From church, to events venue, to landmark? Hearing tomorrow

By Tracy Record
West Seattle Blog editor

Tomorrow afternoon, the city Landmarks Preservation Board will consider whether to designate the building now known as The Sanctuary at Admiral – officially known in its nomination as the former Sixth Church of Christ, Scientist — as a city-designated Seattle landmark.

After a presentation last month (WSB coverage here; see the presentation document here), the board agreed to consider the nomination, but there’s a high hurdle to leap (see the criteria here) to get from that point to official designation.

Board members were scheduled to make a site visit last week as part of the process, according to Sanctuary owner Dahli Bennett, who invited us to visit recently for a closer look at the building that served as a Christian Science church for almost three-quarters of a century, before its congregation merged with the one on SW Barton by Fauntleroy Park and then sold the building (Bennett bought it in 2003).


View Larger Map

The building is at 42nd/Lander, across from the north side of Hiawatha (its south side is in the Google Street View image above). Its landmark application is part of a process to keep the building open as an events venue, Bennett acknowledges, while saying that’s not her only motivation – she believes it’s worthy of preservation: “We’re crossing our fingers. There are a lot of developers who want to buy it. … When I bought this building, it wasn’t my intention to change this. It kind of looks like it’s always been here, will always be here … I love this building and I want it to be here forever.”

She bought the building in 2003, and moved in with her daughters, but doesn’t live there any more. She did live there long enough, she says, for one thing to kick in: “If you live in a building for a year, it messes up the zoning – nobody told me that.” Records show the city believes it’s been used in a means that diverges from its current zoning: The city’s page for The Sanctuary’s address has a long list of entries, from a complaint made a year ago, to violations, and other actions.

So now, Bennett says, she is pursuing the permits required to use the building as an events venue, with an application to be made this week. If it’s designated as a landmark, she says, that will open the door to other permissions “so it will be economically viable” for her to keep, “as a steward … It’s an expensive building to maintain and keep it going” – a task that is led by Bennett and “venue mistress” Jennifer (at right, with The Sanctuary’s owner, in this photo):

Landmark status brings restrictions, as well – such as a requirement for Landmarks Board approval before changes can be made to the protected portion of a building, even something as simple as an awning.

Right now, Bennett says, The Sanctuary averages about four event bookings a month, and most of the marketing is word-of-mouth: “All the parties we have here, lead to other parties.” She talks about a recent visit from participants in the Hedgebrook women writers’ retreat, including women’s-rights-advocacy legend Gloria Steinem, with “food, culture, and music” – the facility’s kitchen has developed a following:

Food also was at centerstage earlier this year when the International Food Bloggers’ Conference scheduled part of its agenda at The Sanctuary (which has wi-fi). But weddings are the most common bookings, not surprising for a former church. They’d like to have more events, Bennett says, but they turn down some requests – she mentions “Halloween raves.” She also says they’ve capped attendance far below the building’s capacity, 150, compared to the potential 350. And venue mistress Jennifer says they have a “strict curfew, 11 pm.” The two offer a tour of the building, which is more expansive than it looks from the street, even when you take into account its classic brick facade:

Looking down toward the stage, where church leaders once delivered their weekly messages, you see the open (between events) floor, where the pews once held court – and congregants:

Wood from the pews has been recycled elsewhere in the facility – made into railings, for example – but a few of the pews remain, like this one – also note the fir floor, an original feature to the building, uncovered and restored:

The bar is made from what was the speaker’s podium:

Upstairs, what was once Bennett’s living area now serves as small getaway zones during events – where brides prepare for the ceremony, for example. Some decorations and artifacts nod at the building’s history – note what’s in the table:

Elsewhere in the building, some more-whimsical touches have nothing to do with the building’s past. Case in point: Baby Tusko:

Bennett says he was rescued from the former White Center Chubby and Tubby store. Now, he is in the lobby, where we pass Tusko on the way to the stairs into the church’s basement, which retains more of its original touches, even the coat room:

Some of the touches are subtle, like the terrazzo stone stairs – original – to and from the basement. Or paintings by local artist Steve Klinkel, commissioned by Bennett; she also points to glass art in and around the kitchen, made by local artisans. (Other photos of The Sanctuary can be seen in this Vintage Seattle report.) And the building has areas not open to the public, such as the roof, where Bennett is cultivating an edible garden:

From the roof, you can glimpse downtown – where a key decision that’s about to be made will have a major effect on the future of this West Seattle building with a storied past.

