Seattle Public Schools’ reopening plan for 2020-2021 depends on what phase we’re in

As promised, Seattle Public Schools‘ hybrid year has wrapped up with an announcement of the plan for next year, so far. As published on the district website:

As we wrap up this school year, we have been planning for 2020-21. We hope that at the start of the new school year, King County is in Phase 4 of the Governor Inslee’s reopening plan\. If we are, in alignment with public-health agency recommendations and the governor’s plan, school will resume as normal and students, who choose to, will return to face-to-face classroom instruction. Unfortunately, we don’t know what will happen over these next few months, so a contingency plan is needed, including how we will address a potential resurgence of COVID-19 in our community.

Four engagement teams of just over 100 participants that included students, parents, educators, school leaders, community partners, and central office administrators have been meeting to develop priorities for school in the fall — responsive to safety measures required for each phase of re-opening and the experiences of our students and families furthest from educational justice.

The engagement teams worked together to understand the operational and budget constraints, public health and safety guidelines, and feedback gathered in a recent staff, family, and leadership survey. Common values and priorities emerged from the four groups and leadership team, you can view them on our Planning for Re-Entry announcement webpage.

These values and priorities resulted in a model framework. If King County is in Phase 2 or 3 this fall, some type of in-person, part-time instruction will be provided for all K-12 students with the option of 100% online, remote learning for families who aren’t ready to send their students back to school buildings. Regular in-person instruction will resume when we are in Phase 4.

100% online learning will be provided as an opt-in option for any family that does not want to return in person. This option will also be available in the event buildings remain closed through fall or close abruptly due to a resurgence of COVID-19. Online learning will be high-quality and consistently provided with clearer expectations and accountability for instruction and assignments. Online learning will be provided on a reliable schedule that includes live instruction, video lessons, and small group supports, etc. Over the summer months, educators, school leaders, and a digital learning task force will prepare for delivery of these enhanced supports.

A blended model with some in-person learning for all K-12 students and some remote, online instruction. This scenario is highly dependent on public health guidelines and if we are in Phase 2 or 3 in the fall. It was determined by the Reopening Leadership Team with input from the engagement teams that while the hope is to provide in-person class time for everyone, social distancing guidelines may require a phased in approach or starting with smaller student numbers. In doing that, priority would be given to students of color furthest from educational justice, students who require in-person therapy, students who receive Special Education services or IEP supports that can’t be delivered online, students who receive services as English Learners, and students supported by McKinney Vento – students experiencing homelessness or unstable housing. Teams also expressed interest in providing additional in-person instruction for K-3 students and students in transition years – sixth grade and ninth grade. The schedule for a blended model, part-time in person and part-time remote learning, is yet to be determined. The in-person schedule is dependent on the physical capacity of our buildings. We are exploring partnerships with community organizations to increase space capacity.

A full return to in-person classes. A full return to regular instruction will require we are in Phase 4 and that we follow guidelines of Public Health. While we are hopeful, this scenario is unlikely in Fall 2020.

Next week, families will need to complete an Intent to Enroll questionnaire to hold a place in their program selection. Families will be asked to indicate if they plan to enroll in the 100% online learning option for the fall or want the in-person option program. Depending on responses, in-person K-12 instruction frequency will be determined. Please look for an email early next week from Public Affairs with more details. This information will be critical in helping us finalize plans for next year.

We know the uncertainty for next school year is stressful and there are still a lot of unknowns. Staff and the Seattle School Board will be working diligently to provide additional answers and details in collaboration with educators and school leaders over these next few weeks.

Next steps: On June 30, a detailed Fall Reopening Plan will be presented to the School Board during a public work session. The plan will reflect the values and priorities surfaced during the recent engagement, the model framework outlined above, an analysis of our buildings’ physical capacity, and adherence to Public Health guidelines.

Feedback? Here’s how to send it.

104 Replies to "Seattle Public Schools' reopening plan for 2020-2021 depends on what phase we're in"

  • Anna June 19, 2020 (7:00 pm)

    This makes sense! Wondering though why they are saying it’s unlikely that we will be in phase 4 by fall 2020?

    • WSB June 19, 2020 (7:20 pm)

      Perhaps given the fact that (per the health officer’s briefing this afternoon) cases are on the rise and people seem laissez-faire about wearing masks and distancing, we might not be able to count on quickly moving through the phases. Even if the minimum 3 weeks is spent in 2 and then 3, that’s six weeks from now and it’ll already be August. They would have to make the call in August as the first day of school is September 2nd.

      • Anna June 19, 2020 (7:36 pm)

        Yes, I see. It feels so much farther away. Thank you, and thank you for covering this. 

    • Apple June 21, 2020 (5:13 pm)

      Yes, the superintendent of Seattle public schools and the head of ospi have unequivocally said that it is very unlikely we will be at phase 4 by the beginning of this coming school year.

  • Will June 19, 2020 (7:10 pm)

    Has anyone read this yet?  Have they lost their minds? Did someone hack into this statement?  This is from the paragraph regarding the blended model:“In doing that, priority would be given to students of color”Giving any students priority on going back to school in the fall should not be based on skin color!  This is getting outrageous.  Like a ton of families here in West Seattle we were eagerly anticipating this announcement today.  I cannot believe they said this.   They did NOT say disadvantaged students. We are stunned. We are moving.

