FOLLOWUP: That ‘wasn’t anger for the sake of anger,’ explains ‘bullet hole in car seat’ dad

(WSB photo, Wednesday night)

11:59 PM: As we reported last night, City Councilmember Rob Saka‘s community-safety meeting for three West Seattle neighborhoods ended with several frustrated attendees shouting that they hadn’t been allowed to speak.

Among them, Phil Brandt, the High Point resident whose car had been hit by gunfire in High Point last month – leaving his 3-year-old’s car seat with a bullet hole.

Today, he contacted WSB wanting to tell his side of the story, to offer context. “That wasn’t anger for the sake. of anger,” he said. “It’s important for the community to understand the three weeks that preceded last night.”

He laid out this timeline:

-April 17, in gunfire near Walt Hundley Playfield, two rounds hit his vehicle, one going through his son’s car seat. We received this photo from a reader that night:

Brandt said that was one of eight West Seattle gunfire incidents in 34 days. Two were in High Point, he said, one in an area with a longterm streetlight outage. He said he was out of town at the time and not aware of the bullet hole for a few days but once he was, he emailed a photo of the car seat to Councilmember Saka, and other emails to SPD and the councilmember’s staff. He said they got back to him and urged him to speak at the April 22 City Council meeting, which he did (with the car seat), expressing frustration there too (see it here, two minutes into the meeting).

After that meeting, he said, “multiple staffers from multiple councilmembers” asked what they could do. Talking to other High Point community members, he said, they had three demands, starting by asking that all 33 streetlight outages in High Point within a week. He said that led to staff for four councilmembers – Saka, Alexis Mercedes Rinck, Sara Nelson, Dan Strauss – contacting City Light, and fast repair action resulting.

Second, he said, was a High Point town hall with Saka and SPD, and third was a High Point neighborhood walkthrough with Saka, his staff, and local police. Saka’s staff started working on the town hall, Brandt said, and community members emphasized that they did NOT want a presentation. “They agreed to open Q&A,” he said. But, he said, he did not hear from Saka himself until a phone call on May 2. “I don’t know why it took 11 days to contact me directly.”

The meeting announcement sent to Saka’s newsletter email list said the meeting would be “about listening” among other things – here’s a screengrab:

But, Brandt told. us, “last night I had a feeling we weren’t going to get what we asked for. I’m happy that (many) city officials showed up, but it’s not what we asked for and agreed to. When I got there at 6 pm, it was the first time I had heard there would not be live questions.”

Overall, he said he found the hour-and-a-half meeting frustrating except for Police Chief Shon Barnes and Chief Public Safety Officer Natalie Walton-Anderson. Regarding the announcement promising “listening,” he said, “I don’t know where the ‘listening’ was.” Not with Saka, he alleged, “I lost track of how many times he (started sentences) with ‘I’… this was not a campaign stop, this was a community hurting.” Instead of guns, Saka focused on sidewalks, Brandt noted, saying that might have been relevant if there was data to show that a lack of sidewalks factored into crime.

Brandt has lived in High Point since last summer, after returning to Seattle from a few years away, noting that he has two sets of family members who also live in High Point. He says the organizations that manage the area have been “very helpful,” so his beef’s not with them.

He’s waiting to hear what Saka plans to do … but hadn’t heard from him or his staff by day’s end. (We’ll be asking them “what’s next?” tomorrow.)

ADDED 1:05 PM FRIDAY: We saw Councilmember Saka at an event on Alki with the mayor this morning (report to come). We asked him afterward what he had done about all this since the meeting. He told us to “stay tuned” for his next newsletter. It just arrived, including his explanation of the Wednesday meeting format.

31 Replies to "FOLLOWUP: That 'wasn't anger for the sake of anger,' explains 'bullet hole in car seat' dad"

  • Disappointed May 16, 2025 (5:25 am)

    Saka has been a terrible disappointment,  will use my wallet and vote to make sure he is a one term mistake

    • Phil B May 16, 2025 (12:26 pm)

      Agreed and thank you!

  • michaela May 16, 2025 (6:27 am)

    Phil, thank you for holding Saka accountable. I’ve found his lack of true care for the community he loves to claim deeply frustrating. Maybe you should run against him in a future election…Thank you for representing our interests and safety!– a High Point resident

    • Phil B May 16, 2025 (12:27 pm)

      For someone who loves to talk about accountability – Saka sure likes to avoid it himself

  • Brian May 16, 2025 (7:03 am)

    It’s super encouraging to see folks holding this dude accountable for his district and not accepting being “talked at” as a solution. Keep it up High Point. 