The Landmarks Preservation Board will consider The Sanctuary at Admiral’s landmark nomination during its meeting tomorrow (Wednesday), 3:30 pm, 40th floor of the Municipal Tower downtown, and there will be an opportunity for public comment. One other West Seattle item on the board’s agenda tomorrow: The only current West Seattle church on the city’s list of landmarks, Fauntleroy Church, is seeking board approval for some interior and exterior improvements – once you have landmark status, you need board approval to change protected portions of the property.

17 Replies to "From church, to events venue, to landmark? Hearing tomorrow"

  • AM August 4, 2009 (12:12 pm)

    this building is so beautiful! I seriously hope that it is preserved as a landmark. Please please please! I wish i could make it to the meeting; i’ve lived in west seattle, specifically the admiral area my whole life, and i would hate to see such an original gorgeous building like this be sold to a developer who will more than likely put condo’s up. :( Good luck Dahli!

  • 37Ray August 4, 2009 (12:32 pm)

    Frankly I think it is kind of an unremarkable-to-ugly building from the outside, but I couldn’t agree more I would rather look at it for the next hundred years than see one more ubiquitous “mixed use cali condo box” go up…

  • DH August 4, 2009 (1:52 pm)

    Having just moved to the Admiral area, I’ve quickly fallen in love with this building and it would be very sad to see it lost to another condo box.

  • michael hebb August 4, 2009 (4:10 pm)

    god damn! this place must stay. it will be creating remarkable memories and serving as a nexus for culture for years to come.

  • WSB August 4, 2009 (4:14 pm)

    Just a reminder, if you didn’t make it all the way to the end of the story, there WILL be a public-comment period at tomorrow’s hearing. Awkward time but probably won’t be right at the start of the agenda, since a few items (like the aforementioned Fauntleroy Church approval) come first; this likely will be taken up around 4 pm – TR

  • Ashley Arias August 4, 2009 (4:32 pm)

    I love this venue and have been to a number of fun, friendly, community-oriented events there. I feel that the Sanctuary at Admiral is a cornerstone of the West Seattle community and will only serve to bring people closer together in what can be a sometimes discouraging Seattle social scene. The sanctuary hosts and has hosted many beautiful and memorable weddings, family & corporate parties as well as creative, culinary and artistic gatherings. It is so nice to have this type of venue available in the area it is in, and the history of the building is a treasure that should be shared with its neighbors and fellow Seattlites.

    I love the Sanctuary and hope everyone gets a chance to enjoy its versatility and bask in its charm. It has stimulated the activity in our neighborhood and encourages an interactive and inspiring energy that will only help us continue to thrive as neighbors and friends. It characterizes everything I love about West Seattle, the place where I was raised.

  • fluorescent carl August 4, 2009 (4:39 pm)

    GOOD LUCK Dahli! If the city is willing to let this become another BOX it will be very sad indeed. I remember when the blog wrote about the Safeway parking lot problems. The end result is this I guess? I am happy to see the WSB write this article helping to fill in the blanks and portraying this building in it’s proper light, good job. (hopefully not too late) This is I feel a very positive venue for West Seattle and one I hope people can get behind. It’s no secret that the culture of West Seattle hangs in a delicate balance, we continue to see the addition of generic buildings everywhere. To me this feels like Giant unplanned growth, if you continue to strip the heart and soul from a community you end up with Federal Way. WS is a unique Seattle neighborhood where you can see the history everywhere in it’s homes and buildings. I know growth is necessary and unstoppable but to tear this building down so we can add another box makes zero sense to me! especially when there is an owner in place who wishes to maintain this building and share it with the community as an events space. Good luck tomarow!