    • Mr J June 19, 2020 (7:27 pm)

      Will, did you read the whole statement or just stop after the word color? The context comes after and makes perfect sense. You seem to be exhibiting signs of White Fragility, I suggest some reading around the matter of white fragility as well as the historical context behind the Furthest from Educational Justice. I’m also noting that you didn’t mention the other groups that are being given priority, evaluate that. 

    • Matt June 19, 2020 (7:32 pm)

      It said “students of color furthest from educational justice” Will.If you can’t see the importance of narrowing the gap between those who have access to educational justice and those who don’t, then yes, please move.

    • Anna June 19, 2020 (7:38 pm)

      I think they did list several categories of disadvantaged students. Students of color furtherest away from educational justice was just one group of students in the list. 

    • R K June 19, 2020 (7:40 pm)

      PLEASE move !

    • West Seattle Hipster June 19, 2020 (7:43 pm)

      Glad I put my kiddo in private school.

      • TheMama June 20, 2020 (9:23 am)

        Me too. I’ve lived in this city for 30 years. West Seattle has been the most racist and homophobic under the guise of “hipsters”. I see you.

      • Wst June 20, 2020 (9:47 am)

        What are private schools doing?

    • Gwen June 19, 2020 (8:07 pm)

      ‘Students of color FURTHEST FROM EDUCATIONAL JUSTICE.’ Don’t cherry pick your outrage. 

    • WS Guy June 19, 2020 (8:10 pm)

      Are you serious?  That’s outright racism.  Actual, institutional racism.

    • SEA June 19, 2020 (8:15 pm)

      They DID list several categories of disadvantaged students who would receive priority. Students of color furthest from educational justice. (You left off the last part of the phrase.) Black, Latino, and indigenous youth are particularly disadvantaged in our schools due to systemic issues of white privilege and racism. In a addition, they mentioned prioritizing other disadvantaged youth including students receiving special ed services, English language learners, and the homeless. So I disagree, they did say disadvantaged students would receive priority. 

      • Chemist June 19, 2020 (11:46 pm)

        What is “educational justice” and is there any way to identify those in need beyond skin color?

        • ally cat June 21, 2020 (7:07 pm)

          Great question. Here is an introduction, one explanation you can check out:

          https://youtu.be/SUnzLGMW81Q

          (Video by UW Banks Center for Educational Justice)

    • Belv June 19, 2020 (8:15 pm)

      It’s not based on skin color. It’s based on systemic racism, which is something I hope my new West Seattle neighbors care about.

    • M June 20, 2020 (6:57 am)

      Is it even legal? All children should be provided EQUAL access to education. That is the foundation of equality. Removing institutional racism does NOT require holding other students behind. As a parent of two children under the age of 7 in the Seattle Public Schools this online, remote learning simply doesn’t work. It’s been a disaster for my children’s development and mental health. As has it been for both my wife and I who are trying to manage it all. It may very likely be the unraveling of our marriage and own mental health. The education of our kids doesn’t have to be stunted to help close the racial educational gap. My kids are not a pawn in a social experiment to end institutional racism. We CAN have it both ways. Please check your own privilege before you race to check mine. Because you don’t know me or my family’s situation. Growing up in the Seattle Public Schools myself in the 80s and 90s I was too caught up in the districts social experiments as well and know first hand the impact that has on kids lives. I was forced out of my school community and away from my family, friends, and support network so that I could be bused alone to a school at the other end of the district in the quest for integration. It didn’t go well. 

      • Am.I.M June 20, 2020 (12:41 pm)

        Wow, I had to double check my memory to confirm I wasn’t the one that wrote this.  Haunting.  Glad to know that my wife, 6 year old daughter and I aren’t alone in our feelings. @M, I hear you, stay strong.

    • TheMama June 20, 2020 (9:22 am)

      Bye,Will!

    • WS June 20, 2020 (3:01 pm)

      Buh-Bye!!

    • ally cat June 20, 2020 (4:07 pm)

      What is the problem with specifically calling out the education inequities for students of color?

      ‘In doing that, priority would be given to students of color furthest from educational justice, students who require in-person therapy, students who receive Special Education services or IEP supports that can’t be delivered online, students who receive services as English Learners, and students supported by McKinney Vento – students experiencing homelessness or unstable housing.’

      That anyone would be offended or take issue with this statement is beyond me.

      This is sounding similar to the aversion to the statement ‘Black Lives Matter’ and the need for some people to shift this to ‘All Lives Matter.’

      Acknowledging inequities that exist for people of color because of deeply rooted systemic racism isn’t wrong and shouldn’t be a divisive issue.

      How can we ever change the problems if we can’t even name it without people getting defensive and upset and speaking against it?

  • Alki resident June 19, 2020 (7:29 pm)

    I’m mind blown right now reading this article. Special Ed, IEP, homeless and less fortunate kids, and kids of color are priority? Who decides this? How is this showing our kids that we are all equal? This state is more and more everyday becoming the Twilight Zone

    • Marianne June 19, 2020 (8:31 pm)

      Equity does not equal equality.  Equality is providing the same services to everyone.  Equity is providing support and services based on need.  Equity is what the District is providing with this model, because some have greater needs than others. We are not all equal.