  • brizone May 16, 2025 (9:17 am)

    Saka is the worst kind of corporate lawyer, a big mistake for District 1.  He’ll spend $1M to have a traffic divider removed because it’s inconvenient for his driving route, but then goes into PR mode for this stuff.  The entire public safety dog and pony show was PR – from everyone there – trying to cover their butts (not “listening”).

    • Jort May 16, 2025 (9:40 am)

      $2 million. It’s actually $2 million, and another council member reported that Saka told him it was his single biggest budget priority item for West Seattle. And it’s not an “egregious” internet rumor. It’s black and white in the e-mails he’s sent before and after he was elected: it’s a personal vendetta. 

  • Foop May 16, 2025 (9:22 am)

    This is why it’s important to really listen to candidates when they run. None of this is a surprise. Every time Saka engaged with people on the campaign he would let them speak, replay with some variation of “I hear you” (tip: if someone says that to you, they definitely don’t hear what you’re saying” then veer off onto his own agenda or provide some vague answer and move on to what he wanted to talk about. He’s good at making people hear what they already want to hear while saying nothing at all and this is more of that. I honestly don’t know what he stands for? Turfing parks? No one asked for this. Curby? No one wants this. He’s actively fighting making our streets safer. Fighting traffic calming, diverted to make greenways more accessible to walkers and bikers and the folks that live here. All he seems to care about is his ability to get in and out of the neighborhood quickly. If he wants to live in a suburb he should move to maple valley.hes fought diversers on greenways touting a food desert but what’s he doing to give Delridge more food and shopping options? There are zoning options that can help with that. What about trying to get grants or funding to jumpstart small businesses and help the ones that have folded like the delridge coop?Saka stands for nothing but himself and he needs to go.

    • Phil B May 16, 2025 (12:30 pm)

      Saka is showing us that his ego comes first – which is incredibly unfortunate because we deserve better.

    • Lauren May 16, 2025 (5:40 pm)

      💯

  • Pete May 16, 2025 (9:24 am)

    Hate to say we told you so… but he’s exactly as advertised.

  • Aaron May 16, 2025 (9:38 am)

    I will never vote for One Term Rob again. He’s been such a huge disappointment: feckless, seemingly corrupt (see: Delridge ‘border wall’ and the astroturf selection process), and seemingly just an empty suit.I’d love to see him get recalled before 2027, but failing that let’s make sure he gets a strong opponent who doesn’t self-sabotage by declaring that they want to defund the police.

    • Nolan May 16, 2025 (4:26 pm)

      Please elaborate on why defunding the police would be “self-sabotage”.

  • Disgusted May 16, 2025 (9:41 am)

    Here’s an idea:  if the city officials want to talk AT you…. then have them print their mindset and hand it out. Other than that, it should be the public speaking.TO THEM!  Otherwise having meetings is a ridiculous waste of time. We need to protect our community. It’s getting to be gangland around here.!CITY: LISTEN .!!!! And DO what is needed to remedy thr complaints. Again: LISTEN !!

    • Phil B May 16, 2025 (12:35 pm)

      Agree – I know a few people have commented that the “town hall” was could have been an email or newsletter.  It’s a shame – the event had a great turnout.  Dozens, if not 100+ left halfway through due to standing room only and the fact that it was a waste of everyone’s evening.

  • walkerws May 16, 2025 (9:41 am)

    Rob Saka is the worst. What an embarrassment for West Seattle that we elected such a vapid, self-serving, unintelligent council member. Hopefully he is overwhelmingly defeated if he is foolish enough to run for re-election.

  • Jort May 16, 2025 (9:46 am)

    Rob Saka, like many people who got their feet in the gross corporate world of “management for management’s sake,” will often talk about “data” as being a driver for action. But there is no data that says new sidewalks are going to reduce teens from shooting up neighborhoods. There’s no data that says that blocking life-saving traffic diverters on Neighborhood Greenways resolves the “Food Desert” issues in low-income neighborhoods. There’s no data that traffic cameras in “racing areas” where noisy cars gather actually reduces roadway deaths (of which the second one at the same spot, far away from Alki, in South Park, occurred yesterday in Rob Saka’s own district).  There’s no data that says allocating $2 million for curb removal to allow for illegal vehicle turns actually improves safety. There’s only Rob’s feelings. How Rob feels about these things. And any challenge to this turns into a condescending, snotty lecture. 

