Seattle Police hiring pace described as ‘unprecedented’ and ‘amazing.’ But you won’t see that on the streets for a while

The Seattle City Council‘s Public Safety Committee just got an update on Seattle Police hiring and staffing. The summary from analyst Greg Doss: “Huge increase in hiring, but that takes a while to translate to cops on the street.”

Currently, Doss told the councilmembers, they’re hiring 14 officers a month, which he described as an “unprecedented” pace, “even in good years.” In the first quarter of the year, he elaborated, SPD had 12 more hires and 7 fewer separations than projected, and the department’s already “meeting its goals for the entire year.” (The reduction in number of departures was highlighted again late in the briefing.)

One area isn’t improving, though – increasing the number of women on the force. Applicants and hires are running about 15 percent female, Doss said, so new Chief Shon Barnes has directed that female candidates all get a “second look” to “be sure we’re not missing something.” The department at one point had a declared goal to have a 30 percent female staff by 2030 but is nowhere near that goal.

Other stats shown this morning included the staffing breakdown – the number of officers on “911 response” has held fairly steady, albeit at a level that’s two-thirds of five years ago.

There also were some precinct specific stats, including staffing (no elaboration, but it was mentioned that SPD is currently conducting a “precinct staffing study:):

And also response times, which in general are improving, in part because of a change in categorization of what’s a “Priority 1” call – in some, Doss said, they realized that callers in some categories weren’t necessarily in immediate danger. That meant more calls are “Priority 2,” and those response times are improving too – possibly, briefers said, because the availability of CARE responders means officers can turn some incidents over to them and get back to 911 responses sooner.

The increase in hiring and reduction in separations means that the years of “we have money for more positions than we can fill” are over – now SPD is hiring more than it’s budgeted for, but councilmembers were told SPD does not expect to ask for budget supplementation until later in the year. Right now, they’re still relying on overtime to reach minimum staffing on most if not all shifts, councilmembers were told. But the briefers say right now, the staffing level is on a road to recovery: This year’s hiring could re-fill as many as 70+ of the vacancies left when 300+ officers left in the early 2020s.

Committee chair Councilmember Bob Kettle wrapped up the briefing by saying he feels encouraged but wary of mixed messages to the public since, as noted above, increased hiring pace now won’t mean increased officer numbers on the street for a while. He also said it’s vital to keep up the pace on other things – particularly police reform.

(P.S. If you’ve got questions about Southwest Precinct operations, remember that its Precinct Advisory Council has an open community meeting next Tuesday (June 3) at High Point Neighborhood House (6400 Sylvan Way SW), 6:30 pm.)

See today’s full briefing presentation slide deck, from which the graphics above were pulled, by going here.

54 Replies to "Seattle Police hiring pace described as 'unprecedented' and 'amazing.' But you won't see that on the streets for a while"

  • k May 27, 2025 (11:39 am)

    Study after study shows that giving poor people money reduces crime more effectively than giving police more money.  Improved response time is cool, but preventing crime is better.

    • Marcus May 27, 2025 (12:28 pm)

      I do not believe that. Police deterrents are a key function along with the safety nets. That philosophy is over used.

      • k May 27, 2025 (12:51 pm)

        It’s not a philosophy.  It’s literally science.  You don’t need to believe it for it to be true.

        • ltfd May 27, 2025 (5:23 pm)

          Source/citation?

      • Derek May 27, 2025 (1:21 pm)

        Marcus it doesn’t matter if you believe it, it’s true. Fixing social inequality fixes crime, every time in every case.

        • Rob May 27, 2025 (2:05 pm)

          How much do you donate to the average poor person?  I don’t mean food an clothing. I mean cold hard cash out of your pocket.  Literally do you walk up to the average poor person on the street an hand them couple 100 or a 1000 bucks.

          • Nolan May 27, 2025 (6:07 pm)

            This is a non sequitur. Societal problems require intervention at the societal level.

        • Conan May 27, 2025 (6:07 pm)

          You lost credibility when you used “every” twice.  We were taught in elementary school that when answering multiple choice questions, never select the answer that includes an absolute.

    • Bob on Alki May 27, 2025 (1:15 pm)

      Please site one study.  

    • Actually Mike May 27, 2025 (1:15 pm)

      Those are not mutually exclusive categories, and both can be true at the same time–reduce crime with targeted supports and services, and better support law enforcement for when that doesn’t work or doesn’t work well enough. The idea that a city this size can be safe and liveable without some law enforcement is a pipe dream.

      • alkiannie May 27, 2025 (5:52 pm)

        Thank you for being the responsible adult in the room. 

  • jim May 27, 2025 (11:55 am)

    problem is they are lowering the qualification standards

    • WSB May 27, 2025 (12:13 pm)

      No, they’re not. Sara Nelson asked all those questions toward briefing’s end. You can watch for yourself when the recording is out, probably within a few hours.