    • SEA June 19, 2020 (8:32 pm)

      This is an image often used to teach new teachers about equity. The first image is treating everyone the same. The second image is recognizing different people have different needs and disadvantages. That’s equity. It’s our job as teachers to strive for equity. 

      • miws June 19, 2020 (8:51 pm)

        SEA, Thank you for providing that visual. That was the first thing I thought of when I saw Marianne’s informative comment, and I was going to seek that out to share here. —Mike

      • Ceepeezie June 19, 2020 (9:04 pm)

        except in this case, the ‘non disadvantaged’ kid is not even at the stadium watching the game…

        • Gwen June 19, 2020 (10:09 pm)

          That’s dumb, Ceepeezie. The nondisadvantaged student will still be receiving an appropriate education. A lot of students with special needs have received none of the services they need to have an equitable chance. Same with students lacking the resources for remote learning. MOST LIKELY all students will be receiving a component of in-person education. But those who are negatively affected the most by remote education need to be considered first. 

        • Person June 20, 2020 (7:58 am)

          The nondisadvantaged person is the tall one in this scenario. 

        • Marianne June 20, 2020 (9:40 am)

          Ceepeezie, I believe you are talking about the child on the left.  Or maybe you are talking about the child that is in the front (or any) row inside the actual stadium.

        • Pigeon Point RN June 20, 2020 (10:01 am)

          No, the ‘non disadvantaged kid’  is actually INSIDE the stadium in a seat,  unlike these black and brown kids struggling to look over the fence.

          • Person June 20, 2020 (11:32 am)

            Of course! Thanks.

      • TheMama June 20, 2020 (9:25 am)

        Equity means lowering the fence.

        • Opal June 20, 2020 (11:28 am)

          Better yet, removing the barrier.

          • Cera June 21, 2020 (12:02 pm)

            I like that the other one includes a ramp, showing that there are different supports, but this shows the next step! (And yes, I realize removing the fence would make more sense but it’s still a good point.)

    • James June 19, 2020 (8:49 pm)

      You raise some excellent points, Alki Resident. Only 25% of homeless and unsheltered children are victims of abuse and neglect, so let’s tell the remaining 75% they don’t deserve special treatment since they must have the same access to shelter and healthy food like two-income families in Seattle.2 out of 3 children who are Black, Indigenous, or have Parents of Color are victim to the same systemic racism as their parents. We can tell that remaining third they have nothing to worry about in systems and institutions created and built around whiteness.Student with disabilities have their own unique sets of challenges like speech impediments and visual impairments, so aren’t they already receiving special treatment? Do we really need to give them more? Certainly they should be able to perform the same mental and physical actions as kids without disabilities. Kids are kids, amirite.

  • John June 19, 2020 (7:42 pm)

    Will, goodbye and sorry to see you leave.  You have entertained me with some snappy exchanges.Responding to your question with my own back at ya, did you read the whole sentence?  The quote was cut short ‘edited’ to falsely imply that ‘students of color’ is the single determining factor, when the remainder of the sentence includes many other determinants.  Here is the whole including what was omitted.“priority would be given to students of color furthest from educational justice, students who require in-person therapy, students who receive Special Education services or IEP supports that can’t be delivered online, students who receive services as English Learners, and students supported by McKinney Vento – students experiencing homelessness or unstable housing.” 

  • Gwen June 19, 2020 (8:30 pm)

    It was so great when folks like Will and Alki Resident we’re advocating for the special needs students, homeless students, and others who were unable to receive needed services due to the closure, right? Nah, wait, y’all were crying about having to stay indoors. Miss me with that junk.

    • Will June 19, 2020 (8:50 pm)

      Actually I do advocate for any special needs or disadvantaged students. I just don’t base it on race. Ever. That would be racist. 

      • ApparentlyImRacist June 19, 2020 (9:38 pm)

        Don’t worry Will, I read it the same way.  I also didn’t like how they set a deadline for themselves on a plan and gave zero detail by their deadline.  On the other hand, I just learned from everyone attacking you that apparently I am a racist too.  I guess I have just been unwittingly fooling myself for years that I wasn’t, so I guess it is also possible I just don’t know how to read either.  Nice to know that there are so many people out there that will willingly point out my flaws, and that they don’t even need to actually know me to do it!  So many smart people here that they can sum up someone so quickly with so little information.  Come to think of it, maybe I’m not really very smart either.  I’m learning so much about myself tonight!  Thank you all!!!

        • Gwen June 19, 2020 (10:27 pm)

          Well, if given a detailed list of disadvantaged students who would likely be the first focus of phased-in re-entry, you get stuck on the phrase “students of color furthest from educational justice.” and you find yourself incensed on the “students of color” part…yeah, you’re a racist.

      • Kay June 20, 2020 (11:28 am)

        Amen Will. Couldn’t agree more.

      • Sarah June 20, 2020 (11:54 am)

        Will, I feel the exact same way. I volunteer to help kids “furthest from educational justice” read and write, and still see this as thinly veiled segregation.