  • Johnny Stulic May 16, 2025 (9:48 am)

    Regardless of Saka’s record and performance as a Council member, I fail to understand what exactly everyone expects him personally to do about the shootings and violent crime. Neither he nor anyone else in the Seattle City Council writes or controls state laws for prosecution and punishment of violent criminals, especially the young offender sentencing guidelines that actively encourage repeat offending and a career in crime through virtually no repercussions.  
    And sure, they could do something about the massive increase in the homeless population and the drug related gang activity that accompanies it, but their lack of action on this issue reflects the views of the majority of voters, which seems to be performative compassion with a complete denial of correlation between drugs, homelessness, and crime. 
    So if you’re astonished about the sidewalks he keeps pushing, this is hardly any different a solution than the affordable housing, to name just one example. Sounds great, solves nothing.

    • North Delridge Resi May 16, 2025 (11:38 am)

      I echo your thoughts. I’m not sure a community meeting where they all sat up there to get yelled at would have been productive either. City council members do city council things like streetlights and sidewalks. Cops do cop things like patrolling and arresting. I think that’s why everyone liked when the cops spoke.Remember a few short years ago when no one wanted to hear from the cops? Things have changed…

    • Jake May 16, 2025 (12:40 pm)

      He can start will forming a policy that bridges income gaps. Like affordable access to healthcare, implementing a child access prevention law like we have seen in Colorado, create more space for youth so gangs are a distant option to some. Streetlight is about the worst idea I’ve heard. There’s so much this conservative council can do, and all they do is do reaction-based stuff, and scold the old council who lives rent-free in their minds from 4 years ago. SODA did nothing. None of these implementations helped anything but just move crime. Much like sweeping. Got to fix the wealth gaps. Taxing Amazon was a lot better use of time than suggesting bandaids like SODA or street lights or Harrell’s favorite: ShotSpotter. Vote these people out.

      • Johnny Stulic May 16, 2025 (2:37 pm)

        The policies you call for have been in place, particularly in places like WA and Seattle for decades with no discernible difference. The argument calls for throwing more and more money at the issue regardless of what difference it makes as a result which can at best described as a complete failure by any measurable metric. It is also unbelievably insulting to thousands of people who work two or three jobs in order to better their lives and provide for their families and are forced to subsidize this utopian pipe dream of some imaginary social and racial justice through an ever increasing taxation. No matter how you paint the distorted picture, in the country where the unemployment rate has been around 3% for decades now, absolutely no one needs to rob a 7-Eleven for his next meal. No one has to shoot up a neighborhood other than for sheer gang related bragging rights. Stop making excuses for criminal scum that should be locked up. Voters like you are the reason we are in this situation.

    • Anne May 16, 2025 (12:40 pm)

      I can’t believe it- an actual voice of sanity!! No fan of Saka- but what exactly do folks want him/City/County Council to actually do about these shootings? Right now- if- that’s a big if – a LEO just happens to be in a position to see & be 100% sure who in a car actually has a gun in their hand at the moment the trigger is pulled & can arrest that person – the rest is up to prosecutors who are bound by laws as to what can be charged.If it can’t be proved the shooter was targeting someone – the charge would likely be a misdemeanor- what kind of punishment do folks think will be handed down? Especially if that shooter is under 18.Want tougher penalties – lobby State Senators & Congressmen & women to enact tougher laws & penalties. 

      • k May 16, 2025 (3:00 pm)

        City Council and the mayor do have the ability to impact crime.  Harrell’s obsession with “visible” homelessness has diverted a ton of SPD resources to sweeps and harassing people for sitting on sidewalks, when those resources could be directed toward investigation units and more neighborhood patrols.  

        • Nolan May 16, 2025 (4:33 pm)

          To say nothing of Seattle’s choice to spend 5x more on cops than courts; the contract-enforced kneecapping of “dual dispatch” that prevents CARE from actually doing their jobs; and spending about as much money on CARE as they do on the “Unified Care Team”, whose actual job is to seize people’s property and destroy what little stability they’ve managed to build for themselves, which makes everyone worse off.

          There’s plenty of opportunity for City Council to improve our city, if they can think of a second solution to crime besides cops.