      • Walkerws May 27, 2025 (3:14 pm)

        Sara Nelson is not reliable or trustworthy 

        • Question Authority May 27, 2025 (4:27 pm)

          Sara has brought more positive results and improvements to the City than any activists on the Council, ever.

          • walkerws May 27, 2025 (5:09 pm)

            Sara Nelson *is* an activist on the Council. You should, to quote someone, question her authority.

          • Question Authority May 27, 2025 (8:08 pm)

            She’s no card carrying Socialist like Sawant and certainly doesn’t put out the bat call for activists to pound on windows and disrupt business.  You must think the City functions on wishes and dreams instead of the hard work necessary to pay the bill$.

          • Delridge420 May 27, 2025 (10:51 pm)

            Is Sawant in the room with you right now?Nelson is a hack Republican, her favorability is underwater by 20 points for a reason.

          • K May 28, 2025 (9:28 am)

            You have a very myopic view of what constitutes activism.  Sara Nelson is definitely an activist.

          • k May 27, 2025 (5:35 pm)

            Tell us you don’t attend or pay attention to city council meetings without telling us you don’t attend or pay attention to city council meetings.

  • Neighbor May 27, 2025 (12:04 pm)

    What changed?  Why is it easier to hire now?  Do we conduct background checks on these new officers to ensure they weren’t a problem at previous departments?

    • WSB May 27, 2025 (12:10 pm)

      Yes, they do. Council President Sara Nelson asked a bunch of those questions. No major reason emerged.

    • Question Authority May 27, 2025 (4:32 pm)

      The Council changed direction and quit working against the Police, this helped create a more and long overdue welcoming environment because crime needs control for the good of the City.

      • Nolan May 27, 2025 (6:08 pm)

        Sure, that must be it. Punishing people harder is clearly solving the problem, which is why we stopped having concerns about crime after Nelson and her ilk bought their seats.

    • Ferns May 27, 2025 (5:18 pm)

      My guess would be that economic uncertainty and layoffs are driving people to more traditionally secure, well paying jobs like Police work. The competition for good paying jobs is high and cost of a full 4 year degree too expensive for many. 

  • Derek May 27, 2025 (1:24 pm)

    Would love to know what Kettle thinks is “police reform” because Saturday’s display by the cops in Capitol Himl sure isn’t anything close to reform. They were pepper spraying counter protesters who were posing zero threat at the anti-trans event. As well as the typical SPOG response that placed blame again on politicians. Never at themselves.

    • WSB May 27, 2025 (1:34 pm)

      The councilmembers discussed that for a while too.

    • A May 27, 2025 (3:10 pm)

      The only people to blame for Saturday are the politicians and the antifa groups they continue to sympathize with. Free speech is for all views, not just yours. 

    • wscommuter May 27, 2025 (5:51 pm)

      I wasn’t there Sunday, but I did read in the Times today that among those arrested were “counterprotestors” who threw “a rock with an explosive attached”, bottles, rocks and at least one person who shoved a police officer on a bike to the ground.  The video available of the scene when it got violent showed some of the counterprotestors clearly behaving in violent/aggressive ways, so I don’t doubt that the police response was necessary.  While I am appalled the city gave a permit to these far-right nuts to use Cal Anderson, there was despicable behavior by some of the counterprotestors that was, in fact, criminal and dangerous. Of course, if you’re purely anti-police, you’ll see only victimization for those idiots.  Your call.    

      • A May 27, 2025 (6:03 pm)

        wscommuter – again, the park is public property and free speech is everyone’s right. You don’t have to like it, but they’re allowed. They did everything by the book. Imagine if the LGBTQ community was denied a permit in Idaho, people would be up in arms. When you want to spread a message, you go to the places you think the people need to hear it the most. Not in the echo chambers most of Seattle lives in. 

        • Derek May 27, 2025 (7:42 pm)

          Hypothetically does this apply to KKK? Can KKK or Nazis have a party in the park with zero pushback or…?

          • A May 27, 2025 (8:30 pm)

            Yes. First Amendment Protection: The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects freedom of speech and association, including the right to express unpopular or offensive views and to join groups that share those views. Hate Speech vs. Hate Crimes: While hateful speech can be offensive, it’s generally protected under the First Amendment unless it falls into a specific exception like incitement to violence, true threats, or harassment.I didn’t say people weren’t allowed to counter protest, that’s also their right. But from what I saw, the Christian group wasn’t the one being violent. The counter protesters were. And those cops seemed to have a lot of patience with them until they went too far. Cry more.

    • Marcus May 27, 2025 (5:54 pm)

      Let me see here. The counter protesters started throwing bottles at the police, because I assume they were angry about the original protesters ideas. No one from the original protesters raised a violent hand. Glad to see the SPD not taking any crap from the violent counter protesters. Good job SPD! All probably recorded and will be replayed to fence sitting moderates. Great way to gain support for the counter protesters, not very intelligent.