      • Jim McIntyre June 21, 2020 (12:35 pm)

        Thank you, Will. Broadly classifying people based on skin color is wrong. It’s always been wrong. It will always be wrong. Adding qualifiers like “educational justice” doesn’t change that. My goal is to treat each person I meet as a unique human being with their own unique story to tell. No school system should ever classify students based on skin color. Ever. It builds walls between humans instead of bringing us together. It’s totally proper to identify struggling students and to provide programs to support them (ELL, special ed, low test scores, high absenteeism, low gpa, single parent home, homeless, etc.). It is wrong to use race. I’ve been a public school teacher for 16 years. I will do everything in my power to help any struggling kid. And I will never make assumptions about my school kids based on the color of their skin.   They are each a unique gift to this planet.  Using “White” and “Black” to broadly categorize, classify, judge, criticize, or promote any group of people for any purpose is racist. MLK, we need you now more than ever.

  • Will June 19, 2020 (8:46 pm)

    Because I literally said that color should play no part in who gets to go to school, I am being called a racist.Literally.  Reread this. 

    • WS Guy June 20, 2020 (12:18 pm)

      Ironic.  For more evidence that we now live in clown world, see the constitutional amendment moving through CA legislature.  It repeals the civil rights protection that forbids discrimination based on race, sex, etc.  https://ballotpedia.org/California_Repeal_Proposition_209_Affirmative_Action_Amendment_(2020)

      California is clearing the way for legalized racism.  And the people who originally added that civil rights text to the constitution, or defend it now, have become the racists.  Doublespeak anyone?

  • Elementary mom June 19, 2020 (10:17 pm)

    What a s–t show… So basically there is zero answer. Why don’t they just plan for phase 2/3 and give the parents an idea of what it will really look like?The last few month have been so disappointing. There has been ZERO instruction provided by SPS since mid March. The teachers zoom calls were a total joke, basically just some kind of “hey kids how are you feeling? Yeah I know it sucks we can’t be together”, and the lesson plans were just a bunch of links to Youtube videos and online math and reading practice sites. Why can’t teachers give online math or grammar lessons? If it’s going to be like that next year, I’d rather know now so I can plan accordingly (private school, sabbatical, tutor, move to another district etc).

    • Westgirl206 June 19, 2020 (10:52 pm)

      That’s too bad because my daughter had a pretty good time with distance learning. One weekly zoom meeting to do over their schedule, and two other optional meetings for specific help with those subjects. 

      • Teacher June 20, 2020 (5:54 am)

        She has the option to opt out of in school classes if your family is not able to send her back. 

    • Elementary mom2 June 19, 2020 (10:53 pm)

      I agree completely. SPS has been entirely disappointing since March and today’s announcement was more of the same. In a household with two essential worker parents, who did not get Bachelor degrees in elementary education AND work their own full time jobs out of the house, the pipe dream that partial or even full time online school will teach my child anything is disturbing. I also found the 30 minutes of zoom meeting per week for a group of kindergarten children barely able to write all of the letters of the alphabet, absolutely outrageous. Children need to play. They need to interact and learn how to communicate and form relationships in person. The virus is real- I know first hand.  It is necessary to protect those most vulnerable. I’ve seen it. But the social emotional damage done to a whole generation of children because of the lack of instruction by SPS and the lack of interaction among children will be far worse for generations. Not to mention, children are a vulnerable population but there have been zero COVID related children deaths in Seattle and zero studies to show it is being spread by children.

      • Admiral Mom June 20, 2020 (8:08 am)

        Two words: GLOBAL PANDEMIC 

        • Elementary mom 2 June 20, 2020 (4:17 pm)

          It sure is a global pandemic. And although a different virus, every year we have seasonal flu where many children actually die from the virus. And actually have been proven to spread the virus to others. And we DO NOT CLOSE schools for influenza. I believe in the severity of COVID. But I do not believe in letting fear override common sense. (And before I get jumped on… I’m not saying anyone is specifically doing that). And as Anthony Fauci stated, closing schools in the fall would be “a bit of a reach”. If others can day after day protest in large groups as our constitution allows than all of our children should be allowed back in schools with proper safety measures so they  have their constitutional right to education. What SPS has done is March is not education. 

          • Admiral Mom June 20, 2020 (7:10 pm)

            And  you know what difference in education your ranting and sideline coaching is doing?ZERO

    • Cmc June 19, 2020 (10:59 pm)

      Exactly!

    • Canton June 20, 2020 (12:06 am)

      Completely agree. With all the zoom meetings at various hours, zero… academics have been accomplished, all face time. The learning aspect has been completely on parents, trying to navigate the virus rules. All they seem to ask, is how my kid is feeling?? 

    • SPS elementary school dad June 20, 2020 (11:56 am)

      Totally agree.  Seattle Public Schools has been absent Since March.  Every other industry seems to be finding work aroundS to continue to provide services during the pandemic, while the school system has done next to nothing.  There has been almost zero instruction provided since students were sent home.  In short, it has been shocking and disappointing.It could be that we are in a bubble, but all of our friends with kids in Seattle public elementary schools — and not just in our own public school here in West Seattle — have said the same thing.  Education since March has been virtually (no pun intended) nil.For the lucky few that seems to have teachers that are going way above the norm, it seems like you have hit the lottery.For those families that are in private schools, we’d love to hear if the experience has been better.  We’re not sure what we should do this fall — and although private school may be too expensive, we don’t see how more of the same will work for us.

