FOLLOWUP: Mayor announces revised transportation levy. More money, and West Seattle project changes

(SDOT camera at 35th/Holden, south end of newest corridor proposal)

One week after the end of public feedback on his initial $1.35 billion proposal for the new transportation levy, Mayor Harrell has just announced the revised plan. He’s added another $100 million, so it’s now a $1.45 billion, nine-year levy. But the list of potential West Seattle projects in the overview has been scaled back since that previous announcement (here’s our West Seattle-focused report from April).

Perhaps the biggest West Seattle change is a reduction for what’s envisioned for a “corridor” project on 35th SW – instead of the previously mentioned project (including repaving) from Morgan to Alaska, the revised levy only mentions Morgan to Holden. The revised levy document also no longer mentions Fauntleroy Way SW (the Triangle section was originally in the now-expiring Levy to Move Seattle, then shelved in case light rail needed that corridor). The one West Seattle holdover from the first proposal is at Olson, toward the end of the Roxbury corridor:

Olson Pl SW / 1st Ave S: 2nd Ave SW to SW Cloverdale St — Street reconstruction with a widened sidewalk or trail and treatments to keep vehicles from skidding on wet pavement.

We note two additions: On the list of potential sidewalk projects, the new proposal adds SW Brandon between 26th and 30th, something that’s been on the North Delridge wish list forever. And a “transit corridor performance project” is proposed for the block of SW Oregon between California and 44th.

The reduction in named West Seattle projects doesn’t necessarily mean this area is getting less investment – there are many categories in which the plan doesn’t go into detail (we asked about specifics previously and SDOT said those were yet to come). You can read the city’s overview of the new proposal here, and more details here. Now it goes to the City Council, with District 1 Councilmember Rob Saka leading the review as chair of the Transportation Committee and the all-councilmembers Select Committee focusing on the levy, starting next Tuesday morning (here’s the agenda).

25 Replies to "FOLLOWUP: Mayor announces revised transportation levy. More money, and West Seattle project changes"

  • LetsGetReal May 3, 2024 (1:17 pm)

    Blew the budget on Alki public to private road conversions safe streets projects. 

  • Darius May 3, 2024 (2:38 pm)

    I swear there was something about fixing Sylvan in one of these big projects – is that still on the table?

  • Fiz May 3, 2024 (2:49 pm)

    I’m confused by “transit corridor performance project”.  Can anyone translate that for me?  In simple language?

    • Mike May 3, 2024 (4:34 pm)

      Yes, you say “Cha-ching” over and over like a slot machine and magically money appears in pockets of everyone connected to government projects.  We, tax payers then say, “I am broke, what happened?”.  That the definition of “transit corridor performance project”.

  • Chuck Jacobs May 3, 2024 (5:09 pm)

    A hundred million  here, a hundred million  there, pretty soon you’re talkin’ about real money!

  • Admiral-2009 May 3, 2024 (5:42 pm)

    The City, aka taxpayers, should not foot the entire cost of sidewalks.  Abutting property owners need to form LID’s to pay at least 50% of the cost.  Developer’s are required to install sidewalks as a part of development activity, this cost gets passed on to the future owners and tenants. 

    • WSB May 3, 2024 (5:50 pm)

      Well, in the case of Brandon, the abutting property owner IS the city.
      https://maps.app.goo.gl/QtGtVHqU7qfn796D7

    • Chemist May 3, 2024 (8:53 pm)

      Interesting micro-funding approach.  Can we also make parents of school-age children responsible for 50% of their child’s education costs?  Parents could form LIDs to build new schools in their neighborhood. 

      • AMD May 4, 2024 (2:15 pm)

        Don’t forget making criminals pay for jails, since they’re the only ones staying there.  Or car owners pay for street repair and maintenance.

  • TJ May 3, 2024 (5:43 pm)

    Terrible return on investment for West Seattle. Oh well, just another $1.45 billion that won’t do a lot. For what it takes to get a main arterial paved here, how will the city ever get to fixing residential side streets? Lots of these streets are falling apart, with sunken sections and seriously cracked sections. I saw a story a few years ago that said 60% of Seattle streets were paved between 1930 and 1950, with some being also new streets being built. How could that be done today 

  • Scobby May 3, 2024 (6:56 pm)

     I have an idea, if/when this is put up for a vote let’s not approve it!  The voters in Seattle have always approved tax increase, yet do we know where the money goes?  Have we seen results from the other approved tax increases?  it’s time to say no.

  • Scobby May 3, 2024 (8:18 pm)

    Thank you!

  • Don_Brubeck May 3, 2024 (9:07 pm)

    Amazingly little in  this levy for the SW.  Not Sylvan Way. Not Roxbury. Not Fauntleroy Way. No work at Delridge or Avalon light rail stations. One short block of improvements for all the bus routes in WS. Nice of us in West Seattle to be sending our tax dollars for the next eight years to build the rest of the city’s infrastructure. Hard to believe that the Chair of the City Council Transportation Committee is our elected council member. This levy will keep us on our path of car dependence and failure to deal with growth, climate change, traffic deaths, injuries, and equity. If we vote for it.

    • Amy May 3, 2024 (9:44 pm)

      Maybe he is too busy being King of Potholes

  • WSB May 3, 2024 (9:51 pm)

    Here’s his official statement. Doesn’t say anything local, so I didn’t include it.
    https://council.seattle.gov/2024/05/03/seattle-councilmember-saka-ready-to-lead-council-review-of-the-proposed-transportation-levy/

  • Eldorado May 3, 2024 (10:01 pm)

    Fix the brown water first!

  • 1994 May 3, 2024 (10:10 pm)

    The new proposed transpo levy gets my no vote just like the laughable Move Seattle levy.

  • Admiral-2009 May 3, 2024 (10:41 pm)

    Chemist – you need to read the SMC section 15.70 in particular sections 15.70.020 and 15.70.030.  Per the SMC the cost to construct and maintain sidewalks is the responsibility of the abutting property owner.  

  • Mel May 4, 2024 (12:49 pm)

    I’ll be voting no but as usual, everyone else will vote yes and we’ll be paying more in taxes…again.

  • Derek May 4, 2024 (1:00 pm)

    If you don’t like levies then you should support taxes on Amazon and Starbucks and Boeing and other big corporations…

  • Millie May 4, 2024 (3:48 pm)

    I’m actually not surprised that not much West Seattle taxpayer transportation money is spent on the peninsula.  They have been historic “rumors” (accept this as just that – rumors) that more tax dollars are spent north of Lake Union.  If memory serves me, we once were considered for an Energy Resource Recovery Facility (burning garbage to create electricity) and a Correctional Facility, Fortunately, neither came to fruition.  After a “cursory review” of the proposed Transportation Levy, it is still difficult to identify “definite” work projects and cost ranges/estimates.   Yes. I will no!   By the way,  Amazon, Starbucks, Boeing and other corporations do pay taxes and, often, support the communities through “in-kind” support.   Property taxes, as a result, of voter approved levies are increasing faster than some salaries.  By the way, if you rent, you also pay these increases through increased rent costs.   In the end we all pay one-way or another.

Sorry, comment time is over.