FOLLOWUP: Here’s what Metro told HPAC about proposed bus-stop changes

(WSB photo, last week)

“We really bumbled out of the gate,” acknowledged Metro‘s Robbie Frankel at last night’s HPAC meeting, referring to how the proposed bus-stop closures in Highland Park/South Delridge were – and were not – initially communicated. As first reported here, the only initial notification was via paper notices posted at the stops, and they pointed would-be commenters to an email address that bounced. That emailbox – which apparently had been deactivated since the last time Metro gathered feedback on stops in this area – has since been reactivated, and Frankel said the feedback already has likely taken one pair of stops off the table for closure consideration: He says they’ve heard a lot about the importance of the SW Thistle stops, two of six stops proposed for changes on the original list.

Otherwise, Frankel stressed that the proposal is in the very early stages. As to why stop closures are being proposed at all, he said it’s because of the City of Seattle’s plan to give Metro money to beef up weekend/night service on Route 125, and to improve some of the stops – maybe adding shelters, benches, paved pads, etc. They wouldn’t want to waste that money on stops that might eventually be removed in a future Metro review of the route, so they stepped up the review (though otherwise their next look at local routes isn’t scheduled until 2026).

It was stressed to Frankel that 16th SW serves South Seattle College (WSB sponsor) and the community really wants to ensure the college is getting the support it needs to thrive, so that’s another reason to tread lightly with this route. It was also suggested that Metro will want to reach out to the 16th SW Safety Committee that’s been active in advocating for traffic calming and other concerns closer. Meantime, the extended deadline for comments is two weeks from today – March 14 – and you can email your feedback to busstopsw@kingcounty.gov.

P.S. More on the rest of last night’s HPAC meeting later.

5 Replies to "FOLLOWUP: Here's what Metro told HPAC about proposed bus-stop changes"

  • miws February 29, 2024 (3:37 pm)

    It should be no surprise that the bumbling resulted in rejected emails. Everyone knows that Bumbles bounce… —Mike

  • WS4life February 29, 2024 (4:26 pm)

    Looks like they really missed the bus on this one!

  • TMorgan February 29, 2024 (6:00 pm)

    The bus stop at Charleston and California for our sight impaired neighbor, and Massachusetts and California for the financially disadvantaged nursing home patients who need buses to get to medical appointments, K-12 schools and community college students, and libraries could be considered “essential” service bus stops for safety reasons.  I am hoping that our Metro route planning analytics could reflect the needs for customer support and solidarity to protect critical stop locations.  Thanks WSB for the journalism leadership to keep the important conversation in play!!  Neighbors, please consider emailing and calling Metro if you’re able to do so. Thanks.

    • TMorgan March 1, 2024 (5:33 pm)

      … and the local food banks for a critical stop priority list… optimistic.

  • Kyle February 29, 2024 (8:31 pm)

    I mean I’m glad Metro agrees they bungled this. But they still haven’t brought anything meaningful to the table. None of the few remaining proposed stop closures will make any dent in ride times. If this is all they are proposing might as well leave the stops as is for convenience until their is a more substantial proposal for more hours, etc.

Sorry, comment time is over.