 2025 (1:06 pm)

        I am familiar with the tree topping on the City owned ECA Steep Slope  Slide  area west of Bonaire.  

        Apparently, several homes on the even side of the 1900 block of Bonaire were given perpetual tree topping on the sliding hillside to the west that they donated to Seattle Parks.   

        There are other examples of such anachronistic and long ago prohibited exclusive deals to top and remove trees in the Seattle Parks ECA that was donated by the Schmitz family above Jacobsen Place.  

        These banned practices being allowed for a secret, wealthy and influential few contradict and undermine Seattle’s mantra of tree protection.

        Maybe attention of public exposure will end this practice. 

  • SoDelridgeResident June 3, 2025 (8:54 am)

    I’m a yes on more parking too. Let’s keep the public beaches for the public (and give folks a place to park) since they are few and far between in West Seattle. I’ve been karen’ed a number of times barely setting foot on someone’s “private beach.”

    • walkerws June 3, 2025 (9:21 am)

      Public beaches are for the public. Making them free of loud idling cars makes them better for the public.            

  • wetone June 3, 2025 (9:06 am)

    I see another 4-5 year project with this SDOT parking issue on Alki ave. Why I say this ? Just look at SDOT ‘s handling of roadway redesign around Alki Point. They have been spending taxpayer dollars on this very small section of roadway for 4 years and still going…. Trying to fix something that did not need fixed. Especially if Seattle government would allow SPD to enforce current laws to All that are causing the issues. Would not be surprised if the Building Community is behind the push of the current parking increase on Alki ave, would surely help making the current and future Condo projects much more appealing $$$$ if parking was available for guests and services ;)

  • bill June 3, 2025 (10:15 am)

    The ped path and biking/rolling paths are not wide enough. Allowing more people to park, opening their car doors into the bike path, and then standing and walking on the path will degrade the experience for everyone — cyclists annoyed the peds have no situational awareness, peds irritated by cyclists dodging them. Take the road lane for a wider sidewalk and wider bike path.

  • Admiral-2009 June 3, 2025 (10:40 am)

    An Actual Alki Resident what Ocean view is being blocked?  There are no views of the Ocean from WS that I am aware of.

  • AK June 3, 2025 (11:00 am)

    Yes! Bring back the parking!! Miss Old West Seattle!

  • Erik June 3, 2025 (11:19 am)

    The lack of parking is the exact reason I never visit Alki anymore on the weekends. Glad to see they are going to provide vital infrastructure in an area that desperately needs it!

    • walkerws June 3, 2025 (1:15 pm)

      “Nobody goes there any more – they’re too busy!”

  • Unfortunate June 3, 2025 (11:46 am)

    This comment section is full of people who decided to live near the only beach in the city getting upset that they have to deal with the natural and inevitable consequences of living near the only beach in the city. If you don’t want to have to deal with lots of people and cars… don’t move to a location that you know will attract lots of people and cars.

    • walkerws June 3, 2025 (1:14 pm)

      I don’t live near the beach and don’t want the cars there. This is not just people who live nearby who realize that cars are a scourge on nice places

    • Platypus June 3, 2025 (1:27 pm)

      People are great, the beach is for people. Cars ruin cities

  • Dusgusted June 3, 2025 (11:48 am)

    Councilman Sska and SDOT want to overturn 40+ years of no water-side parking on Alki Avenue without a single public hearing. And then they have the indecency of inviting public opinion by phone or email WITHOUT telling the public it’s a done-deal! The survey is a sham, a fraud. 

  • Alki Parent June 3, 2025 (12:10 pm)

    Can’t imagine this will be very safe with people crossing the bike path. As a bonus, this will make traffic a nightmare along that entire stretch in the summer. Parallel parking crushes the flow of traffic, so good luck to all who want to drive there! 