      • Derek May 27, 2025 (10:33 pm)

        Wrong. Two of the Mayday people threw stuff and pushed people. Jseattle and The Burner both reported it and showed footage. Disgraced reporter Jonathan Choe hit someone unprovoked tonight too. You guys need to stop following biased sources.

        • Marcus May 28, 2025 (4:57 am)

          I read a Jburner article on the protest. Other than a popped ballon I see nothing that the original protesters did to warrant violence by the counter protesters other than their viewpoint. In fact I saw the article just as bias as FOX news. You guys got played. So an ultra conservative group comes to Seattle and the counter protesters cannot hold it together. As far as I am concerned the counter prospers are just a bunch of immature, undisciplined, angry children. You got played and lost your moral high ground. Wise up and do a better job next time.

          • Nolan May 28, 2025 (11:50 pm)

            It’s trivially easy to discredit any protest you want if your standard is 100% perfect behavior. Why are you so sure those bigots didn’t start the violence themselves?

  • Vetting May 27, 2025 (1:34 pm)

    Is there any part of the vetting process that could assure us that we tax payers are funding the hiring of POs who are not anti-LGBTQ? Is there vetting to see if they are known to be intolerant of other races, religions, and lifestyles, or if they are part of one of the growing number of white nationalist groups? Will they actually be living in Seattle, or coming from the suburbs and outlying cities? These things matter. From what we can see, just this weekend, the current POs have a number of officers who are way too quick to anger and react. Officers who seem pretty intolerant of peaceful protests and are quick to start pepper spraying crowds with kids in them and start coming at the press with clubs. Given the current situation in this country these are important factors for all the people I know who live and love in this city. How are those in power making sure our new officers don’t “fit the description” of intolerant anti-Democracy authoritarians? 

  • John May 27, 2025 (2:34 pm)

    This is great news.  The more officers on the street the better.

  • East Coast Cynic May 27, 2025 (3:53 pm)

    I think the SPD is getting better applicants because of the professional class office worker hiring slump.  I’ll bet a lot of these applicants got tired of long term unemployment and underemployment, and decided to go after a career/job that paid more than the entry level positions they were possibly competing for (assuming that many of the applicants were on the young side).

  • ltfd May 27, 2025 (5:28 pm)

    “Chief Shon Barnes has directed that female candidates all get a “second look” to “be sure we’re not missing something.” Sounds like a different standard, depending on who you are.

    • Nolan May 27, 2025 (6:06 pm)

      Wait ’til you find out what standard is applied to men by default.

    • Delridge420 May 27, 2025 (11:03 pm)

      Probably a better standard than whatever was applied to our drunkard Secretary of Defense 

    • CAM May 28, 2025 (9:49 am)

      Sounds like you don’t understand inherent bias. Nowhere does it say that they were going to lower the standard for hiring female officers. It said they were going to look at the applicants to make sure they weren’t missing anything. You interpreted that to mean lowering the hiring standards because you assume that all candidates are given equal opportunity from the start. That is your inherent bias ignoring the inherent bias in the police hiding process. To clarify further, every person on this earth has some degree of inherent bias. Our brains look for patterns and try to fit situations into boxes to make information easier to process. That means that we all need to be regularly (constantly?) questioning our decisions/opinions, particularly when it comes to groups we have nothing in common with and thus are more likely to revert to prejudice. 

  • Linda May 27, 2025 (9:18 pm)

    If only they could bring back the Officer Friendly program, I miss that. Police walking about too,  around ..ahead..of issues..before they begin. A show of the badge, respect.

  • Watertowerjim May 28, 2025 (6:24 am)

    “Defund the police” sounds so idiotic in hindsight – and did to most sane people at the time.  Five years and counting and we’re still trying to dig out of the 2020 summer of love. Unreal.

    • Jay May 28, 2025 (10:20 am)

      Defund the police wasn’t about eliminating police, it was about eliminating the culture and lack of accountability where residents of the city are of limited value and where we have no recourse or oversight when police commit crimes against us, whether it is overtime fraud to make over $400,000 as a regular cop to murdering us. You are bringing out the “summer of love” propaganda, but what about “she had limited value”?

    • Aphyde May 28, 2025 (4:01 pm)

      It sounded idiotic to people who only read headlines.It also never happened, so it’s completely unrelated to anything that’s going on right now, except maybe an uptick in the vitriol and frequency of SPOG tantrums. 

  • Jay May 28, 2025 (10:17 am)

    As long as SPOG prevents any oversight, nothing is going to change. You can’t have a completely unaccountable department and expect any positive results.

  • Admiral-2009 May 28, 2025 (5:29 pm)

    If the new higher I know is indicative of the other hires the quality is vastly improved from the past when ex military personnel were recruited.  The new recruits are college educated, diverse and are being taught de-escalation techniques.

  • Mike May 28, 2025 (6:16 pm)

    Godspeed, new recuits

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published.