      • Sandal91 June 20, 2020 (12:40 pm)

        I’m a mom of 2 boys attending Holy Rosay. Moved my kids from SPS (Lafayette) 4 years ago into HR, BEST decision as a parent so far!!  My 7th and 5th graders were on remote learning from day one of the shutdown….. The boys did not miss a beat on all core subjects (math soc studies science LA Spanish Reading) Oh and they have been taught cursive 🤪  

    • WS Parent June 20, 2020 (6:36 pm)

      Sorry your child had a negative experience. Distance learning was definitely tough. After talking to parents from around the district and elsewhere, there was definitely a wide range of instructional models and expectations. SPS did set expectations for teachers in April and they were expected to provide instruction to their students. A lot of teachers had whole class lessons and small group for K-5. My 2nd grader had 2 whole class and 3 small group per week as well as weekly emails and content sent in Mondays. I’d suggest reaching out to your child’s  school and don’t hesitate in asking what’s expected by the district and hold them accountable in the Fall.

  • But... June 19, 2020 (10:20 pm)

    It just seems like some folks forget some people can’t afford at home WiFi <gasp>. This actually exists and many kids have had no instruction for months. Don’t play the equivalent of all lives matter on this. If you actually care, support giving kids most in need the first place in line. You’re laying your cards on the table when you disagree with how we educate the less moneyed.

    • Admiral Mom June 20, 2020 (8:06 am)

      Yes. This is a priority and SPS better has a solid budget for that. 

  • Mj June 19, 2020 (10:48 pm)

    Maybe the most equitable thing is to simply open schools up in the Fall!  School age kids are low risk and by this time a good portion of the population will have already been exposed to the virus.

    • heartless June 20, 2020 (2:13 pm)

      and by this time a good portion of the population will have already been exposed to the virus.”

      Uh? What’s a “good portion” and on what are you basing this guess? Truly curious. Thanks.

  • Admiral Mom June 19, 2020 (11:29 pm)

    “1. Prioritized students furthest from educational justice (e.g., African American Males (AAM), Special Ed, English Language Learners (ELL), McKinney-Vento (students experiencing homelessness or unstable housing)”YES YES and YES. Although non of my kids fall into the above categories. Now let’s stay focused and keep the school district (SPS), the teacher union (SEA) and the principals union (PASS) accountable to deliver. They were all at the table and they all need to collaborate with integrity and conviction to make whatever model Covid-19 allows, happen for our students to the best possible extent.

  • Billy June 20, 2020 (12:30 am)

    Practically speaking, what does “students of color furthest from educational justice” mean in the real world and how will the district decide who these kids are? Best case this is well-intentioned lip-service that won’t actually help any students of color, worst case it’s divisive language and it’s implementation impossible. People jump all over anyone pointing this out but it doesn’t mean they are racist. SPS should not fuel this fire, but their emails are always a little sloppy, long and meandering. That aside, I like having the choice of not send my kids back if rates of infection are high (even though distance learning has been such a mixed bag). With summer here quarantine “fatigue” seems to be settling in so there’s no way we’ll be in Phase 4 in the fall. 

    • Teacher June 20, 2020 (5:50 am)

      Here’s a real world example: Kid #1 Comes to school hungry and eats free breakfast and lunch at school because his family is poor. Is alone all day because parent(s) cannot work from home. Has issues or does not have internet because family is poor. Has been historically underserved because of skin color. Needs extra supports because he is in special ed. Vs kid #2. Has plenty of food at home and parent(s) who work from home (And can support him if needed) because they can. Is not underserved because of skin color. Has high speed internet. Is not in special ed. If you had to pick one of these students to re-enter school first, which one would you pick?

      • Admiral Mom June 20, 2020 (7:13 pm)

        Thank you teacher. You got it right. Now please tell your union to get it right by students with an emphasis on those with the highest need

  • Person June 20, 2020 (2:58 am)

    OK, but what will “online learning ” look like? Same as what has been happening?  That’s all I was waiting for.  If they aren’t going to be back in school. I think the  charter school who by design is already ready to go or just plain old online homeschooling will be better options. While i do understand people being upset about the wording and message of this communication,  I also think you folks could benefit from reading Whie Fragility. Even if you dont agree with it, it might give you an idea of what people are trying to say about race.

  • Victor June 20, 2020 (4:41 am)

    Man the white fragility and tears in this thread are pathetic. Y’all are crying because a pandemic doesn’t have a timeline or end date? Pathetic. Grow up. Or move back to your backwoods states. Feel free.

  • Kim June 20, 2020 (7:09 am)

    Whay can’t it say “student’s furthest from educational justice”?

  • Kay June 20, 2020 (7:52 am)

    How are we going to stop treating people differently based on the color of their skin until we actually DO stop treating people differently based on the color of their skin?   SPS, look at your racism here!

    • ally cat June 20, 2020 (3:06 pm)

      When the issues have been openly called out and named and accepted as reality and have been addressed and worked through. When life is equitable for all and all are truly seen and treated as equals. That’s when.

      SPS isn’t being racist in this. They are acknowledging and trying to address racism and inequity.

      Seeing others simply as equals does nothing to help others have actual equality. It’s effectively turning a blind eye to the inequities, and deeply rooted systemic racism.