    • Alki resident June 3, 2025 (7:14 pm)

      THISSSS!!! On busy days – Wouldn’t adding 150 more parallel parking cause more congestion and backups? Just seems like a more chaotic scenario. The magic of walking/biking in that area of Alki is the calm and quiet of it all. Someone mentioned that emergency access was important to alki and adding more parallel parking seems like a major issue for them 

  • Admiral-2009 June 3, 2025 (12:18 pm)

    bill – agreed this section of the bike path is nice to ride and you are spot on regarding vehicle doors, a big fear for many cyclists, and the creation of increased cycle pedestrian conflict.  Way too many pedestrians have no situational awareness and block the lane and expect cyclists to avoid them, IT IS A BIKE LANE not a pedestrian path and thus an unnecessary conflict would be created by the added parking!

  • Disgusted June 3, 2025 (1:11 pm)

    How is it that a councilman, together withSDOT, can unilaterally change 40+ years of no parking along Alki Avenue without a public hearing, without a formal council proposal, without due  process? Seems to me Rob Saka’s online survey is a naked attempt to circumvent the public good. 

    • walkerws June 3, 2025 (2:34 pm)

      “Rob Saka’s online survey is a naked attempt to circumvent the public good” – well, that’s on brand for Clowncil Member Saka at least

  • T June 3, 2025 (1:50 pm)

    No additional parking. If anything, make the bike path wider. Most people drive down there to get out and walk anyway, so make the end experience better. Maybe the city can work with King Co Metro to get a bus line that runs on weekends during the nice months to handle the higher demand. There is a heavily underutilized park and ride at Avalon and Spokane.

  • Alki M June 3, 2025 (1:53 pm)

    For a little historical context- please read the article from 9/26/ 2006 in Westside Seattle in which the same issue was raised and rejected.  The ACC voted 192 to 28 against re-establishing the parallel parking spots on the 1100 to 1700 blocks of Alki in 2006.  Ironically, just after the vote a car careened off of Alki Point killing 2 and injuring 4. This came a month after a motorcyclist came off the road and killed a skateboarder on the trail. This was before cell phones magnified the issues.   the businesses, ferry riders and beach goers have all survived without this parking for more than 30+ years.  This is not a good idea when the last few years have been focused on reducing increased hazards to public safety.  Why, when Don Armeni was overrun last weekend with dangerous car driving and had a huge police response to break up the mob would we think putting more parking in this area would be a good idea for public safety??? How does SPD feel about their ability to police this area??? Who will enforce the rules at night??? In 2006, the emergency services also were not in favor of increased parking in this area. What problem is being solved by this historically problematic proposal that was rejected 20 years ago?  Are we doomed to keep making the same mistakes because because no one bothers to look at the history of the reoccurring physical place issues? Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) is what is needed here to insure public safety.   

    • I like Alki June 3, 2025 (5:09 pm)

      Very well said!  A few months ago we wake up with a dead body right at the diagonal parking  because this area is out of control. Adding more parking is not the solution at all. There is no city in the world that is adding parking to handle crowds.  The modern solution everywhere is public transportation plus active transportation for the last mile, this is a textbook case. I can’t believe they are thinking of adding more cars to a place that is already congested. 

  • Kathy June 3, 2025 (4:49 pm)

    Replace the 10 lost diagonal spaces with 10 more spaces if you really feel it’s necessary at the west end of the proposed area. Stop trying to solve a non-existent problem. We already have plenty of visitors and crowded beaches and restaurants in Alki on sunny days and the government shouldn’t be in the business of spending money to attract more business. On bad weather days there is no parking shortfall. Adding so many spaces will not stop people from driving closer to  the beach and residential areas near the businesses to hunt for closer parking which they will eventually find. Moste people are too lazy to walk from parking so far away from the action.

    • TAnderson June 4, 2025 (1:30 pm)

      Yes. Exactly right!

  • Alki Resident June 3, 2025 (6:29 pm)

    I think that the discussion on this thread makes it clear that Rob Saka needs to meet with the community on this issue. Shoving this through without proper discourse is problematic. 

