SEATTLE TRANSPORTATION PLAN: Here’s what’s in it for West Seattle

Most of West Seattle’s arterials get shoutouts in the newly released Seattle Transportation Plan, billed as the city’s long-term vision for people will get around over the next 20 years or so.

We reported several times last year on comment opportunities for the draft version of the plan; today, Mayor Harrell officially sent his recommended final version to the City Council for consideration. The SDOT announcement describes the plan as the “20-year vision for the future of Seattle’s streets, sidewalks, and public spaces.” In addition to philosophy and goals, it includes a list of dozens of potential projects meant to help achieve those goals.(You can see them in the “implementation strategy” section – 103 pages into the plan with more project-by-project details in Appendix A.)

The plan does not address funding – that’ll be in the spotlight within a few months, when the next transportation levy proposal is unveiled. Nor does it include specific dates for the potential projects. But it does offer prioritization.

Two West Seattle projects are listed in the “highest tier” of prioritization – 35th Avenue SW and “Fauntleroy Boulevard.” The latter is a project that was supposed to be in the nine-year transportation levy that’s expiring this year, shelved because of the possibility that light rail would follow the same path and lead to relatively new roadwork being torn up. The former is of interest because 35th SW got a significant amount of attention, including partial rechannelization, last decade. The overview of this potential project (19 pages into Appendix A) says:

This project will improve a major street that connects many West Seattle neighborhoods. This could include:

• Repaving portions of the road
• Redesigning the street to better support transit
• Repairing sidewalks and making it safer to cross the street with elements like extensions of curbs and better crossings
• Adding bicycle routes for people of all ages and abilities
• Enhancing access to destinations like shops, businesses, restaurants, and cultural centers in the area

The “middle tier” of prioritization includes projects for California SW, SW Alaska, and the south section of Fauntleroy Way (separate from the Triangle-area section involved in the “Fauntleroy Boulevard” plan). The rest of the list includes possible projects for 16th SW, SW Orchard/Dumar, Highland Park Way, Roxbury, the Alki Trail, and an Admiral Way project that’s definitely many years down the line – redirecting the RapidRide H Line to Admiral/Alki once West Seattle’s light-rail extension opens (currently projected for late 2032).

Again, the projects are just part of the plan. SDOT says things will get more specific when they create an “implementation plan” for the Transportation Plan next year; meantime, the City Council will be accepting public comment before voting on whether to accept the plan – council@seattle.gov, and public comment during a council meeting on March 5 (watch for the agenda here).

24 Replies to "SEATTLE TRANSPORTATION PLAN: Here's what's in it for West Seattle"

  • Admiral February 28, 2024 (5:41 pm)

    All of us in the north end would appreciate more regular direct transit to downtown which it sounds like redirecting the H line would accomplish . Right now the 56/57 is one way in the commuter hours. Would be nice to have that continued on weekends and wider hours particularly evenings for games etc

    • Yello February 29, 2024 (6:21 am)

      This! Comment of the year. Yes please weekend service would be the cats pajamas.

    • WS resident February 29, 2024 (3:25 pm)

      It feels like north of the junction is completely neglected. I often have to drive to the Junction in order to take the C Line.

  • WS Guy February 28, 2024 (6:35 pm)

    Fauntleroy really needs to be fixed up now that the light rail path is set.  It’s such a trashy way to enter West Seattle right now.

    • Seth February 28, 2024 (8:50 pm)

      Is the rail path set?  I don’t think itis no?

      • WSB February 28, 2024 (8:59 pm)

        The “preferred alternative” is, and it doesn’t involve that section of Fauntleroy, but the route won’t be finalized until later this year, after the final EIS is published.

  • Frog February 28, 2024 (7:49 pm)

    Scratching head — Rapid Ride H goes all the way to Burien center, and serves all of Delridge, following massive investment there.  How could it possibly be redirected to Alki?  It’s more possible to imagine the C line being redirected at least to Admiral, though if it went all the way to Alki, how would it continue to serve Morgan junction, the ferry, and Westwood Village?

    • Bus February 29, 2024 (6:42 am)

      I think they’re talking about it continuing north to Admiral and Alki instead of going downtown (because it will connect to the light rail to take you downtown).  The stops south of the light rail would likely remain.

    • SDRidge February 29, 2024 (9:41 am)

      I’m hoping they mean the current Delridge through Burien section would stay in use, but instead of continuing on to Downtown it will loop through the north end of West Seattle and back to the Delridge station before heading south again on the current route. A one seat ride to Alki from Burien would be really nice. 

      • Frog February 29, 2024 (12:42 pm)

        So in other words, neither Burien nor Alki would have bus service all the way to the city center.   Everyone would be required to transfer to light rail at north Delridge?

        • SDRidge February 29, 2024 (3:57 pm)

          My understanding is H/C and other West Seattle lines that current run direct to downtown will terminate at a light rail station once they open. Which means a one seat ride on the H to downtown today is going to be a 3 seat ride from 2032 till the Ballard line is open and light rail from west Seattle can run all the way downtown. 