      It’s a painful process, for white people to realize maybe we’ve not been seeing the issues clearly, and have been complicit in systemic racism.

      https://www.npr.org/2020/06/09/873375416/there-is-no-neutral-nice-white-people-can-still-be-complicit-in-a-racist-society

      Others have mentioned the book White Fragility, and I recommend white folks having a strong negative reactions or resistance, to check it out, or look up videos online of the author speaking on the subject.

  • highschoolmom June 20, 2020 (7:59 am)

    Elementary mom 1 &2….. I wholeheartedly agree! I am a mom of a high school student, and not one Zoom instructional meeting was implemented. A total failure for 2020. I too would like to know the “worst case” scenario, so we can plan accordingly.  Perhaps soon after the June 30th meeting we can get more details as parents. Please see the end of the article, where it says “Feedback? Here’s where to send it” We need to let our voices be heard, and what our expectations are. Please send feedback. 

  • Confused about Phases June 20, 2020 (9:29 am)

    I’m baffled as to the reasoning behind keeping schools closed until Phase 4. Phase 4 is when we can have large sporting events and concert venues reopen. It seems schools ought to be able to reopen safely prior to that. Additionally, I can’t find anything online about Governor Inslee’s criteria for moving to Phase 4. Is that a vaccine or a treatment? If so, we could be looking at an entire year of parents returning to work with absolutely no plan for childcare. I fear for the disproportionate impact this will have upon women in the workplace, not to mention the education of our children. 

  • Elementary/middle school parent June 20, 2020 (9:53 am)

    Equity means raising the level of the disadvantaged kids.  It doesn’t mean abandoning education for everyone else. We were disappointed in the “online learning” effort for the kids.  Very few of the teachers were equipped to teach lessons during the zoom calls.   So my kid with a learning disability stared at work sheets and tried to participate in erratic weekly zoom calls.  In addition not all teachers chose to post information on schoology so information was distributed in various emails.  I didn’t even know my kids math class had meetings until the last week of school. The teachers were trying their best – it’s obvious that the direction they were getting from SPS was totally inconsistent.  I would like to hear from the district how they plan to facilitate online learning better.  It’s possible all kids will have to still do that if COVID spikes again.   In other districts they moved to a set schedule and adapted.Ideally every kid could attend school.   But if they can’t we also need to step it up for kids that can’t come in.  All kids should be able to view the baseball field.

    • Admiral Mom June 20, 2020 (10:30 am)

      Stay involved. Keep district and unions accountable. Demand they work together to have clear expectations and accountability for educators and building leaders. Make sure proper training is MANDATORY, not optional.Keep an eye on the technology availability to all.And keep an eye on principals. Some are pretty amazing and committed, some are not.

  • Unbelievable June 20, 2020 (1:23 pm)

    My husband who is not “black” but African American, his words specifically, is completely outraged by this entire thread. White privilege is only something that is recognized or said by mostly white people trying to make themselves feel like they are the biggest supporters of BLM and non racists. The more everyone posts about white people being racist causes animosity towards one another. It’s laughable how little respect is really out there. These posts on here don’t make any of you better than than the next. Will, I’m sorry your were attacked on here.

    • heartless June 20, 2020 (2:06 pm)

      Will purposely chose a specific portion of a much larger and more nuanced statement, and he happened to quote just the words that, out of context, and only out of context, made the statement seem deeply flawed.

      Now, I can think of only two reasons he could have done this. 

      1) He didn’t fully comprehend what he was reading–in which case he should be thankful that his initial interpretation was not what was meant.  He doesn’t seem to be in this camp, which leaves:

      2)  He was trying to frame the statement as racist, conveniently leaving out all of the context that explains how reasonable it actually was.In which case I am entirely behind everyone explaining to him how dumb his ‘interpretation’ was and, frankly, you should be too.  You’re sorry he was attacked on here?  Why? 

      Let me ask you this.  Look at the full quote, below, and tell me if you agree with it:

      “…priority would be given to students of color furthest from educational justice, students who require in-person therapy, students who receive Special Education services or IEP supports that can’t be delivered online, students who receive services as English Learners, and students supported by McKinney Vento – students experiencing homelessness or unstable housing.”

      • heart June 20, 2020 (2:51 pm)

        @heartless, when did “attacking” someone become ok (in any form)?  So two wrongs make a right, huh?    Also, how do you know what @Will’s intent was?  Do you honestly think the choice is simply binary?  There couldn’t possibly be a 3rd or 4th option you just didn’t consider?  Who are you to determine what is in someone’s heart?  Intolerance isn’t really a good look on anyone…

        • heartless June 20, 2020 (4:39 pm)

          “@heartless, when did “attacking” someone become ok (in any form)?”

          What do you mean by ‘ok’?  People have been attacking others since the advent of humankind, and before, it is legitimized by various religions and philosophies and governments the world over.  

          “Also, how do you know what @Will’s intent was?”

          I guessed.  I thought he either misunderstood or was purposely cherry-picking the quoted words to make them seem (more?) racist.  Do you have any guesses what he was doing?  And since this is a public forum that he posted in, surely he can chime in as well, no?

          “Intolerance isn’t really a good look on anyone…”

          We disagree.  I think there are some things in this world we should never grow to tolerate.