  • WestSeattleDerm June 3, 2025 (11:02 pm)

    So weird being a loyal walker and bicyclist and feeling the need to support adding free 120 parking spaces along Alki as being a good idea. Traffic is hell on the street during weekends and hot days cause no one can park anywhere.  This thread is so strange compared to a few days ago.  No one has called out crime and late night issues as being the detractors.  It’s all about:-Obstruction of views, from my house.-Really your multistory unit can’t see over 4-6 foot tall  car? -Obstruction of drivers cruising  and can no longer see the view.-Park. Get out of your car.  See the view. Smell the ocean. Hear the birds sing.  -Obstruction of walkers and bikers who somehow became so important that driving a family down to a safe place so they could bike or walk is a nuisance.  -We get more parking, we then get leverage on SDOT to expand the bike and walk lanes along the same corridor.  Road bikers, the Alki trail speed limit is 15 mph. Check your speed before hating on the “tourists”.  I bike Alki trail 2-3 times/week.  Skip the weekend and peak hours or bike 8 mph; cause yah, people get holiday-mode like when they get to Seattle’s only place of genuine summer beach lifestyle.  Take a trip to LA, SF, San Diego, Santa Cruz.  Top class coastal cities have the parking where cities can provide it, ocean side all the way.  Users of coastal cruise paths know they gotta ride cool in the busy sections.If Seattle is going to mature to the population density that is already here and getting denser by the month, we gotta grow up.Still hate our reality of needing cars/trucks/SUVs. But please give them a chance to park.

    • North Admiral Cyclist June 4, 2025 (6:23 am)

      I’ve checked my speed riding my bike along Alki and find that I typically ride about 12 mph (when no pedestrians are in the immediate area).  We go much slower in areas with peds, illegal venders blocking the path, etc.  We occasionally get passed by some cyclists going about 15 mph (too fast for Alki in my book).  I’ve rarely seen any cyclist going faster than about 15 mph, but as you infer, some road bikers ride too fast for conditions.  I do see road bikers and the occasional e-biker will ride way too  fast in ped/bike “traffic”, which is dangerous in my view.  They may call out “passing”, but that gets garbled in the wind.  Personally, I’ve had too many peds turn on their heels and step right in front of me on this path over the years.  Earbud use on the bike path makes things worse.  We use a bike bell, which pedestrians seem to understand better than calling out by voice.  In any event, as part of the automobile parking expansion we strongly urge the City of Seattle to improve the Alki bike path signs and paint markings to modern standards used in other parts of the city – such as liberal use of green paint to reinforce the bike path in areas crossed by peds or cars.  

  • cwit June 4, 2025 (10:41 am)

    Since I don’t actually see his contact info at the end of the article, here’s Rob Saka’s email: Rob.Saka@seattle.gov
    Not sure if he’ll take anything you say into consideration but worth a shot if you want to let him know how you feel one way or another.

    • WSB June 4, 2025 (10:51 am)

      I apologize, fixing. The email and phone contact info is on his official council website
      https://www.seattle.gov/council/saka

    • walkerws June 4, 2025 (11:27 am)

      Odds of Rob Saka taking his constituents’ comments into consideration are about the same as the tooth fairy being real, but at least we can try.

  • TAnderson June 4, 2025 (1:07 pm)

    Sorry if this has already been mentioned: the change to the diagonal parking area is being made to reduce the level of illegal and noisy activity after hours, as I understand it. To go to parallel vs. diagonal costs X number of parking spots. To accommodate the reduced number of spots we are considering adding spots that don’t currently exist on the more narrow area on Alki Ave SW?So from my perspective because we can’t or won’t control the lawless behavior in the current parking configuration we will limit parking in that area and move the mayhem further on down the road on Alki Ave. and that is a good solution?

  • Alki EMO June 5, 2025 (7:29 am)

    Yes to more parking. Longtime Alki resident who has most of the parking directly in front of their place, let it spread out so maybe it is less chaotic and violent. When large groups are forced to party right next to one another, fights happen. I’m glad that my neighbors down the way will now see what we do. Maybe there will be less parking in the fire lanes and where busses need to park and where the cops have their white stripes marked off, because those are completely full of visitors all weekend. I hate many choices made to keep Alki streets safer but this idea is excellent.