          • Mickymse March 1, 2024 (8:35 am)

            Yes, all current bus routes to Downtown would terminate at light rail because that would be a FASTER ride to Downtown for most portions of the day. However, Sound Transit has repeatedly stated that they will not seek bus changes from Metro until after the second tunnel opens and provides direct light rail service from West Seattle, so there will not be a  3 seat ride.

  • Juanita February 28, 2024 (9:17 pm)

    So does this mean removing parking on 35th in order to put in bike lanes or removing one of the car lanes for a bike lane?  Not against bike lanes, just trying to figure out where one would go.

    • Foop February 29, 2024 (9:37 am)

      I fully support removing a travel lane on 35th. Excessive speeds and terrible sight lines for anyone not in a car for a street so many people live on.

    • platypus February 29, 2024 (3:31 pm)

      I am so excited to see 35th on the list! The north stretch past Morgan is too fast, too wide, and with lanes drifting around turn lanes far to dangerous. I welcome the noise and hassle required to make it a better road. thanks SDOT!    

  • 1994 February 28, 2024 (10:10 pm)

    How about removing those giant barricades that say local traffic only , safe streets? Allow the streets to be used for what they were built for – traffic.  The road diets on 35th and Roxbury just make the trips longer.  Crashes still happen.  Driver’s get annoyed & use the center turn lanes as passing lanes. Unsafe moves but the road diets may have contributed to some increased risky driving moves, and perhaps more distracted drivers since the ride is slow and gives drivers the impression they can let their eyes wander off the traffic in front of them.

    • HappyCamper February 29, 2024 (8:06 am)

      Yep seen it many times. We live on 35th. Lots more crashes on the south end where the road diet is. And lots of people passing going like 50+ in the turn lane or in the curb parking lane. It’s not uncommon to hear an engine/exhaust wind up and see a car fly by our house traveling in the turn lane going around slower cars.

    • platypus February 29, 2024 (3:41 pm)

      I am actually a fan of the road diet, and I dont live there. It is barely slower, I think I saw a 1 minute increase when they measured the impact? But moves as efficiently as I would expect and without people changes lanes a thousand times. I have seen the reckless driving i the middle lane, but that can be solved with infrastructure. The benefits far outweigh the costs in my opinion.

      • KB February 29, 2024 (5:17 pm)

        I definitely noticed an impact.  What used to be a 40 minute bus ride from south Arbor Heights to downtown now takes an hour – 40 additional minutes on my commute each day.

      • D-Mom March 1, 2024 (6:14 am)

        You obviously do not drive this every day. The road diet caused a significant delay and often bumper to bumper cars with frustrated drivers passing in the turn lane. I will be furious if they extend this. It also seems even more difficult to cross the street due to the constant flow. People in WS need main arterials to function to get us to the bridge and through West Seattle. Stop making it harder to get places!

  • wetone February 29, 2024 (9:51 am)

    I would like the mayor and SDOT explain what they accomplished and completed with moneys from last levy…..This city had little follow through and for some reason no real accountability to what was promised. SDOT has been on a patch only detail in many cases instead of solving and fixing issues properly. Due to moneys spent elsewhere and bad decisions from management. Until I see  better decision making don’t ask me for more money. This city has failed with maintaining infrastructure as “their” priorities were accomplished elsewhere. Just one example is the multi year project involving roadway around Alki point Safe Streets, (still in work). Not a lot of money, but when there are many projects as this through out city, its taking engineering, blue collar workers, vehicles and $$$ budget from what should be higher priorities of infrastructure maintenance…..Like fixing failed rebuild of Spokane st viaduct (continuous patch work) or 4th ave overpass by Costco (1 lane closed for years…) Tired of hearing these 20yr visions with no budget, start maintaining and following thru on current issues.

  • Eldorado February 29, 2024 (2:16 pm)

    Please make ALL five major intersections in the Junction ‘All Ways Crosswalk’ similar to The Alaska Junction. So that’s California and Oregon; Oregon and 42nd. Ave SW; Oregon and Alaska; and California and Erskine Way/SW Edmunds! Additionally, do the same for California and Admiral… and California and Fauntleroy.Do it now! I guarantee that traffic will be improved!

  • Millie March 2, 2024 (6:59 pm)

    Speaking only for myself, I would really prefer SDOT choose one or two projects for West Seattle and complete the entire project within the same period of time.  These “fast food” choices neither improve or resolve any traffic issues on the West Seattle Peninsula.  For example: 35th Avenue SW – the south end was “put on a diet” Kubly’s (former SDOT Director’s verbiage) one traffic lane in each direction with a center lane.  How they are talking of redesigning the northern portion to better accommodate transit.  What happens at the meeting point?  One has a bus lane, one does not!  Another “pie in the sky” request I would ask of SDOT,  Dept.  of Land Use/Building Permits , City Light and Public Utilities is please work together so you only need to do the job once (i.e., paving) – don’t pave a road and one week later have it torn up due to new utilities’ connections to new construction.  It could actually save $$$$.  Am I being too unrealistic??

Sorry, comment time is over.