      • Phil B May 16, 2025 (8:55 pm)

        Hey Anne – I responded to Johnny but also want to respond to you.  I agree with your sentiments for the most part.  It’s not city council’s job to be the ones to directly respond to and address these shootings.However I have the following expectations of my city councilmember:

        1. 1. When a community is in crisis (8 shootings in 34 days with 2 more today), they create a forum to listen to the concerns of community members.
        2. 2. They follow through on promises.  Saka’s team agreed to open community forum and did not deliver.
        3. 3. Be truthful and transparent.  Saka and his team took credit for putting the town hall together and never once publicly acknowledged that it was the community that requested the meeting and played a significant role in the organization.

        Again – I don’t expect Saka or any other council member to stop gun violence tomorrow.  That is unrealistic and completely unreasonable.  However, I expect them to meet some baseline requirements which Saka has failed to do.I appreciate you taking the time to respond and voice your opinion here.  I’m happy to provide more clarity or reasoning on any of my responses. 

    • Jort May 16, 2025 (2:05 pm)

      One thing he could do is just, you know, shut up and listen to his constituents. It’s not that hard. It would be a start. Just listen. Standard politician stuff. Shut up. Listen. 

    • k May 16, 2025 (2:57 pm)

      Rob Saka promised to reduce crime when he was campaigning.  He promised an open Q & A.  It is not wrong to be upset at your elected representative for making promises and not keeping them.  

    • Phil B May 16, 2025 (8:47 pm)

      Hey Johnny – I’m happy to provide further explanation to address your comments on what I expect Saka to do personally regarding the shootings and gun violence.  Simply put, I don’t expect him to do anything personally the will directly stop gun violence – those wouldn’t be fair expectations in my view.  The anger and frustration is not directed at wanting Saka to directly stop the gun violence, it is directed at his lack of attention, communication and willingness to listen to his constituents.No matter policies, opinions or priorities, I expect local government officials to communicate and listen to their constituents.  That is a baseline requirement of in the job description of a local public official.  An important point in all of this is that myself and the residents requested this town hall with Saka and others on 4/22.  Saka’s team agreed to a live open forum with the community to address the spree of recent shootings (that continued today in High Point unfortunately).  As I discussed in my interview above, Saka’s team was actually very engaged with myself and other community members in the planning process for the meeting.  The anger and frustration come from the fact that our original request was not met.  His team asked me 15 minutes before the town hall to “respect their decision to change the format” and that I “need to get on board and be respectful of their choice”.  This meeting was not Saka’s idea.  It never was.  It was the community’s idea (with me being the voice).  That’s where the frustration lies.  Not in unrealistic expectations of Saka solving the gun problem tomorrow.  It lies in Saka being unwillingly to perform the baseline responsibilities that he owes to the residents of West Seattle.I really appreciate you taking the time to voice your opinion and concern. 

  • Delusional if you think lights are a deterrent May 16, 2025 (10:53 am)

    I doubt it helps. The rest of the hp incidents happened in areas with the normal lighting. The shooting by the bee hive/pond, the shootings by the library and golf, etc. 

    • Phil B May 16, 2025 (12:43 pm)

      I get that – and in the first couple days after the Walt Hundley shooting I thought along similar lines.  However, there are actual studies and data points that show a growing body of evidence that streetlight outages leads to increased crime and decreased perceptions of public safety.  I encourage you to take a look at the NYC Streetlight Outage Study from 2017.  It found that street lights led to a minimum 36% reduction in nighttime crimes, specifically property damage.But I agree that it’s unrealistic to think of streetlight outages as the only solution.  There are deep rooted issues that lead to gun violence – streetlights are just a deterrent.  At the end of the day, if someone wants to commit a crime, they are going to do it.  The immediate focus on the streetlights after the shootings was that it was a simple task that could show immediate progress.  That doesn’t mean it’s the only thing being done – just the first.  I appreciate your comment and voicing your opinion – it’s important that residents all do that.

  • DavidWS May 17, 2025 (9:53 am)

    A lot of anger at the state of affairs in Seattle, especially surrounding crime and gun violence. But it’s not fair to lay the blame at Saka’s feet. The violence we face is due to years of mismanagement, neighborhood silos, and special interests by the former councilmembers and city leaders. To spend decades allowing crime and violence to become embedded in our communities, and then expect things to change as soon as Saka took his seat is unfair. I know personally, that Rob Saka has engaged community leaders with historical ties to underserved and at risk communities, many, like current position 8 candidate, Ray Rogers, have a lifetime of work with at-risk youth, providing mentoring, violence interruption, and gang intervention. Additionally, Saka has supported art-infused behavioral health programs. These are the things that are going to make a difference in the long term.We change the culture of violence by engaging and working with our youth and Saka has shown his commitment to this cause.

Leave a Reply to Nolan Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.