  • Matt June 5, 2025 (9:44 am)

    I’m a little late to this article so I’m not sure I’ll see any replies, but I really don’t understand how this section of Alki (from ~1200-1700) is all of a sudden going to be overrun with cars.  It’s a stretch with a sea wall, no beach access (outside of what, two sets of stairs with the beach only accessible at low tide?), and about a 6-8 foot strip of grass.  Is anyone expecting a bunch of families to pull up, throw down a blanket on the tiny strip of grass, and spend a bunch of time in the middle of nowhere with no access to food, facilities, a beach, room to play, etc?

    To be clear, as a road cyclist (who travels over 15mph and sees plenty of people doing over 15mph), I’d prefer it stay no-parking.  Especially on weekends the wide surreys and crowds make traveling on the trail extremely annoying so I prefer to ride in the street and generally will rejoin the trail only (and then slow down) when the parking starts (I might keep going in the street depending on how closely I can keep up to traffic).  I just don’t see the mass appeal of this stretch of road as a park that would bring in tons of parking, especially given how far it would be to walk from there to Alki Beach proper.

    But I’ve also seen dudes who think they’re hot **** park directly in front of a no-parking sign and literally stand on the trail in front of their car doing bicep curls like morons, so, maybe legal parking here would be a bigger problem than I’m thinking  lol.

  • Frustrated June 5, 2025 (10:21 am)

    We are talking away 10 parking spaces, and in response adding 150?! I don’t understand that logic. Does anyone that enjoys alki at peak summer times really think we need even more cars down there? 

  • Betty June 5, 2025 (1:27 pm)

    I totally get that people want to come here—seriously, I do. It’s a beautiful, unique part of the city. Before I moved to this side, I used to visit on weekends too, and yes, parking could be a pain sometimes. But that’s just part of the deal—you either circle around and park a bit farther out, or you find somewhere else to go. Even if you add more parking, there still won’t be enough. It doesn’t fix the actual problem.As a resident (and honestly, even if I weren’t), I’m really against this parking expansion. And yes, I’m going to say it—I pay to live here for a reason. It’s frustrating to see decisions made that consistently favor visitors over the people who actually live in the neighborhood. It feels like our needs are an afterthought.This proposal would cut into the bike lane and likely the pedestrian path too. How is that a good solution? We’re giving up safe, usable space for people who live and move through the area every day…for what, a few extra spots?And here’s the bigger issue—how much is this going to cost? I doubt it’s cheap. That money would be way better spent on things like increased patrols, especially around Don Armeni. There are already a ton of parking spots there, but they’re basically unusable. That area is constantly taken over by people blasting music, revving those obnoxiously loud cars, smoking, drinking, and generally being disruptive—only to get chased off by multiple police cars after they start doing sideshows or whatever else.Why not focus on enforcing the rules in places we already have instead of spending a bunch of money to add new spots that won’t solve anything? Their claim that this is about cutting down on illegal activity is ridiculous—if anything, it gives those same people more places to park and hang out.And yes, I know a lot of visitors aren’t causing problems. But again, if we clear out the bad actors from places like Don Armeni, there’s plenty of parking already available for the people who are actually here to enjoy the beach and respect the space.

    Let’s fix what’s broken instead of creating new problems under the illusion of solving one.

  • WSB June 5, 2025 (2:23 pm)

    For anyone still following this – CM Saka says in his newsletter that he’s actually against the 150 spaces. I’m trying to get clarification from him and SDOT whether that means they’re scrapped or not. Separate story to come.

    • Coral June 5, 2025 (3:19 pm)

      Thank you WSB, looking forward to your update. SDOT pulled Saka into this by publishing a fact sheet that says “(SDOT) is making changes to on-street parking in West Seattle at the request of City Councilmember Rob Saka”. NO parking changes need to be made, we need enforcement. Current daytime parking rule at diagonal parking is not being obeyed, if this was enforced, it would discourage the “loitering and illegal activity”. Don’t need or want more parking spaces.

Sorry, comment time is over.