      • Jim June 20, 2020 (2:57 pm)

        “…priority would be given to students  furthest from educational justice,”     Would have said the same thing, helped the same people, without appearing to exclude anyone based on race.    Will was correct.  Attacking him with that “racist” label was out of line.   Reminds me of the Salem Witch Trials.

        • Will June 20, 2020 (5:06 pm)

          Thank you Jim. As an African-American I absolutely abhor being called a racist. It bothers me immensely. Extremely hurtful and inappropriate at this juncture.

          • heartless June 20, 2020 (8:08 pm)

            (All quotes by Will, in these threads)

            “…color should play no part in who gets to go to school. ”

            “As an African-American I absolutely abhor being called a racist. It bothers me immensely. Extremely hurtful and inappropriate at this juncture.”

            Wait wait, I’m confused, are we supposed to take race into account or not? 

            “I am an African-American,which probably means I do not fully understand white fragility.”

            Ooooh, sorry, you being an African-American really shouldn’t matter here–happy to have a conversation and argue with you, but our discussion isn’t going to be influenced by your race.  When it comes to having these discussions, 
            “I just don’t base it on race. Ever. That would be racist. “

    • ally cat June 21, 2020 (6:12 pm)

      ‘White privilege is only something that is recognized or said by mostly white people trying to make themselves feel like they are the biggest supporters of BLM and non racists.’

      This is not true, it is a generalized misjudgment of those who have done work around this, are speaking up for change, and who may be more informed on the issues and trying to take positive action and engage others.

      Also, being married to an African American does not exempt you from having white privilege or white fragility.

  • PW June 20, 2020 (3:06 pm)

    The message from Seattle Schools for the reentry plan was poorly written and posted. Agreement kids as risk need less risk and back in school if that is a possibility and the sooner the better.  A white child may have all the same issues as one of color. Please address all at risk children to assist with their supported reentry.  The Seattle School post is creating a divide which is not necessary. These are kids for goodness sake. Identify the children with no virtual capabilities and special needs and get them in the classroom, who cares what DNA is on their skin.The Seattle School reentry and virtual learning from what  have heard was lacking many levels or planning and organization. Not that they have had all this time to gather the supplies and tools for all children to be successful  and address what did not work in virtual learning they should be held accountable. Grow up Seattle Schools, you get a lot of taxpayer money. Hire a better spokesperson to unite the community not divide.  

    • heartless June 20, 2020 (4:43 pm)

      A white child may have all the same issues as one of color.”

      I don’t know what to say.

  • PW June 20, 2020 (4:51 pm)

    Heartless I guess that sums up the reply.

    • heartless June 20, 2020 (7:56 pm)

      I get the feeling that you’re not exactly picking up what I’m puttin’ down…

      I mean, you’re flat-out saying that people of color don’t have it any harder than whites in this society–is that what you mean to be saying?  (Cuz that’s totally what you’re saying.)

  • Will June 20, 2020 (4:57 pm)

    Thanks immensely to all of you who did not attack my opinion or character, and for all of you that did not call me a racist.To those of you who did decide to attack me personally and viciously, understand this. I am an African-American,which probably means I do not fully understand white fragility. People should think twice before attacking others.I did not cherry pick anything from the statement. I simply stated that I do not believe who goes back to school in the fall should be based on skin color. Again, who goes back to school and who doesn’t should not be based on skin color as was clearly stated. Read it  it’s really sad that when an African-American man states that he doesn’t think skin color should be a deciding factor on public education availability he is called a racist.  It is truly the first time that anyone has told me I have white fragility. Normally that would be funny.  Thank you to all of you that didn’t attack me and to those of you who did, at least understand what you’ve done. When someone states that they don’t think skin color should decide who gets to go back to school, they are not racist. You are.BLM

    • heartless June 20, 2020 (7:05 pm)

      Nonsense.

      You did cherry pick, perhaps you don’t understand the definition– you specifically picked one part of the criteria they have, ignoring all the others.  You made it seem as if race was the only factor, when it is not.

      And on that topic, do you really believe that race should never be a factor?  Because the vast majority of the United States does not believe that, if only implicitly, and not in the direction you’d perhaps wish.You (and the French, hah!) might think that pretending to be blind to race is the cure for something, but I assure you it is not.  It is not, and it has never been, because the playing field has not ever been level in this country–and to ignore an uneven playing field is one of the most annoying and incipient forms of racism in this country.

    • ally cat June 20, 2020 (7:55 pm)

      Will, I think more than a few are eating crow right now and feeling a bit confused. Hoping you can see that your comment was mistaken as a white person being outraged over considerations for students of color and inequities. I don’t think anyone would have called you a racist otherwise. Sorry that you were assigned a white racist perspective. We should all be more careful in making assumptions!

      Do you not believe students of color are largely furthest from educational justice?  Or see efforts such as this problematic rather than helpful for students of color?

      Some of us spoke up because we support change, for more equity and justice, and the statement you called out by SPS sounded like an effort aligned with that.

      There may be a number of different views and good for them all to be aired and discussed, as people want to.