  • Marie Antoinette August 4, 2009 (4:52 pm)

    My husband and I had our wedding reception here two years ago. Our guests were thoroughly charmed by the building and we were impressed with the low-key elegance of the place. West Seattle has plenty of townhouses, condos and lots where they could be built. But there is only one Sanctuary. I hope it endures.

  • yummmyummm August 4, 2009 (5:24 pm)

    The Sanctuary at Admiral should be kept the way it is, my fear is that America is becoming so homogenized that the future citizens will not have a point of reference when they see Marlon Brando in “The Wild Ones”, think about it! I have attended events at “the church” and have only the best memories and I imagine it would be nice if returning visits could be made to the site where significant life events had occurred.

  • david aparicio August 5, 2009 (12:43 am)

    I absolutely love the Sanctuary! Thanks for sharing it with our community,and (mostley) me.

  • Arciteuthis August 5, 2009 (2:25 pm)

    Wait a minute here! Three people have complained about the possibility of a “box”. And yet this sounds like an article that proposes to subsidize a private homeowner with public money to keep her private business afloat. And it’s already a “box”! If she wants to preserve it she shouldn’t have altered it the way she did to make it a home! It was a church only five years ago! Now that the owner can’t afford to maintain the place we all should as taxpayers? The addition of a green roof, though admirable, should automatically exclude this now single family residence from protection. It has been visibly altered from it’s historic look from the street, negating it’s historic value. Let the owner do what she wants with the place, I’m grateful she is opening it up to private parties, so that she can charge people to see what has become a beautiful home with an incredibly oversize gas stove, and gleaming granite countertops!

  • AW August 5, 2009 (2:45 pm)

    I’m not sure where Arciteuthis is getting their information. There are certain tax benefits when you have Landmark status such as when you make improvements that have to do with the restoration. Since this building is fully restored as I understand, the owner will not even benefit financially from this perk. No public money is given from the city to buildings that have the Landmark status.
    Get your facts straight A.

    AW

  • WSB August 5, 2009 (2:51 pm)

    Also to clarify, it’s not a green roof. A couple planters up there have edible-gardening plants such as the tomatoes shown in the photo. Most of the roof is, well, a roof.

  • Marie Antoinette August 5, 2009 (3:06 pm)

    Further clarification to correct the errors in Arciteuthis’ post: The Sanctuary is not a single family dwelling open to the public for parties. By the time I had my party there, the owner had long before moved out of the place, which as I understand it she only inhabited briefly.

    It is a very nice local venue for West Seattle. Its owner has clearly put a lot of time and money into making it a terrific and unique place, and has preserved the historic feel of this landmark.

    As for the countertops and giant stove, they certainly come in handy for catered events. What do you expect? Barbecue pits and picnic tables?

  • Heidi Wastweet August 7, 2009 (12:03 am)

    Pictures don’t do justice to this unique and amazing venue. The entire community definitely benefits from having this resource available. I’m priviledged to have attended several events here and count it as one of the things that makes Seattle such a cool place to live.

  • TC August 10, 2009 (9:18 am)

    I’ve participated as a guest at an event there and am a neighbor, as well. Thanks to all for correcting Arciteuthis’ “shoot from the hip” ramble. This building is a beautiful resource for the Admiral Distric for all types of functions. The owner has been a long-time West Seattleite and seems to care greatly about the neighborhood. Can’t wait to attend another event there. Keep up the great work Ms. Bennett!

  • April Lane August 17, 2009 (6:13 am)

    The Sactuary is a very uniuqe place and Dahli has put so much creativity and warmth into this little West Seattle Gem, it would be heart breaking to see it go away. I would be shocked if the city didn’t find a way to leave it as a venue for all to enjoy.

Sorry, comment time is over.