      • Will June 20, 2020 (9:32 pm)

        Thanks Ally cat. I totally appreciate your thoughts.  I don’t think heartless should be allowed on here at all though.  Should be screened out.  Nothing but personal attacks. I very simply stated that I do not believe skin color should be a factor, at all, in who gets to go back to school first. That’s it.  I didn’t put skin color as a priority in the statement from the schools, they did.  That makes me mad. Two wrongs do not make a right.  Imagine what that action would brew. What it would teach. I am quite hurt by all of the personal attacks on me.  That I’m being called a racist for stating that in my opinion a child’s skin color should not decide things.I hope some of you will stop with the instant assumptions and seriously stop instantly labeling anyone who speaks up with a differing opinion as a racist.  Clearly heartless has learned nothing.  I’m sure they’ll attack me again. Thanks everyone. 

        • heartless June 20, 2020 (10:32 pm)

          But I never called you racist?  Very confused.

        • ally cat June 21, 2020 (6:39 pm)

          Thanks for sharing your perspective and concerns, it’s helpful to hear the spectrum of feelings on this matter. And I think good to take a step back and realize the complexities involved with how different we all may be understanding and feeling about the issues around race and social justice, at this time, depending on many factors.

          Also, totally understand your frustration and feeling attacked here. It sounds like you were coming from a well intentioned place and that was misunderstood. 

          I wonder if perhaps Heartless may be feeling similarly.

    • Darryll June 22, 2020 (4:22 am)

      Will – Thanks for speaking up in the face of the monolithic so-called progressive narrative. I agree with you that we should be talking about ideas and striving to come together. We all need each other more than any one of us needs to be “right.”  Sadly, I’m not surprised at all that you’re being attacked personally by white people who seem to desperately need to be counted as one of the good ones. It’s also disturbing to me how many  people are buying into moral relativism and using playground bullying tactics to silence critical voices. It’s a sign that ideas are weak or perhaps disingenuous when they cannot be challenged or questioned.

  • WS Mom June 20, 2020 (5:07 pm)

    “A white child may have all the same issues as one of color.”Except one HUGE one. Wow. Privilege, anyone? I don’t know what to say either, Heartless.

  • heart June 20, 2020 (10:16 pm)

    Is this really what constitutes constructive dialogue? Unfortunately it gives credence to the term “intolerant left”.  Since there are a lot of accusations of people being racist on this thread, at what point will someone call someone else a nazi? I find it interesting when people on either side of the divide seem to label the other with the exact same terms.  Is the middle truly dead?  Please do not try to infer my political or social beliefs from this statement, I promise you that you will be wrong.  Is civility dead?

    • heartless June 20, 2020 (10:54 pm)

      Oh calm down.  It’s not the end of civilization, it’s people arguing on the internet.

      And as for accusations of people being racist, I’ve not accused anyone of that.  (Ironically, it was Will who leveled that particular accusation.)

      My point has remained simple: the original quote was taking vastly out of context, and I see nothing wrong with schools helping kids who have been historically (provably!) disadvantaged.

      I have pointed out hypocrisy in others–Will, specifically–and also invited dialogue–asking Will if he agrees with the rest of the SPS statement.  (So far he hasn’t responded.)

      • Admiral Mom June 21, 2020 (9:54 am)

        Oh Heartless I wish I knew you IRL (maybe I do!). You are good at staying focused. Will, being a person of color (like you and me) does not guarantee we are prejudice-free. Your words and the fact that YOU focused on skin color and nothing else tells me you have a lot to learn. SPS has many many flaws but I know intentional work has been done and continues to be done to dismantle institutional racism – I have been part of the conversations and actionable items.
        Will, you sound like a person with strong convictions, would love to see you involved beyond an anonymous post on a blog. But it might be too late for SPS to have your contribution. Wherever you go, please be bold, unapologetic and speak up for Black people, it is so much needed. But also consider your Blackness does not mean you understand  racial equity. 

  • 1994 June 20, 2020 (10:28 pm)

    Hi Will – look into one of the local public charter schools for your childrenRainier Prep is a 5th – 8th grade middle school. Summit Atlas is middle to high school grades. Both of those are in West SeattleSummit Sierra is grades 9 through 12 in the Chinatown International District. 

  • Christina June 22, 2020 (9:50 pm)

    By all means, please send the children furthest from educational justice back first.  I don’t even care how you define it.  But. But. But.  My kid, who I expect won’t fall into that category, needs something better than the dumpster fire that was Spring 2020.  Please find an equity model that doesn’t leave ANY kids floundering with vague expectations, getting zoom bombed, subpar instruction, educators with dubious connection quality, and ultimately the easiest straight As known to mankind. My daughter lost a whole semester of preparation for college.  Please don’t make it a whole year.  That’s not equity, that’s injustice.  That’s giving the tallest kid no supports with a fence that’s still too tall to see over. 

  • Dani June 24, 2020 (8:25 am)

     Dear neighbors, I understand if you feel that way, and as an educator  I ask you to please try and research why the district made this choice to better understand the goals of education and the necessity of supporting those with the greatest needs priority. Before casting judgement and becoming angry. We are a community and by lifting and helping those with the greatest need society as a whole becomes more successful. A simple example can be found when you go hiking: you go at the pace of the slowest hiker, so no one gets left behind. If you would like to have a productive conversation or recommendations of where to find research to try to understand, feel free to message me. I know it feels unfair, so let’s try and understands all aspects and support a change in those feelings or at least an understanding of everyone’s needs.Our kids are watching, let’s set a good example

Sorry, comment time is over.